This paper deals with principal issues of the civil liability of the corporates governance bodies. The question of ,,corporate governance” are not enough analyzed in the law doctrine of Lithuania. The term ,,corporate governance” related with the corporate governance systems, governance bodies, shareholders and other stakeholders. This definition depend on every country legal framework, rules, procedures and traditions. The status problems of corporate governance bodies are shortly discussed in this study. There are made conclusion, that they are liable under Civil law rules. This means that director is subject of full liability principle, which require that he/she would have to cover all damages, which are result of his/her illegal action. The member of corporate governance body becomes civilly liable when four conditions are present: damage, illegal action, causality and fault. The general obligations of the corporate governance bodies provided in the Lithuanian Civil Code, Corporation Act, the local acts of corporation and they rise from specifical (fiduciary) theirs position. Fiduciary duty means an obligation to act in the best interest of another party. The corporate governance bodies duties falled into three broad categories: the duty of care, duty of loyalty and duty to act in good faith. This work discuss about the limitation of the directors civil liability, the directors liability insurance. / -.

Darbe analizuojami subjektai, turintys teisę inicijuoti įmonės bankroto bylą, analizuojamos problemos, su kuriomis susiduria šie subjektai, įgyvendindami bankroto bylos iniciatyvos teisę. / The paper examines the entities, which have a right to initiate bankruptcy proceedings. The paper also clarifying aspects of the problem faced by these entities in bankruptcy initiation stage.

Magistro baigiamajame darbe analizuoti universiteto valdymo pokyčiai po 2009 m. mokslo ir studijų reformos. Darbe iškelta universitetų valdymo struktūros kaitos problema, įvertinami valdymo subjektų funkcijų perskirstymo, sudėties formavimo, universitetų autonomijos bei atskaitomybės visuomenei aspektai. Lyginami Aukštojo mokslo (2000 m.) ir Mokslo ir studijų (2009 m.) įstatymai, siekiant nustatyti valdymo reformos pokyčius, apibrėžti jų privalumus ir trūkumus. Pirmoje darbo dalyje apžvelgiamas viešojo valdymo kontekstas, analizuojant viešojo valdymo paradigmą, išryškinami viešojo valdymo principai ir modernizavimo prielaidos Lietuvos aukštojo mokslo reformoms vykti. Aptariamas aukštojo mokslo institucijų valdymas, pristatoma aukštojo mokslo samprata, aukštojo mokslo institucijos vaidmuo, jos veiklos administravimas. Išskiriamos universitetų valdymo problemos, kurios darė įtaką universitetų valdymo struktūros pokyčiams, valstybinio reguliavimo ir aukštojo mokslo institucijos autonomijos santykio apibrėžimui. Lyginamuoju aspektu aptariama Lietuvos aukštųjų mokyklų valdymo struktūra, analizuojant teisės aktus, išryškinamos aukštosios mokyklos valdymo subjektų funkcijos, sudėtis ir jos formavimo principai. Antroje darbo dalyje aprašomas universitetų valdymo pokyčių tyrimas. Remiantis dokumentų ir mokslinės literatūros analize, organizuojamas universitetų valdymo pokyčių empirinis tyrimo modelis. Atliktas empirinis kokybinis tyrimas, pateikiami ir analizuojami... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / In Master‘s work are analysis of the changes of universities management after reform of science and studies in 2009. In this work was raised a problem of change in structure of universities management, evaluated aspects of reformation of functions of management bodies, formation of structure, autonimy of universities and accountability to society. There is comparison of the Law of Higher education (2000) and the Law of Science and Studies (2009) in order to identify management changes and to discribe its advantages and disadvantages. In the first chapter is reviewed the content of public management by analysing paradigm of public management and there is highlighted principles of public management and assumptions for modernization in performing reforms of higher education area. There is reviewed the management of higher education organizations, is represented a conception of higher education, a role of higher education organization and administration of its activities. Also there is excreted university‘s management problems that have influenced changes to structure of higher education management and to description of relations of state regulation and autonomy of higher education institutions. Using comparing method there is reviewed structure of higher education schools in Lithuania, legislation acts, also there is highlighted functions, structure and formation priciples of higher educaton schools‘ management subjects. In the secind chapter is described a research in changes... [to full text]