Spelling suggestions: "subject:"cisual communication -- rrt."" "subject:"cisual communication -- rört.""
1 |
Art-making in the reconceptualisation and transformation of midlifeNewell-Walker, Ursula January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
A risk worth taking incorporating visual culture into museum practices /Wurtzel, Kate. Kundu, Rina, January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of North Texas, Dec., 2008. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
Redefining exhibition in the digital age /Christiansen, Lauren. January 2010 (has links)
Thesis (B.A. in Visual and Critical Studies) -- School of the Art Institute of Chicago, 2010. / Thesis advisor: Maud Lavin. Includes bibliographical references.
|
4 |
The relationship between visual and verbal codes of visual rhetoric in a sequential art settingVan der Merwe, Ernest 11 1900 (has links)
Thesis (M. Tech.) - Dept. of Visual Arts and Design, Faculty of Human Sciences - Vaal University of Technology / The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between visual and
verbal codes of visual rhetoric in a sequential art setting. The literature
investigation component of the study covered: (1) the notion of visual literacy;
(2) the principles of visual rhetoric, and (3) trends in sequential art. The
empirical component of the study involved the production of sequential art
test material with an accompanying questionnaire in order to measure the
comprehension of visual rhetoric in a sample of 197 undergraduate students
at the Vaal University of Technology. The working hypotheses that guided
the study were, firstly, that the comprehension of the visual code of the visual
rhetoric used in a sequential art setting differs between (a) study participants
that received visual training prior to the data collection and (b) study
participants that received no visual training prior to the data collection, and secondly, that the comprehension of the visual code of the visual rhetoric
used in a sequential art setting differs between (a) study participants that
received test material in their home language and (b) study participants that
did not receive the test material in their home language. Following a one-way
ANOVA analysis of the questionnaire data, the first hypothesis indicated a
significant statistical difference (p=O.OO) and was not rejected. The second
hypothesis indicated no significant statistical difference (p=0.138) and was
rejected. Based on the result obtained, possibilities for further research were motivated. / Vaal University of Technology
|
Page generated in 0.0959 seconds