Spelling suggestions: "subject:"administration inn then university"" "subject:"administration inn them university""
1 |
A GESTÃO NA UNIVERSIDADE ELEMENTOS PARA UMA CRÍTICA COM BASE NA TEORIA DA ATIVIDADERabelo, Rafael Castro 17 September 2009 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-27T13:54:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RAFAEL CASTRO RABELO.pdf: 606167 bytes, checksum: 11ec27e1991e44a3b10a80cc74bc519c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-09-17 / Leaving of the presupposition that the human work that takes place a school institution has
the center the individuals' education, seeking his/her formation and transformation, this work
should be organized so that the different elements and dimensions that compose are him
united around the educational purposes. In that sense, one of the essential elements is the
administration. It is verified that the studies that treat of the school administration have if
gone back to the basic teaching and, with smaller frequency, for the higher education. Studies
returned to the university have been giving little emphasis to the administration in the
university, revealing the need of more studies concerning this theme. Starting from the study
of the theory of the activity formulated by A. N. Leontiev, that explains the general structure
of the human activity, it was noticed his/her potential to enrich the analysis of the
administration in the university. This research search to investigate the administration in the
university starting from the following subject: how can the academical administration are
characterized in an understanding based in the theory of the activity? His/her relevance is
evidenced by the own shortage of studies concerning the theme and also for offering an
analysis based on concepts of the theory of the activity, contributing to better understanding
of the academical administration as a system of activities and for larger valorization of the
dimension of the administration of the higher education. It was made a bibliographical
research concerning the theme, the deepened study of the theory of the activity being looked
for a possibility of characterization of the administration in the university. The theoretical
foudation was looked for mainly in A. N. Leontiev and Y. Engeström. The general objective
of the research was to characterize the administration in the university as a system of
activities. The main results of the research reveal that: the brazilian universities, especially the
public ones, still today use of the rational and bureaucratic administration model business,
whose beginnings are guided for the obtaining of quantitative income and efficiency of the
universities in the preparation of exits for the job market in a capitalist perspective; being
considered the bureaucratic administration model of the universities and the System of
Activity proposed by Engeström, it is had inside of the university a system of simultaneous
and interlinked activities that you/they intersect to reach certain results, however the
contradiction of this model does with that he/she gets lost his/her own administration essence,
once the activities separate inside from the university according to specific departments,
putting the subjects in work actions in conditions that isolate them some of the other ones and
of the common objectives. / Esta pesquisa parte do pressuposto de que o trabalho humano que se realiza numa instituição
escolar de ensino superior tem como um dos elementos essenciais a gestão. A questão que
norteou a pesquisa foi: como pode ser caracterizada a gestão na universidade numa
compreensão baseada na teoria da atividade? A relevância de se investigar esta questão
evidencia-se na contribuição que traz para se compreender a gestão na universidade como um
sistema de atividades, seus elementos e suas contradições. Optou-se pela pesquisa
bibliográfica, fundamentada principalmente na teoria da atividade formulada por A. N.
Leontiev e ampliada por Y. Engeström. O objetivo geral foi caracterizar a gestão na
universidade a partir de uma análise baseada nos conceitos dessa teoria, principalmente o
conceito de sistema de atividades. No entanto, verificou-se uma contradição essencial
expressa nos seguintes elementos: - as universidades brasileiras, em especial as públicas,
ainda hoje utilizam o modelo de gestão racional e burocrático empresarial, cujos principais
objetivos são o rendimento e a eficiência, preparando os egressos para o mercado de trabalho;
- esse modelo de gestão, todavia, já não consegue responder às necessidades da sociedade
capitalista contemporânea; considerando-se o modelo de gestão burocrático das universidades
e o Sistema de Atividade proposto por Engestrom, tem-se dentro da universidade um sistema
de atividades simultâneas e interligadas que se entrecruzam para atingir determinados
resultados; - a contradição gerada por esse modelo faz com que se perca sua própria essência
de gestão, uma vez que, no interior da instituição, as atividades se separam conforme
departamentos específicos, colocando os sujeitos em condições de trabalho que os isolam uns
dos outros e dos objetivos comuns da instituição. Conclui-se que se faz necessário que a
universidade brasileira busque mudanças e transformações em sua estrutura organizacional e
em seu modo de gestão a partir de outros modelos, sobretudo no tocante à construção de um
modelo democrático de gestão.
|
2 |
Analýza dopadu odstranění nákladových modelů používaných pro vykazování uznatelných nákladů v projektech 6. rámcového programu na výzkumně vzdělávací instituce participující v projektech 7. rámcového programu / The analysis of impact of removing the cost models used for reporting the eligible costs in projects financed from 6th Framework Programme on research and educational institutions participating in projects of 7th Framework ProgrammeŘípová, Zuzana January 2008 (has links)
This diploma thesis is focused on sixth and seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities, which are one of the finacial tools of European Community for coordinating the priorities of research and development in particular member states. In first two parts (chapter 2 and 3) the work makes an effort to explain the principles of both Framework Programmes. The third part (chapter 4) is focused on the analysis of specific financial and administration situation of university participating in collaborative project in both Programmes.
|
Page generated in 0.1874 seconds