No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

The overall aim of the research project was to evaluate the potential of the fungal pathogen <I>Ascochyta caulina</I> as a biological control agent against <I>Chenopodium album</I>, a major weed in arable crops. A number of isolates of <I>Ascochyta caulina</I> were evaluated but isolate W 90-1 from Holland proved to be the most promising candidate because of its high virulence. It was therefore selected for more detailed greenhouse and field studies into the environmental parameters required for infection and disease development. Results of these studies showed that in order to achieve the maximum infection, a temperature of between 20-30°C, a relative humidity of >95% for 24 h and a spore density of approximately of 1-2 x 10⁶ spores per ml spore suspension were required. Mortality and plant necrosis levels after application of <I>A. caulina</I> decreased with plant age and treatment of <I>C. album</I> shortly after emergence or to juvenile plants (before 4-leaf growth stage) was most effective. The requirement for long periods of high relative humidity and the inability of <I>A. caulina </I>to cause satisfactory disease after the 4 leaf growth stage are the most important limiting factors for the development of <I>A. caulina</I> as a bioherbicide for <I>C. album. </I>A range of spore formulations was studied with the aim of reducing the requirement for long periods of high relative humidity for disease development. Studies indicated that disease development could be increased by incorporation of surfactants (Tween 80 or Sylgard) and nutrients (Czapek-Dox Broth and Yeast Extract) into inoculum suspension. Results of field trials indicated that if application were properly timed and optimum environmental conditions can be achieved the pathogen can give satisfactory control of the weed.

No / This is the second in a series of three papers from a project that has attempted to answer the question ‘does the application of agrochemicals accelerate the corrosion of archaeological metals in the top 50cm of the soil?’. We have approached it through a combination of field-based experiments, by establishing laboratory microcosms and by using geochemical modelling techniques to understand the processes involved. This paper reports on two different experimental approaches in the laboratory - a microcosm designed to mimic one of the burial sites (the ‘Lab Bin’ experiments), and a simpler one to understand the reaction between metal samples and concentrated aqueous solutions of the fertilizers and laboratory reagents used (the ‘Lab Beaker’ experiments). The bins were monitored for in situ corrosion and aqueous effluent collected for13 weeks, after which they were excavated and the metal coupons examined. The Lab Beakers were monitored for in situ corrosion for seven weeks, and then the coupons examined. We focus here on a sub-set of the data relating to the behaviour of the thinnest samples of copper in each case. As with the field data previously reported, the results are sometimes contradictory, but on balance this project has demonstrated that applied agricultural chemicals are likely to accelerate the rate of corrosion of metal objects within 50cm of the surface. In particular, it is likely that any fertilizers containing KCI will be particularly aggressive.

No / This is the third in a series of papers from a pilot project that has attempted to answer the question ‘does the application of agrochemicals accelerate the corrosion of archaeological metals in the top 50cm of the soil?’. We have approached it by a combination of field-based experiments, by establishing laboratory microcosms and by using geochemical modeling techniques to understand the processes involved. This paper reports on the geochemical modelling simulations that trace the potential corrosion pathways followed in two sets of laboratory microcosm experiments (‘Lab Beakers’ and ‘Lab Bins’) and one field experiment (at Palace Leas). This approach uses soil solution as the fluid mediating corrosion in the soil vadose zone. Soil solution was displaced following controlled exposure to fertilizers. Modelling using The Geochemists Workbench was carried out to mimic the experimental conditions, and predictions were compared with image analysis results, limited XRD analysis and published corrosion observations. We focus here on a sub-set of the data relating to the behaviour of the thinnest samples of copper in each case. As with the field and laboratory data previously reported, the results are sometimes contradictory, but on balance this project has demonstrated that applied agricultural chemicals are likely to accelerate the rate of corrosion of metal objects within 50cm of the surface. In particular, it is likely that any fertilizers containing KCI (‘potash’) will be particularly aggressive. Geochemical modeling generates plausible corrosion predictions based on post-depositional interaction between archaeological copper and soil solution, and appears to be useful in helping to simplify and understand corrosion pathways in naturally complex systems.

No / Part of a project that has attempted to answer the question ‘does the application of agrochemicals accelerate the corrosion of metals in the top 50cm of the soil? ’ is reported. We have approached the question by a combination of field-based experiments (on two sites), establishing laboratory microcosms (one involving simple aqueous systems and the other a series of simulated burial experiments) and by using geochemical modelling techniques to understand the processes involved. Two different experimental approaches in the field are documented — one using in situ monitoring of corrosion potentials and the other assessing the degree of induced corrosion using image analysis on recovered samples. The first was carried out on arable land close to the University of Bradford to which we applied different fertilizer regimes. The second was established on land owned by the University of Newcastle at Palace Leas, Morpeth, Northumberland, which has a documented field management regime extending back over one hundred years. We focus here on a sub-set of the data relating to the behaviour of the thinnest samples of copper in each case. There does seem to be some evidence of an effect resulting from the applied fertilizer, but the data are sometimes contradictory. We suggest a number of improvements for future field experiments that monitor in situ corrosion in the vadose zone.

Arable plant species diversity has been on a decline, with many species dependent on arable land becoming threatened. At the same time, attempts at defining the drivers of arable plant diversity have proven difficult and results are often contradictory. Much of the available data come from surveys that are small-scale and with great variability in methodology, leading to difficulties comparing them. In this study, I have used survey data from Gotland to examine how arable plant diversity is influenced by management, field size, soil texture and standing crop. I found a negative trend of diversity with increasing field size, and a suggested effect of management and soil texture on the presence of red listed arable plants. This study also evaluates the use of small datasets when examining plant diversity, and the limitations associated with it. It shows that while a small dataset cannot be analysed to the extent a more comprehensive one can, it is possible to identify trends and patterns with it, which may inform further studies.

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a powerful greenhouse gas (GHG) which has a global warming potential 296 times greater than that of carbon dioxide (CO2). Agriculture is a major source of N2O and in the UK approximately 71 % of N2O emissions are produced by agricultural soils, mainly as a result of the application of nitrogenous fertilisers. Despite previous research into agricultural N2O emissions which has demonstrated that N2O emissions have high spatial and temporal variability, there is still a lack of knowledge surrounding the factors that influence the magnitude of emissions from agricultural soils. Agricultural N2O emissions for the UK’s annual GHG inventory are currently estimated using a 1.25 % emission factor (EF) (to be decreased to 1 % in 2015) which assumes that 1.25 % of applied nitrogen (N) fertiliser is emitted as N2O. The EF does not take into account influencing factors such as location or fertiliser type. Mitigation of N2O emissions is vital if future climate change is to be prevented, yet this must also be combined with the need to intensify agricultural production to feed the increasing global population. Biochar which is a carbon rich material produced during the pyrolysis of biomass has been identified as a potentially useful soil amendment with the ability to mitigate N2O emissions. However, most previous research has focused on laboratory scale experiments and there is a need to investigate the use of biochar in a field environment. Other N2O mitigation options such as nitrification inhibitors, or altering fertiliser management practices, require testing under different conditions to assess their suitability for use. This thesis aims to investigate a). The factors affecting N2O emissions from synthetically and organically fertilised arable soils, and b). To explore the potential of various N2O mitigation options for arable systems, including biochar. This thesis firstly investigates N2O emissions from synthetically fertilised arable soil. Varying application rates of ammonium nitrate fertiliser were applied to a Scottish arable soil during a year long field experiment and the effects of mitigation options such as a nitrification inhibitor (DCD) were assessed. N2O emissions were shown to be significantly affected by soil water filled pore space and the 1.25 % EF was demonstrated to be generally greater than those calculated in this experiment. The use of DCD significantly decreased N2O emissions and crop yields. A second year long field experiment was carried out to investigate N2O and NH3 emissions from an organically fertilised arable soil and to explore the effect of the timing, form and method of organic fertiliser application on emissions and EFs. Slurry, poultry litter, layer manure and farmyard manure were applied in the autumn and the spring. Cumulative N2O emissions were generally greater from the autumn applications and NH3 emissions were greater from the spring applications, due to wetter soil conditions and incorporation of fertiliser during the autumn. The type of fertiliser applied affected the magnitude of emissions with the greatest cumulative N2O and NH3 emissions from the layer manure. The method of fertiliser application had no effect on emissions. The following experiment investigated the ability of different biochars to retain N from a solution and the effect of biochar particle size on retention. A batch sorption experiment was used to test the affinity and capacity of six biochars for ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) from different concentrations of NH4NO3 solution. All of the biochars studied demonstrated the ability to retain NH4+ and NO3- from solution although greater NH4+ retention was observed. Differences in biochar affinity for N could be explained by pyrolysis temperature, but there was no effect of particle size or pH. Oil seed rape straw biochar was demonstrated to have the greatest NH4+ and NO3- retention capacity and as such was chosen for use in the next experiment. This work investigated the potential for oil seed rape straw biochar to decrease emissions of N2O, CH4 and CO2 from stored slurry and whether any GHG mitigation effects would continue following application of the slurry to arable soil. The effect on emissions of amending the biochar and slurry mixture with DCD after application to the soil was also explored. There was no significant effect of the biochar on GHG emissions from the stored slurry although the slurry initially acted as a sink for N2O and CO2. There were no significant differences between emissions from any treatments following application to the soil. The overall results of these studies indicate that N2O emissions are highly dependent on weather conditions, and hence location, in addition to fertiliser type and application timing. It was concluded that the use of a standard 1.25 % EF for synthetic and organic N fertiliser applications for the whole of the UK is inappropriate. Mitigation options such as the use of DCD, altering fertiliser application season or fertiliser type have been shown to possess the potential to mitigate N2O emissions but tradeoffs between N2O and NH3 emissions, and impacts on crop yields must be considered. Biochar was demonstrated to retain NH4+ and NO3- ions and this property may account for biochar’s N2O mitigation capabilities as observed by previous researchers. However, if N retention is taking place, the N appears to still be available for production of N2O and crop uptake.