No description available.

No description available.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that the introduction of articaine has had on local anesthetic selection by general and pediatric dentists for use in three different age groups of children.Methods: Using a cross sectional survey design, a questionnaire regarding the use of local anesthetics in children was mailed to a random sample of 500 general dentists from North Carolina, 500 general dentists from Virginia, and all 230 pediatric dentists from North Carolina and Virginia. The 16-item questionnaire included questions regarding the preferred local anesthetic to use in three different age groups, 2-3 years of age, 4-6 years of age, and 7-10 years of age. Furthermore, the questionnaire also included questions specifically on articaine use in the three different age groups and any related side effects. The association between dental practitioner type and anesthetic use was tested using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.Results: A sample of 337 dentists completed the questionnaire. There was no significant difference in preference of articaine except in older patients aged 7-10 years old where general dentists prefer articaine significantly more than do pediatric dentists (28.1% versus 15.9%). Lidocaine with epinephrine was the local anesthetic that was most preferred in all age groups by all practitioners. Pediatric dentists preferred lidocaine more often than general dentists and general dentists preferred lidocaine without epinephrine more often than pediatric dentists. Twenty-one percent of all dentists surveyed have used articaine in children under 4 years of age and 13% list articaine as the preferred local anesthetic for children under 4 years of age.Conclusion: While lidocaine with epinephrine is still the preferred local anesthetic for use in children, the use of articaine in children is very prevalent among general and pediatric dentists. Articaine use becomes more prevalent as the age of the patient increases and many pediatric and general dentists are using articaine in children under four years of age.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos cardiovasculares da infiltração maxilar usando lidocaína 2% associada à epinefrina 1:100.000, articaína 4% associada à epinefrina 1:100.000 e 1:200.000 em diferentes etapas da consulta odontológica para realização de procedimento restaurador. Vinte voluntários receberam, aleatoriamente, 1,8 ml dos três anestésicos locais. A pressão arterial sistólica, diastólica e média e a freqüência cardíaca foram avaliadas pelos métodos oscilométrico e fotopletismográfico em sete etapas da consulta odontológica. A análise estatística dos parâmetros cardiovasculares através dos testes ANOVA e Tukey não mostrou diferenças significativas entre as três soluções anestésicas. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante para os parâmetros cardiovasculares entre as diferentes etapas clínicas da consulta odontológica. A variação dos parâmetros cardiovasculares é semelhante para as soluções de articaína e lidocaína associadas à epinefrina e é influenciada pelas etapas da consulta odontológica. / The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular effects by maxillary infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:100.000 and 1:200.000 epinephrine in different stages of dental appointment for restorative procedures. Twenty healthy patients randomly received 1,8 ml of the three local anesthetics. Systolic blood pressure, average blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated by the oscillometric and photoplethysmograph methods in seven stages of the appointment. Statistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey tests of cardiovascular parameters did not show significant differences between the anesthetic associations. There were significant differences for the parameters among different clinical stages of the dental appointment. The variation of cardiovascular parameters is similar for articaine and lidocaine solutions and it is influenced by the stages of the dental appointment.

O objetivo dessa pesquisa foi avaliar o tempo de latência e duração pulpar anestésica da dose de 1,8ml das seguintes soluções anestésicas locais: cloridrato de articaína 4% associado à epinefrina 1:100.000 (ART 100) e 1:200.000 (ART 200) e cloridrato de lidocaína 2% associado à epinefrina 1:100.000 (LIDO 100) no bloqueio convencional do nervo alveolar inferior. A amostra do experimento consistiu de vinte pacientes normorreativos, submetidos a três consultas para tratamento restaurador de baixa complexidade em três dentes posteriores inferiores. Os períodos de latência e duração da anestesia local na polpa dentária foram monitorados com um estimulador pulpar elétrico (Vitality Scanner Model 2006®-SybronEndo, CA, EUA). Para análise e comparação dos resultados da latência e duração pulpar das três soluções anestésicas locais foi utilizado o teste paramétrico ANOVA e o teste auxiliar de Bonferroni com nível de significância fixado em 5% (p<0,05). Em relação ao período de latência pulpar não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre nenhuma das três soluções anestésicas locais utilizadas (p > 0,05). Já em relação ao período de duração pulpar houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre ART 100 e LIDO 100 (p=0,000) e entre ART 200 e LIDO 100 (p=0,000). Portanto, a latência das duas soluções de articaína foram similares à solução de lidocaína, mas ambas apresentaram duração de ação anestésica maior do que a solução de lidocaína. / The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and duration of pulp anesthetic dose of 1.8 ml of local anesthetic solutions following: 4% hydrochloride articaine associated with epinephrine 1:100.000 (ART 100) and 1:200.000 (ART 200) and 2% hydrochloride of lidocaine associated with epinephrine 1:100.000 (LIDO 100) in alveolar nerve block lower. The sample of the experiment consisted of twenty healthy patients, underwent three appointments for restorative treatment of low complexity in three subsequent lower teeth. The periods of onset and duration of local anesthetic in dental pulp were monitored with an electric stimulator pulp (Vitality Scanner®, Model 2006 - SybronEndo, CA, USA). To analyze and compare the results of onset and duration of the three pulp solutions local anesthetic was used parametric ANOVA test and the test of Bonferroni help with significance level set at 5% (p < 0.05). For the period of onset there was no statistically significant difference between any of the three approaches used local anesthetic (p> 0.05). Already in relation to the duration of pulp statistically significant difference between ART 100 and LIDO 100 (p = 0000) and between ART 200 and LIDO 100 (p = 0000). Therefore, the onset of the two solutions of articaine were similar to the solution of lidocaine, but both showed duration of anesthetic action superior to the solution of lidocaine.

Background: Several studies have suggested that the likelihood of paraesthesia may depend on the local anaesthetic (LA) used. The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of paraesthesia among dental LAs used in the U.S. Methods: Reports of paraesthesia involving LAs between November 1997 through August 2008 were obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Chi-Square analysis compared expected frequencies, based on U.S. LA sales data, to observed reports of oral paraesthesia. Results: During the study period 248 cases of paraesthesia following dental procedures were reported. Most (94.5%) cases involved mandibular nerve block. The lingual nerve was affected in 89.0% of cases. Reports involving 4%-prilocaine and 4%-articaine were 7.3-times and 3.6-times, respectively, greater than expected (χ2, p<0.0001) based on LA usage by U.S. dentists. Conclusions: Consistent with previous reports, these data suggest that paraesthesia is more common following use of 4% LA formulations.

Background: Several studies have suggested that the likelihood of paraesthesia may depend on the local anaesthetic (LA) used. The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of paraesthesia among dental LAs used in the U.S. Methods: Reports of paraesthesia involving LAs between November 1997 through August 2008 were obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Chi-Square analysis compared expected frequencies, based on U.S. LA sales data, to observed reports of oral paraesthesia. Results: During the study period 248 cases of paraesthesia following dental procedures were reported. Most (94.5%) cases involved mandibular nerve block. The lingual nerve was affected in 89.0% of cases. Reports involving 4%-prilocaine and 4%-articaine were 7.3-times and 3.6-times, respectively, greater than expected (χ2, p<0.0001) based on LA usage by U.S. dentists. Conclusions: Consistent with previous reports, these data suggest that paraesthesia is more common following use of 4% LA formulations.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos cardiovasculares da infiltração maxilar usando lidocaína 2% associada à epinefrina 1:100.000, articaína 4% associada à epinefrina 1:100.000 e 1:200.000 em diferentes etapas da consulta odontológica para realização de procedimento restaurador. Vinte voluntários receberam, aleatoriamente, 1,8 ml dos três anestésicos locais. A pressão arterial sistólica, diastólica e média e a freqüência cardíaca foram avaliadas pelos métodos oscilométrico e fotopletismográfico em sete etapas da consulta odontológica. A análise estatística dos parâmetros cardiovasculares através dos testes ANOVA e Tukey não mostrou diferenças significativas entre as três soluções anestésicas. Houve diferença estatisticamente significante para os parâmetros cardiovasculares entre as diferentes etapas clínicas da consulta odontológica. A variação dos parâmetros cardiovasculares é semelhante para as soluções de articaína e lidocaína associadas à epinefrina e é influenciada pelas etapas da consulta odontológica. / The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiovascular effects by maxillary infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine, 4% articaine with 1:100.000 and 1:200.000 epinephrine in different stages of dental appointment for restorative procedures. Twenty healthy patients randomly received 1,8 ml of the three local anesthetics. Systolic blood pressure, average blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated by the oscillometric and photoplethysmograph methods in seven stages of the appointment. Statistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey tests of cardiovascular parameters did not show significant differences between the anesthetic associations. There were significant differences for the parameters among different clinical stages of the dental appointment. The variation of cardiovascular parameters is similar for articaine and lidocaine solutions and it is influenced by the stages of the dental appointment.

O objetivo dessa pesquisa foi avaliar o tempo de latência e duração pulpar anestésica da dose de 1,8ml das seguintes soluções anestésicas locais: cloridrato de articaína 4% associado à epinefrina 1:100.000 (ART 100) e 1:200.000 (ART 200) e cloridrato de lidocaína 2% associado à epinefrina 1:100.000 (LIDO 100) no bloqueio convencional do nervo alveolar inferior. A amostra do experimento consistiu de vinte pacientes normorreativos, submetidos a três consultas para tratamento restaurador de baixa complexidade em três dentes posteriores inferiores. Os períodos de latência e duração da anestesia local na polpa dentária foram monitorados com um estimulador pulpar elétrico (Vitality Scanner Model 2006®-SybronEndo, CA, EUA). Para análise e comparação dos resultados da latência e duração pulpar das três soluções anestésicas locais foi utilizado o teste paramétrico ANOVA e o teste auxiliar de Bonferroni com nível de significância fixado em 5% (p<0,05). Em relação ao período de latência pulpar não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre nenhuma das três soluções anestésicas locais utilizadas (p > 0,05). Já em relação ao período de duração pulpar houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre ART 100 e LIDO 100 (p=0,000) e entre ART 200 e LIDO 100 (p=0,000). Portanto, a latência das duas soluções de articaína foram similares à solução de lidocaína, mas ambas apresentaram duração de ação anestésica maior do que a solução de lidocaína. / The aim of this study was to evaluate the time of onset and duration of pulp anesthetic dose of 1.8 ml of local anesthetic solutions following: 4% hydrochloride articaine associated with epinephrine 1:100.000 (ART 100) and 1:200.000 (ART 200) and 2% hydrochloride of lidocaine associated with epinephrine 1:100.000 (LIDO 100) in alveolar nerve block lower. The sample of the experiment consisted of twenty healthy patients, underwent three appointments for restorative treatment of low complexity in three subsequent lower teeth. The periods of onset and duration of local anesthetic in dental pulp were monitored with an electric stimulator pulp (Vitality Scanner®, Model 2006 - SybronEndo, CA, USA). To analyze and compare the results of onset and duration of the three pulp solutions local anesthetic was used parametric ANOVA test and the test of Bonferroni help with significance level set at 5% (p < 0.05). For the period of onset there was no statistically significant difference between any of the three approaches used local anesthetic (p> 0.05). Already in relation to the duration of pulp statistically significant difference between ART 100 and LIDO 100 (p = 0000) and between ART 200 and LIDO 100 (p = 0000). Therefore, the onset of the two solutions of articaine were similar to the solution of lidocaine, but both showed duration of anesthetic action superior to the solution of lidocaine.

Orientador: Jose Ranali / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-01T00:20:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Soares_PatriciaCristinedeOliveira_M.pdf: 3581523 bytes, checksum: 0acfec963e5a1be1e2748b5f7426b0e7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002 / Resumo: Este estudo avaliou a variação de parâmetros cardiovasculares após injeção anestésica, através do monitoramento contínuo por 48 horas. Foram selecionados 20 voluntários com idade entre 20 e 39 anos, normotensos, saudáveis e com canino superior direito hígido. Realizaram-se registros da pressão arterial sistólica (PAS), diastólica (PAD), média (PAM) e freqüência cardíaca (FC) em 3 fases: A - monitoramento por 24 horas sem procedimento odontológico; B pnmeIro procedimento anestésico, 48 horas, registros 15-15 minutos, e 2-2 minutos durante o procedimento anestésico; o segundo procedimento anestésico, semelhante a fase B, variando a solução anestésica. As injeções infiltrativas, vestibular e palatina, foram realizadas com duas soluções anestésicas: articaína 4% com adrenalina 1: 100.000 (Septanest® - DFL) e lidocaína 2% com adrenalina 1:100.000 (Alphacaine® - DFL), nas sessões B e C, de forma cruzada, duplo-cega e ao acaso. A eficiência da anestesia foi analisada pela aplicação de estímulo elétrico, e a sensibilidade dolorosa pela escala analógica visual. A análise de variância em esquema de parcelas subdivididas ('alfa¿= 0,05) foi utilizada para avaliar as variações nos parâmetros cardiovasculares e mostrou não haver diferença estatística significante entre as 3 fases. Ao analisar os valores obtidos nas 48 horas, observaram-se que houve diferenças estatísticas nos sub-períodos para PAS, PAD, PAM e FC (p< 0,0001). Durante o procedimento anestésico observou-se diferenças estatísticas significantes em relação aos subperíodos, porém com diminuição frente aos outros intervalos de avaliação. Os valores comparativos entre as soluções anestésicas foram analisados pelo teste de Wilcoxon pareado ('alfa¿= 0,05), não havendo diferença estatística significante entre as soluções de articaína e lidocaína quanto a latência (p=0,80), anestesia completa (p= 0,08), parcial (p= 0,55) e em tecidos moles (p= 0,18). Os valores da Escala Analógica Visual foram submetidos ao teste de Wilcoxon pareado ('alfa¿= 0,05), não foram verificadas diferenças entre as duas soluções (p=0,45). Pode-se concluir que em pacientes jovens, normotensos e saudáveis, o procedimento anestésico e a sensibilidade dolorosa não provocaram aumento dos parâmetros cardiovasculares avaliados e que as soluções anestésicas apresentaram desempenho clínico similares / Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes ofcardiovascular parameters by anesthetic injection, throughout a 48-hour continuous nonlnvaslve registration. Twenty normotensive healthy volunteers, aged between 20-39 years, were selected. The heart rate (HR) and systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and media (MBP) blood pressures were evaluated in 3 phases: A - registration for 24 hours without anesthetic injection; B - first anesthetic solution injection, registration for 48 hours, the records were taken every 15 minutes, and every 2 minutes during the anesthetic procedure; C ¿ second anesthetic solution, similar to phase B. The infiltration anesthesias with the solutions in the vestibular and palatine regions of upper right canine were accomplished using two anesthetic solutions: articaine 4% with adrenaline 1:100.000 (Septanest-DFL) and lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:100.000 (Alphacaine-DFL), in a double blind cross-over manner. The efficiency of the anesthesia was verified by application of electric stimulus and the painful sensibility was verified by the visual analogue scale. The cardiovasculars parameters were analyzed trought ANOVA in sub-parcels scheme following Tukey's test ('alfa¿=0,05). No statistical significant difference was observed among the 3 phases. When the values obtained in 48 hours were analyzed, statistical differences were observed in the sub-periods of 48 hours period in SBP, DBP, MBP and HR (p< 0,0001) and in sub-periods during the anesthetic procedure with decrease in cardiovascular parameters during this procedure. The comparative values between two anesthetic solutions were analyzed by Wilcoxon's test ('alfa¿=0,05). There were no significant statistical differences between articaine and lidocaine solutions by latency (p= 0,80) and pulp (p= 0,08), partial (p= 0,55) and soft tissue (p= 0,18) anesthesias. For visual analogue scale the two solutions did not present differences (p=0,45). It can be concluded that in normotensive healthy patients, the anesthetic injection and painful sensibility were not enough to increase the cardiovasculars parameters, and the both anesthetic solutions, lidocaine 2% with adrenaline 1:100.000 and articaine 4% with adrenaline 1: 100.000, presented similar clinical behavior / Mestrado / Farmacologia, Anestesiologia e Terapeutica / Mestre em Odontologia