Aurora A is an important mitotic regulator that has been found to be up-regulated in a variety oftumours provoking a great deal of attention and the development of a number of small moleculeAurora kinase inhibitors. Most of these inhibitors though have predominantly targeted Aurora B,meaning that our understanding of the role of the kinase activity of Aurora A is comparatively lesswell developed.MLN8054 however, is a small molecule inhibitor that has been reported in vitro to have a highdegree of specificity towards Aurora A activity. In this thesis, I show in vivo that MLN8054 can beused to specifically inhibit Aurora A activity, and exploit this quality to probe the role of Aurora Aactivity in human cells. I was consequently able to show that Aurora A activity not only has a clearrole in spindle formation, where it is required for the determination of K-fibre length and in thedegree of centrosome separation, but also in the regulation of microtubule organisation. Despite thespindle deformities seen after inhibiting Aurora A activity, the majority of HeLa and DLD-1 cellswere still able to form bipolar spindles capable of attaching to kinetochores. These spindlestructures did not however, assert normal levels of force through the kinetochores, and cells wereconsequently unable to efficiently align their chromosomes, causing significant delays to mitoticprogression. Cells were still able to divide in the absence of Aurora A activity, although thedetection of segregation defects and aneuploid progeny indicates a role for Aurora A activity in thefaithful segregation of the genetic material. Importantly however, Aurora A activity was not foundto have a prominent role in the spindle assembly checkpoint.Increasing the potency of Aurora A inhibition by using a drug-resistant cell line confirmed theobservations made in HeLa and DLD-1 cells, emphasising that although Aurora A activity isrequired for spindle assembly, cells can still activate the spindle checkpoint and divide in itsabsence. I therefore propose that Aurora A activity is required for the formation of normal spindlestructures capable of efficiently aligning and evenly dividing chromosomes during cell division.These roles were attributed in part to the kinase activity of Aurora A in the regulation of TACC3and chTOG localisation on the spindle and centrosomes.Interestingly however, Aurora A activity did not appear to be required for spindle assembly in nontransformedcells, which were able to more efficiently align their chromosomes and dividefollowing Aurora A inhibition than the cancer cell lines. Furthermore, the non-transformed cellsaccumulated with 2N DNA after longer-term Aurora A inhibition, as opposed to the cancer celllines, which exhibited profound aneuploidy following the equivalent treatment. This finding isencouraging, as consistent with recently published reports, it indicates that Aurora A inhibitionmay be successfully used in order to specifically target cancer cells.

Recent studies have found that EPS8, a mediator of growth factor signaling to the cytoskeleton, may upregulate expression of the FoxM1B transcription factor and aurora A kinase, both of which have been linked to oncogenic activity. Cell lines transfected with EPS8 and FoxM1B, and appropriate controls, were generated and analyzed by MTT proliferation assays and flow cytometry for relative rates of cell proliferation as well as to determine the percentage of cells in different phases of the cell cycle. qRT-PCR and western blots confirmed higher levels of EPS8, FoxM1B and Aurora A kinase in the overexpressing cell lines. To investigate the role of PI3K-dependent signaling in EPS8-mediated upregulation of FoxM1B and its targets, studies were carried out usingLY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K. In cells overexpressing EPS8, treatment with LY294002resulted in decreased expression of FoxM1B and Aurora A kinase, indicating that PI3Ksignaling mediates EPS8-dependent upregulation of FoxM1B and Aurora A kinase. The study suggests that EPS8 deregulates cell growth by affecting the expression of common regulators of cell cycle progression, in part through PI3K, a known pro-oncogenic kinase.

Current treatments for prostate cancer (PCa) are marred with high relapse frequency and development of progressively aggressive cancers; developing new treatment options for PCa remains crucial. In this project, a series of synthetic compounds based on natural products will be screened to identify inhibitors for Aurora-A kinase (Aur-A). Aur-A facilitates centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation during mitosis. Aur-A is overexpressed in metastatic PCa cells, and is a good candidate for targeted therapies. Compound libraries are designed using natural compounds that contain simple structural elements as starting points for developing drug like libraries. High-throughput screening of these libraries will be used to identify potent antimitotic agents that selectively affect cancer cells but not normal cells. A combination of in vitro protein assays – quantifying protein activity – cell-based assays – measuring cell growth and proliferation – and cell-reporter assays – to determine which metabolic pathway the compound affects – were used to identify potential inhibitors. Through these methods, we have identified several compounds, with special consideration to thiazole piperazine compounds, to successfully inhibit proliferation of metastatic PCa cells.

Das Glioblastom ist der häufigste hirneigene Tumor des Erwachsenen und mit einer 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate von weniger als 5 % eine der aggressivsten Hirntumorerkrankungen (Batash et al., 2017). Verbunden mit einer schlechten Prognose und geringen Remissionsraten ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, bestehende Therapieoptionen zu optimieren und zu erweitern. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurde das vor einigen Jahren entwickelte und aktuell in klinischen Studien angewandte Konzept der Therapie von Malignomen mit elektrischen Wechselfeldern, den sog. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), aufgegriffen. Basis der anti-tumoralen Wirkung der im Rahmen von Glioblastom-Studien applizierten TTFields bildet eine Tumor-spezifische Frequenz von 200 kHz sowie geringe Intensitäten, die einen nebenwirkungsarmen anti-mitotischen Effekt erzielen (Kirson et al., 2004; Kirson et al., 2007; Clark et al., 2017; Porat et al., 2017). Dieser resultiert sowohl aus alternierenden elektrischen Feldern, die während der Metaphase über eine Irritation des Dipolmoments von Tubulin-Untereinheiten die Assemblierung des Spindelapparates inhibieren, als auch aus inhomogenen elektrischen Feldern, die während der Telophase die Trennung der Tochterzellen behindern. Mit dieser Behandlungsoption konnten schon einige gute Ergebnisse für die Behandlung von Glioblastomen in klinischen Studien erreicht werden (Stupp et al., 2017). Eine weitere anti-mitotische Therapieoption stellt die Inhibierung der Aurora B Kinase mittels AZD1152 dar. Die Aurora B Kinase ist Teil des Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC), der bei Inhibierung der Kinase seine Kontrollfunktionen während der Mitose und Zytokinese nicht wahrnehmen kann. Diese fehlende Kontrolle führt zu Polyploidie, die einen Zelltod verursachen kann (Wiedemuth et al., 2016). Aufgrund dieses ähnlichen biologischen Hintergrundes wurde zu Beginn dieser Arbeit die Hypothese aufgestellt, dass eine kombinierte Therapie mittels TTFields und AZD1152 einen additiven zytotoxischen Effekt im Vergleich zur Monotherapie mit TTFields erzielen kann. Es konnte zunächst für die etablierte Zelllinie U87-MG ein signifikanter additiver Effekt in der Kombinationstherapie der TTFields mit AZD1152 im Vergleich zur alleinigen Therapie mittels TTFields nachgewiesen werden. Die mediane Tumorzellzahl konnte hierbei in der Kombinationstherapie um 60 % reduziert werden. Dieser additive Effekt konnte ebenfalls an zwei Primärkulturen reproduziert werden. Hierbei konnte die relative mediane Tumorzellzahl der Primärkultur HT18584 ebenfalls um 60 % in der Kombinationstherapie gesenkt werden. Diese tetraploide Zellreihe zeigte außerdem einen außergewöhnlich großen zytotoxischen Effekt bei der Behandlung mit AZD1152. Signifikant zeigte ebenso die Primärkultur HT12347 einen medianen Verlust von 56 % der Tumorzellen nach einer kombinierten Behandlung. Qualitativ und zellmorphologisch konnte mittels konfokaler Laser-Scanning- sowie Lichtmikroskopie die Akkumulation von mitotischen Defekten detektiert werden, die auch in den Monotherapien aber vor allem in der Kombinationstherapie zu finden waren. Die in der quantitativen Analyse gezeigte additive Zytotoxizität der Kombinationstherapie konnte hier nochmals visualisiert und bestätigt werden. Für eine klinische Phase I-Studie zur Überprüfung der Effektivität sollten zunächst weitere zellkulturtechnische Daten erfasst werden, um die Universalität der kombinierten Behandlung zu überprüfen. Weiterhin wäre die Entwicklung einer selektiven/lokalen Therapie mittels AZD1152 wünschenswert, um die Nebenwirkungen des Medikamentes abzumildern. Es sollte außerdem das im Rahmen dieser Arbeit detektierte sensitivere Ansprechen der tetraploiden Zelllinie HT18584 genauer untersucht werden, um eine potentiell prognostisch günstige Verbindung zwischen der Behandlung mit AZD1152 und tetraploiden Zellen herstellen zu können.:1 EINLEITUNG 1 1.1 Glioblastoma multiforme – Definition, Inzidenz und Ätiologie 1 1.1.1 Symptomatik und Diagnostik des Glioblastoms 2 1.2 Molekulare Klassifizierung 3 1.2.1 Primäre und sekundäre Glioblastome und einige allgemeine Marker 3 1.2.2 Der MGMT-Status 5 1.3 Der eukaryotische Zellzyklus und sequentielle Kontrollpunkte 6 1.3.1 Der Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) 8 1.3.2 Die Familie der Aurorakinasen 9 1.4 Therapie maligner Gliome 10 1.4.1 Standardtherapie eines Glioblastoms 10 1.4.2 Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) – Biologischer Effekt und Studienlage 11 1.4.3 Aurora Kinase-Inhibitoren 14 1.5 Zielstellung der Arbeit 15 2 METHODEN UND MATERIALIEN 17 2.1 Methoden 17 2.1.1 Zellkultivierung allgemein 17 2.1.2 Passagieren adhärenter Zellen 17 2.1.3 Kultivierung von primärem Patientenmaterial 18 2.1.4 Kryokonservierung und Rekultivierung eukaryotischer Zelllinien 18 2.1.5 Bestimmung der Lebendzellzahl mittels Neubauer-Zählkammer 19 2.1.6 Durchflusszytometrische Analyse 19 2.1.7 Bestimmung der Lebendzellzahl mittels Propidiumiodid (PI) 20 2.1.8 Durchflusszytometrische Immunphänotypisierung von Glioblastomzellen 20 2.1.9 In vitro-Applikation der Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) 21 2.1.10 Titration der effektiven Aurora B Kinase-Inhibitorkonzentrationen mittels PI 22 2.1.11 Titration inhibitorischer Temozolomidkonzen-trationen mittels AlamarBlue-Assay 23 2.1.12 Konfokale Laser-Scanning-Mikroskopie 23 2.2. Materialien 25 2.2.1 Geräte 25 2.2.2 Chemikalien und Reagenzien 25 2.2.3 Lösungen 26 2.2.4 Medien 27 2.2.5 Kommerzielle Kits 28 2.2.6 Antikörper 28 2.2.7 Software 28 2.2.8 Statistik 29 2.2.9 Zelllinien 29 3 ERGEBNISSE 30 3.1 Wahl des Designs der Kontrollgruppen 30 3.2 Typisierung der verwendeten Primärkulturen 32 3.2.1 Befunde der Pathologie des Universitätsklinikums Dresden 33 3.2.2 Immunphänotypisierung der Primärkultur HT18584 34 3.2.3 Immunphänotypisierung der Primärkultur HT12347 35 3.3 Titrationen mit AZD1152 36 3.3.1 Titration mit AZD1152 für die Primärkultur HT18584 36 3.3.2 Titration mit AZD1152 für die Primärkultur HT12347 37 3.4 Kombinationstherapie mittels AZD1152 und TTFields 38 3.4.1 Quantitativer Effekt der Kombinationstherapie an U87-MG 39 3.4.2 Quantitativer Effekt der Kombinationstherapie an HT18584 40 3.4.3 Quantitativer Effekt der Kombinationstherapie an HT12347 41 3.4.4 Qualitativer Effekt der Kombinationstherapien 42 3.4.4.1 Die Kombinationstherapie mit U87-MG 43 3.4.4.2 Die Kombinationstherapie mit HT18584 44 3.4.5 Zytotoxischer Effekt der Kombinationstherapie an HT12347 45 3.5 Titrationen mit Temozolomid 47 3.5.1 Therapie mit Temozolomid an U87-MG 48 3.5.2 Therapie mit Temozolomid an Primärkulturen 48 4 DISKUSSION 52 4.1 Vorversuche 52 4.1.1 Wachstumsanalyse der Kontrollgruppen 52 4.1.2 Charakterisierung der Primärkulturen 53 4.2 Die neuen Behandlungsoptionen 54 4.2.1 Applikation der TTFields 54 4.2.2 Die Behandlung mit AZD1152 55 4.2.3 Die Kombinationstherapie 57 4.3. Die Behandlung mit Temozolomid (TMZ) 59 5 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 62 LITERATURVERZEICHNIS 64 TABELLENVERZEICHNIS 73 ABBILDUNGSVERZEICHNIS 74 ABKÜRZUNGSVERZEICHNIS 75 ANHANG 77 Anhang 1: Einverständniserklärung der Patienten 77 Anhang 2: Erlaubnis zur Nutzung der Patientendaten der Pathologie 78 Anhang 3: Erklärungen zur Eröffnung des Promotionsverfahrens 79 Anhang 4: Erklärung über die Einhaltung gesetzlicher Vorgaben 81

Mutações ativadoras no gene KRAS são prevalentes em cancer de pulmão e a as vias de sinalização de RAS estão aumentadas em células iniciadoras de tumor (CITs), que são definidas como células autorrenováveis capazes de iniciar a formação tumoral, sustentar o crescimento tumoral e promover a disseminação tumoral. Entretanto, terapias direcionadas a RAS não foram efetivas até hoje e a identificação de alvos de KRAS que contribuam para o fenótipo oncogênico é necessária. Como a quinase Aurora A (AURKA) já foi implicada, tanto na oncogênese induzida por KRAS, quanto em promover a função das CITs, nós hipotetizamos que a inibição das vias de AURKA seria detrimental para a função de CITs pulmonares portadoras de KRAS oncogênica, desta forma diminuindo o comportamento maligno do câncer de pulmão. Para avaliar a função das CITs, nós usamos ensaios de crescimento de tumoresferas que permitem o crescimento seletivo de CITs in vitro. As linhagens pulmonares positivas para KRAS H358 e A549 formaram tumoresferas em cultura de baixa aderência e, quando comparadas às linhagens parentais, às células oriundas de tumoresferas apresentaram maior capacidade clonogênica in vitro e maior tumorigenicidade in vivo. Além disso, uma análise por qPCR revelou que as células oriundas de tumoresferas possuem expressão aumentada de fatores de células tronco, uma característica de CITs. Em seguida, nós inibimos a AURKA nas linhagens pulmonares positivas para KRAS H358 e A549 por interferência de RNA (RNAi) ou com um inibidor das quinases Aurora (AI II). A inibição de AURKA diminuiu a formação de tumoresferas e o crescimento destas em culturas seriadas, além de reduzir a capacidade clonogênica das células oriundas de tumoresferas. Estes resultados indicam que a AURKA é importante para a autorrenovação e a oncogenicidade de CITs, e que a AURKA induz o fenótipo tronco-tumoral, o que é corroborado pelo achado de que a inibição de AURKA nas tumoresferas reduz a expressão de fatores de célula tronco. Um destes fatores regulados por AURKA é o marcador de superfície de célula tronco CD24. De fato, quando comparadas às células cultivadas de forma aderente, as células oriundas de tumoresferas apresentam maior número de células positivas para CD24 (CD24+) e estes números são reduzidos pelo tratamento com AI II. Finalmente, nós purificamos células H358 CD24+ por citometria de fluxo e mostramos que, quando comparadas às células negativas para CD24, as células CD24+ apresentam maior capacidade de formar tumoresferas em culturas seriadas, e o tratamento com AI II inibe preferencialmente a capacidade de células CD24+ de formarem tumoresferas. Nossos resultados sugerem que uma terapia baseada na inibição de AURKA pode reduzir o número e função de CITs pulmonares portadoras de KRAS oncogênica e, portanto, pode representar uma estratégia terapêutica atraente para reduzir a recidiva e metástase no câncer de pulmão induzido por KRAS. / Activating mutations in KRAS are prevalent in lung cancer and RAS sinaling is enhanced in cancer initiating cells (CICs), which are defined as self-renewing tumor cells able to initiate tumor formation, sustain tumor growth and drive tumor dissemination. However, therapies targeted to oncogenic RAS have been ineffective to date and identification of KRAS targets that impinge on the oncogenic phenotype is warranted. Because Aurora kinase A (AURKA) has been implicated both in RAS oncogenesis and in promoting CIC function, we hypothesized that targeting AURKA pathways would impair KRAS-positive lung CIC function, thereby decreasing lung cancer malignant behavior. To evaluate CIC function, we used tumorsphere assays that allow selective growth of CICs in vitro. KRAS positive lung cancer H358 and A549 cells formed tumorspheres under low attachment conditions, and, when compared to the parental cell lines, sphere-forming cells had increased clonogenic ability in vitro and increased tumorigenicity in vivo. In addition, qPCR analysis revealed that tumorsphere cells displayed increased expression of stem cell factors, a hallmark of CICs. Next, we targeted AURKA in KRAS positive lung cancer H358 and A549 cells by RNA interference (RNAi) or with an Aurora inhibitor (AI II). AURKA targeting decreased tumorsphere formation and growth in serial cultures and reduced clonogenic growth of tumorsphere-forming cells. These results indicate that AURKA is important for CIC selfrenewal and oncogenicity and that AURKA induces a CIC phenotype, which is further underscored by the finding that AURKA targeting in tumorspheres decreases expression of stem cell factors. One such factor shown to be regulated by AURKA is the stem cell surface marker CD24. In fact, when compared to adherent cultures, A549 and H358 tumorspheres display increased numbers of CD24-positive (CD24+) cells and these numbers are reduced by AI II treatment. Finally we purified H358 CD24+cells by flow cytometry and showed that, when compared to CD24-negative cells, CD24+ cells have increased ability to form tumorspheres in serial cultures, and AI II treatment preferentially reduced the ability of CD24+ cells to form tumorspheres. Our results suggest that AURKA inhibition therapy can reduce the number and function of KRAS-positive lung CICs, and, therefore might be an attractive therapeutic strategy to reduce recurrence and metastasis in KRAS-induced lung cancer.

Mutações ativadoras no gene KRAS são prevalentes em cancer de pulmão e a as vias de sinalização de RAS estão aumentadas em células iniciadoras de tumor (CITs), que são definidas como células autorrenováveis capazes de iniciar a formação tumoral, sustentar o crescimento tumoral e promover a disseminação tumoral. Entretanto, terapias direcionadas a RAS não foram efetivas até hoje e a identificação de alvos de KRAS que contribuam para o fenótipo oncogênico é necessária. Como a quinase Aurora A (AURKA) já foi implicada, tanto na oncogênese induzida por KRAS, quanto em promover a função das CITs, nós hipotetizamos que a inibição das vias de AURKA seria detrimental para a função de CITs pulmonares portadoras de KRAS oncogênica, desta forma diminuindo o comportamento maligno do câncer de pulmão. Para avaliar a função das CITs, nós usamos ensaios de crescimento de tumoresferas que permitem o crescimento seletivo de CITs in vitro. As linhagens pulmonares positivas para KRAS H358 e A549 formaram tumoresferas em cultura de baixa aderência e, quando comparadas às linhagens parentais, às células oriundas de tumoresferas apresentaram maior capacidade clonogênica in vitro e maior tumorigenicidade in vivo. Além disso, uma análise por qPCR revelou que as células oriundas de tumoresferas possuem expressão aumentada de fatores de células tronco, uma característica de CITs. Em seguida, nós inibimos a AURKA nas linhagens pulmonares positivas para KRAS H358 e A549 por interferência de RNA (RNAi) ou com um inibidor das quinases Aurora (AI II). A inibição de AURKA diminuiu a formação de tumoresferas e o crescimento destas em culturas seriadas, além de reduzir a capacidade clonogênica das células oriundas de tumoresferas. Estes resultados indicam que a AURKA é importante para a autorrenovação e a oncogenicidade de CITs, e que a AURKA induz o fenótipo tronco-tumoral, o que é corroborado pelo achado de que a inibição de AURKA nas tumoresferas reduz a expressão de fatores de célula tronco. Um destes fatores regulados por AURKA é o marcador de superfície de célula tronco CD24. De fato, quando comparadas às células cultivadas de forma aderente, as células oriundas de tumoresferas apresentam maior número de células positivas para CD24 (CD24+) e estes números são reduzidos pelo tratamento com AI II. Finalmente, nós purificamos células H358 CD24+ por citometria de fluxo e mostramos que, quando comparadas às células negativas para CD24, as células CD24+ apresentam maior capacidade de formar tumoresferas em culturas seriadas, e o tratamento com AI II inibe preferencialmente a capacidade de células CD24+ de formarem tumoresferas. Nossos resultados sugerem que uma terapia baseada na inibição de AURKA pode reduzir o número e função de CITs pulmonares portadoras de KRAS oncogênica e, portanto, pode representar uma estratégia terapêutica atraente para reduzir a recidiva e metástase no câncer de pulmão induzido por KRAS. / Activating mutations in KRAS are prevalent in lung cancer and RAS sinaling is enhanced in cancer initiating cells (CICs), which are defined as self-renewing tumor cells able to initiate tumor formation, sustain tumor growth and drive tumor dissemination. However, therapies targeted to oncogenic RAS have been ineffective to date and identification of KRAS targets that impinge on the oncogenic phenotype is warranted. Because Aurora kinase A (AURKA) has been implicated both in RAS oncogenesis and in promoting CIC function, we hypothesized that targeting AURKA pathways would impair KRAS-positive lung CIC function, thereby decreasing lung cancer malignant behavior. To evaluate CIC function, we used tumorsphere assays that allow selective growth of CICs in vitro. KRAS positive lung cancer H358 and A549 cells formed tumorspheres under low attachment conditions, and, when compared to the parental cell lines, sphere-forming cells had increased clonogenic ability in vitro and increased tumorigenicity in vivo. In addition, qPCR analysis revealed that tumorsphere cells displayed increased expression of stem cell factors, a hallmark of CICs. Next, we targeted AURKA in KRAS positive lung cancer H358 and A549 cells by RNA interference (RNAi) or with an Aurora inhibitor (AI II). AURKA targeting decreased tumorsphere formation and growth in serial cultures and reduced clonogenic growth of tumorsphere-forming cells. These results indicate that AURKA is important for CIC selfrenewal and oncogenicity and that AURKA induces a CIC phenotype, which is further underscored by the finding that AURKA targeting in tumorspheres decreases expression of stem cell factors. One such factor shown to be regulated by AURKA is the stem cell surface marker CD24. In fact, when compared to adherent cultures, A549 and H358 tumorspheres display increased numbers of CD24-positive (CD24+) cells and these numbers are reduced by AI II treatment. Finally we purified H358 CD24+cells by flow cytometry and showed that, when compared to CD24-negative cells, CD24+ cells have increased ability to form tumorspheres in serial cultures, and AI II treatment preferentially reduced the ability of CD24+ cells to form tumorspheres. Our results suggest that AURKA inhibition therapy can reduce the number and function of KRAS-positive lung CICs, and, therefore might be an attractive therapeutic strategy to reduce recurrence and metastasis in KRAS-induced lung cancer.

Aurora-A (AurA) est une sérine/thréonine kinase jouant un rôle majeur dans le cycle cellulaire. Elle est connue pour son rôle oncogène et les compagnies pharmaceutiques développent des inhibiteurs ciblant son activité kinase. Cependant, il a été montré chez différentes espèces qu’Aurora-A possède des rôles indépendants de son activité kinase et agit également comme suppresseur de tumeur quand son activité kinase est altérée. Ceci pose donc un problème dans le développement des inhibiteurs car cibler l’activité kinase d’Aurora-A pour traiter le cancer pourrait mener à l’effet inverse. Pour résoudre ce dilemme, j’ai étudié en détail les phénotypes de mutants AurA nul et hypomorphe chez Drosophila melanogaster. J’ai étudié à la fois les défauts de développement en me basant sur le temps de pupation des larves et le rôle de suppresseur de tumeur en me basant sur les neuroblastes du cerveau central. Dans ce modèle, une caractéristique des suppresseurs de tumeur est leur capacité à induire la formation de neuroblastes supplémentaires dans le cerveau central conduisant à une surcroissance du cerveau. Chez les mutants AurA, la taille du cerveau est plus petite jusqu’à 96h de développement larvaire. Cependant, la pupation arrivant normalement entre 96h et 120h de développement larvaire est retardée chez le mutant et les larves ont une taille plus importante. Chez les mutants en retard de pupation le cerveau devient plus gros que ceux du contrôle. Le cerveau des mutants AurA a une importante augmentation du nombre de cellules positives pour Deadpan, un marqueur spécifique des neuroblastes et ce, avant que le cerveau des mutants AurA devienne plus grand que celui du contrôle. De plus, les disques imaginaux d’ailes et la glande annulaire sont clairement plus petits que ceux du contrôle à 96h de développement larvaire et les larves mutantes atteignent les stades L2 et L3 plus tôt. En conclusion, les mutants AurA montrent 1) une avance dans leur développement précoce certainement reliée au défaut de croissance de la glande annulaire ; 2) un retard de pupation ressemblant à celui observé en cas de défauts dans la voie de l’ecdysone, certainement dû à des défauts de croissance des disques imaginaux d’ailes ; 3) une surcroissance du cerveau à mettre en lien à la fois avec une augmentation du nombre de pseudo-neuroblastes et avec le retard de pupation. / Aurora-A (AurA) is a major kinase playing various roles in cell cycle. It’s a well-known oncogene and companies are developing drugs inhibiting its kinase activity. However, it has been shown in different species that AurA can have a kinase independent role or act as a tumor suppressor when its kinase activity is altered. This represents a problem for drugs development as inhibiting AurA kinase activity only could lead to life threatening phenotypes. To address this dilemma, we carefully deciphered phenotypes of AurA null and AurA hypomorph mutants in Drosophila melanogaster using the pupation as readout for development timing and larval central brain neuroblasts as model for tumorigenic study. One readout to define a tumor suppressor in this model is a brain overgrowth phenotype associated to central brain neuroblasts over-proliferation. In AurA mutants, brain size appears slightly smaller until 96h of larval development. However, pupation occurring normally between 96 and 120h of larval development is delayed in AurA mutants and larvae have an increased size. In this “delayed” mutant larvae, brains are eventually bigger than wild-type controls. Furthermore, AurA mutant central brains show a huge increased number of cells positive for deadpan, a marker of neuroblast identity, even before the appearance of brain over-growth phenotype. Additionally, wing discs and ring glands are clearly smaller in AurA mutants at 96h compared to control and mutant larvae reach L2 and L3 developmental stage earlier than control. In conclusion, AurA mutants have: 1) a precocious developmental advance certainly related to ring gland growth defect; 2) a pupation delay which resembles Ecdysone pathway timing defects certainly due to wing discs growth defect; 3) an enlarged brains phenotype due to an increased of the number of neuroblast-like cells and the pupation delay.