Os receptores acoplados à proteína G (GPCRs), também chamados de receptores 7TM, são conhecidos por regular virtualmente todos os processos fisiológicos em mamíferos e cerca de 40% de todas as drogas comerciais agem através destes receptores. A sinalização mediada por eles é classicamente atribuída à proteína G, que é ativada pela troca de GDP por GTP, promovendo a separação das subunidades G e G, e leva à produção de mensageiros secundários como cAMP, Ca2+ e DAG. Após a resposta os GPCRs são fosforilados pelas quinases de GPCRs (GRKs), sinalizando para recrutamento das -arrestinas citoplasmáticas, que por sua vez desencadeiam a formação de endossomos internalizando e dessensibilizando o receptor. Entretanto, estudos mostram que este endossomo, contendo o complexo ligante-receptor--arrestina, pode interagir com proteínas sinalizadoras no citoplasma desencadeando vias de sinalização independentes de proteína G. Recentemente foram descritos para diferentes receptores, ligantes capazes de ativar seletivamente uma das duas vias, proteína G ou -arrestina, chamados agonistas seletivos. O receptor AT1 é um GPCR particularmente interessante no estudo do agonismo seletivo, tanto por sua vasta expressão em tecidos quanto pelo conhecimento de agonistas seletivos já estabelecidos, tais como os ligantes SII e TRV120027. O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar comparativamente os perfis de sinalização decorrente da ativação de AT1 por SII ou TRV120027 através do uso de arranjos de quinases e da modulação de genes relacionados a sinalização de GPCRs. Ang II que é ligante natural e total (ativa via dependente de proteína G e de -arrestina) neste receptor foi usada como controle para fins de comparação. Nossos dados mostraram que o perfil da sinalização mediada pelo receptor AT1 varia não só entre AngII e os agonistas seletivos, mas também entre os dois ligantes seletivos SII e TRV120027, mostrando que a interação receptor-ligante pode influenciar a sinalização em um grau mais refinado, além da ativação dependente de -arrestina ou proteína G. Estes dados mostram que existem perspectivas para o desenvolvimento futuro de ligantes com ainda maior grau de seletividade. / G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as 7TM receptors, are known to regulate virtually all physiological processes in mammals and approximately 40% of all current clinical drugs act by modulating such receptors. The signaling mediated by them is classically by coupling to G protein, which is activated by exchanging bound GDP for GTP, dissociation of G and G subunits, then leading to production of second messengers such as cAMP, Ca2+, and DAG. After the signal transduction, GPCR are phosphorylated by GPCR kinases (GRKs), followed by recruitment of cytoplasmic -arrestins, which initiate the endosome formation with consequent internalization and desensitization of the receptor. However, is has been demonstrated that the endosome assembling the ligand-receptor--arrestin complex can interact with cytoplasmic signaling proteins, therefore activating signaling pathways independently of G protein coupling. Recently, for different receptors, it has been described ligands capable of selectively activating one of these signaling pathways, G protein or -arrestin, called biased agonists. The AT1 receptor is a particularly interesting GPCR for the study of biased agonism, either due to its wide tissue expression as well as also due the existence of known and established biased ligands, such as SII and TRV120027. The aim of our study was to comparatively analyze the AT1 receptor signaling pathways profiles after activation by SII or TRV120027, using kinases arrays, and expression modulation of genes related to GPCRs signaling. AngII is the natural and full agonist of this receptor (activates both G protein and -arrestin signaling pathways) was used for comparison. Our data show that the signaling profile mediated by AT1 receptor can be distinct not only when comparing the profiles from AngII and the biased agonists, but also when comparing the profiles from the two biased ligands SII and TRv120027; revealing that the complex ligand-receptor can influence the downstream signaling pathways in a fine-tune way, further to the activation of -arrestin or G-protein. This data show that there are perspectives for the future development of ligands with even higher degree of selectivity.

Receptores acoplados a proteína G (GPCRs) são proteínas integrais de membrana caracterizados por possuírem sete ?-helices transmembranares e por isso também são chamados de receptores 7TM. Esta superfamília de receptores medeia um grande numero de processos fisiológicos e é alvo para aproximadamente 40% de todas as drogas no mercado. O receptor de Bradicinina de tipo 2 (B2) é o principal mediador do sistema Calicreina-Cinina e é classicamente ativado pelo nonapeptídeo Bradicinina (BK). Trabalhos recentes descreveram agonistas para diferentes GPCRs, que podem ativar seletivamente (ou pelo menos preferencialmente) vias de sinalização dependentes de proteína G ou do acoplamento de ?-arrestina, sendo este fenômeno denominado agonismo tendencioso (do inglês \"biased agonism\"). Neste trabalho estão sendo desenhados e sintetizados uma serie de análogos com o objetivo de produzir novos ligantes com distintas propriedades bioquímicas e farmacológicas. Alguns destes análogos já sintetizados apresentaram características interessantes nos perfis de ativação. Estes análogos devem ser utilizados como modelos para a síntese e caracterização de novas gerações de análogos com potenciais propriedades de agonismo tendencioso. Nos acreditamos que o desenho de novos agonistas tendenciosos pode levar ao desenvolvimentos de uma nova geração de drogas, seletivas para ativação não somente de um subtipo de receptor, mas também de uma via de sinalização especifica / G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins characterized by bearing seven transmembrane ?-helices, and are therefore also known as 7TM receptors. This receptor superfamily mediates a large number of physiological processes and is subject to approximately 40% of all drugs on the market. The type 2 Bradykinin receptor (B2) is the primary mediator of the Kallikrein-Kinin System and is classically activated by the nonapeptide Bradykinin (BK). Recent studies have described different GPCRs agonists which can selectively activate (or at least preferably) dependent signaling pathways of G protein or ?-arrestin coupling, this phenomenon is called biased agonism. This work are based in design and synthesize a series of analogs with the goal of producing new ligands with different biochemical and pharmacological properties. Some of these synthesized analogs have presented interesting characteristics in activation profiles. These analogs should be used as templates for the synthesis and characterization of novel analogs with properties of biased agonism. We believe that the design of novel agonists can lead to development of a new generation of drugs, not only selective for activation of a receptor subtype but also a specific signaling pathway

Receptores acoplados a proteína G (GPCRs) são proteínas integrais de membrana caracterizados por possuírem sete ?-helices transmembranares e por isso também são chamados de receptores 7TM. Esta superfamília de receptores medeia um grande numero de processos fisiológicos e é alvo para aproximadamente 40% de todas as drogas no mercado. O receptor de Bradicinina de tipo 2 (B2) é o principal mediador do sistema Calicreina-Cinina e é classicamente ativado pelo nonapeptídeo Bradicinina (BK). Trabalhos recentes descreveram agonistas para diferentes GPCRs, que podem ativar seletivamente (ou pelo menos preferencialmente) vias de sinalização dependentes de proteína G ou do acoplamento de ?-arrestina, sendo este fenômeno denominado agonismo tendencioso (do inglês \"biased agonism\"). Neste trabalho estão sendo desenhados e sintetizados uma serie de análogos com o objetivo de produzir novos ligantes com distintas propriedades bioquímicas e farmacológicas. Alguns destes análogos já sintetizados apresentaram características interessantes nos perfis de ativação. Estes análogos devem ser utilizados como modelos para a síntese e caracterização de novas gerações de análogos com potenciais propriedades de agonismo tendencioso. Nos acreditamos que o desenho de novos agonistas tendenciosos pode levar ao desenvolvimentos de uma nova geração de drogas, seletivas para ativação não somente de um subtipo de receptor, mas também de uma via de sinalização especifica / G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are integral membrane proteins characterized by bearing seven transmembrane ?-helices, and are therefore also known as 7TM receptors. This receptor superfamily mediates a large number of physiological processes and is subject to approximately 40% of all drugs on the market. The type 2 Bradykinin receptor (B2) is the primary mediator of the Kallikrein-Kinin System and is classically activated by the nonapeptide Bradykinin (BK). Recent studies have described different GPCRs agonists which can selectively activate (or at least preferably) dependent signaling pathways of G protein or ?-arrestin coupling, this phenomenon is called biased agonism. This work are based in design and synthesize a series of analogs with the goal of producing new ligands with different biochemical and pharmacological properties. Some of these synthesized analogs have presented interesting characteristics in activation profiles. These analogs should be used as templates for the synthesis and characterization of novel analogs with properties of biased agonism. We believe that the design of novel agonists can lead to development of a new generation of drugs, not only selective for activation of a receptor subtype but also a specific signaling pathway

Os receptores acoplados à proteína G (GPCRs), também chamados de receptores 7TM, são conhecidos por regular virtualmente todos os processos fisiológicos em mamíferos e cerca de 40% de todas as drogas comerciais agem através destes receptores. A sinalização mediada por eles é classicamente atribuída à proteína G, que é ativada pela troca de GDP por GTP, promovendo a separação das subunidades G e G, e leva à produção de mensageiros secundários como cAMP, Ca2+ e DAG. Após a resposta os GPCRs são fosforilados pelas quinases de GPCRs (GRKs), sinalizando para recrutamento das -arrestinas citoplasmáticas, que por sua vez desencadeiam a formação de endossomos internalizando e dessensibilizando o receptor. Entretanto, estudos mostram que este endossomo, contendo o complexo ligante-receptor--arrestina, pode interagir com proteínas sinalizadoras no citoplasma desencadeando vias de sinalização independentes de proteína G. Recentemente foram descritos para diferentes receptores, ligantes capazes de ativar seletivamente uma das duas vias, proteína G ou -arrestina, chamados agonistas seletivos. O receptor AT1 é um GPCR particularmente interessante no estudo do agonismo seletivo, tanto por sua vasta expressão em tecidos quanto pelo conhecimento de agonistas seletivos já estabelecidos, tais como os ligantes SII e TRV120027. O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar comparativamente os perfis de sinalização decorrente da ativação de AT1 por SII ou TRV120027 através do uso de arranjos de quinases e da modulação de genes relacionados a sinalização de GPCRs. Ang II que é ligante natural e total (ativa via dependente de proteína G e de -arrestina) neste receptor foi usada como controle para fins de comparação. Nossos dados mostraram que o perfil da sinalização mediada pelo receptor AT1 varia não só entre AngII e os agonistas seletivos, mas também entre os dois ligantes seletivos SII e TRV120027, mostrando que a interação receptor-ligante pode influenciar a sinalização em um grau mais refinado, além da ativação dependente de -arrestina ou proteína G. Estes dados mostram que existem perspectivas para o desenvolvimento futuro de ligantes com ainda maior grau de seletividade. / G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as 7TM receptors, are known to regulate virtually all physiological processes in mammals and approximately 40% of all current clinical drugs act by modulating such receptors. The signaling mediated by them is classically by coupling to G protein, which is activated by exchanging bound GDP for GTP, dissociation of G and G subunits, then leading to production of second messengers such as cAMP, Ca2+, and DAG. After the signal transduction, GPCR are phosphorylated by GPCR kinases (GRKs), followed by recruitment of cytoplasmic -arrestins, which initiate the endosome formation with consequent internalization and desensitization of the receptor. However, is has been demonstrated that the endosome assembling the ligand-receptor--arrestin complex can interact with cytoplasmic signaling proteins, therefore activating signaling pathways independently of G protein coupling. Recently, for different receptors, it has been described ligands capable of selectively activating one of these signaling pathways, G protein or -arrestin, called biased agonists. The AT1 receptor is a particularly interesting GPCR for the study of biased agonism, either due to its wide tissue expression as well as also due the existence of known and established biased ligands, such as SII and TRV120027. The aim of our study was to comparatively analyze the AT1 receptor signaling pathways profiles after activation by SII or TRV120027, using kinases arrays, and expression modulation of genes related to GPCRs signaling. AngII is the natural and full agonist of this receptor (activates both G protein and -arrestin signaling pathways) was used for comparison. Our data show that the signaling profile mediated by AT1 receptor can be distinct not only when comparing the profiles from AngII and the biased agonists, but also when comparing the profiles from the two biased ligands SII and TRv120027; revealing that the complex ligand-receptor can influence the downstream signaling pathways in a fine-tune way, further to the activation of -arrestin or G-protein. This data show that there are perspectives for the future development of ligands with even higher degree of selectivity.

No description available.

<p>The following thesis will focus on understanding the downstream behavioral effects of δORmediated β-arrestinsignaling. δORagonists have been implicated as effective targets for a variety of diseases, however detrimental side effects of opioid-targeting agonists limit their clinical use. δORagonists specifically can induce seizures, however the underlying mechanism contributing to this  behavior  is  unknown.  We  review  this  phenomenon  in  more  detail,  highlighting  current agonists known to induce seizures and potential circuits and pathways involved. Our work suggests β-arrestinsignaling  is  involved,  specifically β-arrestin2  mediated  signaling  may  be  largely contributing  to δORagonist-induced  seizure  behavior.  As  it  is  possible  the β-arrestinisoforms have unique roles in seizure behavior, we also analyzed methods in which to provoke β-arrestinisoform bias of δORtargeting compounds. Though the full mechanism relating δORagonists with seizures remains unknown, our work provides foundational detail of this behavior, implicating the importance of β-arrestinisoform signaling through δOR; allowing for future studies to full define this seizure pathway and develop δORsafer agonists.  </p>

Les opioïdes restent encore à l’heure actuelle les composés pharmacologiques les plus efficaces pour traiter les différentes formes de douleurs, et donc fournir une analgésie thérapeutique. Cependant, l’administration répétée de ces composés entraîne des effets secondaires majeurs comme la dépression respiratoire, la tolérance, mais également, il a été montré que certains de ces opioïdes pouvaient engendrer des états proépileptiques. D’un point de vue thérapeutique, il existe donc un réel besoin pour de nouveaux et meilleurs traitements analgésiques, n’élicitant pas ces effets secondaires. Notre laboratoire étudie la signalétique des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G comme les récepteurs opioïdes et leur capacité de sélectivité fonctionnelle depuis des années, et en particulier celle du récepteur delta opioïde (DOP). En effet, celui-ci présenterait moins d’effets indésirables que le récepteur mu opioïde (MOP) qui est la cible principale des opioïdes classiques comme la morphine. Cependant, il semblerait que le DOP justement soit à l’origine des états proépileptiques précédemment décrits. Ainsi malgré la promesse initiale des agonistes delta par rapport à la diminution des effets secondaires, les effets proépileptiques de certains ont notamment contribué à une baisse d’intérêt vers le DOP et aucun de ses agonistes n’a pu passer les phases de tests cliniques. Cependant, il a été démontré que certains agonistes delta n’entraînaient pas d’effet proépileptique; tandis que d’autres oui. Comment expliquer un tel phénomène ? Ceci est la question que pose la présente recherche. Ainsi notre objectif sera d’obtenir et de comparer les signatures pharmacologiques des agonistes connus pour être proépileptiques versus ceux qui ne le sont pas ; par rapport à la transduction de signal via le récepteur delta opioïde et sa protéine G hétérotrimérique ; et par rapport à un de ses effecteurs principaux pour l’analgésie, un canal potassique rectifiant entrant. Cette comparaison se fera selon les paramètres du modèle classique de la pharmacologie, comme l’efficacité et la puissance ; mais également avec un outil plus récent appelé modèle opérationnel, utilisant des paramètres comme l’affinité et le coefficient de transduction. Pour se faire, le transfert d'énergie par résonance de bioluminescence ou BRET sera utilisé afin de caractériser les différentes voies signalétiques impliquées. Cette recherche s’inscrit dans un vaste contexte de collaboration entre différents laboratoires, et au sein de chacun d’entre eux, dans l’espoir de pouvoir synthétiser un jour, de meilleurs composés pharmacologiques, capables de cibler uniquement les voies médiatrices des effets thérapeutiques voulus, ici l’analgésie ; sans éliciter celles entraînant les effets secondaires associés, ici, les états proconvulsifs. L’aboutissement de cette recherche permettrait donc d’impacter la vie de millions de gens en souffrance, et c’est pourquoi il nous semble plus qu’important de continuer à l’entreprendre. / Opioids are still nowadays the most efficacious pharmacological compounds available to treat the different types of pain, and therefore provide a therapeutic analgesia. However, repeated administration of those compounds lead to major secondary effects like respiratory depression, tolerance, but also it was shown that some opioid compounds could induce seizures. From a therapeutical point of view, there is a serious need for new and better analgesic treatments that do not elicit such adverse effects. Our lab has been studying for years the signaletics of G-protein coupled receptors like the opioid receptors, and their capacity for functional selectivity, especially more recently the one of the delta opioid receptor (DOP). Indeed, this receptor elicits fewer adverse effects compared to the mu opioid receptor (MOP) that is the main target of all clinically used opioids such as morphine. However, it seems like the DOP itself would be responsible for the pro-epileptic states previously described. Thus, despite initial promises of the delta agonists towards reducing adverse effects whilst providing analgesia, the pro-convulsive effects that some seem to elicit have induced a loss of interest towards the DOP, and so far none of its agonists have gone further than pre-clinical trials. However, it has been shown that not all of those DOP agonists had those pro-convulsive adverse effects. How to explain such a phenomenon? This is the question which the present research will be asking. Thus our goal is to obtain and compare pharmacological signatures of the agonists known for being pro-convulsive versus those that are not ; regarding the transduction of signals through the delta opioid receptor and its heterotrimeric G-Protein ; and also regarding one of its main effectors to induce analgesia, an inwardly rectifying potassium channel. This comparison will be done according to the classical parameters of pharmacology, such as efficacy and potency ; but also according to the newest operational model, with parameters such as affinity and transduction coefficients. In order to do so, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer or BRET, will be used in order to characterize and quantify the signalling pathways there implicated. This research is embedded in a vast collaboration context, in between laboratories around the world, and within those laboratories as well, in hope to be able to one day synthesize, better pharmacological compounds, capable of targeting only the pathways responsible for the desired effects, here analgesia ; without triggering the associated adverse effects, here pro-convulsive states. The culmination of this research could allow to impact the lives of millions of people throughout the world, and this is why it is more than important for us to keep on pursuing it.

La leucémie myéloïde aiguë (LMA) est causée par une prolifération anormale de cellules souches sanguines immatures. Notre laboratoire se concentre sur un sous-groupe de la LMA représentant près de 30% de la LAM pédiatrique et caractérisé par la translocation chromosomique KMT2A-MLLT3. L'analyse par séquençage de l’ARN (RNA-seq) dans notre modèle de LMA médiée par la fusion KMT2A-MLLT3 et des échantillons de patients leucémiques a révélé que les gènes codant la chimiokine CCL23 et son récepteur correspondant CCR1 sont surexprimés dans cette maladie. Bien qu'il ait été rapporté que CCL23 et CCR1 sont impliqués dans le trafic de leucocytes et le développement de l'inflammation, les rôles exacts de ces deux protéines dans la leucémogenèse sont inconnus. Pour illustrer les effets de la signalisation CCL23/CCR1 dans la leucémie causée par la fusion KMT2A-MLLT3, nous avons utilisé la technique de transfert d'énergie de résonance de bioluminescence 2 améliorée (ebBRET2) avec des tests d'immuno-empreintes. Nos résultats ont révélé que la signalisation de l'axe CCL23/CCR1 active plusieurs effecteurs de signalisation intermoléculaire, y compris Gi2, G12/13 et β-arrestine 1/2, mais avec un biais vers le recrutement de la β-arrestine. Nous avons également montré que le récepteur CCR1 présente une activité constitutive qui peut se coupler à une voie médiée par la protéine G et activer la voie impliquant les MAP kinases. Enfin, nous avons montré que la signalisation de l'axe CCL23/CCR1 provoque une activation de ERK1/2 dans les lignées cellulaires LMA potentiellement par une voie médiée par la β-arrestine. Ces résultats indiquent que la signalisation de l'axe CCL23/CCR1 active plusieurs voies biologiques pouvant fournir des avantages majeurs pour le développement et la progression de la LMA et présentent ainsi CCL23 et CCR1 comme deux candidats intéressants pour une thérapie ciblée contre la LMA de type KMT2A-MLLT3. / Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is caused by abnormal proliferation of immature blood stem cells. Our lab focuses on an AML subgroup accounting for almost 20% of pediatric AML and characterized by a chromosomal translocation that generates the gene fusion: KMT2A-MLLT3 (KM3). Interestingly, RNA-seq analysis of our KM3 AML model and AML patient samples has revealed that the chemokine CCL23 and its corresponding receptor CCR1 are highly upregulated in this disease. Although it has been reported that CCL23 and CCR1 are implicated in leukocyte trafficking and development of inflammation, the exact roles of these two proteins in leukemia are unknown. To illustrate the effects of CCL23/CCR1 signaling in the KMT2A-MLLT3 rearranged leukemia we employed the enhanced bystander bioluminescence resonance energy transfer 2 (ebBRET2) technique along with phospho-immunoblots assays. Our results revealed that CCL23/CCR1 axis signaling activates multiple intermolecular signaling effectors, including Gi2, G12/13, and β-arrestin1/2 albeit with a bias towards β-arrestin recruitment. We also showed that the CCR1 receptor exhibits a constitutive activity which can couple to a G-protein mediated pathway to activate the MAPK cascade. Finally, we showed that CCL23/CCR1 axis signaling causes an activation of ERK1/2 in AML cell lines potentially through a β-arrestin-mediated pathway. These results indicate that the CCL23/CCR1 axis signaling activates several biological pathways than can provide major advantages for the AML disease development and progression thus presenting both CCL23 and CCR1 as interesting candidates for targeted therapy against KMT2A-MLLT3 AML.