Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:36:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 NAIRA CHRISTOFOLETTI SILVEIRA.pdf: 1749185 bytes, checksum: 599c9b9e2ea5317466d7937658d2f0cf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-02-10 / The alterations to the way knowledge is produced and the great amount of documents stimulate and pressurize into changes in cataloguing. In this context, a theoretical model for cataloguing known as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) was published in 1998. Generally speaking, the cataloguing codes are divided into two parts: one related to description and another to the access points. This work aims to analyse the procedures to choose the access points of personal responsibility of the bibliographic records, in order to relate them to the concepts shown in the FRBR. The present work is characterized as a theoretical search and the investigation resorts to deductive approach to analyse the rules and the internationally accepted principles utilized in the choice of the access points. This search also has an empirical part to collect factual data about the use of cataloguing rules and to compare the registers with or without the use of the FRBR. As a result, it is observed that the cataloguing rules are still directed to the impressed catalogues. However, the concepts presented by the FRBR are related to the automated catalogues. The FRBR enlarge the dimensions of the responsabilities about the content of work and expression, and they translate the social changes to the possibilities of information representation in the bibliographic records. With the FRBR the rules have to be stipulated to facilitate the user activities. This implies in the review of the cataloguing rules, mainly the ones related to the choice of the access point. In this way, the professional of information will pay more efforts to determine which the access points for the user are. Among the uncountable impacts caused by the FRBR, perhaps the most important are to resume the discussion about the cataloguing in theoretical level and to highlight the importance of intellectual work of professional of information. / As altera??es na forma de produ??o do conhecimento e o grande volume de documentos pressionaram e estimularam mudan?as na cataloga??o. Nesse contexto, foi publicado em 1998 um modelo te?rico para a cataloga??o conhecido como Requisitos Funcionais para Registros Bibliogr?ficos (FRBR . Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records). Em geral, os c?digos de cataloga??o s?o divididos em duas partes: uma destinada ? descri??o e outra aos pontos de acesso. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar os procedimentos para a escolha dos pontos de acesso de responsabilidade pessoal do registro bibliogr?fico, relacionando-os com os conceitos apresentados nos FRBR. Caracterizada como uma pesquisa te?rica, a investiga??o recorreu ? abordagem dedutiva para analisar as regras e os princ?pios aceitos internacionalmente utilizados na escolha dos pontos de acesso. A pesquisa tamb?m possui uma parte emp?rica para coletar dados factuais sobre a aplica??o de regras de cataloga??o e comparar os registros com e sem a base dos FRBR. Como resultado, observou-se que as regras da cataloga??o ainda se direcionam aos cat?logos impressos. No entanto, os conceitos apresentados pelos FRBR se relacionam aos cat?logos automatizados. Os FRBR ampliam as dimens?es das responsabilidades sobre o conte?do de uma obra e express?o, traduzindo as altera??es sociais para as possibilidades de representa??o da informa??o nos registros bibliogr?ficos. Com os FRBR as regras devem ser estipuladas para facilitar as atividades dos usu?rios. Isto implica na revis?o das regras de cataloga??o, especialmente as relacionadas ? escolha dos pontos de acesso. Assim, o bibliotec?rio empenhar? mais esfor?os para determinar quais ser?o os pontos de acesso necess?rios aos seus usu?rios. Dentre os in?meros impactos provocados pelos FRBR, talvez, os de maior destaque sejam a retomada das discuss?es sobre a cataloga??o em n?vel te?rico e o realce da import?ncia do trabalho intelectual dos profissionais.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:36:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leiva Nunes.pdf: 403940 bytes, checksum: 08a12e3b692121cf143bf8b7ef89ceae (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-12-12 / The theoretical basis to build on this research was the discussion of the concepts, paradigms and pertinent approaches to the classification areas in Biblioteconomics, specially concerning to the information classification and organization, considering the changing of the heritage paradigm and the information paradigm, as well as the behavior of the bibliographical classification enlighten by the connection to the access to the documents. Recurring to the inductive hypothetical method, to the exploratory and historical research, and to the documental analysis, it has been tried to find the necessary explanations that interconnects themselves and should be further and deeper investigated and understood. The bibliographical classification, as a study topic, encircle from the most incipient phase of the scientific research, in which there is the heritage as the identification of the problem to be studied to the moment that the produced knowledge is absorbed and internalized as an access to the human knowledge. Identify relations and differences between taxonomies and classification schemes and thesauri. To analyze the access approaching the language as a preponderant factor, its possibilities, its differential and it contribution to the Information Science and its institutionalization. / A base te?rica para o fundamento desta pesquisa foi a discuss?o dos conceitos, paradigmas e abordagens pertinentes ?s ?reas de classifica??o em Biblioteconomia, especialmente, quanto ? classifica??o e ? organiza??o da informa??o, ao levar em considera??o a altera??o do paradigma do acervo para o paradigma da informa??o, bem como o comportamento da classifica??o bibliogr?fica ? luz de liga??o de acesso aos documentos. Ao recorrer-se ao m?todo hipot?tico indutivo, ? pesquisa explorat?ria e hist?rica e ? an?lise document?ria, buscaram-se as explica??es necess?rias que se interrelacionam e que devem ser mais bem investigadas e compreendidas. A classifica??o bibliogr?fica, como t?pico de estudos, abrange desde a fase mais incipiente da pesquisa cientifica, quando temos o acervo como a identifica??o do problema a ser estudado at? o momento em que o conhecimento produzido ? absorvido e internalizado como acesso ao saber humano. Identifica rela??es e diferen?as entre taxonomias, esquemas de classifica??o e tesauros. Analisa o acesso com abordagem ? linguagem, como fator preponderante, e o que possibilita, qual o diferencial dele e em que contribui para a Ci?ncia da Informa??o e a institucionaliza??o da mesma.