O advento da Constituição Federal de 1988, que positivou a saúde como direito social de todos dependente de políticas de Estado (art. 196, CF) e criou o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) para garantir ações e serviços assistenciais universais, igualitários e integrais (art. 198, CF), propiciou, em pouco tempo, o incremento da judicialização da saúde no Brasil, em dimensões preocupantes, sobretudo por conta do significativo impacto orçamentário gerado. Mas a ingerência do Poder Judiciário nas políticas públicas de saúde, que ocorre principalmente em ações civis individuais de medicamentos e produtos de interesse à saúde, aguarda ainda uma crítica mais definitiva, que ultrapasse posicionamentos meramente teóricos e avalie o fenômeno empiricamente. O presente estudo desenvolve, em primeiro lugar, uma análise da CF e da legislação sanitária, inclusive a Lei Orgânica da Saúde (Lei 8.080/90) e os novos marcos legais da integralidade (Lei 12.401/11, Lei 12.466/11, Decreto 7.508/11 e LC 141/12), para identificar o regime jurídico-constitucional do SUS e o conteúdo material do direito à saúde, que corresponde ao que foi denominado integralidade sistêmica ou regulada (análise jurídica). Em seguida, o estudo faz uma pesquisa retrospectiva das ações judiciais de medicamentos, insumos terapêuticos e produtos de interesse à saúde, registradas no sistema informatizado do CODES (Coordenação de Demandas Estratégicas do SUS) da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, durante o período de 2010 a 2014, objetivando constatar as suas principais características, buscando compreender o fenômeno enquanto realidade prática (análise fenomenológica). Em conclusão, verificou-se que, em regra, as ordens judiciais determinam escolha de marca comercial, medicamentos não previstos nos protocolos clínicos e nas relações de medicamentos, sem registro na Anvisa, importados e experimentais, e mesmo sem qualquer relação com as atividades assistenciais do SUS, frequentemente com base em prescrições médicas irregulares e privadas, gerando grande impacto orçamentário e desorganização das atividades administrativas. O confronto com o regime jurídico-constitucional do SUS e a legislação demonstra que o Poder Judiciário descumpre, em bloco, o ordenamento jurídico sanitário, uma ruptura do Estado Democrático de Direito que coloca em risco o projeto constitucional do SUS. Algumas sugestões de enfrentamento do problema são apresentadas / The advent of the Federal Constitution of 1988, which stated health as a social right for everyone dependent on government policies (art. 196, CF) and created the Unified Health System (\"SUS\") to ensure universal, egalitarian and integral assistance services and actions (art. 198, CF), provided, in a short time, the increased judicialization of health in Brazil, in alarming proportions, particularly due to significant budget impact generated. But the interference of the Judiciary in public health policies, which occurs primarily in individual civil actions of drugs and supplies, still awaiting a more definitive critical, going beyond merely theoretical positions and assess the phenomenon empirically. This study develops, first, an analysis of CF and health legislation, including the Organic Law of Health (Law 8.080/90) and the new legal frameworks of integrality (Law 12.401/11, Law 12.466/11, Decree 7.508/11 and LC 141/12), to identify the legal and constitutional arrangements of the \"SUS\" and the material content of the right to health, which corresponds to what is called systemic or regulated integrality (legal analysis). Then, the study makes a retrospective survey of judicial decisions concerning medications, therapeutic supplies and health-related products, recorded in the computerized system CODES (Coordination Strategic Demands of SUS) of the Secretariat of Health for the State of São Paulo, during the period from 2010 to 2014, aiming to realize its main features, trying to understand the phenomenon as a practical reality (phenomenological analysis). In conclusion, the study found that, as a rule, the court orders determine the choice of trade mark, medications not covered in the clinical protocols and relationships of drugs, without registration at ANVISA, imported and experimental, and even unrelated to the welfare activities of the \"SUS\", often based on rough and private medical prescriptions, generating large budget impact and disruption of administrative activities. The confrontation with the legal and constitutional arrangements of the \"SUS\" and the legislation shows that the Judiciary violates, as a whole, the health law, a breach of the Democratic State of Law that endangers the constitutional SUS project. Some suggestions of trouble confrontation are presented

Stains and stained incipient lesions can be challenging to differentiate with established clinical tools. New diagnostic techniques are required for improved distinction to enable early noninvasive treatment. This in vitro study evaluates the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification of hyperspectral imaging data for early occlusal lesion detection and differentiation from stains. Sixty-five extracted permanent human maxillary and mandibular bicuspids and molars (International Caries Detection and Assessment System [ICDAS] II 0–4) were imaged with a hyperspectral camera (Diaspective Vision TIVITA® Tissue, Diaspective Vision, Pepelow, Germany) at a distance of 350 mm, acquiring spatial and spectral information in the wavelength range 505–1000 nm; 650 fissural spectra were used to train classification algorithms (models) for automated distinction between stained but sound enamel and stained lesions. Stratified 10-fold cross-validation was used. The model with the highest classification performance, a fine k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm, was used to classify five additional tooth fissural areas. Polarization microscopy of ground sections served as reference. Compared to stained lesions, stained intact enamel showed higher reflectance in the wavelength range 525–710 nm but lower reflectance in the wavelength range 710–1000 nm. A fine k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm achieved the highest performance with a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.75, a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.80 when distinguishing between intact stained and stained lesion spectra. The superposition of color-coded classification results on further tooth occlusal projections enabled qualitative assessment of the entire fissure’s enamel health. AI-based evaluation of hyperspectral images is highly promising as a complementary method to visual and radiographic examination for early occlusal lesion detection.