Invasões biológicas representam atualmente a segunda maior ameaça à biodiversidade e dois fatores são considerados os mais importantes para o sucesso de invasões: pressão de propágulos e distúrbios. Um tipo de distúrbio antrópico que pode promover invasões, por mudar a quantidade de habitats alterados e a extensão de bordas entre eles e habitats nativos, é a perda de habitat. Apesar da reconhecida importância da pressão de propágulos e dos distúrbios, poucos estudos os investigaram simultaneamente e, os que o fizeram, apresentam limitações, como escalas espaciais pequenas e correlações entre os determinantes, dificultando a compreensão da importância relativa e interações entre eles. Cachorros são os carnívoros mais abundantes no mundo. Em áreas rurais, a maioria mantém comportamento de animal de vida de livre, interagindo com e afetando espécies nativas através de predação, transmissão de doenças e competição. Usando um banco de dados obtido através de armadilhas fotográficas e censo da população de cachorros em uma região de Mata Atlântica de 300,000 ha, avaliamos a importância relativa e interações entre pressão de propágulos e distúrbios para a invasão por cachorros. Selecionamos 12 paisagens de 2830 ha cada, variando de 10 a 50% de floresta nativa remanescente. Em cada uma, alocamos através de amostragem aleatória estratificada 8 pontos de amostragem em florestas nativas, onde uma armadilha fotográfica foi instalada por ∼42 dias consecutivos. Todos os domicílios em cada paisagem foram visitados para a contagem do número de cachorros. A pressão de propágulos foi quantificada como a densidade de cachorros criados e a média e mediana das distâncias entre os locais de criação e a floresta nativa mais próxima; e distúrbios, como a proporção da paisagem ocupada por floresta nativa e total (nativa e exótica) e a extensão de bordas entre florestas nativas e áreas abertas. Através da identificação de cachorros nas fotos e considerando cada paisagem como uma unidade amostral, nós comparamos por AICc modelos de abundância (N-mixture) para estimar a abundância de cachorros em florestas nativas, considerando a detecção imperfeita. O único modelo selecionado indica que a abundância de cachorros em florestas nativas é maior onde a densidade de cachorros é mais alta e a cobertura florestal total é menor (ωi=0.82). A densidade de cachorros criados foi mais importante que a distribuição espacial dos indivíduos, e a cobertura floresta total mais importante que a extensão de bordas, para a abundância de cachorros invasores. A abundância estimada de cachorros variou de 12 a 79 (30.9 ± 19.5), e a proporção de cachorros criados que invadem florestas de 6 a 21% (12 ± 6%), entre as paisagens. Nossos resultados indicam que a perda de habitat é tão importante quanto a pressão de propágulos para a invasão de florestas nativas por cachorros, mas seus efeitos são aditivos em vez de sinérgicos. Dado que cachorros frequentemente realizam movimentos longos em áreas abertas, nós levantamos a hipótese de que a capacidade de deslocamento é a causa do efeito desprezível da distribuição espacial dos indivíduos criados sobre a invasão, e que florestas representam barreiras a estes movimentos, tornando o efeito da cobertura florestal mais importante do que o efeito da extensão de bordas (mais relacionada a extensão de acesso a floresta). Além disso, o número e proporção de cachorros invasores são expressivos, colocando o cachorro na posição de carnívoro mais abundante em remanescentes florestais. Junto com os conhecidos impactos severos de cachorros sobre espécies nativas, estes números sugerem a urgência de planos de ação para controlar a invasão por cachorros. Além dos métodos tradicionais de controle populacional, o contexto da paisagem deve ser levado em conta nestes planos. Paisagens muito desmatadas devem ser priorizadas, e manter e restaurar florestas também devem ser valorizados pelos efeitos negativos sobre invasões biológicas. Por fim, dada a associação da invasão por cachorros com a perda de habitat e com a densidade de cachorros e da população humana, sugerimos que pelo menos parte dos efeitos negativos sobre mamíferos nativos usualmente atribuídos ao desmatamento e a caça podem ser causados pela invasão por cachorros / Biological invasions are currently the second main threat to biodiversity and two drivers are considered as the most important for invasions success: propagule pressure and disturbance. An anthropogenic disturbance that can promote invasions, by changing the amount of altered habitats and the extension of edges between altered and native habitats, is habitat loss. Despite the recognized importance of propagule pressure and disturbance, few studies have simultaneously investigated these factors, and those that did so present limitations, such as small spatial scales and correlations between drivers, impairing our understanding of the relative importance and interactions between these drivers. Dogs are the most abundant carnivores worldwide; in rural areas, most are free ranging, interacting and affecting native species through predation, disease transmission and competition. Using a camera trap dataset and censuses of dog populations obtained across a 300,000-ha Atlantic forest region, we evaluated the relative importance and interactions of propagule pressure and disturbance as drivers of dog invasion. We selected 12 2830-ha landscapes, ranging from 10 to 50% remaining native forest. Within each, we selected through a random-stratified sample 8 forest sites where a camera trap was set for ∼42 consecutive days. All households in each landscape were visited to count the number of dogs. Propagule pressure was quantified as the density of raised dogs, and mean and median distances between locations where dogs were raised and the nearest forest; and disturbance as the proportion of the landscape occupied by native forest and by total forest (native and exotic), and edge extension between native forest and open areas. By identifying individual dogs in the photos and considering each landscape as a sampling unit, we compared through AICc N-mixture models to estimate the abundance of dogs within forests, considering imperfect detection. The only selected model indicates that dog abundance in forests is higher where the density of raised dogs is higher and where total forest cover is lower (ωi=0.82). Density of raised dogs was more important than the spatial distribution of individuals, and total forest cover more important than edge extension, in determining the abundance of invading dogs. The estimated dog abundance varied from 12 to 79 (30.9 ± 19.5), and the proportion of raised dogs that invade forests from 6 to 21% (12 ± 6%), across landscapes. Our results indicate that habitat loss is as important as propagule pressure in driving the invasion of native forests by dogs, but their effects are additive rather than synergic. Given that dogs frequently make long movements in open areas, we hypothesize that dog vagility is the cause of the negligible effect of spatial distribution of raised individuals on invasion, and that forests represent barriers to these movements, making the effect of forest cover more important than the effect of edge extension (more related to the extension of access to forests). Moreover, the number and proportion of invading dogs are impressive, ranking dogs as the most abundant carnivore in forest remnants. Together with the known severe impacts of dogs on native species, these numbers suggest the urgency of action plans for controlling dog invasion. Beyond the traditional population control, landscape context should be taken into account within strategies to reduce impacts of dogs. Highly-deforested landscapes should be prioritized, and maintaining and restoring forests should be valued also by their negative effects on biological invasions. Finally, given the observed associations between dog invasion and both habitat loss and density of dogs and human populations, we suggest that at least part of the negative effects on native mammals currently attributed to deforestation and hunting can be caused by dog invasion

Invasões biológicas representam atualmente a segunda maior ameaça à biodiversidade e dois fatores são considerados os mais importantes para o sucesso de invasões: pressão de propágulos e distúrbios. Um tipo de distúrbio antrópico que pode promover invasões, por mudar a quantidade de habitats alterados e a extensão de bordas entre eles e habitats nativos, é a perda de habitat. Apesar da reconhecida importância da pressão de propágulos e dos distúrbios, poucos estudos os investigaram simultaneamente e, os que o fizeram, apresentam limitações, como escalas espaciais pequenas e correlações entre os determinantes, dificultando a compreensão da importância relativa e interações entre eles. Cachorros são os carnívoros mais abundantes no mundo. Em áreas rurais, a maioria mantém comportamento de animal de vida de livre, interagindo com e afetando espécies nativas através de predação, transmissão de doenças e competição. Usando um banco de dados obtido através de armadilhas fotográficas e censo da população de cachorros em uma região de Mata Atlântica de 300,000 ha, avaliamos a importância relativa e interações entre pressão de propágulos e distúrbios para a invasão por cachorros. Selecionamos 12 paisagens de 2830 ha cada, variando de 10 a 50% de floresta nativa remanescente. Em cada uma, alocamos através de amostragem aleatória estratificada 8 pontos de amostragem em florestas nativas, onde uma armadilha fotográfica foi instalada por ∼42 dias consecutivos. Todos os domicílios em cada paisagem foram visitados para a contagem do número de cachorros. A pressão de propágulos foi quantificada como a densidade de cachorros criados e a média e mediana das distâncias entre os locais de criação e a floresta nativa mais próxima; e distúrbios, como a proporção da paisagem ocupada por floresta nativa e total (nativa e exótica) e a extensão de bordas entre florestas nativas e áreas abertas. Através da identificação de cachorros nas fotos e considerando cada paisagem como uma unidade amostral, nós comparamos por AICc modelos de abundância (N-mixture) para estimar a abundância de cachorros em florestas nativas, considerando a detecção imperfeita. O único modelo selecionado indica que a abundância de cachorros em florestas nativas é maior onde a densidade de cachorros é mais alta e a cobertura florestal total é menor (ωi=0.82). A densidade de cachorros criados foi mais importante que a distribuição espacial dos indivíduos, e a cobertura floresta total mais importante que a extensão de bordas, para a abundância de cachorros invasores. A abundância estimada de cachorros variou de 12 a 79 (30.9 ± 19.5), e a proporção de cachorros criados que invadem florestas de 6 a 21% (12 ± 6%), entre as paisagens. Nossos resultados indicam que a perda de habitat é tão importante quanto a pressão de propágulos para a invasão de florestas nativas por cachorros, mas seus efeitos são aditivos em vez de sinérgicos. Dado que cachorros frequentemente realizam movimentos longos em áreas abertas, nós levantamos a hipótese de que a capacidade de deslocamento é a causa do efeito desprezível da distribuição espacial dos indivíduos criados sobre a invasão, e que florestas representam barreiras a estes movimentos, tornando o efeito da cobertura florestal mais importante do que o efeito da extensão de bordas (mais relacionada a extensão de acesso a floresta). Além disso, o número e proporção de cachorros invasores são expressivos, colocando o cachorro na posição de carnívoro mais abundante em remanescentes florestais. Junto com os conhecidos impactos severos de cachorros sobre espécies nativas, estes números sugerem a urgência de planos de ação para controlar a invasão por cachorros. Além dos métodos tradicionais de controle populacional, o contexto da paisagem deve ser levado em conta nestes planos. Paisagens muito desmatadas devem ser priorizadas, e manter e restaurar florestas também devem ser valorizados pelos efeitos negativos sobre invasões biológicas. Por fim, dada a associação da invasão por cachorros com a perda de habitat e com a densidade de cachorros e da população humana, sugerimos que pelo menos parte dos efeitos negativos sobre mamíferos nativos usualmente atribuídos ao desmatamento e a caça podem ser causados pela invasão por cachorros / Biological invasions are currently the second main threat to biodiversity and two drivers are considered as the most important for invasions success: propagule pressure and disturbance. An anthropogenic disturbance that can promote invasions, by changing the amount of altered habitats and the extension of edges between altered and native habitats, is habitat loss. Despite the recognized importance of propagule pressure and disturbance, few studies have simultaneously investigated these factors, and those that did so present limitations, such as small spatial scales and correlations between drivers, impairing our understanding of the relative importance and interactions between these drivers. Dogs are the most abundant carnivores worldwide; in rural areas, most are free ranging, interacting and affecting native species through predation, disease transmission and competition. Using a camera trap dataset and censuses of dog populations obtained across a 300,000-ha Atlantic forest region, we evaluated the relative importance and interactions of propagule pressure and disturbance as drivers of dog invasion. We selected 12 2830-ha landscapes, ranging from 10 to 50% remaining native forest. Within each, we selected through a random-stratified sample 8 forest sites where a camera trap was set for ∼42 consecutive days. All households in each landscape were visited to count the number of dogs. Propagule pressure was quantified as the density of raised dogs, and mean and median distances between locations where dogs were raised and the nearest forest; and disturbance as the proportion of the landscape occupied by native forest and by total forest (native and exotic), and edge extension between native forest and open areas. By identifying individual dogs in the photos and considering each landscape as a sampling unit, we compared through AICc N-mixture models to estimate the abundance of dogs within forests, considering imperfect detection. The only selected model indicates that dog abundance in forests is higher where the density of raised dogs is higher and where total forest cover is lower (ωi=0.82). Density of raised dogs was more important than the spatial distribution of individuals, and total forest cover more important than edge extension, in determining the abundance of invading dogs. The estimated dog abundance varied from 12 to 79 (30.9 ± 19.5), and the proportion of raised dogs that invade forests from 6 to 21% (12 ± 6%), across landscapes. Our results indicate that habitat loss is as important as propagule pressure in driving the invasion of native forests by dogs, but their effects are additive rather than synergic. Given that dogs frequently make long movements in open areas, we hypothesize that dog vagility is the cause of the negligible effect of spatial distribution of raised individuals on invasion, and that forests represent barriers to these movements, making the effect of forest cover more important than the effect of edge extension (more related to the extension of access to forests). Moreover, the number and proportion of invading dogs are impressive, ranking dogs as the most abundant carnivore in forest remnants. Together with the known severe impacts of dogs on native species, these numbers suggest the urgency of action plans for controlling dog invasion. Beyond the traditional population control, landscape context should be taken into account within strategies to reduce impacts of dogs. Highly-deforested landscapes should be prioritized, and maintaining and restoring forests should be valued also by their negative effects on biological invasions. Finally, given the observed associations between dog invasion and both habitat loss and density of dogs and human populations, we suggest that at least part of the negative effects on native mammals currently attributed to deforestation and hunting can be caused by dog invasion

Invasões biológicas representam hoje a segunda maior ameaça à biodiversidade, e o homem desempenha papel fundamental na introdução de espécies exóticas potencialmente invasoras. O cachorro (Canis lupus familiaris) é uma dessas espécies. Presente em todos os continentes, é o carnívoro mais abundante do mundo, e pode causar impactos à fauna nativa através de efeitos letais e não letais da predação, competição, hibridização e transmissão de doenças, além de ser potencialmente importante na epidemiologia de zoonoses. Em áreas rurais, que concentram grande parte dos remanescentes de vegetação nativa no mundo, os cachorros são frequentemente criados soltos e circulam livremente, intensificando a chance de contato com a fauna nativa. Nesse trabalho, avaliamos a importância relativa de fatores associados a atributos individuais (sexo, idade, condição de saúde, comportamento exploratório, tamanho e raça), formas de manejo (incentivo do dono à movimentação, motivo para a criação, confinamento e frequência de alimentação) e contexto ambiental (proximidade à mata nativa) para determinar a chance de cachorros visitarem remanescentes florestais em paisagens fragmentadas de Mata Atlântica. Selecionamos oito paisagens de 2830 ha cada, nas quais visitamos todas as construções em áreas rurais a fim de entrevistar, através da aplicação de questionário, os responsáveis pela criação de cachorros e fotografar os cachorros. Utilizamos a imputação múltipla para estimar os dados faltantes (comuns em dados obtidos via questionários), gerando 10 conjuntos de dados imputados que foram analisados separadamente. Por meio de seleções de modelos através do Critério de Informação de Akaike, comparamos modelos candidatos com até cinco variáveis independentes para determinar a chance de cachorros visitarem remanescentes florestais. Nossos resultados nos permitem afirmar que quatro fatores - dois associados a atributos individuais e dois associados a formas de manejo - atuam em conjunto para determinar a chance de cachorros visitarem remanescentes florestais em paisagens rurais da Mata Atlântica. Cachorros maiores, mais exploradores, que recebem mais incentivo a se movimentar e que passam menos tempo confinados têm maior chance de visitar remanescentes florestais. A maior importância de atributos individuais e da forma de manejo está de acordo com a grande variação fenotípica existente entre cachorros e a variedade de modos como são manejados. Entre os atributos individuais, tanto características físicas como comportamentais são importantes, enquanto os aspectos chave da forma de manejo são aqueles mais diretamente relacionados à movimentação dos cachorros. Independentemente do tempo de confinamento, o incentivo do dono à movimentação do cachorro, em particular o estímulo para que o cachorro o acompanhe em visitas a remanescentes florestais, é fundamental. O contexto ambiental, em especial a proximidade do domicílio a áreas de mata nativa, por sua vez, é irrelevante dada a alta mobilidade dos cachorros. Nossos dados sugerem que a densidade de cachorros em paisagens rurais de Mata Atlântica é uma ordem de magnitude mais alta do que a de carnívoros de médio porte silvestres relativamente comuns, que muitos cachorros já tiveram contato direto com espécies silvestres, e que a vacinação e outras medidas profiláticas são relativamente incomuns. Todos esses dados indicam o potencial de efeitos negativos, tanto para a fauna silvestre como para o homem. Programas de redução destes impactos devem incluir tanto aspectos veterinários, como a expansão de campanhas públicas de profilaxia para além da vacinação antirrábica, quanto aspectos sociais, como a divulgação e conscientização dos potenciais problemas ocasionados pela entrada de cachorros em áreas de vegetação nativa, visando mudanças nas crenças, atitudes e comportamento da população humana / Biological invasions are today the second greatest threat to biodiversity, and humans play a significant role in the introduction of potentially invasive exotic species. The dog (Canis lupus familiaris) is one of such species. Distributed across all continents, the dog is the most abundant carnivore in the planet, and can impact wildlife through lethal and non-lethal effects of predation, competition, hybridization and disease transmission, besides being potentially important in the epidemiology of zoonoses. In rural areas where most remnants of native vegetation around the world are concentrated, most dogs are free-ranging, enhancing the chance of interactions with wildlife. Here, we evaluated the relative importance of factors associated with individual traits (sex, age, health condition, exploratory behaviour, size and breed), management (owner\'s incentive to movement, motive for raising, confinement and feeding frequency), and environmental context (proximity to native forest) to determine the chance of dogs visiting forest remnants in Atlantic Forest fragmented landscapes. We selected eight landscapes of 2830 ha each, where we visited all constructions in rural areas in order to interview dog owners by applying a questionnaire and to photograph dogs. We used multiple imputation to estimate missing data (common in data obtained through questionnaires), obtaining 10 imputed datasets that were analyzed separately. We compared candidate models with up to five independent variables to determine the chance of dogs visiting forest remnants through the Akaike Information Criterion. Our results indicate that four factors - two associated with individual traits and two associated with management - work together to determine the chance of dogs visiting forest remnants in Atlantic Forest rural landscapes. Larger dogs, and those that exhibit exploratory behaviour, are more stimulated to move or confined for shorter periods have greater chance of visiting forest remnants. The greater importance of factors associated with individual traits and management is in accordance with the ample phenotypic variation among dogs and the variety of ways they can be managed. Among individual traits, both morphological and behaviour characteristics are important, whereas the key aspects of management are those directly related to dog movement. Irrespective of the time confined, the owner\'s incentive to movement, in particular taking the dog to the forest, is a crucial aspect. In contrast, the environmental context, especially the proximity of the household to native forest, is irrelevant given the vagility of dogs. Our results suggest that the density of dogs across rural landscapes in the Atlantic forest is at least one order of magnitude higher than the density of relatively common medium-sized native carnivores, that several dogs have already had direct contact with wild species, and that vaccination and other prophylactic measures are relatively uncommon. All of these highlight the potential for negative effects on both wildlife and human population. Plans to reduce these effects should include not only veterinarian aspects, such as the expansion of public prophylactic campaigns beyond rabies vaccination, but also social aspects, such as the dissemination of information on the problems caused by dogs visiting native vegetation, aiming at changing people\'s beliefs, attitudes and behaviour

Abstract Illegal killing of wolves (hereinafter ’wolf poaching’) in human-inhabited areas where wolves are also legally harvested is a special case of wildlife crime. This doctoral thesis examines wolf poaching in Finland and Sweden from the ecological perspective. In the first paper, we examined the causes of mortality among collared Finnish wolves and the role of estimated poaching rates on population changes. The second paper related the likelihood of being poached to covariates expressing different dimensions of the wolf conflict at two spatial scales (territory and country level) in Finland. Third paper turns the focus to Sweden, where we examined the disappearances of adult wolves in relation to population size, legal harvest and inbreeding. The first two studies were done in collaboration with the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) and the third with the Scandinavian wolf research project SKANDULV. Poaching outnumbered other causes of death. Most poaching cases were unverified. Other causes of death were legal harvest, traffic and natural mortalities. Both populations had a relatively high number of wolves with unknown fates. Inbreeding was not related to the disappearances of adult wolves in Sweden. Remoteness to human inhabitation and the detectability of the wolves from the forest roads (road crossings by wolves) increased the likelihood of poaching in Finland. Adult wolves suffered high risk of poaching in both populations. Risk was highest in early spring in Finland. Larger population size increased and the number of legally harvested wolves decreased poaching in both countries. Poaching seemed to limit the study populations despite the management efforts that used legal hunting as a tool to increase tolerance towards wolves. / Tiivistelmä Suden ja ihmisen rinnakkainelo johtaa konflikteihin, joiden lievittämiseksi susikantoja rajoitetaan usein luvallisella metsästyksellä. Suteen kohdistuu lisäksi laitonta tappamista eli salametsästystä. Tämä väitöstutkimus selvittää salametsästyksen ekologisia vaikutuksia Suomen ja Ruotsin susipopulaatioihin. Ensimmäisessä osatyössä selvitimme suomalaisten pantasusien kuolinsyitä, arvioimme salametsästyksen voimakkuutta ja sen vaikutuksia populaatiotasolla. Toisessa osatyössä tarkastelimme susikonfliktiin liittyvien ennustetekijöiden vaikutusta laittomasti tapetuksi tulemisen riskiin reviiritasolla ja koko Suomen mittakaavassa. Kaksi ensimmäistä osatyötä tehtiin Luonnonvarakeskuksen (Luke) suurpetotutkimuksessa. Kolmas osatyö tehtiin osana skandinaavista susitutkimushanketta (SKANDULV). Siinä selvitimme populaatiokoon, luvallisen pyynnin ja sukusiittoisuuden vaikutuksia aikuisten susien katoamiseen Ruotsissa. Salametsästys oli susien yleisin kuolinsyy, mutta suurin osa tapauksista jää toteen näyttämättä. Muita kuolinsyitä olivat luvallinen metsästys, liikenne ja luonnolliset kuolinsyyt. Aineistoissa oli runsaasti kohtaloltaan tuntemattomaksi jääneitä yksilöitä. Yksilöiden sukusiittoisuusaste ei ollut yhteydessä susien katoamisiin Ruotsissa. Syrjäinen sijainti ja susien havaittavuus metsätiestöltä lisäsivät laittoman tapon todennäköisyyttä Suomessa. Salametsästysriski oli korkein kevättalvella. Aikuisilla susilla oli huomattavan korkea riski tulla laittomasti tapetuksi. Tutkimuksen perusteella salametsästyksen määrää selittävät erityisesti susipopulaation kulloinenkin koko ja luvalliset pyyntimäärät. Suurempi susikanta lisäsi salametsästystä ja metsästyslupien määrä vähensi sen riskiä. Salametsästys vaikuttaa säädelleen susikantoja siitä huolimatta, että susikonfliktia on pyritty lieventämään luvallisella metsästyksellä.

Driving into Yellowstone National Park for the first time is a moving experience. Gazing over the sweeping landscapes, seeing a geyser erupt 80 feet into the air, and having your first ‘wildlife encounter’, whether that be a 2 ton bull bison aggressively wallowing on his dirt mound, snorting and kicking up dust, or watching a pack of 6 wolves move through a valley off in the distance, pausing to howl in search of their companions. Yellowstone staff wishes to manage our park in a way that preserves these remarkable experiences. In order to effectively manage this dynamic ecosystem, it is critical to thoroughly understand how different animal and plant species interact with each other and their environment. Wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995-1997 and park researchers and managers are still trying to understand how their presence impacts the ecosystem. In Yellowstone, wolves primarily prey on elk; however, predation on bison has started to increase in recent years. We still know little about how wolves hunt bison and what impacts wolves have had on how bison use their environment. The objective of this study was to better understand the behavioral and ecological interactions of wolves and bison, the most dangerous prey for wolves in North America. Since reintroduction, researchers have collected data on how wolves hunt both elk and bison. I used these data to understand 1) the conditions that allow wolves to capture their most dangerous prey, bison, 2) whether wolves have started preying on bison more often as the bison population increased, and 3) whether wolf reintroduction has limited bison use of Yellowstone’s most extreme high-elevation winter range. Finally, I collaborated with ecologists in Scandinavia to determine how wolf predation was affected by a competitor, the brown bear. My study adds to the current body of work addressing the effects of wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone. This research is unique because it focuses on wolf bison interactions, about which little is known in this system. This research also sheds light on the behavioral relationships at play in a special type of predator-prey interaction: predators that hunt dangerous prey

<p>Management of wolves is a complex issue, and molecular genetics is an important tool in this work. Molecular genetics can provide important information at the species, population and individual level, which can be essential for the development of management programs aiming at the long term survival of wolf populations.</p><p>In this thesis I developed new genetic markers on the canine Y chromosome to estimate the number of founders of the Scandinavian wolf population. This knowledge is important to reconstruct the history of the population and to design the most appropriate conservation strategies. Next, genetic markers with different pattern of inheritance have been used to identify hybrids between wolves and dogs. This allowed us to determine the direction of hybridization and to evaluate its possible impact on the gene pool of a wolf population. Furthermore, I also developed a method for a more reliable identification of the predator responsible of an attack by using saliva remains left on the prey. Since predation on livestock is perhaps the main reason for the negative opinions about the predator, the correct identification of the responsible for an attack (wolf, dog or hybrid) is essential. </p><p>Finally, this thesis has also been focusing on the domestication of dogs. By using Y chromosome markers (paternally inherited), it has been possible to complement previous studies based on mtDNA sequences (maternally inherited) and autosomal markers (inherited from both parents). In this way I have obtained a more complete picture of the domestication process and of the origin of breeds. This has shown that there has been a bias in the contribution of the two sexes in the origin of dog breeds (fewer males then females contributing to each breed) and that the origin of dogs was not marked by extensive backcrosses with male wolves over the entire species range.</p>

Management of wolves is a complex issue, and molecular genetics is an important tool in this work. Molecular genetics can provide important information at the species, population and individual level, which can be essential for the development of management programs aiming at the long term survival of wolf populations. In this thesis I developed new genetic markers on the canine Y chromosome to estimate the number of founders of the Scandinavian wolf population. This knowledge is important to reconstruct the history of the population and to design the most appropriate conservation strategies. Next, genetic markers with different pattern of inheritance have been used to identify hybrids between wolves and dogs. This allowed us to determine the direction of hybridization and to evaluate its possible impact on the gene pool of a wolf population. Furthermore, I also developed a method for a more reliable identification of the predator responsible of an attack by using saliva remains left on the prey. Since predation on livestock is perhaps the main reason for the negative opinions about the predator, the correct identification of the responsible for an attack (wolf, dog or hybrid) is essential. Finally, this thesis has also been focusing on the domestication of dogs. By using Y chromosome markers (paternally inherited), it has been possible to complement previous studies based on mtDNA sequences (maternally inherited) and autosomal markers (inherited from both parents). In this way I have obtained a more complete picture of the domestication process and of the origin of breeds. This has shown that there has been a bias in the contribution of the two sexes in the origin of dog breeds (fewer males then females contributing to each breed) and that the origin of dogs was not marked by extensive backcrosses with male wolves over the entire species range.

Archaeologists have favored a date of 14,000-15,000 years before present (BP) for canine domestication. However, recent studies of mutations in the mitochondrial DNA sequence by molecular geneticists have implied that dogs were domesticated over 100,000 years ago, which has challenged traditional theory. Geneticists have further hypothesized that dogs originated from wolf ancestors based upon the number of substitutions observed in dog and wolf haplotypes. Although both disciplines provide substantial evidence for their theories, the origin of dog domestication remains controversial. Several areas continue to be debatable. First, both geneticists and archaeologists incorrectly use the term domestication to describe events that clearly can not be proven to under human control. Second, the evolutionary development of canines is viewed by molecular biologists as well as archaeologist to be indicators of domestication without any further exploration of other probable causes. Third, the studies in canine genetics are so complex that most archaeologists have difficulty in providing evidence that would be contradictory to molecular theory. Fourth, both fields of study continually ignore innate behavioral characteristics of wolves that would make domestication highly improbable. Fifth, geneticists rely heavily on data gathered from sequencing of mitochondrial DNA, which has been assumed to maternally inherited. However recent human studies have shown that this assumption has now been proven to be incorrect. And finally, not only are morphological traits of fossilized dogs and wolves so similar that making a taxonomic identification improbable, but also the amount of archaeological remains available are too sparse and fragmented for accurate affiliation. An alternate theory of canine domestication will be proposed utilizing data gathered from the archaeological record and molecular research. I hypothesize that dogs diverged naturally from wolves 100,000 years ago as a result of the natural course of evolution, not human intervention, and had already evolved into a dog prior to being domesticated by humans 14,000-15,000 years ago. Evidence will be presented to clearly show that this hypothesis is a more accurate scenario of canine domestication.

No description available.

Canis lupus is one of the most important but least studied species of Turkish fauna, however, livestock depredation and recently increased number of publications on attacks on humans intensifies human-wildlife conflict. In this study, wolf depredation is studied in Bozdag in the province of Konya where conflicts between wolves and livestock holders are well known. The study site holds &gt / 50,000 sheep and covers 9 villages and a small town. A total of 13 shepherds are interviewed in 2004 and 2005 to reveal husbandry methods and vulnerability of livestock to wolf attacks in Bozdag. Each flock is attended by a shepherd and several livestock guarding dogs (LGDs), and experiences 1.96 wolf attacks per year, on average, independent of flock size. The flocks attended by less LGDs experience less attacks and therefore, the quality of the LGDs &amp / #8211 / not their numbers- are more important. Confining sheep in corrals that are attended by a shepherd and good quality LGDs appears to be the most effective husbandry method to decrease depredation. Human attitude towards wolf is also assessed and the perception of wolf is generally negative / 8 out of 11 shepherds are in favour of the eradication of this carnivore. Publicized wolf attacks on humans are compiled from 21 news sources on the internet and records of wolf rabies are sought from various sources. There were five publicized cases of attacks on humans, no verified records of human death between 2000 and 2005. Rabies stands out as the primary reason of wolf attacks, but it requires further research because proper records are missing.