Thesis ad doctoratum--Facultas theologiae--Pontificia universitatis Sanctae Crucis. / Bibliogr. p. 303-324.

Submitted by Nara Lays Domingues Viana Oliveira (naradv) on 2015-07-10T18:18:56Z No. of bitstreams: 1 girotto.pdf: 3133312 bytes, checksum: 4123a33ae75d8af0a8caf70f92072bbc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-10T18:18:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 girotto.pdf: 3133312 bytes, checksum: 4123a33ae75d8af0a8caf70f92072bbc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02 / CNPQ – Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / Pensar os escritos da Companhia de Jesus no século XVIII implica refletir sobre o significado simbólico do que foi produzido pelos seus membros, bem como sobre as condições em que estes escritos foram produzidos (CERTEAU, 1982). A proposta desta dissertação é a de analisar a obra produzida pelo jesuíta José Chantre y Herrera intitulada Historia de las misiones de la Compañía de Jesús en el Marañón español 1637-1767. Sua narrativa é dividida em doze livros que tratam das Missões de Maynas (1639 a 1767), localizadas no Alto Amazonas e foram dirigidas pelos padres da Companhia em meio a várias etnias indígenas. Chantre y Herrera era professor de metafísica quando, em 1767, sofre as sanções do decreto de Carlos III que expulsou todos os membros da Ordem dos territórios da Monarquia Espanhola. Ele jamais conheceu a América, entretanto, escreveu a obra da qual tratamos, a partir de informações e documentos produzidos por seus companheiros que tinham vivido e trabalhado naquela região de missão. Consideraremos, portanto, os motivos que instigaram este autor a escrever para seus pares e para uma Europa ilustrada, que vivia um momento de debates historiográficos, e tentaremos, por meio dele, acompanhar os debates que na época pautaram a “escrita da história do Novo Mundo” (CAÑIZARES ESGUERRA, 2007). / Thinking about the writings of the Society of Jesus in the eighteenth century implies reflecting on the symbolic significance of which was produced by its members, as well as on the conditions under which these writings were produced (Certeau, 1982). The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the work produced by the Jesuit José Chantre y Herrera entitled Historia de las misiones de la Compañía de Jesús en el eMarañón spañol 1637-1767. The narrative is divided into twelve books that treats of the Missions Of Maynas (1639-1767), located in Alto Amazonas and were directed by the priests of the Company among various indigenous groups. Chantre y Herrera was professor of metaphysics when, in 1767, suffers sanctions of the decree of Carlos III who expelled all members of the Order of the territories of the Spanish monarchy. He has never met the America, however, wrote the work which we treat, starting from informations and documents produced by his companions who had lived and worked in that area of mission. We will consider, therefore, the reasons that prompted this author to write for their peers and for an illustrious Europe, which lived a moment of historiographical debates, and we will try, through it, follow the debates then at that time guided the "history’s writing of the New World" (CAÑIZARES Esguerra, 2007).

S’il est devenu aujourd’hui assez courant de s’intéresser à la genèse d’écrits littéraires divers, il est un genre qui ne semble guère se prêter à ce genre d’approche : le journal personnel. Écriture au jour le jour, écriture a priori spontanée semblant exclure tout brouillon, toute préparation autre que mentale, on ne voit pas bien comment on pourrait en suivre la genèse. Or les Cahiers de Jacques de Bourbon Busset que nous publions ici apportent un démenti éclatant à de tels préjugés : pendant six ans et demi, d’août 1958 à décembre 1964, l’écrivain, qui a déjà publié plusieurs récits, va s’interroger très longuement sur ce que doit être son œuvre essentielle, qu’il estime ne pas avoir encore écrite. Et ces Cahiers montrent en particulier comment, peu à peu, il évolue, abandonnant l’idée d’écrire un grand roman, puis un livre d’essais, puis un grand récit autobiographique, pour accepter finalement l’idée que l’œuvre essentielle qu’il doit écrire est son Journal, Journal qu’il publiera effectivement pendant vingt ans. Comment arriver à accepter cette idée quand on déteste l’anecdotique, la complaisance, le narcissisme et quand on refuse de prendre soi-même la parole dans ses livres ? / Although it has now become quite common to study the origins of various literary works there is one genre which would not appear to be suited to this type of approach: the personal diary. Entries are written day to day, the writing is, in principle, spontaneous, and would appear to exclude any kind of rough draft, any kind of preparation other than mental. It is difficult to see, therefore, how its origin can be tracked. And yet the Cahiers written by Jacques de Bourbon Busset that we are publishing here refute such prejudices completely: for six and a half years, from August 1958 to December 1964, the author, who had already published several books, was to ask himself at great length what his essential work was to be, work that he believed he had not yet written. And these Cahiers demonstrate specifically how he gradually evolved, abandoning ideas of writing a great novel, then a book of essays and then a major autobiographical account, before finally accepting the idea that the essential work he had to write was his Journal or private diary, a Journal that he actually published over a period of twenty years. How did he come to accept this idea when he hated all things anecdotal, self-indulgent or narcissistic and when he refused to speak in the first person in his books?