<p>U radu se proučava uticaj pojedninih organizacionih varijabli preko<br />teorije razumne akcije na proces prenošenja znanja. Istražuje se kako<br />i u kojoj meri organizaciona klima određena dimenzijama pripadnosti,<br />pravednosti i inovativnosti i delegirajući stil liderstva utiču na<br />prenošenje znanja između zaposlenih u organizaciji. U tu svrhu su<br />kreirani i validirani upitnici i dizajniran je strukturalni model.<br />Primarni cilj ovog rada je bolje i jasnije razumevanje faktora koji<br />utiču na proces prenošenja znanja između zaposlenih u organizaciji.</p> / <p>This thesis examines the impact of certain organizational variables through<br />the theory of reasoned action on knowledge sharing behavior. It explores<br />how and to what extent organizational climate determined by its dimensions<br />of cohesion, innovativeness and fairness, and empowering leadership affect<br />knowledge sharing behavior of employees in organizations. For this purpose,<br />questionnaires were created and validated and a structural model was<br />designed. The primary objective of this paper is better understanding of<br />factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior of employees in organizations.</p>

Emissions keep rising, states keep trading, and Earth will be 1.5°C warmer within five years. These are results of inadequate global governance. As globalisation has brought complexity to the international settings, creating overlapping webs of interactions: no International Organisation has properly responded. In this context, we are now situated in a trade regime complex with overlapping rules and norms, but what agency can be claimed? The thesis investigates the trade-environment nexus by addressing how legitimate climate leadership in a trade regime complex is pursued.   By challenging the conventionality of international leadership theory with a separation from hegemony and applying it outside multilateral negotiations, the thesis found it applicable for this new setting. Through mixed methods, statistics and textual analysis, the United States (US) Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA) were a surprisingly fitted case for this. To understand climate leadership performance and underlying objectives for such, the TREND database was adopted. Within, all US PTAs are shown and to what extent it has adapted 294 environmentally-related norms. Coded into means for leadership, the US legalistic approach of structurally directing others to mitigating measures seems to be a double-edged sword. Done right, it creates non-derogative measures. Done wrong, it creates a hegemon.

This thesis examines the climate role conceptions and climate role positions of Iceland and Sweden respectively, as they are portrayed in their climate action plans. This study compliments the current trend to examine climate leadership within International Relations, with an additional focus on the Nordic countries. Not only is the Nordic identity enmeshed with ideas of environmentalism, but the Nordic countries also have a reputation of being environmental leaders. Despite this reputation, the Nordic countries vary considerably between themselves when it comes to climate performance, thus inspiring the study of the highest and lowest Nordic emitters of greenhouse gases. The study is carried out from a constructivist role theory perspective, which is complemented with a novel climate role analytical framework. A content analysis is conducted on Iceland‘s and Sweden‘s countries‘ climate action plans, and climate role indicators are coded and analyzed. The study reveals that both Iceland and Sweden depict themselves as climate leaders in their climate action plans. However, while both countries refer to themselves as climate leaders, the leadership indicators are manifested distinctively, resulting in the countries projecting different climate leadership role positions. By evaluating Iceland’s and Sweden’s portrayal of global climate leadership, it is assessed that Iceland assumes the climate role position of a pioneer, with aspirations for setting an example for other countries through its climate transition, and that Sweden assumes the climate role position of a constructive pusher, with aspirations to lead the domestic and global climate transition through ambitious actions. The analysis thus reveals how Sweden’s internationally ascribed roles as a climate leader and Iceland’s internationally ascribed role as an environmental leader is legitimated and reverberated throughout their respective climate action plans, in accordance with their role conceptions and identities.