Since the construction industry has a significant impactful footprint on the climate, a transition to sustainable solutions is imperative. Concrete is the predominant material for load-bearing structures in multi-residential buildings and is usually used in more walls than necessary, resulting in unnecessary excess of carbon dioxide. This study aims to climate-optimize the intended load-bearing structure in a multi-residential building project by evaluating the possibility of an alternative load-bearing structure. Concrete party walls, those which are unnecessary for load-bearing purposes, are removed in the alternative load-bearing structure and replaced with stud walls that meet sound and fire requirements. The comparison is made between the alternative and intended load-bearing structures concerning structural performance and overall climate impact. To comprehend the subject, an extensive literature study was conducted. Subsequently, the load-bearing structures were modelled in FEM-design program to analyse and compare structural aspects. Using FEM-Climate, life-cycle analyses (LCAs) were performed for both load-bearing structures to assess the difference in the total amount of carbon dioxide equivalents ( ). The results indicate that utilization rates are optimized in the alternative load-bearing structure with the reduction of concrete walls. Furthermore, the results show that the deflection value in the alternative load-bearing structure increases relative to the intended, which is deemed acceptable according to the established requirements. Moreover, LCA results show that the total amount of carbon dioxide equivalents ( ) decreased by approximately 6.5% kg   per gross area in the alternative load-bearing structure. However, with the replacement of stud walls, the total amount of   increased by about 6% kg   per gross area. This resulted in the alternative load-bearing structure being a less favourable solution than the intended one, as no optimization had been achieved from a climate perspective according to the LCA calculations and   values. Since the construction industry has a significant impactful footprint on the climate, a transition to sustainable solutions is imperative. Concrete is the predominant material for load-bearing structures in multi-residential buildings and is usually used in more walls than necessary, resulting in unnecessary excess of carbon dioxide. This study aims to climate-optimize the intended load-bearing structure in a multi-residential building project by evaluating the possibility of an alternative load-bearing structure. Concrete party walls, those which are unnecessary for load-bearing purposes, are removed in the alternative load-bearing structure and replaced with stud walls that meet sound and fire requirements. The comparison is made between the alternative and intended load-bearing structures concerning structural performance and overall climate impact. To comprehend the subject, an extensive literature study was conducted. Subsequently, the load-bearing structures were modelled in FEM-design program to analyse and compare structural aspects. Using FEM-Climate, life-cycle analyses (LCAs) were performed for both load-bearing structures to assess the difference in the total amount of carbon dioxide equivalents ( ). The results indicate that utilization rates are optimized in the alternative load-bearing structure with the reduction of concrete walls. Furthermore, the results show that the deflection value in the alternative load-bearing structure increases relative to the intended, which is deemed acceptable according to the established requirements. Moreover, LCA results show that the total amount of carbon dioxide equivalents ( ) decreased by approximately 6.5% kg   per gross area in the alternative load-bearing structure. However, with the replacement of stud walls, the total amount of   increased by about 6% kg   per gross area. This resulted in the alternative load-bearing structure being a less favourable solution than the intended one, as no optimization had been achieved from a climate perspective according to the LCA calculations and   values.