Spelling suggestions: "subject:"connection"" "subject:"connectional""
1 |
Implementing a relational worldview: Watershed Torbay, Western Australia connecting community and placelouiseduxbury@westnet.com.au, Marie-Louise Duxbury January 2007 (has links)
The Australian landcare movement is considered to be a major success, with an extensive community landcare network developed, raised levels and depth of awareness, and a range of demonstration projects undertaken. It has inspired people across Australia and has been emulated overseas. However, negative trends in environmental conditions continue unabated. If the approach of the Australian landcare movement to date has not addressed the current unsustainable farming practices, what approach will?
This Australian study explores the history of the mechanistic worldview, its influence on the attitudes to and treatment of landscapes and indigenous knowledge from colonisation, and the ongoing impacts on current social and natural rural landscapes. Increasing tension between the mechanistic worldview and the growing landcare ethic based on relationships is apparent.
Through the focus project, Watershed Torbay, a different way of seeing and treating the world is explored by praxis. A worldview based on relationships and connection as the end purpose is proffered. Strengthening connection with ones own moral framework, and relationships with people and place in community, are seen as the path to achieving sustainability based on ecological and values rationality.
It is recognised that there are multiple ways of seeing and experiencing the world, and it is important to give voice to all players with a connection to decision making. This also means that there are different forms of knowledge; these can be grouped under the typology of epistemic or scientific knowledge, techne or technical/practical capability, and the central form of knowledge about values and interests.
I have worked with the focus project as a reflective practitioner undertaking action research; this is evident in the movement between theory and practice through the thesis. The thesis concludes in praxis taking the learning from the focus project, and exploration of theory, to answer the question posed at the outset by outlining how the relational worldview can be applied to the regional bodies now delivering major landcare programs.
|
2 |
A interface humor e trabalho de face: o uso da provocação como estratégia de aproximação/afastamentoCosta, Simone Muller 19 March 2015 (has links)
Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-05-09T19:47:42Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
simonemullercosta.pdf: 871377 bytes, checksum: bfe602e84b905f2682ee939e457ca383 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-06-07T16:00:41Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
simonemullercosta.pdf: 871377 bytes, checksum: bfe602e84b905f2682ee939e457ca383 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-07T16:00:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
simonemullercosta.pdf: 871377 bytes, checksum: bfe602e84b905f2682ee939e457ca383 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-03-19 / Neste trabalho, investigamos a relação entre humor, im/polidez, trabalho de face e papéis em
episódios do programa “Quatro em Campo”. Esse é um programa de rádio, exibido de
segunda a sexta, pela rádio CBN e tem como foco discutir futebol. O programa tem o formato
de uma mesa redonda, com um apresentador/mediador e três apresentadores/comentaristas.
Embora o foco do programa seja futebol, muitas vezes, surgem provocações humorísticas, que
podem atacar tanto aspectos da vida pessoal quanto profissional dos participantes. A
literatura estudada aponta que sempre houve dificuldades em definir humor e, que, por isso, a
primeira Teoria do Humor só surgiu em 1985 (RASKIN, 1985). Mais recentemente, alguns
autores (NORRICK (1993); HOLMES (2000)) têm buscado definir o humor em situaçãoes
reais de interação, considerando, principalmente, a forma como o alvo reage aos supostos
enunciados humorísticos. Attardo (1994) defende que a provocação é um tipo de humor que
traz em si um elemento de “crítica” e se realiza com a presença do alvo da crítica na interação.
Assim, por ter se mostrado recorrente em nossos dados, o nosso foco de análise serão as
provocações. Deste modo, adotando uma perspectiva relacional em estudos do discuro e uma
abordagem interpretativista em análise de dados, buscamos verificar: os papéis que
caracterizam/constituem o tipo de atividade analisada (Quatro em Campo); a relação entre
humor e trabalho de face; e como as provocações emergem e são negociadas no discurso. A
análise desses dados mostra que, nesse contexto, as provocações emergem, principalmente,
quando um comentário esportivo gera algum tipo de desacordo/dissenso entre os
participantes. Com essas provocações, busca-se uma mudança do enquadre que está sendo
dado ao tópico em curso. Entretanto, essa mudança depende da forma como os alvos das
provocações as recebem. Notou-se que há uma relação entre a forma como os participantes
reagem às provocações e o papel que eles assumem, por exemplo, se o de comentarista
esportivo ou de torcedor. De forma geral, o uso do humor se mostrou ambivalente,
produzindo, ao mesmo tempo, afastamento e aproximação entre os interactantes. / In this paper, we investigate the relationship between humor, im/politeness, facework and
roles in episodes of the program “Quatro em Campo”. It`s a radio program, aired from
Monday to Friday by CBN radio and it focuses discussions about soccer. The program is
shaped as a round table, with a presenter/facilitator and three presenters/commentators.
Although the program`s focuses, as it`s said, is soccer, many times, emerge humorous
provocations. The literature has sowed that there have always been difficulties in defining
humor and so the first Theory of Humor was built only in 1985 (RASKIN, 1985). More
recently, some authors (NORRICK (1993); HOLMES (2000)) has been sought to define
humor in real situations of interaction. Attardo (1994) argues that provocation is a type of
humour which brings in it a critical element and it is done in the target`s of criticism presence.
So, considering the fact that provocations have showed be recurring in our data, our anlysis
focus will be provocations. Thus, adopting a relational perspective in the discourse studies
and a interpretative approach to data analysis, we seek to ascertain: the roles which
characterize/ constitute the type of activity analyzed (Quatro em Campo); the relationship
between humor and facework; and how the provocations emerge and how they are managed
in the discourse. The analysis of data shows that, in this context, the provocations emerge,
mainly, when a sporting commentary generates some kind of disagreement or dissent among
the participants. With these provocations, the participants seek a change in the frame wich has
being given to the current topic. However, this change depends on how the provocations`
target receive them. It`s been noted that there is a relation between the way how participants
react to provocations and the role they assume, for example, if it is the commentator role or
the fan role. Moreover, in a general way, the use of humor has showed to be ambivalent,
producing, at the same time, separation and connection among interactants.
|
Page generated in 0.0649 seconds