Two instructional design features hypothesized to affect problem solving performance, problem format and contextual interference, were investigated. Problem format was manipulated by altering the format of worked examples to demonstrate a molar or modular solution. Contextual interference was manipulated by randomizing the order in which problem categories were studied. Participants studied worked examples from 5 complex probability categories and solved 11 novel problems. The modular problem format reduced study time and the workload during study and increased performance on the subsequent test. Greater contextual interference increased study time but had no effect on workload or test performance. Additionally, a regression analysis demonstrated that mental workload partially mediated the effect of problem format on test performance. A separate regression analysis did not demonstrate that working memory capacity moderated the effect of problem format on mental workload.

The skill of putting in golf contributes approximately 40 percent to one’s total score making it an important skill to master in golf. One of the critical means of improving putting skill is through practice. The purpose of this study was to: (a) investigate if different practice schedules with different degrees of contextual interference (CI) influenced the participants’ immediate and long-term putting performance, (b) examine if performance changes were associated with concomitant changes in specific kinematic parameters, and (c) assess the cognitions of the participants during various stages of the practice of the putting skill. Twenty-four undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either a blocked or random practice schedule. On Day One each participant practiced putting to three targets (4 ft, 8 ft, and 12 ft distance) for a total of 108 trials (36 trials to each target). On Day Two 30 trials of retention (10 trials to each target) and 10 transfer trials (10 ft distance) were performed. To obtain a kinematic description of the putting action, an OPTOTRAKTM 3020 camera system recorded the 3D movement of the putter. Participants’ cognitions were analyzed from stimulated recall interview data. Random practice participants exhibited poorer putting performance during acquisition compared to their blocked practice counterparts but showed superior performance in retention and transfer tests. While the blocked practice participants had significantly lower variability in the amplitude in the x-dimension for backswing, impact velocity, and putter position at impact (z-dimension) during practice, the random practice participants showed significantly lower variability in the amplitude of the x-dimension for the backswing and downswing, impact velocity, and putter position at impact during the retention and transfer phases. Content analysis of interview data yielded three emergent categories: participant focus, self-evaluation of performance, and benefits of practice. The participants provided evidence of active thought processes during the putting task while receiving little instruction. The blocked group focused more on accuracy while the random group was more focused on judging distance. The lack of recognition about the z-dimension has potential implications for how instruction and feedback might be employed during the learning process.

The purpose of this research was to examine whether a transition schedule of contextual interference facilitated learning in retention and transfer equal to or better than random and blocked schedules among children. The author selected participants from the central coast of California and from youth activity leagues. The author selected children between the ages of 10 to 13 with a mean age of 11.5. There were a total of 36 subjects, half male and half female. Unfortunately, due to computer error, only data from 15 subjects were saved and available for analysis. Researchers randomly assigned participants to one of three groups: the random group, the blocked group, or the transition group. Each group performed 60 trials during the acquisition phase and practiced a total of 3 different arm patterns. All three groups practiced each pattern a total of 20 times during acquisition. The random group practiced each pattern in random fashion such that no one pattern was repeated more than twice in a row. The blocked group performed 20 trials of the green pattern, followed by 20 trials of the blue pattern, and lastly 20 trials of the red pattern. The transition group performed the first 24 trials in a blocked fashion, that is 8 trials of the green pattern were practiced, followed by 8 trials of the blue pattern, and then 8 trials of the red pattern. The group then practiced smaller blocks and performed 5 trials of each color. Another 9 trials were performed in a blocked fashion with 3 trials of each pattern. The final 12 trials were presented randomly to this group. Following acquisition, participants took an immediate retention test that was counter balanced following a 10 minute rest. The retention test consisted of 9 random trials of the three various patterns. Researchers gave a transfer test following the retention test, which consisted of six trials of a novel (white) pattern. Researchers tested all three groups one week later with a delayed retention and transfer test similar to the tests described above. One-way ANOVA analysis of the data revealed a significant movement time difference (F=4.28; P=.039) during the delayed retention test. The follow up Tukey test demonstrated that the transition group had a significantly faster movement time than the blocked group but that random group was not significantly different from either the blocked or transition group. The other retention and transfer tests revealed no significance, however the trend in the data suggest that with a bigger sample size, the transition group would demonstrate learning equal to or better than both random and blocked groups. Further research is needed in the area of transition practice schedules.

O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar o efeito da interferência contextual na aprendizagem de habilidades motoras em função de diferentes testes de retenção. Quatro diferentes intervalos de retenção foram empregados: (10m) 10 minutos (24h) 24 horas, (07d) sete dias, e (30d) 30 dias após a fase de aquisição. Cento e quarenta e quatro estudantes universitários, homens (n=88) e mulheres (n=56), com idade média de 21,9 anos (±3,2), todos voluntários e sem experiência com a tarefa, foram divididos em dois grupos de prática variada: aleatória e blocos. A tarefa consistiu em arremessar dardos de salão em um alvo circular com a mão dominante, a fim de acertar o seu centro. Participantes realizaram a tarefa em três distâncias diferentes do alvo (2,00m, 2,60m e 3,20m). O experimento consistiu de duas fases: aquisição (90 tentativas) e retenção (18 tentativas). O desempenho foi analisado em termos de magnitude (somatória de pontos) e variabilidade (coeficiente de variação dos pontos). Os resultados mostraram que todos os grupos melhoraram o desempenho na fase de aquisição e o mantiveram na fase de retenção. Além disso, concernente ao objetivo deste estudo, nenhuma diferença entre os grupos foi verificada no teste de retenção / The objective of the present study was to investigate the contextual interference effect in the motor skills learning in function of different retention tests. Four different retention intervals were employed: (10m) ten minutes, (24h) twenty-four hours, (07d) seven days, and (30d) thirty days after the acquisition phase. One hundred and forty-four college students, men (n=88) and women (n=56), mean age 21.9 years (±3.2), all volunteers and without experience with the task, were divided into two groups of varied practice: random and blocks. The ask consisted of throwing darts at a circular target (dartboard), with the dominant hand, in order to hit its center. Participants performed the task at three different target distances (2,00m, 2,60m, and 3,20m). The experiment consisted of two phases: acquisition (90 trials) and retention (18 trials). Performance was analyzed by magnitude (sum of points) and variability (coefficient of variation of points). Results showed that all groups improved the performance in the acquisition phase, and that it was kept in the retention test. Moreover, concerned to the aim of this study, no difference between the groups was found in the retention test

O objetivo do presente trabalho foi investigar os efeitos da interferência contextual em função das dificuldades funcional e nominal da tarefa. Participaram do estudo 160 adultos de ambos os sexos. Os participantes divididos em grupos de experientes e inexperientes praticaram uma tarefa simples ou complexa de timing coincidente, sob regime aleatório ou por blocos, totalizando oito grupos experimentais. As medidas de desempenho foram os erros absoluto, variável e constante. Os resultados não mostraram diferenças entre os grupos de prática aleatória e por blocos em nenhuma das condições de dificuldade (nominal e funcional). Sendo assim, concluiu-se que o efeito da interferência contextual não é dependente das dificuldades funcional e nominal da tarefa / The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of contextual interference due to the lack of functional and nominal task. The study included 160 adults of both sexes. Participants were divided in groups of experience and inexperience, which performed a simple or complex task of coincident timing, under random or blocked schedule. It resulted in eight experimental groups. Performance measures were the absolute, variable, and constant errors. Results did not show differences between random and blocked groups in all conditions of difficult (nominal and functional). Therefore, it was conclude that the effect of contextual interference is not dependent of the nominal and functional difficulties of the task

É sabido que a população idosa vem aumentando em números relativamente altos, gerando preocupações em relação aos cuidados que necessitam. Uma forma de idosos se manterem ativos é através da aprendizagem de novas habilidades motoras. Neste sentido, foram encontrados poucos estudos envolvendo a população idosa e o efeito da interferência contextual, particularmente estudos que utilizassem habilidades esportivas como tarefa. O objetivo do estudo foi investigar se há o efeito da interferência contextual na aprendizagem de uma habilidade esportiva em idosos. Foram selecionados para participar do estudo quarenta idosos (65-80 anos), fisicamente ativos, que foram divididos aleatoriamente em dois grupos: prática variada aleatória; e prática variada em blocos. A tarefa praticada foi o arremesso a ponto do jogo de bocha e bola deveria atingir três alvos nas distâncias de 2, 4 e 6 metros. A prática constou de 120 tentativas divididas em duas sessões de prática. Foram realizados dois testes de Retenção (10min e 24h) e também dois testes de Transferência (24 horas), sendo um realizado com a mão preferencial e outro com a mão não preferencial do participante, com o alvo à 5 metros. As medidas de desempenho utilizadas foram o erro radial, o desvio padrão do erro radial e a frequência de erros grosseiros. Também foram realizadas medidas cinemáticas, como amplitude, velocidade média e pico de aceleração de deslocamento da bola no forwardswing; e velocidade de soltura da bola. Na comparação entre os grupos de prática, não foi encontrada diferença no erro radial ou no desvio padrão do erro (p > 0,05), mas na frequência de erros grosseiros houve diferença entre os grupos apenas na fase de aquisição (p < 0,05). Além disso, as análises inferenciais referentes às medidas cinemáticas nos testes de retenção e transferência, tanto da velocidade média como da velocidade de soltura, mostraram que os idosos de ambos os grupos mudaram a velocidade nos testes (p < 0,05), provavelmente procurando ajustar o movimento. Correlações de Pearson foram realizadas entre medidas de desempenho e medidas cinemáticas e observou-se apenas uma correlação fraca entre o erro radial e a amplitude de deslocamento da bola no teste de transferência com a mão não preferencial (p < 0,05). Em conjunto, os resultados mostraram que os grupos apresentaram desempenho semelhante em ambas as estruturas de prática (aleatória e blocos) e, portanto, não houve efeito da interferência contextual na aprendizagem de idosos nesta habilidade esportiva. No entanto, pode ser argumentado que o controle adequado de força necessário no arremesso a ponto possa exigir maior tempo de prática para ser adquirido / It is known that the elderly population is increasing in relatively high numbers, generating concerns about the care they need. A form of seniors remain active is through the learning of new motor skills. In this sense, few studies involving the elderly population and the contextual interference effect have been found, particularly, studies that used sports skills as task. The objective of this study was to investigate if there is the contextual interference effect on sports skill learning in elderly. We selected 40 old persons (65-80 years old), physically active, which were divided randomly into two groups: random varied practice; and practice varied in blocks. The task was the throwing practiced at the bocce game, in which the ball should reach three targets at distances of 2, 4 and 6 meters. The practice consisted of 120 attempts divided into two practice sessions. Two Retention tests were conducted (10 min and 24 hours) and also two Transfer tests (24 hours), being performed with the preferential hand and also with the non-preferential hand of the participant, with the target at 5 meters. The performance measures used were the radial error, the standard deviation of radial error and frequency of gross errors. Kinematic measures were also used, such as amplitude, average speed and peak of acceleration in the displacement of the ball on the forwardswing; and also, speed of release of the ball. Comparisons between the practice groups, found no difference in the radial error or the standard deviation of the error (p > 0.05), but in the frequency of gross errors, there was a difference between the groups only at the acquisition phase (p < 0.05). In addition, the inferential analysis on retention and transfer tests, both the average speed as the speed of release, showed that the elderly of both groups have changed the speed (p < 0.05), probably trying to adjust the movement. Pearson correlations were performed between performance and kinematic measures and there was only a weak correlation between the radial error and amplitude on the transfer test with the non-preferential hand (p < 0.05). Overall, the results showed that the groups have similar performance on both practice structures (random and blocks) and, therefore, there was no effect of contextual interference in learning this sport skill by the elderly. However, it can be argued that the proper control of force needed in this task may require more practice time to be acquired

Em um estudo recente, Guadagnoli e Lee (2004) propuseram que o efeito de interferência contextual (IC) depende da dificuldade funcional de uma tarefa motora, com reversão do efeito de aprendizagem esperado quando a dificuldade imposta pela tarefa é elevada. No presente estudo esta hipótese foi testada em crianças na aprendizagem de uma tarefa de desenhos de padrões gráficos em uma base digitalizadora, recebendo feedback visual imediato invertido em um monitor de microcomputador. Foram avaliadas 30 crianças de 8-9 anos de idade, as quais foram designadas a três grupos: baixa IC, com prática variada entre blocos de tentativas possuindo o mesmo padrão gráfico; alta IC, com variação aleatorizada dos padrões gráficos entre as tentativas dentro de cada bloco; e controle, sem prática na tarefa. Após a etapa de prática, o tempo de movimento foi comparado entre os grupos em testes de retenção, transferência ipsilateral e transferência contralateral de aprendizagem. Os resultados mostraram que os dois grupos experimentais obtiveram resultados semelhantes de aprendizagem em todas as avaliações realizadas, com ambos os grupos apresentando resultados superiores ao grupo controle. A ausência de diferença entre os grupos experimentais indica que ambos os modos de variar a prática, sob baixa e alta IC, induziram efeitos semelhantes de aprendizagem, oferecendo apenas suporte parcial à hipótese de Guadagnoli e Lee. A vantagem dos grupos experimentais no teste de transferência contralateral indica que a adaptação devida à aprendizagem da tarefa não foi específica ao sistema neuromuscular empregado durante a prática / In a recent study, Guadagnoli and Lee (2004) proposed that the contextual interference (CI) effect depends on the functional difficulty of a motor task, with reversion of the expected learning effect when the difficulty imposed by a task is high. In the present study that hypothesis was tested in children in the learning of a task of drawing graphic patterns on a digitizing tablet while receiving immediate inversed visual feedback on a microcomputer monitor. Thirty 8-9 year-old children were assessed, who were assigned to three groups: low CI, with variability between blocks of trials composed of the same graphic pattern; high CI, with random variability within blocks of trials; and control, without practice on the task. Following the practice phase movement time was compared between the groups in retention, ipsilateral transfer, and contralateral transfer tests. Results showed that both experimental groups achieved similar results of learning in all tests, with the two groups presenting better results in comparison with the controls. Absence of difference between the experimental groups indicates that both modes of practice variability, under low and high CI, induced similar effects of learning, offering only partial support for the Guadagnoli and Lees hypothesis. The advantage of the experimental groups over the controls in the contralateral transfer of learning indicates that adaptation was not specific to the neuromuscular system employed during practice

AIM The purpose of this experiment is to assess whether the advantages of variable practice are due to schema formation or to enhanced information processing (contextual interference) alone. DESIGN The design involved a 2 (mode; cognitive and motor) x 5 (practice schedule; blocked, random, constant distance one, constant distance two, and constant distance three) between subjects design resulting in ten groups. One hundred participants were randomly chosen from Human Movement students at Australian Catholic University and assigned to each of the ten groups (n=10). The cognitive mode involved the participants having to recognise the appropriate target from three geometrical shapes (triangle, square or circle), the triangle being the target in every case. The motor mode involved the participants having to tap on the target among three boxes that was merely filled in. The experiment consisted of ninety (3 blocks of 30) acquisition trials followed by ten transfer trials to a novel movement. MAIN HYPOTHESIS It was hypothesised that if facilitated transfer to a novel target occurs through schema formation, then there would be no differences between the motor groups and their corresponding cognitive groups. However, if facilitated transfer to a novel target occurs through enhanced information processing, then there would be differences between the motor groups and their corresponding cognitive groups. RESULTS Statistical analysis revealed a contextual interference effect for participants involved in the cognitive mode, in that the cognitive blocked group outperformed the cognitive random group in acquisition, but the reverse was the case in transfer. In the motor mode, the motor blocked group outperformed the motor random group in acquisition, and repeated the performance in transfer. CONCLUSION The results appear to indicate that for simple motor tasks it is the amount of variability of practice that is important for transfer to a novel task, while for tasks with a cognitive component, the schedule of practice is critical.

Em um estudo recente, Guadagnoli e Lee (2004) propuseram que o efeito de interferência contextual (IC) depende da dificuldade funcional de uma tarefa motora, com reversão do efeito de aprendizagem esperado quando a dificuldade imposta pela tarefa é elevada. No presente estudo esta hipótese foi testada em crianças na aprendizagem de uma tarefa de desenhos de padrões gráficos em uma base digitalizadora, recebendo feedback visual imediato invertido em um monitor de microcomputador. Foram avaliadas 30 crianças de 8-9 anos de idade, as quais foram designadas a três grupos: baixa IC, com prática variada entre blocos de tentativas possuindo o mesmo padrão gráfico; alta IC, com variação aleatorizada dos padrões gráficos entre as tentativas dentro de cada bloco; e controle, sem prática na tarefa. Após a etapa de prática, o tempo de movimento foi comparado entre os grupos em testes de retenção, transferência ipsilateral e transferência contralateral de aprendizagem. Os resultados mostraram que os dois grupos experimentais obtiveram resultados semelhantes de aprendizagem em todas as avaliações realizadas, com ambos os grupos apresentando resultados superiores ao grupo controle. A ausência de diferença entre os grupos experimentais indica que ambos os modos de variar a prática, sob baixa e alta IC, induziram efeitos semelhantes de aprendizagem, oferecendo apenas suporte parcial à hipótese de Guadagnoli e Lee. A vantagem dos grupos experimentais no teste de transferência contralateral indica que a adaptação devida à aprendizagem da tarefa não foi específica ao sistema neuromuscular empregado durante a prática / In a recent study, Guadagnoli and Lee (2004) proposed that the contextual interference (CI) effect depends on the functional difficulty of a motor task, with reversion of the expected learning effect when the difficulty imposed by a task is high. In the present study that hypothesis was tested in children in the learning of a task of drawing graphic patterns on a digitizing tablet while receiving immediate inversed visual feedback on a microcomputer monitor. Thirty 8-9 year-old children were assessed, who were assigned to three groups: low CI, with variability between blocks of trials composed of the same graphic pattern; high CI, with random variability within blocks of trials; and control, without practice on the task. Following the practice phase movement time was compared between the groups in retention, ipsilateral transfer, and contralateral transfer tests. Results showed that both experimental groups achieved similar results of learning in all tests, with the two groups presenting better results in comparison with the controls. Absence of difference between the experimental groups indicates that both modes of practice variability, under low and high CI, induced similar effects of learning, offering only partial support for the Guadagnoli and Lees hypothesis. The advantage of the experimental groups over the controls in the contralateral transfer of learning indicates that adaptation was not specific to the neuromuscular system employed during practice

O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar o efeito da interferência contextual na aprendizagem de habilidades motoras em função de diferentes testes de retenção. Quatro diferentes intervalos de retenção foram empregados: (10m) 10 minutos (24h) 24 horas, (07d) sete dias, e (30d) 30 dias após a fase de aquisição. Cento e quarenta e quatro estudantes universitários, homens (n=88) e mulheres (n=56), com idade média de 21,9 anos (±3,2), todos voluntários e sem experiência com a tarefa, foram divididos em dois grupos de prática variada: aleatória e blocos. A tarefa consistiu em arremessar dardos de salão em um alvo circular com a mão dominante, a fim de acertar o seu centro. Participantes realizaram a tarefa em três distâncias diferentes do alvo (2,00m, 2,60m e 3,20m). O experimento consistiu de duas fases: aquisição (90 tentativas) e retenção (18 tentativas). O desempenho foi analisado em termos de magnitude (somatória de pontos) e variabilidade (coeficiente de variação dos pontos). Os resultados mostraram que todos os grupos melhoraram o desempenho na fase de aquisição e o mantiveram na fase de retenção. Além disso, concernente ao objetivo deste estudo, nenhuma diferença entre os grupos foi verificada no teste de retenção / The objective of the present study was to investigate the contextual interference effect in the motor skills learning in function of different retention tests. Four different retention intervals were employed: (10m) ten minutes, (24h) twenty-four hours, (07d) seven days, and (30d) thirty days after the acquisition phase. One hundred and forty-four college students, men (n=88) and women (n=56), mean age 21.9 years (±3.2), all volunteers and without experience with the task, were divided into two groups of varied practice: random and blocks. The ask consisted of throwing darts at a circular target (dartboard), with the dominant hand, in order to hit its center. Participants performed the task at three different target distances (2,00m, 2,60m, and 3,20m). The experiment consisted of two phases: acquisition (90 trials) and retention (18 trials). Performance was analyzed by magnitude (sum of points) and variability (coefficient of variation of points). Results showed that all groups improved the performance in the acquisition phase, and that it was kept in the retention test. Moreover, concerned to the aim of this study, no difference between the groups was found in the retention test