Spelling suggestions: "subject:"deduction."" "subject:"deductive.""
61 |
The meaning of expenditure actually incurred in the context of share-based payments for trading stock or services renderedNguta, Mbulelo January 2015 (has links)
Section 11(a) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 entitles taxpayers to a deduction in respect of expenditure actually incurred, provided that all the other requirements of section 11 and section 23 of the Act have been met. A company may issue its own shares, credited as fully paid up, as a payment for trading stock or services rendered, as was the case in C:SARS v Labat Africa (2011) 74 SATC 1. The question that was raised by this decision is whether the issue of shares constitutes “expenditure” as contemplated in section 11(a) of the Act. It is trite that a share in a company is a bundle of rights which entitle the holder to dividends when declared and to a vote in shareholders’ meetings and that a share does not come into the hands of a shareholder by way of transfer from the company, but is rather created as a bundle of rights for him in the company. In C: SARS v Labat Africa, the Supreme Court of Appeal decided that to issue shares as a payment for goods is not expenditure as contemplated in section 11(a) of the Act. The Act does not define “expenditure”. It has been interpreted in certain cases as a payment of money or disbursement, while it has been interpreted as the undertaking of a legal obligation in other cases. The Labat Africa case has been criticised for its interpretation of expenditure on the grounds that it is contrary to the principle that “actually incurred” does not mean “actually paid”. This research has argued that, in the context of the Labat Africa case, which related to an issue of shares in payment for goods, Harms AP’s judgment was concerned with showing why a share issue is not expenditure. He could not have intended to deny a deduction to transactions such as credit purchases.
|
62 |
Deductions from employees’ remuneration: seeking clarity in the lawCato, Cara January 2009 (has links)
Magister Philosophiae - MPhil / Sectoral Determination 9,1 Wholesale and Retail Sector echoes the wording found in the Basic Conditions of Employment Act2 when it comes to the section pertaining to deductions from employees’ remuneration. It is unclear how an employer may lawfully make a deduction (other than those required by law) from an employee’s remuneration in order to recover costs such as till shortages, stock losses and improper notice. Loss and damages are common problems faced not only by retailers but by all employers, yet the two governing bodies, that is, the Department of Labour and the CCMA, fail to
offer any assistance to the employer in this regard. The law is unfairly biased against the employer, who may be financially unable to recover from losses caused by an employee and may face closure should it be unable to recover losses suffered. The two remedies available to the employer are civil action and criminal action against the employee. However, both have proven to be inadequate for recovering losses incurred. Furthermore, the employer will have already incurred losses and therefore can ill afford the money or the time to pursue these options. The Small Claims Court does offer some relief to a smaller employer wanting to claim to a maximum of R7000, but companies are excluded from this mechanism as the rules of the Small Claims Court specifically exclude them from using this forum. In this study, I will look at the common law principle of offset to see whether it can be applied to employers making deductions against employees for loss or damage. Notice is a quantifiable amount and is a legal debt; therefore. it should be able to be applied as an offset. Two subsections deal with deductions; after looking carefully at the wording of theses subsections I will try to determine whether the one is alternate to the other, or whether the narrow interpretation that the Department of Labour gives to the statute is accurate. A narrow interpretation of the law states that the employee must sign an acknowledgement of debt. However, employees often refuse to sign an
acknowledgement of debt, thereby frustrating the law. Could this possibly have been the intentions of the drafters? Surely not, yet the Department of Labour, by having a narrow interpretation of the law, see it as such and as a result the employer is left out of pocket. In this mini-thesis, I will look at the way the law should be interpreted and the way it should be applied in practice. 1 Sectoral Determination 9: Wholesale and Retail Sector, Government Gazette No. 24207 2 The Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 What problems does this ambiguity create? Some problems could include a higher case load for the Department of Labour, demotivated employees, increased tension in the workplace and frustrated employers.
I also consider comparative labour law to see if other countries faced with similar situations have made any allowances for such circumstances.
Aims of this mini-thesis: 1. To highlight the problems and ambiguities in the interpretation and application of section 34 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA)3 and section 8 of the Sectoral Determination 9(SD9)4
2. To recommend, propose and encourage a practical solution for employers to
implement in the workplace 3. To improve the situation for employers under the current structure. 4. To lead the legislature drafters to amend or redraft these sections
|
63 |
A critical analysis of the tax deductibility of expenses incurred in virtual worlds by the South African taxpayerMoodley, Theogaren 09 March 2012 (has links)
The arrival of the Internet and the World Wide Web has had a radical impact on commerce and people’s ability to interact virtually. Through these channels various new methods of earning income have been created. Income earned virtually creates a new type of commerce not previously envisioned whilst the South African Income Tax Act was drawn up. The revenue earned is, however. encompassed in the Act. South African residents have as a result entered the taxation net of the South African Revenue Services without understanding the full implications of being taxed. Of particular importance are the deductions available to residents whose incomes are earned through virtual worlds. The various deductions available in the South African Income Tax Act do not specifically deal with the expenses incurred in the production of virtual world income. South Africans are thus exposed to taxation implications not fully explored by the South African Revenue Services nor the general public. The public needs guidance on this matter and the South African Revenue Services needs further research to be conducted in this area. The study revealed that deductions would be allowed against taxable income earned through conducting virtual world commerce. The general deduction formula should be applied to all expenses. Capital expenses should be researched further, for application in terms of the Act. However, it appears that the Act can be applied to non- capital expenses incurred for trading in virtual worlds. AFRIKAANS : Die aankoms van die Internet en die Wêreldwye Web het reeds ‘n geweldige impak op die handle en mense se vermoëns om virtueel in wisselwerking te wees. Deur middle van hierdie kanale het verskeie nuwe metodes onstaan om ‘n inkomste te verdien. ‘n Inkomste wat virtueel verdien word, skep ‘n nuwe sort handle waarvoor daar geen voorsiening gemaak is toe die Inkomste Belastingswetgewing opgestel is. Die inkomste wat verdien word is wel binne die bestek van die Wetgewing. Suid-Afrikaanse inwoners val dus binne die belastingsnet van die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomste Dienste sonder om die volle implikasies van die belasting te begryp. Van besondere belang is die belastingsaftrekkings wat vir inwoners, wie se inkomste in die virtuele wêreld verdien word, beskikbaar is. Die verskeie aftrekkings beskikbaar in die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomste Belastingswetgewing maak nie spesifiek voorsiening vir die uitgawes wat aangegaan word terwyl ‘n inkomste in die virtuele wêreld verdien word nie. Suid Afrikaners word duw aan belastingsgevolge blootgestel wat nie ten volle deur die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomste Dienste, of die algemene publiek verken is nie. Die publiek het leiding in die opsig nodig en die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomste Dienste benodig verdere navorsing in die verband. Die studie toon dat aftrekkings toegelaat sou word teen belasbare inkomste wat verdien word, deur handel in die virtuele wêreld te dryf. ‘n Algemene formule moet op alle uigawes toegepas word. Kapitale uitgawes moet verder nagevors word vir toepassing op die Wetgewing. Nieteenstaande, wil dit voorkom dat die Wetgewing op nie-kapitale uitgawes wat in die proses van handel dryf in die virtuele wêreld, toegepas kan word. Copyright 2011, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. Please cite as follows: Moodley, T 2011, A critical analysis of the tax deductibility of expenses incurred in virtual worlds by the South African taxpayer, MCom dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-03092012-112031 / > F12/4/163/gm / Dissertation (MCom)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Taxation / unrestricted
|
64 |
The tax consequences of a contingent liability disposed of as part of the sale of a business as a going concernStaude, Daylan January 2015 (has links)
The sale of an entity as a going concern has a number of tax consequences for both the purchaser and the seller. The tax deductibility of a contingent liability upon its transfer from the seller to the purchaser, where the selling price has been reduced by the value of the contingent liabilities transferred, remains uncertain following the decision in Ackermans Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service. An expense is either deductible under a specific section of the Income Tax Act, 58 of 1962, or under the general expense provisions in terms of sections 11(a) and 23(g). The Act does not contain a specific section relating to contingent liabilities and therefore a contingent liability will need to be considered for deduction under these sections. The Act further disallows an expense as a deduction under section 23(e), where a reserve is created (for example a leave pay provision). This study analyses the tax deductibility of a contingent liability, where the contingent liability has been transferred from the seller to the purchaser in a sale of an entity as a going concern and the purchase price has been reduced to compensate for the transfer of the contingent liability. The deductibility of the contingent liability was first assessed in terms of the provisions of the Act (sections 11(a), 23(g) and 23(e)) and associated case law. The decision in the Ackermans case and its preceding Income Tax Case 1839 was then analysed in order to establish the principles arising from the decisions. Finally the proposals in the Draft Taxation Laws Amendment Bill, 2011, and the subsequent Discussion Document issued by the South African Revenue Service were discussed. The analysis revealed the continuing confusion surrounding the status quo, thus demonstrating the importance of legislative intervention to provide guidelines for taxpayers.
|
65 |
Úlevy u daně z příjmu fyzických osob ve vybraných státech EU / Tax allowances in personal income tax in selected EU Member StatesVeselá, Veronika January 2007 (has links)
The content of this thesis is a detailed analysis of individual types of tax allowances provided to individuals - residents, focusing on selected states of the European Union. Tax allowances are considered deductions, allowances, credits and tax band with a zero tax rate. The author explains the differences between these types of tax allowances, analyzes the types of tax allowances granted in selected states of the European Union and examines the tax yield of the basic types of tax allowances of the taxpayer with an average gross wage.
|
66 |
Mzdové účetnictví / Payroll accountingFürbachová, Helena January 2011 (has links)
The graduation thesis is focused on payroll accounting according to valid legislation of year 2012.The aim was to explain the payroll in the business sector with regard to labor regulations, the finance accounting, social insurance and health insurance, income tax from employment. The graduate thesis is based on the assumption that the employees working under the same conditions of employment with the same-time and with the same wage conditions have the same net salary to be paid. Chapters are devoted to the issue of labor relations, the calculation of net earnings, deductions for health and social insurance, taxation and payroll deductions from wages. The original assumption was not clearly confirmed, because to the calculation of net earnings enter a number of aspects.
|
67 |
Apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimo ypatumai / Peculiarities of taxable income calculationStoškutė, Simona 25 June 2014 (has links)
Lietuva per paskutinius keletą metų prarado lyderės pozicijas Vakarų Europoje lyginant apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimo taisykles ir pelno mokesčio tarifo dydį, tačiau iš pirmaujančių šalių grupės nepasitraukė, nenusileidžia ji ir Latvijai bei Estijai, kuriose yra sukurtos taip pat vienos patraukliausių investuotojams pelno mokesčio sistemų Europos Sąjungoje. Siekiant įvertinti šalies patrauklumą užsienio investuotojams reikia įvertinti apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimo taisykles bei apžvelgti pelno mokesčio tarifą. Šio darbo objektas yra apmokestinamasis pelnas. Tikslas – išsiaiškinti apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimą. Šiam tikslui pasiekti iškelti šie svarbiausi uždaviniai: 1) išnagrinėti pelno sampratą bei pateikti informaciją apie pelno valdymą; 2) išanalizuoti Lietuvos akcinių bendrovių apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimą; 3) išnagrinėti ir palyginti Lietuvos, Latvijos ir Estijos apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimo tvarką; Darbą sudaro 3 pagrindinės dalys. Pirmoje dalyje “Pelno samprata ir valdymas“ nagrinėjama pelno sąvoka, išskiriami neatitikimai tarp finansinio ir mokestinio pelno bei pateikiamos pelno valdymo galimybės pasirenkant apskaitos politikos priemones. Antroje dalyje „Apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimas Lietuvoje“ analizuojama akcinių bendrovių apmokestinamojo pelno apskaičiavimo tvarka, pateikiamos neapmokestinamosios pajamos, neleidžiami ir ribojamų dydžių leidžiami atskaitymai. Nagrinėjami galimi pelno mokesčio sumažinimo būdai bei metinė pelno... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Lithuania during several recent years has lost its leading position in Western Europe compared to calculation of taxable profit rules and income tax rate, but it is still one of leading countries, it keep up with Latvia and Estonia where also are developed one of the most attractive income tax systems in the European Union. In order to evaluate country’s attractiveness to foreign investors we need to evaluate calculation of taxable profit rules and review corporate income tax rate. The subject of this investigation is taxable profit. Purpose is to find out calculation of taxable profit rules. There are main tasks to achieve the purpose: 1) to investigate concept of profit and to give information about profit management; 2) to analyze calculation of taxable profit of Lithuanian stock companies; 3) to consider and compare Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian calculation of taxable profit. This paper consists of three main parts. In the first part “Concept of profit and management”, is considered the profit concept, differences between taxable and accounting profit, also there is written about profit management opportunities choosing of accounting policy tools. In the second part “Calculation of taxable profit in Lithuania” is analyzed stock companies calculation of taxable profit and is introduced non-taxable income, not allowed and limited amount allowed deductions. Also there is written possibilities of reducing income tax and about profit tax declaration as well its purpose. The... [to full text]
|
68 |
Gebeurlikhede in die deliktuele skadevergoedingsregSteynberg, L. 30 June 2006 (has links)
OPSOMMING
Gebeurlikhede kan omskryf word as onsekere omstandighede van positiewe of negatiewe aard wat, onafhanklik van die verweerder se optrede en indien dit sou realiseer, waarskynlik 'n persoon se gesondheid, inkomste, verdienvermoë, lewenskwaliteit, lewensverwagting of onderhoudsafhanklikheid in die toekoms kan beïnvloed of in die verlede kon beïnvloed het en wat gevolglik op billike en realistiese wyse in ag geneem moet word ter bepaling van die skadevergoedingsbedrag. Die skadevergoedingsbedrag kan vanweë gebeurlikhede verminder of vermeerder word waar die eiser wel met `n oorwig van waarskynlikheid die volle omvang van die skade bewys het, maar die hof nie kon oortuig dat geen ander oorsaak die skade waarskynlik ook sou kon veroorsaak nie (sg "gebeurlikheids-aanpassings"). In gevalle waar die eiser nie die volle omvang van die skade op `n oorwig van waarskynlikheid kon bewys nie, kan die hof nogtans `n verminderde bedrag toeken op grond van die gebeurlikheid dat die skade wel waarskynlik in die toekoms kan realiseer (sg "gebeurlikheidstoekennings"). Die eiser moet getuienis voorlê van gebeurlikhede wat die skadevergoedingsbedrag sal verhoog, en die verweerder van gebeurlikhede wat die skadevergoedingsbedrag sal verlaag. Die waarskynlikheid dat die gebeurlikheid sal realiseer, moet deur die hof aan die hand van objektiewe maatstawwe en op grond van feitelike bewerings en logiese afleidings uit deskundige en ander getuienis in die vorm van `n waarskynlikheidsgraad van tussen vyf persent en tagtig persent uitgedruk word. Hipotetiese kousaliteit word deur die hof aangewend om gebeurlikhede op `n billike wyse in ag te neem en verwys na die kousale ketting van hipotetiese feite wat waarskynlik sou gerealiseer het indien die skadestigtende gebeurtenis nie plaasgevind het nie. Gebeurlikhede kan in twee kategorieë geklassifiseer word: Algemene gebeurlikhede wat gewoonlik in enige stadium by alle persone kan voorkom (bv vroeë dood, siekte ens) en spesifieke gebeurlikhede wat gewoonlik op spesifieke tydstippe by spesifieke individue kan voorkom (bv hertroue, egskeiding ens). Terwyl die hof geregtelik kennis behoort te kan neem van die invloed van algemene gebeurlikhede, behoort die hof hoofsaaklik op grond van ondersteunende getuienis van die invloed van spesifieke gebeurlikhede oortuig te word. Algemene gebeurlikheidsaanpassings is gewoonlik relatief laag (gemiddeld tien persent), terwyl gebeurlikheidsaanpassings vir spesifieke gebeurlikhede fluktueer (gewoonlik tussen vyf persent en vyftig persent), afhangende van die getuienis en omstandighede van die eiser. Gebeurlikheidstoekennings is gewoonlik laer as vyftig persent.
SUMMARY
Contingencies can be described as uncertain circumstances of a positive or negative nature which, independent of the defendant's conduct and if it should realise, would probably influence a person's health, income, earning capacity, quality of life, life expectancy or dependency on support in future or could have done so in the past, and which must consequently be taken into account in a fair and realistic manner in the quantification of damages. Contingencies can be used to increase or reduce damages in circumstances where the plaintiff succeeded in proving the full loss on a preponderance of probability, but could not convince the court that there was no probability that any other cause could also have given rise to the loss (so-called "contingency adjustments"). In circumstances where the plaintiff could not prove the full loss on a preponderance of probability, the court can nevertheless award a reduced amount on the basis of the contingency that loss could probably realise in future (so-called "contingency allowances"). The plaintiff must adduce evidence of contingencies that can increase damages, and the defendant of contingencies that can reduce damages. The degree of probability that the contingency will realise, must be expressed by the court as a percentage of between five percent and eighty percent, in view of objective measures and on the basis of factual allegations and logical deductions derived from expert and other evidence. Hypothetical causation assists the court in taking account of contingencies in a fair manner and refers to the causal link of hypothetical events which would probably have realised if the damage-causing event did not occur. Contingencies can be classified into two categories: General contingencies that usually can be present in the lives of all people at any point in time (eg early death, sickness, etc) and specific contingencies that usually are present in the lives of specific individuals at specific times (eg remarriage, divorce, etc). While the court should be able to take legal notice of the influence of general contingencies, the court should be convinced of the influence of specific contingencies primarily on the basis of supporting evidence. General contingency adjustments are usually relatively low (on average ten per cent), while contingency adjustments for specific contingencies fluctuate (usually between five per cent and fifty per cent), depending on the evidence and circumstances of the plaintiff. Contingency allowances are usually lower than fifty per cent. / Jurisprudence / LL.D
|
69 |
Possible tax treatments of the transfer of accounting provisions during the sale of a business and subsequent tax considerationsKroukamp, Susan 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MAcc (Accountancy))--University of Stellenbosch, 2006. / The potential buyer of a business evaluates the attractiveness of the transaction by
considering the financial status of the business being sold. In determining the
financial status of a business it is more important to determine the nature of the assets
and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet rather than the mere existence thereof.
Included in the liabilities are accounting provisions recorded in terms of the Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP) to reflect a fair representation of the financial
status. Although these provisions are made for accounting purposes, they cannot
necessarily be deducted under the terms of the Income Tax Act, no 58 of 1962. The
tax deductibility of accounting provisions has long been a potential contention when a
business is sold.
The Income Tax Act has specific sections that must be applied in determining the
deductibility of accounting provisions, for example, section 11(a), which is the general
deduction formula; section 23(g), which prohibits expenses not laid out for the
purposes of trade; and section 23(e), which does not allow a deduction when a
reserve fund is created (for example a leave pay provision).
In conducting this study, seven types of accounting provision generally recorded by
businesses were identified: the bonus provision, leave pay provision, warranty
provision, settlement discount and incentive-rebate provision, post employment
provision, retrenchment cost provision and other provisions. These provisions are
discussed in view of their possible income tax deductibility, and relevant case studies
were identified to confirm the possible deductibility of these accounting provisions.
In this study, the transfer of accounting provisions during the sale of a business is
considered for the purposes of both the buyer and seller. The tax implications for the
buyer and seller are then evaluated, as well as the subsequent treatment of the accounting provisions for the purposes of the buyer. Because the wording of the
purchase contract is extremely important when a business is acquired, three examples
of the wording of a purchase contract are discussed as well as the income tax
implications thereof.
The extent of the advice given by a tax practitioner will depend on the allegiance of the
practitioner (either for the buyer or seller) and will determine how the contract will be
concluded. In conclusion a tax practitioner would want to assist his client to obtain the
most effective tax position for the transaction and therefore each purchase contract
must be reviewed on its own set of facts.
|
70 |
The deductibility of future expenditure on contract in terms of section 24CCalitz, Johanna Eliza 04 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MAcc)--Stellenbosch University, 2015. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Section 24C of the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 (‘the Act’) provides for a deduction of
future expenditure that will be incurred by the taxpayer in the performance of his
obligations under a contract from which the taxpayer derived income.
Due to uncertainties regarding the meaning of certain words and phrases used in section
24C, the first aim of this assignment was to determine the meaning of the word
‘expenditure’ and the phrase ‘will be incurred’ as used in section 24C. The second aim was
to establish how a taxpayer will prove with certainty that he will incur future expenditure in
the performance of his obligations under a contract. This was done by discussing the
effect of contractual terms and other circumstances and by taking into account certain
additional guidelines regarding the interpretation of section 24C provided for in
Interpretation Note: No. 78 (‘IN 78’).
It was established that the word ‘expenditure’ means the amount of money spent, including
the disbursement of other assets with a monetary value. The word ‘expenditure’ also
specifically includes the voluntary payments and disbursements of assets. The word
‘expenditure’ can also include a loss if the word ‘loss’ can be equated to the word
‘expenditure’.
The phrase ‘will be incurred’ implies that the taxpayer will, in a subsequent year of
assessment, have an unconditional obligation to pay for expenditure, which must arise
from the taxpayer’s obligations to perform under the contract.
Contractual terms and other circumstances can indicate whether there is certainty that
future expenditure will be incurred as aforementioned. Conditions and warranties are
contractual terms that indicate that there is uncertainty regarding the taxpayer’s obligations
to perform under the contract. A time clause in a contract can indicate that there is
certainty regarding the taxpayer’s obligations to perform under the contract. Similar
contracts with similar conditional obligations to perform cannot be grouped together in
order to determine the probability, and thus the certainty, that future expenditure will be
incurred in the performance of the taxpayer’s obligations under a contract. The probability
that a taxpayer will perform his unconditional obligation under the contract must, however,
be proved in order to demonstrate that there is certainty regarding the incurral of the future
expenditure.
IN 78 does not specify whether a loss which can, in certain circumstances, be equated to
the word ‘expenditure’, is deductible under section 24C. This should be clarified. The new
undefined phrases (a high degree of probability, inevitability, certainty and potentially
contractually obligatory), as used in IN 78, might cause confusion when interpreting
section 24C. These phrases should be defined and it should be explained how the high
degree will be measured.
Lastly, is was shown that an anomaly occurs regarding trading stock at hand at the end of
a year of assessment, which will be utilised in a subsequent year of assessment in the
performance of the taxpayer’s obligations under a contract. Such trading stock does not
represent ‘future expenditure’ and must be excluded from the section 24C allowance.
However, due to the interplay between section 24C and section 22(1), the taxpayer does
not receive any tax relief for the expenditure actually incurred to acquire the closing trading
stock in the year in which such trading stock is acquired. It is, therefore, questioned
whether the established interpretation of section 24C is in agreement with the Legislator’s
original intention with section 24C namely, to match income received under a contract with
the related deductible expenditure. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Artikel 24C van die Inkomstebelastingwet No. 58 van 1962 (‘die Wet’) voorsien ʼn
aftrekking vir toekomstige onkoste wat deur die belastingpligtige aangegaan sal word in
die nakoming van sy verpligtinge ingevolge ʼn kontrak waaruit hy inkomste verkry het.
As gevolg van onsekerhede ten opsigte van die betekenis van sekere woorde en frases
wat in artikel 24C gebruik word, was die eerste doelstelling van hierdie navorsingswerkstuk
om die betekenis van die woord ‘onkoste’ en die frase ‘aangegaan sal word’,
soos wat dit in artikel 24C gebruik word, te bepaal. Die tweede doelstelling was om vas te
stel hoe 'n belastingpligtige met sekerheid sal bewys dat hy toekomstige onkoste sal
aangaan in die nakoming van sy verpligtinge ingevolge ʼn kontrak. Dit is gedoen deur die
effek van kontraksbedinge en ander omstandighede te bespreek en deur sekere
bykomende riglyne ten opsigte van die interpretasie van artikel 24C, soos vervat in
Interpretasienota No. 78 (‘IN 78’), in ag te neem.
Daar is vasgestel dat die woord ‘onkoste’ die bedrag van geld wat bestee word, insluitend
die uitbetaling van ander bates met 'n geldwaarde, beteken. Die woord ‘onkoste’ sluit ook
spesifiek vrywillige betalings en uitbetalings van bates in. Die woord ‘onkoste’ kan ook 'n
verlies insluit, indien die woord ‘verlies’ gelyk gestel kan word aan die woord ‘onkoste’.
Die frase ‘aangegaan sal word’ impliseer dat die belastingpligtige, in 'n daaropvolgende
jaar van aanslag, 'n onvoorwaardelike verpligting sal hê om vir onkostes te betaal. Hierdie
onkostes moet ontstaan weens die belastingpligtige se verpligtinge ingevolge die kontrak.
Kontraksbedinge en ander omstandighede kan aandui of daar sekerheid is dat die
toekomstige onkoste, soos hierbo genoem, aangegaan sal word. Voorwaardes en
waarborge is kontraksbedinge wat daarop dui dat daar onsekerheid is rakende die
belastingpligtige se verpligtinge om ingevolge die kontrak op te tree. ʼn Tydsklousule in 'n
kontrak kan aandui dat daar sekerheid is rakende die belastingpligtige se nakoming van sy
verpligtinge ingevolge die kontrak. Soortgelyke kontrakte, met soortgelyke voorwaardelike
verpligtinge kan nie saam gegroepeer word ten einde te bepaal of dit waarskynlik, en
gevolglik seker is dat toekomstige onkoste in die nakoming van ʼn belastingpligtige se
verpligtinge ingevolge die kontrak aangaan sal word nie. Die waarskynlikheid dat 'n belastingpligtige sy onvoorwaardelike verpligting ingevolge die kontrak sal nakom moet
egter bewys word ten einde aan te dui dat daar sekerheid is dat toekomstige onkoste
aangegaan sal word.
IN 78 spesifiseer nie of 'n verlies wat, in sekere omstandighede, gelyk gestel kan word aan
die woord ‘onkoste’, ingevolge artikel 24C aftrekbaar is nie. Duidelikheid hieromtrent moet
verskaf word. Die nuwe, ongedefinieerde frases ('n hoë graad van waarskynlikheid,
onafwendbaarheid, sekerheid en potensieel kontraktueel verpligtend (vry vertaal)), soos in
IN 78 gebruik, kan moontlik verwarring veroorsaak wanneer artikel 24C geïnterpreteer
word. Hierdie frases moet gedefinieer word en daar moet verduidelik word hoe ʼn hoë
graad gemeet gaan word.
Laastens blyk dit dat 'n teenstrydigheid ontstaan ten opsigte van handelsvoorraad op
hande aan die einde van 'n jaar van aanslag, wat in 'n daaropvolgende jaar van aanslag
deur die belastingpligtige in die nakoming van sy verpligtinge ingevolge 'n kontrak gebruik
sal word. Sodanige handelsvoorraad verteenwoordig nie ‘toekomstige onkoste’ nie en
moet by die artikel 24C toelaag uitgesluit word. Die belastingpligte ontvang egter, weens
die wisselwerking tussen artikel 24C en artikel 22(1), nie ʼn belastingverligting vir die
onkoste werklik aangegaan in die jaar waarin sodanige handelsvoorraad verkry is nie. Dit
word dus bevraagteken of die bewese interpretasie van artikel 24C in ooreenstemming is
met die Wetgewer se oorspronklike bedoeling met artikel 24C, naamlik, om inkomste
ontvang ingevolge ʼn kontrak met die verwante aftrekbare uitgawes te paar.
|
Page generated in 0.0907 seconds