Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-17T14:55:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 8341348 bytes, checksum: 3c793b10a08a57a4fe65df46346e7385 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-03-15 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / The first classifications for the annelids were presented within a peculiar group of worms grouped within Class Vermes. The group was initially divided into Errant Annelides, Tubicolous or Sedentary Annelides, Terricolous Annelids, and Freshwater Annelids. These classifications did not reflect common ancestry. With the advent of phylogenetic systematics, many proposals were made for other organisms, attempting to reflect true relationships. The first proposals for annelids and polychaetes appeared in the 90s, based on morphology, and attempted to confirm the monophyly of these two groups. In these analyses, the Pogonophora were reduced to a family of Polychaeta, the Siboglinidae. These results remained incongruent when compared to results obtained later from molecular data. Another phylogenetic proposal presented the Pogonophora as being close to the sedentary polychaetes, closely related to Owenia. In this proposal, the clade Metameria was established to group the annelids, Enterocoela and Deuterostomia. Pogonophora as a family of Polychaeta disregards the evolutionary relationships that this taxon shares with the deuterostomes. In the present work, polychaetes with tori were selected as the ingroups of the analysis, together with Pogonophora, and including Phoronida and Pterobranchia, in order to establish genealogical relationships among these taxa. For parsimony analyses molecular data from 18S rRNA, morphological data coded as binary (a/p), multistate, and combined data (multistate molecular and morphological data) were used. Several slightly different topologies appeared in our results on morphology and molecules. On the other hand, the combined data was similar to the topology obtained from multistate morphology. From these analyses, we hypothesize that sedentary polychaetes with tori (including Pogonophora) are strictly related to Phoronida and Deuterostomia, their tagmatization being considered a particularly important synapomorphy. Finally, we emphasize the paraphyletic nature of Protostomia, Spiralia, Trochozoa and Lophotrochozoa, which are contrasted to the monophyletic Metameria. / As primeiras classificações para os anelídeos foram representadas para um grupo peculiar de vermes que formavam as primeiras famílias de poliquetas, agrupadas dentro da Classe Vermes. O grupo foi dividido inicialmente em Annélides Errantes, Annélides tubicoles ou Sédentaires, Annélides Terricoles e Annélides souceuses. Essas classificações não refletiam ancestralidade comum. Com o surgimento da sistemática filogenética, muitas propostas foram apresentadas para vários outros grupos de organismos, buscando refletir as relações de parentescos. A partir da década de 90 surgiram os primeiros trabalhos de filogenia com dados morfológicos para os anelídeos e poliquetas, com objetivo de confirmar a monofila dos dois grupos. Nestas análises, Pogonophora foi reduzido a uma família de Polychaeta, os Siboglinidae. Os resultados permaneceram incongruentes quando comparados os dados morfológicos com os dados moleculares, que surgiram posteriormente. Outras propostas filogenéticas apresentaram os Pogonophora como grupo próximo aos poliquetas sedentários, relacionados com os Owenia. Nessa proposta, foi estabelecido o clado Metameria para agrupar anelídeos, Enterocoela e Deuterostomia. Pogonophora como uma família de Polychaeta quebra a relação de paradigma evolutivo que este táxon compartilha com os Deuterostômios. Neste trabalho, se usou como grupo interno poliquetas com tori, Pogonophora, Phoronida e Pterobranchia, a fim de estabelecer relações genealógicas entre eles. Desta forma, se usou para análise de parcimônia dados moleculares 18S rRNA, dados morfológicos codificados como binário e multiestados, e dados combinados (moleculares e morfológicos multiestados). Os resultados mostraram várias hipóteses que se diferenciaram um pouco nas topologias, quando foram comparados os cladogramas de caracteres moleculares com os cladogramas de caracteres morfológicos. Embora, a topologia de caracteres combinadas se mostrou igual à topologia de caracteres morfológicos multiestados. Dessa maneira, hipotetiza-se a partir das análises aqui obtidas, que os poliquetas sedentários portadores de tori (incluindo Pogonophora) estão estritamente relacionados aos Phoronida e Deuterostomia, principalmente quando se ressalta o processo de tagmatização. Finalmente, enaltece-se a parafilia de Protostomia, Spiralia, Trochozoa e Lophotrochozoa, ressaltando o monofiletismo de Metameria.

Pour bien comprendre comment les espèces actuelles ont évolué, il est important d’étudier certains groupes clés. Ces groupes clés sont parfois bien négligés au profit d’autres groupes apparentés. L’embranchement Hemichordata forme, avec Echinodermata, le clade Ambulacraria. Ce dernier, avec l’embranchement Chordata, forme le super-embranchement Deuterostomia. Parmi les deutérostomes, la classe d’hémichordé Enteropneusta est souvent considérée comme étant la plus ressemblante au dernier ancêtre commun des deutérostomes. Les entéropneustes partagent en effet plusieurs caractéristiques avec Chordata et Ambulacraria et en étudiant celles-ci on peut reconstruire et comprendre leurs états ancestraux. Dans le chapitre d’introduction, j’aborde la morphologie générale des hémichordés et leurs relations évolutives avec les deux autres embranchement deutérostomes. Je présente aussi les caractéristiques qu’ils partagent avec les échinodermes et les cordés. J’aborde ensuite les formes que prennent les parties dures chez les animaux et en particulier chez les deutérostomes. Dans le chapitre deux, j’examine et décris la forme et la composition chimique des osselets chez huit espèces d’hémichordé. Cette étude représente un énorme bond dans nos connaissances sur la biominéralisation chez les hémichordés, car jusqu’à présent les osselets n’avaient été décrits que chez deux espèces, et la composition chimique déterminée chez une seule d’entre elle. J’interprète également ces données dans un contexte évolutif, car les osselets d’hémichordé sont probablement homologues au squelette des échinodermes. Ce chapitre est important, car il nous donne une hypothèse sur l’origine des osselets chez le dernier ancêtre commun des ambulacraires. Dans le chapitre trois, je quantifie l’asymétrie dans les fentes pharyngiennes de populations de deux espèces d’entéropneustes et d’une espèce de cordé non-vertébré. En mettant ces différents nivaux de symétrie en parallèle avec leur comportement alimentaire, les résultats supportent l’hypothèse de l’alimentation par filtration comme rôle initial des fentes pharyngiennes chez les deutérostomes et que la perte de cette fonction induit du bruit développemental, une vestigialisation ou une perte des fentes branchiales. Dans le chapitre quatre, J’utilise la micro-tomographie aux rayons-X pour décrire une espèce d’hémichordé qui était jusqu’à présent un numen nudum. Cette nouvelle technique est comparée avec l’histologie traditionnelle afin de prouver qu’elle pourrait être utilisée dans les futures études taxonomiques sur les hémichordés. Dans le chapitre cinq, je présente quelques expériences qui ont dû être exclues des chapitres précédents car elles ont donné des résultats négatifs non-publiables. Je discute des raisons pour lesquelles ces expériences ont échoué ainsi que quelques pistes de solutions possibles pour qui voudrait tenter de les refaire. Ensuite je récapitule les résultats des chapitres précédents pour montrer comment étudier les hémichordés peut encore nous apprendre beaucoup sur d’autres groupes pourtant déjà très étudiés. / The phylum Hemichordata forms, with Echinodermata, the group Ambulacraria that in turns forms with Chordata, the Deuterostomia. Among deuterostomes, the hemichordate class Enteropneusta is often viewed as the group that most closely resembles the last common ancestor of deuterostomes. Enteropneusts indeed share many traits with the other two deuterostome phyla and by studying them, we can infer the ancestral states of those traits. In the first chapter, I present the general morphology of hemichordates and their relationships with the other two deuterostome phyla. I also discuss the shared traits between the hemichordates, the echinoderms and the chordates. Last, I present the varied shapes that hard parts can take in animals, with a focus on deuterostomes. In chapter two, I describe the shape and mineral composition of ossicles in eight enteropneust species. This study is a major leap in our understanding of biomineralization in Hemichordata since up to this point ossicles were only described in two species and the mineral composition determined for only one. I discuss these results in an evolutionary context since hemichordate ossicles are probably homologous with echinoderm skeletal ossicles. This chapter is significant because it provides a hypothesis on the origin of ossicles in the last common ancestor of ambulacrarians. In chapter three, I quantify the level of asymmetry of the pharyngeal slits in populations of two species of enteropneusts and the invertebrate cephalochordate Branchiostoma floridae. We found that adults of these species display fluctuating asymmetry in the gills and that this asymmetry is lower in filter feeding. This is significant because it supports the hypothesis that filter feeding is an ancestral feature of deuterostomes and that the loss of this function increases developmental noise, vestigiality, or loss of the gills. In chapter four, I use X-ray microtomography to describe the enteropneust Balanoglossus occidentalis that was heretofore a nomen nudum. This new technique is compared with traditional histology to show that it is a viable tool in hemichordate taxonomical studies. In chapter five, I present a few experiments that had to be excluded from the other chapters because they gave negative, unpublishable results. I discuss the probable causes of their failures and potential ways to solve these issues for those who would want to pursue them further. Finally, I summarise the results of the previous chapters to show how studying hemichordates can still teach us a lot about the origin and evolution of the better studied deuterostome phyla.

The evolutionary origin and the phylogeny of higher metazoan taxa is still under debate although considerable progress has been made in the past 20 years. Metazoa represents a monophyletic group of highly diverse animals including Bilateria, Cnidaria, Porifera, Ctenophores, and Placozoa. Bilateria comprises the majority of metazoans and consists of three major clades: Deuterostomia, Spiralia (= Lophotrochozoa sensu lato), and Ecdysozoa, whereas the sister group taxa Spiralia and Ecdyzozoa form the monophyletic clade Protostomia. Molecular data have profoundly changed the view of the bilaterian tree of life. One of the main questions concerning bilaterian phylogeny is the on-going debate about the evolution of complexity in Bilateria. It was assumed that the last common ancestor of Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa and Spiralia had a segmented and coelomate body organization resembling that of an annelid. On the contrary, the traditional view is the evolution of Bilateria from a simple body organization towards more complex forms, assuming that the last common ancestor of Bilateria resembles a platyhelminth-like animal without coelomic cavities and segmentation. To resolve this question, it is necessary to unravel the phylogenetic relationships within Bilateria. By using mitogenomic and phylogenomic data, this thesis had a major contribution to clarify phylogenetic relationships within problematic metazoan taxa: (1) the phylogeny of Deuterostomia, (2) the questionable monophyly of Platyzoa, and first assumptions concerning the phylogeny of Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha and Polycladida, (3) phylogenetic relationships within annelid taxa, especially Terebelliformia, Diurodrilidae, and Syllidae, with new insights into the evolution of mitochondrial gene order, and (4) new insights into the evolution of annelids, especially the interstitial ones, as well as the colonization of the interstitial realm.