Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2008. / Härtill 7 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2003. / Härtill 6 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2004. / Härtill 7 uppsatser.

<p>Abstract</p><p>Sierra Leone is a very poor country in Africa. Botswana is another country, that has a similar history and the same deposit; diamonds. Botswana has reached economic growth and democracy and Sierra Leone has not.</p><p>The purpose with this study is to explain why Botswana is more democratic and has reached a better result economic than Sierra Leone.</p><p>The questions in this study are:</p><p>What explains the democratic and the economic results in Sierra Leone and Botswana?</p><p>* Dahl’s institutions that furthers a polyarchy?</p><p>* Gunnarsson’s and Rojas’ institutional explanations?</p><p>* Diamond’s and Morlino’s ”rule of law”?</p><p>* Other explanations or a combination of the above-mentioned explanations?</p><p>The method that has been used in this study is a comparative case study with a qualitative contents analysis. The result is that it’s hard to say that one explanation is the right one. It’s more likely a combination of multiple factors that furthers democracy and economic development. Not just one combination is the right one, but the institutional explanation about the autonomy of the state is very important for the result.</p>

Abstract Sierra Leone is a very poor country in Africa. Botswana is another country, that has a similar history and the same deposit; diamonds. Botswana has reached economic growth and democracy and Sierra Leone has not. The purpose with this study is to explain why Botswana is more democratic and has reached a better result economic than Sierra Leone. The questions in this study are: What explains the democratic and the economic results in Sierra Leone and Botswana? * Dahl’s institutions that furthers a polyarchy? * Gunnarsson’s and Rojas’ institutional explanations? * Diamond’s and Morlino’s ”rule of law”? * Other explanations or a combination of the above-mentioned explanations? The method that has been used in this study is a comparative case study with a qualitative contents analysis. The result is that it’s hard to say that one explanation is the right one. It’s more likely a combination of multiple factors that furthers democracy and economic development. Not just one combination is the right one, but the institutional explanation about the autonomy of the state is very important for the result.