The Holocaust is an important part of Swedish history teaching. It tends to exemplify human rights violations and has become a means to educate students to be better citizens. Swedish studies have often focused on students’ historical consciousness. This study aims to examine students’ historical thinking about the Holocaust. Three questions are addressed; how students express substantive knowledge, how students express procedural concepts, and how do students express moral aspects about the Holocaust. The material was created during the authors’ teaching practice (in Swedish VFU) and consists of 28 students’ texts. To analyze the material qualitative content analysis was used. Procedural concepts such as continuity and change, cause and consequence, historical agency and, moral aspects, were also used as tools to interpret students’ texts about what was the cause of the Holocaust. The results show that students made implicit references to different procedural concepts when describing how the Holocaust happened. Students often referred to anti-Semitism, Adolf Hitler, and the developed train system as causes for the Holocaust. They tended to understand Hitler as the founder of anti-Semitism and Nazism. He was described to convince the German people to vote for him. Structures and agency of other actors, therefore, disappeared leading to a shallow understanding of the Holocaust. The author of the study argues for a Holocaust education that uses Alice Pettigrews’ concept of “powerful knowledge” and Gert Biestas’ notion of qualification, socialization, and subjectification, to develop students’ moral and civic understanding.

As climate changes are progressing so is the need for further knowledge surrounding them and their consequences. This includes the ocean’s role in the climate system. Previous studies indicate a general lack of research in students’ understanding of the ocean, which this thesis aims to fill a part of. This thesis has investigated upper secondary school students’ basic knowledges of the ocean’s natural processes and chemistry, as well as the students’ understanding of the consequences of the ongoing ocean warming. The methods used have been a combination of participant observation and a quiz, considering students in an upper secondary school in Stockholm. The results of the quiz show that two thirds of the students have a basic understanding of the ocean’s processes and chemistry. The participant observation supports this conclusion. It additionally showed that most students displayed superficial knowledge of oceanic processes, while having a poorer understanding of more complex processes and the concurrence between processes. Some misunderstandings and alternative understandings surfaced amongst the students’ answers. These, along with systematic geography and its preconditions, are discussed in the discussion section. While the present study was too limited to draw definite conclusions, this study indicated preliminary that students with focus on natural science display a deeper knowledge in the ocean’s chemistry and natural processes than students with focus on social sciences, which would be interesting to investigate further in future research.

Föreliggande studie undersöker sex elevers självskattade förståelse av tre mellanstadielärares språkbruk i tre olika ämnen. Studien utgår från tre frågeställningar som behandlar lärarnas språkbruk, elevernas självskattade förståelse samt elevernas tankar om förståelse och inlärning. Datainsamlingsmetoder är ljudinspelningar, deltagande observationer samt enkäter. Legitimation code theorys semantiska vågor är studiens teoretiska utgångspunkt och analysmetod. Semantisk densitet och semantisk gravitation används därför för att analysera lärarnas språkbruk i kombination med elevernas självskattade förståelse. Studiens resultat åskådliggör att eleverna i stor utsträckning har svårt att förstå ämnesspecifika begrepp som förklaras med hög informationstäthet. Eleverna angav även att muntliga och skriftligaförklaringar bidrog till att skapa större förståelse av ett ämnesinnehåll. Eleverna ansåg även att uppgifter som utfördes i kooperativa och praktiska arbetssätt påverkade deras förståelse positivt. Avslutningsvis presenteras vidare utvecklingsmöjligheter med studien.