Trustworthiness is a roadblock in mass adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. This thesis developed a framework to explore the trustworthiness as it applies to AI in medicine with respect to common stakeholders in medical device development. Within this framework the element of explainability of AI models was explored by evaluating explainable AI (XAI) methods. In current literature a litany of XAI methods are available that provide a variety of insights into the learning and function of AI models. XAI methods provide a human readable output for the AI’s learning process. These XAI methods tend to be bespoke and provide very subjective outputs with varying degrees of quality. Currently, there are no metrics or methods of objectively evaluating XAI outputs against outputs from different types of XAI methods. This thesis presents a set of constituent elements (similarity, stability and novelty) to explore the concept of explainability and then presents a series of metrics to evaluate those constituent elements. Thus providing a repeatable and testable framework to evaluate XAI methods and their generated explanations. This is accomplished using subject matter expert (SME) annotated ECG signals (time-series signals) represented as images to AI models and XAI methods. A small subset from all available XAI methods, Vanilla Saliency, SmoothGrad, GradCAM and GradCAM++ were used to generate XAI outputs for a VGG-16 based deep learning classification model. The framework provides insights about XAI method generated explanations for the AI and how closely that learning corresponds to SME decision making. It also objectively evaluates how closely explanations generated by any XAI method resemble outputs from other XAI methods. Lastly, the framework provides insights about possible novel learning done by the deep learning model beyond what was identified by the SMEs in their decision making. / Thesis / Master of Applied Science (MASc) / The goal of this thesis was to develop a framework of how trustworthiness can be improved for a variety of stakeholders in the use of AI in medical applications. Trust was broken down into basic elements (Explainability, Verifiability, Fairness & Ro- bustness) and ’Explainability’ was further explored. This was done by determining how explainability (offered by XAI methods) can address the needs (Accuracy, Safety, and Performance) of stakeholders and how those needs can be evaluated. Methods of comparison (similarity, stability, and novelty) were developed that allow an objective evaluation of the explanations from various XAI methods using repeatable metrics (Jaccard, Hamming, Pearson Correlation, and TF-IDF). Combining the results of these measurements into the framework of trust, work towards improving AI trust- worthiness and provides a way to evaluate and compare the utility of explanations.

As a complicated lethal medical emergency, sepsis is not easy to be diagnosed until it is too late for taking any life saving actions. Early prediction of sepsis in ICUs may reduce inpatient mortality rate. Although deep learning models can make predictions on the outcome of ICU stays with high accuracies, the opacity of such neural networks decreases their reliability. Particularly, in the ICU settings where the time is not on doctors' side and every single mistake increase the chances of patient's mortality. Therefore, it is crucial for the predictive model to provide some sort of reasoning in addition to the prediction it provides, so that the medical staff could avoid actions based on false alarms. To address this problem, we propose to add an attention layer to a deep recurrent neural network that can learn the relative importance of each of the parameters of the multivariate data of the ICU stay. Our approach sheds light on providing explainability through attention mechanism. We compare our method with some of the state-of-the-art methods and show the superiority of our approach in terms of providing explanations.

In recent years, rapid advancements in computer science, including increased capabilities of machine learning models like Large Language Models (LLMs) and the accessibility of large datasets, have facilitated the widespread adoption of AI technology, such as ChatGPT, underscoring the need to design and evaluate these technologies with ethical considerations for their impact on students and teachers. Specifically, the rise of Automated Essay Scoring (AES) platforms have made it possible to provide real-time feedback and grades for student essays. Despite the increasing development and use of AES platforms, limited research has specifically focused on AI explainability and algorithm transparency and their influence on the usability of these platforms. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study on an AI-based essay writing and grading platform, with a primary focus to explore the experiences of students and graders. The study aimed to explore the usability aspects related to explainability and transparency and their implications for computer science education. Participants took part in surveys, semi-structured interviews, and a focus group. The findings reveal important considerations for evaluating AES systems, including the clarity of feedback and explanations, impact and actionability of feedback and explanations, user understanding of the system, trust in AI, major issues and user concerns, system strengths, user interface, and areas of improvement. These proposed key considerations can help guide the development of effective essay feedback and grading tools that prioritize explainability and transparency to improve usability in computer science education. / Master of Science / In recent years, rapid advancements in computer science have facilitated the widespread adoption of AI technology across various educational applications, highlighting the need to design and evaluate these technologies with ethical considerations for their impact on students and teachers. Nowadays, there are Automated Essay Scoring (AES) platforms that can instantly provide feedback and grades for student essays. AES platforms are computer programs that use artificial intelligence to automatically assess and score essays written by students. However, not much research has looked into how these platforms work and how understandable they are for users. Specifically, AI explainability refers to the ability of AES platforms to provide clear and coherent explanations of how they arrive at their assessments. Algorithm transparency, on the other hand, refers to the degree to which the inner workings of these AI algorithms are open and understandable to users. To fill this gap, we conducted a qualitative study on an AI-based essay writing and grading platform, aiming to understand the experiences of students and graders. We wanted to explore how clear and transparent the platform's feedback and explanations were. Participants shared their thoughts through surveys, interviews, and a focus group. The study uncovered important factors to consider when evaluating AES systems. These factors include the clarity of the feedback and explanations provided by the platform, the impact and actionality of the feedback, how well users understand the system, their level of trust in AI, the main issues and concerns they have, the strengths of the system, the user interface's effectiveness, and areas that need improvement. By considering these findings, developers can create better essay feedback and grading tools that are easier to understand and use.

No description available.

No description available.

Large-scale distributed systems---such as supercomputers, cloud computing platforms, and distributed applications---routinely suffer from slowdowns and crashes due to software and hardware problems, resulting in reduced efficiency and wasted resources. These large-scale systems typically deploy monitoring or tracing systems that gather a variety of statistics about the state of the hardware and the software. State-of-the-art methods either analyze this data manually, or design unique automated methods for each specific problem. This thesis builds on the vision that generalized automated analytics methods on the data sets collected from these complex computing systems provide critical information about the causes of the problems, and this analysis can then enable proactive management to improve performance, resilience, efficiency, or security significantly beyond current limits. This thesis seeks to design scalable, automated analytics methods and frameworks for large-scale distributed systems that minimize dependency on expert knowledge, automate parts of the solution process, and help make systems more resilient. In addition to analyzing data that is already collected from systems, our frameworks also identify what to collect from where in the system, such that the collected data would be concise and useful for manual analytics. We focus on two data sources for conducting analytics: numeric telemetry data, which is typically collected from operating system or hardware counters, and end-to-end traces collected from distributed applications. This thesis makes the following contributions in large-scale distributed systems: (1) Designing a framework for accurately diagnosing previously encountered performance variations, (2) designing a technique for detecting (unwanted) applications running on the systems, (3) developing a suite for reproducing performance variations that can be used to systematically develop analytics methods, (4) designing a method to explain predictions of black-box machine learning frameworks, and (5) constructing an end-to-end tracing framework that can dynamically adjust instrumentation for effective diagnosis of performance problems. / 2021-09-28T00:00:00Z

Recently, there has been a lot of interest in explainable predictions, with new explainability approaches being created for specific data modalities like images and text. However, there is a dearth of understanding and minimal exploration in terms of explainability in the multimodal machine learning domain, where diverse data modalities are fused together in the model. In this thesis project, we look into two multimodal model architectures namely single-stream and dual-stream for the Visual Entailment (VE) task, which compromises of image and text modalities. The models considered in this project are UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learning (UNITER), Visual-Linguistic BERT (VLBERT), Vision-and-Language BERT (ViLBERT) and Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers (LXMERT). Furthermore, we conduct three different experiments for multimodal explainability by applying the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) technique. Our results show that UNITER has the best accuracy among these models for the problem of VE. However, the explainability of all these models is similar. / Under den senaste tiden har intresset för förklarbara prediktioner (eng. explainable predictions) varit stort, med nya metoder skapade för specifika datamodaliteter som bilder och text. Samtidigt finns en brist på förståelse och lite utforskning har gjorts när det gäller förklarbarhet för multimodal maskininlärning, där olika datamodaliteter kombineras i modellen. I detta examensarbete undersöker vi två multimodala modellarkitekturer, så kallade en-ström och två-strömsarkitekturer (eng. single-steam och dual-stream) för en uppgift som kombinerar bilder och text, Visual Entailment (VE). Modellerna som studeras är UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learning (UNITER), Visual-Linguistic BERT (VLBERT), Vision-and-Language BERT (ViLBERT) och Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers (LXMERT). Dessutom genomför vi tre olika experiment för multimodal förklarbarhet genom att tillämpa en metod som heter Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME). Våra resultat visar att UNITER har bäst prestanda av dessa modeller för VE-uppgiften. Å andra sidan är förklarbarheten för alla dessa modeller likvärdig.

Understanding the information encoded in the human genome and the influence of each part of the DNA sequence is a fundamental problem of our society that can be key to unveil the mechanism of common diseases. With the latest technological developments in the genomics field, many research institutes have the tools to collect massive amounts of genomic data. Nevertheless, there is a lack of tools that can be used to process and analyse these datasets in a biologically reliable and efficient manner. Many deep learning solutions have been proposed to solve current genomic tasks, but most of the times the main research interest is in the underlying biological mechanisms rather than high scores of the predictive metrics themselves. Recently, state-of-the-art in deep learning has shifted towards large transformer models, which use an attention mechanism that can be leveraged for interpretability. The main drawbacks of these large models is that they require a lot of memory space and have high inference time, which may make their use unfeasible in practical applications. In this work, we test the appropriateness of knowledge distillation to obtain more usable and equally performing models that genomic researchers can easily fine-tune to solve their scientific problems. DNABERT, a transformer model pre-trained on DNA data, is distilled following two strategies: DistilBERT and MiniLM. Four student models with different sizes are obtained and fine-tuned for promoter identification. They are evaluated in three key aspects: classification performance, usability and biological relevance of the predictions. The latter is assessed by visually inspecting the attention maps of TATA-promoter predictions, which are expected to have a peak of attention at the well-known TATA motif present in these sequences. Results show that is indeed possible to obtain significantly smaller models that are equally performant in the promoter identification task without any major differences between the two techniques tested. The smallest distilled model experiences less than 1% decrease in all performance metrics evaluated (accuracy, F1 score and Matthews Correlation Coefficient) and an increase in the inference speed by 7.3x, while only having 15% of the parameters of DNABERT. The attention maps for the student models show that they successfully learn to mimic the general understanding of the DNA that DNABERT possesses.

In this study the subject of ethics is examined, more specifically how ethical consideration might change for UX-designers when working on artificial intelligence. With the introduction of new, powerful AI tools such as chatGPT and Midjourney, these tools are finding their way into the hands of users all around the world. This being the case, ethical consideration in UXdesign is of great importance, as it is this discipline which shapes products for the needs of the consumer. The aim of this study is to examine how ethical considerations in UX-design for artificial intelligence tools might differ from traditional UX-practise. It is an important field to examine, as little to no prior research has been conducted on the intersection of ethics, user experience design, and artificial intelligence. Initially, a literature review was conducted in order to situate this study in the current field of similar research. Thereafter theories on ethics are presented to facilitate the coming discussion. A qualitative methodological approach was chosen as suitable for the study. By conducting a small-N-study and semi-structured interviews with design practitioners, as well as an AI expert, data was gathered on ethics, UXdesign, and artificial intelligence. This data was then analysed through text analysis and the interpretative research paradigm in order to identify patterns and themes. Four main themes are identified and presented, as well as discussed. The findings of the study show how aspects that have traditionally been connected to the technical development of artificial intelligence are of great relevance to the discipline of UX-design as well. These aspects; responsibility, explainability, and transparency, must be taken into account by design practitioners in design work for artificial intelligence in order to transfer knowledge of the tool onto the user. The findings of this study contribute to the intersection of knowledge of ethics, user experience design, and artificial intelligence by showing how the concept of responsibility in artificial intelligence is of equal importance to design practitioners. Furthermore, it also show that the concepts of explainability and transparency, which have hitherto been exclusive to the realm of AI-development, are applicable in design work. Additionally, based on these findings a prototype framework for the development of ethical guidelines for design practitioners in artificial intelligence is proposed. As for future work in the field, it would be of value if future studies would interview design practitioners with more professional experience of design in artificial intelligence, as well as confirm the findings of this study through the use of other methodologies through method triangulation.

The dependence on Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems has grown significantly in the last decade. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled language models to generate high-quality text at the same level as human-written text. If this growth continues, it can potentially lead to increased misinformation, which is a significant challenge. Although claim verification techniques exist, they lack proper explainability. Numerical scores such as Attention and Lime and visualization techniques such as saliency heat maps are insufficient because they require specialized knowledge. It is inaccessible and challenging for the nonexpert to understand black-box NLP systems. We propose a novel approach called, ExClaim for explainable claim verification using NLP rationalization. We demonstrate that our approach can predict a verdict for the claim but also justify and rationalize its output as a natural language explanation (NLE). We extensively evaluate the system using statistical and Explainable AI (XAI) metrics to ensure the outcomes are valid, verified, and trustworthy to help reinforce the human-AI trust. We propose a new subfield in XAI called Rational AI (RAI) to improve research progress on rationalization and NLE-based explainability techniques. Ensuring that claim verification systems are assured and explainable is a step towards trustworthy AI systems and ultimately helps mitigate misinformation. / Master of Science / The dependence on Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems has grown significantly in the last decade. Recent advances in deep learning have enabled text generation models to generate high-quality text that is at the same level as human-written text. If this growth continues, it can potentially lead to increased misinformation, which is a major societal challenge. Although claim verification techniques exist, they lack proper explainability. It is difficult for the average user to understand the model's decision-making process. Numerical scores and visualization techniques exist to provide explainability, but they are insufficient because they require specialized domain knowledge. This makes it inaccessible and challenging for the nonexpert to understand black-box NLP systems. We propose a novel approach called, ExClaim for explainable claim verification using NLP rationalization. We demonstrate that our approach can predict a verdict for the claim but also justify and rationalize its output as a natural language explanation (NLE). We extensively evaluate the system using statistical and Explainable AI (XAI) metrics to ensure the outcomes are valid, verified, and trustworthy to help reinforce the human-AI trust. We propose a new subfield in XAI called Rational AI (RAI) to improve research progress on rationalization and NLE-based explainability techniques. Ensuring that claim verification systems are assured and explainable is a step towards trustworthy AI systems and ultimately helps mitigate misinformation.