The vertebrate Dlx gene family consists of multiple convergently transcribed bigene clusters and encodes a group of homeodomain-containing transcription factors crucial for the development of forebrain, branchial arches, sensory organs and limbs. At least four cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are responsible for Dlx expression in the forebrain: URE2 and I12b in the Dlx1/Dlx2 (zebrafish dlx1a/dlx2a) locus, and, I56i and I56ii in the Dlx5/Dlx6 (zebrafish dlx5a/dlx6a) locus. Here, we first show that unlike the other three enhancers, mouse I56ii CRE targets a group of GABAergic projection neurons expressing striatal markers Meis2 and Islet1. Meis2 and Islet1 proteins can activate reporter gene transcription via the I56ii CRE, suggesting that they may be potential upstream regulators of Dlx genes in vivo. To determine whether there exists a dlx-mediated regulatory pathway during zebrafish GABAergic neuron formation, we establish two independent lines of transgenic fish in which the GFP reporter gene is controlled by a 1.4kb dlx5a/dlx6a intergenic sequence (encompassing zebrafish I56i and I56ii) and a 1.1kb fragment containing only I56i CRE, respectively. Our observations reveal that dlx5a/dlx6a regulatory elements exhibit a fairly specific activity in the zebrafish forebrain and may be essential for GABAergic neuron generation, while I56i and I56ii are likely to play distinct roles in modulating this process in different subpopulations of cells. Disruption of dlx1a/dlx2a or dlx5a/dlx6a function leads to a marked decrease of enhancer activity in the diencephalon and midbrain as well as a comparatively lesser extent of reduction in the telencephalon. In order to define the specific contribution of various individual CREs to overall Dlx regulation, we also generate a mutant mouse model in which I12b CRE is selectively deleted. Despite that mice homozygous for I12b loss develop normally and harbor no overt morphological defects in the forebrain, targeted deletion of this enhancer results in a significant reduction of Dlx1/Dlx2 transcript levels and seemingly perturbs cell proliferation in the subpallial telencephalon, particularly in the ventricular and subventricular zones of ganglionic eminences. Taken together, these data illustrate a complex and dynamic Dlx regulation in the early developing forebrain through the implications of multiple Dlx CREs with overlapping and diverse functions.

The Spemann organizer in amphibians gives rise to the anterior mesendoderm (AME) and is capable of inducing neural tissues. This inductive activity is thought to occur largely via the antagonism of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling in the organizer. In the mouse, BMP antagonists Chordin and Noggin function redundantly in the AME and are required during forebrain maintenance. However, the timing of forebrain initiation and the function of BMP antagonism in forebrain initiation remained unclear prior to this study. In addition, the Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) ligand Nodal patterns the forebrain via its function in the anterior primitive streak (APS), the precursor tissue of the AME. Whether BMP and Nodal signaling pathways interact has not been previously investigated. The goal of this dissertation was to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in early mammalian forebrain establishment by embryonic and genetic manipulations. This study determined that forebrain initiation occurs during early gastrulation and requires signals from the AVE and AME. The AVE was identified as a source of active BMP antagonism in vivo, and the BMP antagonism supplied by exogenous tissues was capable to promote forebrain initiation and maintenance in the murine ectoderm. It is likely that BMP antagonism enhances forebrain gene expression via inhibiting posteriorization. This study further identified a possible crosstalk between BMP and Nodal signaling. Loss of Chordin or Noggin in combination with heterozygosity for Nodal or Smad3 results in holoprosencephaly. Molecular analyses suggest that the BMP-Nodal interaction occurs in the APS and/or the AME. Failure of this interaction results in an imbalance of BMP and Nodal signal levels that devastate APS and AME patterning during early forebrain establishment, ultimately leading to holoprosencephaly in mid-gestation. This interaction is likely to occur extracellularly, possibly by formation of a BMP-Nodal heteromeric complex. Furthermore, the spatiotemporal expression of phospho-Smad1/5/8, an effector of BMP signaling pathway, was characterized during early mouse embryogenesis. Distribution of phospho-Smad1/5/8 serves as a faithful readout of BMP signaling activity and helps to better understand how BMPs are involved in patterning early embryos. The implication of phospho-Smad1/5/8 expression in both wildtype and mutant embryos is also discussed. / Dissertation

<p>Auditory sensations can arise from objects in our environment or from our own actions, such as when we speak or make music. We must able to distinguish such sources of sounds, as well as form new associations between our actions and the sounds they produce. The brain is thought to accomplish this by conveying copies of the motor command, termed corollary discharge signals, to auditory processing brain regions, where they can suppress the auditory consequences of our own actions. Despite the importance of such transformations in health and disease, little is known about the mechanisms underlying corollary discharge in the mammalian auditory system. Using a range of techniques to identify, monitor, and manipulate neuronal circuits, I characterized a synaptic and circuit basis for corollary discharge in the mouse auditory cortex. The major contribution of my studies was to identify and characterize a long-range projection from motor cortex that is responsible for suppressing auditory cortical output during movements by activating local inhibitory interneurons. I used similar techniques to understand how this circuit is embedded within a broader neuromodulatory brain network important for learning and plasticity. These findings characterize the synaptic and circuit mechanisms underlying corollary discharge in mammalian auditory cortex, as well as uncover a broad network interaction potentially used to pattern neural associations between our actions and the sounds they produce.</p> / Dissertation

Understanding the specificity of homeobox genes has been hampered by the lack of verified direct transcriptional targets. The Dlx family of homeobox genes is expressed in the ganglionic eminences of the developing forebrain. Dlx1/Dlx2 double knockout (DKO) mice die at birth. Phenotypic analyses demonstrate abnormal development of the basal telencephalon, including defects in neuronal differentiation in the basal ganglia, reduced expression of GABA in the basal telencephalon, and loss of migration of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons to the neocortex. The mechanisms underlying DLX protein regulation of differentiation and migration of GABAergic interneurons are poorly defined. We have successfully applied chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify potential direct transcriptional targets of DLX homeoproteins from embryonic tissues in vivo. Reporter gene assays demonstrated the transcriptional significance of the binding of DLX proteins to different downstream regulatory elements, which were confirmed in vitro by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and site-directed mutagenesis. The functional significance of DLX mediated transcriptional regulation of these targets was further elaborated through several series of loss-of-function assays including gene expression in Dlx1/2 knockout embryonic forebrain tissues, as well as siRNA or Lentiviral mediated shRNA knockdown experiments with primary forebrain cultures. Quantitative analysis of the regulatory effect of Dlx genes on various forebrain markers of differentiation and migration was performed using in situ hybridization, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with cell counting. Neuronal migration was assessed by forebrain explants and diI labelling of migratory cells from ganglionic eminence to neocortex. We have demonstrated that DLX1 and DLX2 can transcriptionally activate (Gad1, Gad2) or repress (Nrp2) different downstream targets. In the Dlx1/2 DKO, reduction of GABA expression and failure of GABAergic interneurons to migrate to the neocortex is partly due to loss or aberrant expression of these DLX downstream targets. In the triple Dlx1/2; Nrp2KO, partial restoration of tangential migration of GABAergic interneurons from basal ganglia to the neocortex was successfully established signifying the importance of DLX regulation of Semaphorin-Neuropilin signalling during forebrain development.

Understanding the specificity of homeobox genes has been hampered by the lack of verified direct transcriptional targets. The Dlx family of homeobox genes is expressed in the ganglionic eminences of the developing forebrain. Dlx1/Dlx2 double knockout (DKO) mice die at birth. Phenotypic analyses demonstrate abnormal development of the basal telencephalon, including defects in neuronal differentiation in the basal ganglia, reduced expression of GABA in the basal telencephalon, and loss of migration of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons to the neocortex. The mechanisms underlying DLX protein regulation of differentiation and migration of GABAergic interneurons are poorly defined. We have successfully applied chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify potential direct transcriptional targets of DLX homeoproteins from embryonic tissues in vivo. Reporter gene assays demonstrated the transcriptional significance of the binding of DLX proteins to different downstream regulatory elements, which were confirmed in vitro by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and site-directed mutagenesis. The functional significance of DLX mediated transcriptional regulation of these targets was further elaborated through several series of loss-of-function assays including gene expression in Dlx1/2 knockout embryonic forebrain tissues, as well as siRNA or Lentiviral mediated shRNA knockdown experiments with primary forebrain cultures. Quantitative analysis of the regulatory effect of Dlx genes on various forebrain markers of differentiation and migration was performed using in situ hybridization, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with cell counting. Neuronal migration was assessed by forebrain explants and diI labelling of migratory cells from ganglionic eminence to neocortex. We have demonstrated that DLX1 and DLX2 can transcriptionally activate (Gad1, Gad2) or repress (Nrp2) different downstream targets. In the Dlx1/2 DKO, reduction of GABA expression and failure of GABAergic interneurons to migrate to the neocortex is partly due to loss or aberrant expression of these DLX downstream targets. In the triple Dlx1/2; Nrp2KO, partial restoration of tangential migration of GABAergic interneurons from basal ganglia to the neocortex was successfully established signifying the importance of DLX regulation of Semaphorin-Neuropilin signalling during forebrain development.

The vertebrate Dlx gene family consists of multiple convergently transcribed bigene clusters and encodes a group of homeodomain-containing transcription factors crucial for the development of forebrain, branchial arches, sensory organs and limbs. At least four cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are responsible for Dlx expression in the forebrain: URE2 and I12b in the Dlx1/Dlx2 (zebrafish dlx1a/dlx2a) locus, and, I56i and I56ii in the Dlx5/Dlx6 (zebrafish dlx5a/dlx6a) locus. Here, we first show that unlike the other three enhancers, mouse I56ii CRE targets a group of GABAergic projection neurons expressing striatal markers Meis2 and Islet1. Meis2 and Islet1 proteins can activate reporter gene transcription via the I56ii CRE, suggesting that they may be potential upstream regulators of Dlx genes in vivo. To determine whether there exists a dlx-mediated regulatory pathway during zebrafish GABAergic neuron formation, we establish two independent lines of transgenic fish in which the GFP reporter gene is controlled by a 1.4kb dlx5a/dlx6a intergenic sequence (encompassing zebrafish I56i and I56ii) and a 1.1kb fragment containing only I56i CRE, respectively. Our observations reveal that dlx5a/dlx6a regulatory elements exhibit a fairly specific activity in the zebrafish forebrain and may be essential for GABAergic neuron generation, while I56i and I56ii are likely to play distinct roles in modulating this process in different subpopulations of cells. Disruption of dlx1a/dlx2a or dlx5a/dlx6a function leads to a marked decrease of enhancer activity in the diencephalon and midbrain as well as a comparatively lesser extent of reduction in the telencephalon. In order to define the specific contribution of various individual CREs to overall Dlx regulation, we also generate a mutant mouse model in which I12b CRE is selectively deleted. Despite that mice homozygous for I12b loss develop normally and harbor no overt morphological defects in the forebrain, targeted deletion of this enhancer results in a significant reduction of Dlx1/Dlx2 transcript levels and seemingly perturbs cell proliferation in the subpallial telencephalon, particularly in the ventricular and subventricular zones of ganglionic eminences. Taken together, these data illustrate a complex and dynamic Dlx regulation in the early developing forebrain through the implications of multiple Dlx CREs with overlapping and diverse functions.

The Distal-less homeobox (Dlx) genes encode a group of transcription factors that are involved in various developmental processes including forebrain development. Dlx genes are arranged in convergently transcribed bigene clusters with enhancer sequences located in the intergenic region of each cluster. The expression patterns of Dlx1/Dlx2 and of Dlx5/Dlx6 are attributed in part to the activity of I12a/I12b and I56i/I56ii intergenic enhancers, respectively. In an effort to determine how Dlx intergenic enhancers interact with the promoter regions of each cluster, I employed the Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) technique on developing forebrain at E13.5 and E15.5. My 3C analysis provided potential enhancer-promoter interaction, in cis, that are consistent with previously known regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, trans interactions may exist between Dlx1/Dlx2 and Dlx5/Dlx6 clusters in the developing forebrain at E13.5, thus providing a possible novel cross-regulatory mechanism between these two loci. I have also investigated the phenotypic consequences of Dlx enhancer deletion(s) on forebrain development by characterizing mice with I56ii and I56ii/I12b enhancer deletions. Enhancer deletions significantly impair Dlx expression as well as that of Evf2, Gad2 and of the striatal markers Islet1 and Meis2. Enhancer deletion(s) also reduce the expression of ISLET1 and CTIP2 proteins and Semaphorin 3A, Slit1 and Ephrin A5 that are thought to provide guidance cues in the corridor cells. Overall, these changes may disrupt the guidance of the thalamocortical axons. The data presented here further our understanding of the interactions between Dlx intergenic enhancers and promoter regions. Enhancer deletion(s) furthers our understanding of Dlx regulatory networks necessary that ensure proper Dlx expression, which, in turn may be involved in a genetic pathway underlying the synthesis of GABA, which may be further essential in maintaining the GABAergic phenotype.

La formation des circuits cérébraux, dont l’altération est associée à divers troubles neurologiques et psychiatriques, commence pendant l’embryogenèse. Les microglies sont les macrophages du cerveau et répondent à une inflammation ou une infection par une production de facteurs et une phagocytose active. En plus de leurs fonctions immunitaires, ces cellules ont été récemment impliquées dans l’émergence de troubles associés à des maladies neurodéveloppementales. Elles agissent également sur le remodelage post-natal des circuits neuronaux en phagocytant des synapses et des neurones immatures. Étant donné que les microglies colonisent précocement le cerveau embryonnaire, elles pourraient également participer au développement cérébral précoce. Mes travaux de thèse ont montré que les microglies embryonnaires, par le biais d’une localisation hétérogène, modulent la formation du cerveau antérieur. En effet, l’étude phénotypique comparative in vivo de modèles murins dans lesquels les microglies sont absentes ou leurs fonctions perturbées montrent des défauts de positionnement d’interneurones corticaux et de progression des axones dopaminergiques. De plus, les microglies sont impliquées dans la progression d’un autre faisceau axonal, la capsule externe. Après avoir observé une association très forte entre les microglies et des axones spécifiques, j’ai utilisé deux approches ex vivo et in vivo afin de déterminer si les microglies pourraient agir par phagocytose. Mes résultats montrent que malgré la présence de caractéristiques morphologiques phagocytaires, les microglies ne phagocytent pas les axones de manière intense. Ces travaux suggèrent ainsi que la phagocytose des axones à elle seule ne peut pas expliquer les rôles des microglies sur la croissance axonale. Ce travail, qui montre un rôle anténatal des microglies, révèle une interaction nouvelle entre le développement des systèmes nerveux et immunitaires, et ouvre des perspectives nouvelles pour l’étude sur les mécanismes contrôlant la formation du cerveau en condition physiologique et pathologique. / Brain functioning relies on complex neural circuits that are built during embryogenesis and defects in this process can lead to neurologic or psychiatric disorders. Microglia are the brain resident macrophages, which respond to inflammation and infection by active phagocytosis and secretion of various molecules. In addition to these immune-related functions, microglia were recently involved in the onset of several neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as in postnatal neuronal plasticity, notably through the phagocytosis of developing neurons and synapses. Since microglia colonize the brain during early embryogenesis, they might also participate to the elaboration of neural networks. Here, we reveal that embryonic microglia, via a heterogeneous localization, are modulators of forebrain wiring. Using a cross-comparative analysis of phenotypes induced by either an absence or a perturbation of microglia activity, we showed that microglia directly regulate interneuron positioning as well as dopaminergic axons outgrowth. Moreover, microglia are involved in the formation of another tract, the external capsule. Having observed a strong association between microglia and axons, we combined ex vivo and in vivo approaches in order to decipher whether microglia could act by means of phagocytosis. Despite showing some clear morphological features of intense phagocytosis, our results suggest that microglia do not perform active phagocytosis of axons in vivo. Thus, the phagocytic activity of embryonic microglia by itself is unlikely to explain their role on axonal progression. This study shows for the first time an early prenatal role for microglia and reveal a novel interplay between the central and nervous systems during embryonic development.

The vertebrate Dlx gene family consists of multiple convergently transcribed bigene clusters and encodes a group of homeodomain-containing transcription factors crucial for the development of forebrain, branchial arches, sensory organs and limbs. At least four cis-regulatory elements (CREs) are responsible for Dlx expression in the forebrain: URE2 and I12b in the Dlx1/Dlx2 (zebrafish dlx1a/dlx2a) locus, and, I56i and I56ii in the Dlx5/Dlx6 (zebrafish dlx5a/dlx6a) locus. Here, we first show that unlike the other three enhancers, mouse I56ii CRE targets a group of GABAergic projection neurons expressing striatal markers Meis2 and Islet1. Meis2 and Islet1 proteins can activate reporter gene transcription via the I56ii CRE, suggesting that they may be potential upstream regulators of Dlx genes in vivo. To determine whether there exists a dlx-mediated regulatory pathway during zebrafish GABAergic neuron formation, we establish two independent lines of transgenic fish in which the GFP reporter gene is controlled by a 1.4kb dlx5a/dlx6a intergenic sequence (encompassing zebrafish I56i and I56ii) and a 1.1kb fragment containing only I56i CRE, respectively. Our observations reveal that dlx5a/dlx6a regulatory elements exhibit a fairly specific activity in the zebrafish forebrain and may be essential for GABAergic neuron generation, while I56i and I56ii are likely to play distinct roles in modulating this process in different subpopulations of cells. Disruption of dlx1a/dlx2a or dlx5a/dlx6a function leads to a marked decrease of enhancer activity in the diencephalon and midbrain as well as a comparatively lesser extent of reduction in the telencephalon. In order to define the specific contribution of various individual CREs to overall Dlx regulation, we also generate a mutant mouse model in which I12b CRE is selectively deleted. Despite that mice homozygous for I12b loss develop normally and harbor no overt morphological defects in the forebrain, targeted deletion of this enhancer results in a significant reduction of Dlx1/Dlx2 transcript levels and seemingly perturbs cell proliferation in the subpallial telencephalon, particularly in the ventricular and subventricular zones of ganglionic eminences. Taken together, these data illustrate a complex and dynamic Dlx regulation in the early developing forebrain through the implications of multiple Dlx CREs with overlapping and diverse functions.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(生命科学) / 甲第22133号 / 生博第420号 / 新制||生||55(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院生命科学研究科高次生命科学専攻 / (主査)教授 渡邊 直樹, 教授 千坂 修, 教授 原田 浩 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Philosophy in Life Sciences / Kyoto University / DFAM