This essay discusses in a comparative way the Swedish and Norwegian legal system, mainly laws that contain adoption regulations. It also compares the administrative work that the government in both countries practices in relation to the individual person. In this essay, focus lies on the legal rights of the child in the adoption process and how well the government and its service meet the requirements from abroad.This essay has shown that the government has many rules and regulations that regulate their work and that all the sub processes are designed to ensure the child’s best in the adoption in both Sweden and Norway. Despite some differences in the investigation process, the work is very much alike. The differences in the investigation that leads to an approval has shown that the government in Norway is not as controlling in comparison to the Swedish government. This could lead to the child’s rights being neglected to a certain extent.

Increasing freight transportation volumes continue to increase problems related to human health, congestion on the transport infrastructure, noise, climate changes, etc. Governments often want to minimize these negative effects, and this wish is expressed in societal goals, e.g., to reach environmental targets. An important instrument for reaching societal goals is governmental control policies, e.g., regulations, taxes and fees, which can influence the behaviour of the actors in a transport chain. Before implementing such control policies, it is crucial to predict their effects in order to make probable that it is a good measure. A review of models that consider the effects of governmental control policies on transportation has been performed which shows that macro-level models are mainly used for this purpose. However, the behaviour of the individual transport chain actors can hardly be captured in such models since the decision making actors are not modelled explicitly. Consequently, the negative effects caused by the decisions taken by the individual transport chain actors are not fully captured in these models. We believe that micro-level models have the potential to bridge the gap between governmental policy-making and the behaviour of transport chain actors. A micro-level model based on agent-technology has been developed which captures the environmental, quality and economical performance in transport chains, given different governmental control policies. The transport chain actors are represented by decision-making agents in the model. Logistical factors for characterizing transport chains have been identified and described according to degree of influence. To illustrate the usage of the micro-level model, simulation experiments based on a real world case have been performed where different levels of governmental control policies are introduced. The simulation results so far have showed that the model seems to simulate the behaviour of the transport chain actors correctly in the studied scenarios. The simulation tool can then be used as a decision support for policy-makers and serve as a complement to existing tools based on macro-level models.

Background: With regard to studies on the acceptance of the police, in which neighbourhoodfactors as well as attitude and trust in the police were examined, it is above all factors such asneighbourhood cohesion, disadvantage and trust in the effectiveness of the police presenceand the preference for security that exert an influence.Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate to what extent people's own attitudestowards safety and the environment in which they live influence their Police ProfilingAttitude.Methods: The data was cross-sectional analysis of internal security in Germany 2020, inwhich 1402 people took part. An ordinal regression analysis was performed in the attitudetowards police profiling associated with neighbourhood (condition, cohesion, trust), SecurityFreedom Spectrum (SFS) and sociodemographic factors were included.Results: 46% of those surveyed stated that safety was more important to them than freedom.The results of the regression analysis revealed a negative association between age andattitudes towards police profiling, suggesting that older people are more in favor of morepolice presence. In addition, differences were observed by educational level and Germanregion, with lower educational levels and West Germans tending to have more positiveattitudes towards police profiling. Trust in the neighbourhood and the importance of safetyover freedom also showed a significant association with attitudes towards police profiling.