La communication cellulaire est un phénomène important pour le maintien de l’homéostasie des cellules. Au court des dernières années, cette sphère de recherche sur la signalisation cellulaire a connue des avancées importantes au niveau de l’identification des acteurs principaux impliqués dans la reconnaissance extracellulaire des signaux, ainsi que la compréhension des voies de signalisation engagées par les cellules pour répondre aux facteurs extracellulaires. Malgré ces nouvelles informations, les diverses interrelations moléculaires entre les acteurs ainsi que les voies de signalisation cellulaire, demeurent mal comprises. Le transfert d’énergie de résonance de bioluminescence (BRET) permet la mesure d’interactions protéiques et peut être utilisé dans deux configurations, le BRET480-YFP (connu aussi comme le BRET1) et le BRET400-GFP (connu aussi en tant que BRET2). Suite à l’oxydation de son substrat, la luciférase de renilla peut transférer son énergie à une protéine fluorescente, uniquement si elles sont à proximité l’une de l’autre (≤100Å). La combinaison dans un seul essai des BRET480-YFP et BRET400-GFP, a permis de suivre trois paires d’interactions, sur une même population cellulaire. Par contre, l’utilisation de deux substrats pour la réaction de bioluminescence rend impossible la mesure simultanée des différents signaux de BRET, pour ce trois nouvelles configurations de BRET ont été mises au point en utilisant des nouvelles protéines fluorescentes. Ainsi deux des nouvelles couleurs de BRET ayant des émissions résolues, le BRET400-BFP et le BRET400mAmetrine ont pu être combinées pour mesurer l’engagement par un RCPG d’une protéine G, ainsi que l’accumulation du second messager. La combinaison de ces BRET a également permis de révéler la formation d’un complexe entre le récepteur α2A adrénergique (α2AAR), Gαi1, le dimère Gβγ ainsi que la kinase des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (GRK2), suite à l’activation du récepteur. De plus, seule l’entrée de GRK2 semble être en mesure de causer la désensibilisation du α2AAR, en s’intercalant entre Gαi1 et Gβγ. Par contre, la stabilisation de l’interaction entre α2AAR et la β-arrestine2 semble nécessiter l’activité kinase de GRK2. Une autre étude a révélé l’importance de différentes Gα pour la mobilisation du calcium, suite à l’activation du récepteur aux opioïdes de type delta (DOR). Suite à la surexpression de Gα de la famille Gαq, il a été possible de mesurer une influence de ces Gα sur la mobilisation du calcium. Toutefois, cette réponse calcique mesurée en présence des Gαq demeure sensible aux prétraitements à la toxine de Bordetella pertussis, qui inhibe sélectivement l’activité des Gαi. De plus, la co-expression de Gαi et Gαq permet de potentialiser la mobilisation de calcium, démontrant une interrelation entre ces deux familles de protéine Gα, pour la signalisation du DOR. Afin de démontrer l’interrelation directe, des expériences de BRET ont été réalisées entre différentes Gα. En plus de montrer la formation de complexes sélectifs entre les Gα, les expériences de BRET réalisées en parallèle d’analyses de séquences de Gα, ont également mis à jour un site de sélectivité d’interaction entre les Gα, l’hélice α4. Suite à la transposition de cette hélice α4 de Gα12 sur Gαi1, qui normalement n’interagissent pas, il a été possible de forcer l’interaction entre Gα12 et Gαi1, confirmant ainsi que cette hélice α contient l’information permettant une sélectivité d’interaction. Au cours de cette thèse, il a été possible de générer de nouvelles méthodes de mesure d’interactions protéiques qui permettent de multiplexer différents signaux, ce qui a permis de mettre à jour de nouvelles interactions entre divers effecteurs de la signalisation de RCGP / Cellular communication is an important phenomenon for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Recently, important progress has been made in the cell signalling research field concerning the identification of the major actors and the cellular pathways engaged in response to these extracellular factors. However, in spite of this new information, the interrelationships at the molecular level between the various cellular actors and the different signalling pathways remain badly understood. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) monitors interactions between proteins and can be used in two configurations, the BRET480-YFP (also known as BRET1) and the BRET400-GFP (also known as BRET2). Following oxidation of its substrate, renilla luciferase transfers its energy to a fluorescent protein, only if they are in close proximity (≤100Å). By combining the BRET480-YFP and BRET400-GFP in one assay, it is possible to follow three pair-wise interactions in the same cellular population. However, using two bioluminescence reaction substrates limits the possibility of measuring the different BRET signals simultaneously. In order to measure multiple BRET signals simultaneously, three new BRET configurations, based on the BRET400-GFP, were developed using fluorescent proteins with different emission wavelengths. Two of the new BRET colors which have resolved emission wavelengths, the BRET400-BFP and BRET400mAmetrine, were combined for measuring the heterotrimeric G protein engagement by the vasopressin V2 receptor, as well as the accumulation of the second messenger. Combining these new BRET techniques reveals for the first time the formation of a complex between the α2A adrenergic receptor (α2AAR), Gαi1, the Gβγ dimer and G protein-receptor kinase (GRK2) following receptor activation. Moreover, only the entry of GRK2 into the receptor complex is required for the α2AAR desensitization, by inserting between Gαi1 and Gβγ. On the other hand, the stabilization of the interaction between α2AAR and β-arrestin2 requires the kinase activity of GRK2. Another study revealed the importance of multiple Gα subunits for calcium mobilization induced upon activation of the delta opioid receptor (DOR). Gαq subfamily member overexpression altered the DOR-induced calcium mobilization, but this Gαq calcium mobilization remained sensitive to pre-treatement pertussis toxin, through selective inhibition of the activity of Gαi members. Moreover, Gαi and Gαq co-expression potentiated calcium mobilization, suggesting an interrelationship between these two Gα families in DOR signaling. This Gαi and Gαq interrelationship could result from the formation of a complex close to the receptor. In order to test this hypothesis, BRET experiments were performed, with the aim of measuring the presence of complexes between different Gα. In addition to demonstrating complex formation between Gα subunits, the BRET experiments in parallel with sequence analysis, also revealed a selective interaction site between the Gα, the α4 helix. By swapping the a4 helix of Gαi with the α4 helix of Gα12, which doesn’t normally interact with Gα12, it was possible to force the interaction between Gα12 and Gαi to confirm that this α helix contains information concerning the selectivity of interactions between Gα subunits. During this thesis, new methods were to detect protein interactions and multiplexing these methods allowed the detection of novel interactions between signalling effectors of GPCRs.

A estabilidade genômica é condição essencial à sobrevivência e ao funcionamento dos organismos vivos. No entanto, várias situações podem provocar danos no DNA. Por exemplo, cerca de 104 lesões podem ocorrer no material genético de uma célula de mamífero a cada dia. No intuito de preservar a integridade genômica e contornar os efeitos deletérios destas modificações, uma maquinaria constituída de proteínas especializadas em reconhecer e reparar estes danos foi selecionada ao longo do curso evolutivo. Defeitos em proteínas destas maquinarias causam instabilidade genômica e pode resultar em elevada taxa de mutações e quebras do DNA que resultam em eventos de amplificação gênica, como em células cancerosas. De uma maneira aparentemente contrária ao requerimento de estabilidade genômica como condição primordial para a perpetuação da vida, Leishmania apresenta um genoma notavelmente maleável e explora a amplificação gênica como recurso de sobrevivência. Ainda que a plasticidade genômica em Leishmania seja facilmente demonstrada, nós não conhecemos os mecanismos precisos pelos quais este parasita coordena a ação da maquinaria de detecção de danos no DNA e a consumação dos eventos de amplificação gênica. No intuito de contribuir para a compreensão deste processo, nós identificamos proteínas homólogas do complexo 9-1-1 (Rad9-Hus1-Rad1) em Leishmania major. As proteínas LmHus1 e LmRad9 apresentam marcada divergência estrutural em relação aos seus homólogos em outros eucariotos e nenhuma proteína obviamente homóloga a Rad1 foi identificada neste parasita. Análises filogenéticas indicam que LmHus1 e LmRad9 são relacionadas ao complexos heterotriméricos envolvidos na detecção de danos no DNA. Em acordo com isso, nossos experimentos demonstram que alteração nos níveis destas proteínas interfere na capacidade do parasita em lidar com estresse genotóxico. LmHus1 localiza-se no núcleo, é requerida para o crescimento normal deste parasita e a diminuição de sua expressão compromete mecanismos de controle de ciclo celular e manutenção de telômeros. LmRad9 também localiza-se no núcleo e sua superexpressão causa defeito de crescimento e de resposta ao estresse genotóxico em L. major. Nós observamos que LmHus1 e LmRad9 formam um complexo responsivo ao dano no DNA in vivo, uma forte indicação de que o complexo 9-1-1 tenha sido conservado em L. major. As peculiaridades estruturais destas proteínas sugerem que o complexo 9-1-1 de L. major possua uma arquitetura distinta em comparação aos eucariotos superiores. Em adição a isto, outras proteínas, tais como a LmRpa1, também apresentam uma marcante divergência estrutural. Isso sugere que a via de sinalização de danos no DNA envolvendo o complexo 9-1-1 e Rpa1 de L. major possua mecanismos peculiares de ação. Estas observações podem permitir entender como ocorreu o processo evolutivo da sinalização mediada pelo complexo 9-1-1 nos eucariotos, além de ajudar para o entendimento das bases moleculares de como este parasito conduz os eventos de amplificação gênica. / Genome stability is a essential condition for survival and proper functioning of living organisms. However, a broad range of elements may lead to DNA damage. For instance, about 104 DNA lesions may be inflicted upon any given mammalian cell everyday. In order to maintain the genome integrity and circumvent the deleterious effects of these lesions, a molecular machinery composed of proteins specialized in detecting and repairing DNA damage has been selected in evolution. Defects of the proteins that constitute such machineries may result not only in a high mutation rate, but also in breaks in the DNA structure that can mediate gene amplification as observed in cancer cells. In an apparent opposition to such requirement for stability as an essential condition to life, the protozoan Leishmania presents a highly malleable genome and explores genome amplification as a survival and adaptation tool. Despite of the fact that the Leishmania genome plasticity can be easily demonstrated, the precise mechanisms that coordinate the molecular machineries involved in the detection and signaling of DNA damage, and in the regulation of gene amplification is still largely unknown. In order to contribute to a better understanding of these processes, we identified and studied the Leishmania major proteins that are homologues of those proteins that compose the 9-1-1 complex (Rad9-Hus1-Rad1). The proteins LmHus1 and LmRad9 present a high structural divergence when compared to its homologues from other eukaryotes and no obvious homologue of Rad1 was identified in the parasite genome. Phylogeny analysis indicated that LmHus1 and LmRad9 are closely related to heterotrimeric complexes involved in the detection of DNA damage. In accordance to that, our experiments demonstrated that altered levels of these proteins interfere with the parasite ability to deal with genotoxic stress. Moreover, LmHus1 was localized to the parasite nucleus and is a required protein for normal parasite proliferation. Besides, we showed that decreased levels of LmHus1 compromise cell cycle regulation and the maintenance of telomeres. LmRad9 was also shown to be localized to the cell nucleus and its overexpression led to growth defects and affected the L. major response to genotoxic stress. We also observed that LmHus1 and LmRad9 interact with each other to for a protein complex that is responsive to DNA damage in vivo, which strongly suggested that the 9-1-1 complex was conserved in L. major. The structural peculiarities of these proteins indicate that the possible L. major 9-1-1 complex has a different architecture when compared to the complex found in higher eukaryotes. In addition to that, other proteins, such as LmRpa1, also present a marked structural divergence. Altogether, these findings suggest that the DNA damage signaling pathway involving the 9-1-1 complex and LmRpa1 in L. major, may present a peculiar mode of action. These observations may contribute to a better understanding not only of the evolution of the signaling pathway mediated by the 9-1-1 complex in eukaryotes, but also of the molecular basis of the genome plasticity and the gene amplification phenomenon.