Thesis advisor: Karen Rosen / High achieving girls (i.e., super girls) are under the spotlight in popular psychology and recent media reports. While these reports suggest girls are doing well by objective standards of achievement, little is actually known about high achieving girls' social and emotional development. Understanding psychological aspects of high achievers is critical in determining whether girls pay a price along the road to success. In what follows, the literature on risk, including pressure/stress, coping, and problem behaviors will be reviewed. Salient developmental issues such as self-evaluation and intimacy will also be explored. The literature on these topics will be evaluated first among typical adolescents and then among high achievers. Next, a study that assessed the socioemotional functioning of high achieving girls and boys is described. Results indicated that high academic achievement for both boys and girls was related to higher academic self-concept, lower external and other problem behaviors, lower behavioral misconduct, lower romantic appeal, higher personal standards, and less positive thinking as a coping technique. However, participants' gender played a significant role. Girls revealed lower self-competence, more stress, and greater eating problems, regardless of achievement. Across achievement levels, boys had lower levels of intimacy as compared to girls. In one instance, achievement interacted with gender: low academic achievement was related to higher ratings of behavioral misconduct for boys only. Implications are discussed as they relate to both typical and high achieving students and the contexts in which they live. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2010. / Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Psychology.

abstract: The field of developmental psychology often underrepresents Latinx individuals within their corpus of published scholarship. In the area of lifespan identity development this is particularly evident from the scarcity of Latinx life story narratives. In addition, Latinx family parenting styles is an underdeveloped area of scholarship. At the same time, a robust literature base demonstrates that for youth from non-dominant culture families, ethnic racial identity increases measures of adaptive well-being and academic achievement. Because academic achievement for Latinx students does not proportionately reach levels of educational success as compared to whites, research investigating foundations of ethnic racial identity within Latinx families is warranted. This investigation extends parenting style literature within the field of developmental psychology by exploring inter-generational practices of Latinx families. Participants within this study include mothers of Mexican descent who have earned at least one Master's degree, a level of high academic achievement attained by only 10 percent of adults within the U.S. Each Latina mother, ranging in age from 36 to 63 years, participated in two or more semi-structured interviews. Protocols were based on McAdams's life story interview; McAdams's life story narrative analysis, based upon Erikson's lifespan theory of identity development, provided a model of analysis. In addition, transcripts of participant interviews, totaling more than twelve hours, were analyzed according to themes of parenting styles and family socialization practices. Familial ethnic socialization was embedded within routines and practices of mothers' families of orientation. Mothers employed a concerted cultivation parenting style within their families of procreation. In alignment with McAdams's framework, mothers narrated life stories in a redemptive manner. In other words, a negative life event was conveyed as having a positive outcome. Implications from my study inform scholars and can offer usable information for parent and teacher education by means of contextualized family activities and parental practices gleaned from participants' life story narratives. / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Educational Psychology 2018

Common discourse concerning the educational trajectories of African American males consists of dismal future outcomes due to defective schooling experiences in kindergarten through twelfth grades. There has been a disregard of counter narratives of high academic achievement and overall school success coupled with a highlighting of failure through deficit-based research practices. Consequently, African American males are positioned as delayed or troubled, which serves to perpetuate educational inequity. This study attempts to increase the scarcity of literature by giving voice to the experiences of high achievement among African American adolescent males attending a school designed to support the achievement of impoverished youth of color. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to investigate the lifeworlds of nine African American males in seventh and eighth grade at a private, college preparatory middle school in southwestern Florida. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted regarding their experiences of academic success. The results indicate that these young men developed positive scholar identities through a process that included the cultivation of academic achievement, sacrificing to succeed, trailblazing, striving for the good life, and planning for success while simultaneously rejecting deficit-based and peril portrayals of Black males. Practical implications for school psychologists, educators, and parents are discussed.

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde einem Phänomen nachgegangen, das bislang nur wenig wissenschaftliche Beachtung erfahren hat: der Stigmatisierung von leistungsstarken SchülerInnen als Streber. Da sich bislang kaum Forschung mit der Streber-Etikettierung beschäftigt hat, wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit versucht, anhand quantitativer Studien ein umfassendes Bild von der Etikettierung, ihrer Prozesse und ihrer Konsequenzen zu erfassen. In diesem Rahmen wurde folgenden Fragen nachgegangen: 1) Welche individuellen Faktoren sagen die Etikettierung als Streber und die Stigmatisierung anderer SchülerInnen als Streber vorher? 2) Welche Prozesse liegen der Stigmatisierung als Streber zugrunde? 3) Mit welchen Konsequenzen geht die Stigmatisierung einher? 4) Welche Faktoren tragen zur sozialen Akzeptanz von SchülerInnen mit herausragenden schulischen Leistungen bei? Die vorliegenden Befunde deuten darauf hin, dass es sich dabei um ein relevantes Phänomen handelt, welches mit individuellen Faktoren nebst schulischen Leistungen verbunden ist, durch den Klassenkontext determiniert wird und zudem mit aversiven Konsequenzen für die Betroffenen einhergeht. Neben dieser eher negativen Konnotation zeigen die Befunde aber auch auf, dass es Möglichkeiten zum Umgang und zur Lösung gibt. Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit konnte ein wichtiger Schritt zur Schließung einer Forschungslücke getan werden. Nichtsdestoweniger zeigen die Befunde auch, dass für eine allumfassende Erklärung des Phänomens Streber weitere Forschung dringend benötigt wird.

Doctor of Philosophy / Curriculum and Instruction Programs / Charles E. Heerman / This statewide study examined the relationship between building income level and performance level percentage distribution, using 502 schools that earned a 2005-06 Kansas Standard of Excellence (SOE) building-wide award for reading or math. It originated from the premise that excellence is excellence, no matter the setting or income level of a school. A new baseline of data began in 2005-06 due to changes in the Kansas assessments, including more grades being tested than in previous years. The much larger database more accurately reflected the achievement of low-income students in Kansas. Decades of literature were reviewed, addressing influences on the development of Kansas standards, assessments, and the SOE award; the lifelong significance of income levels and achievement; high achievement for low-income students; and the pursuit of excellence through equitable educational reform. For purposes of this study, SOE schools were sorted into six designated types of buildings based on percentages of students eligible for free and reduced lunches, assessed grade levels, and SOE subject award. Results were reported using aggregate building groups as the unit of analysis. A two-way, repeated-measures, mixed design ANOVA general linear model served as an appropriate method to examine means for significant differences. Low-income SOE schools were noticeably fewer than medium- or high-income schools, especially at the senior high level. Three types of buildings showed some significant mean differences, but generally income did not appear to be a major factor. High-income buildings appeared to have a slight advantage; in the Exemplary category, high-income buildings outperformed the others; in the lower performance categories, high-income buildings had significantly lower means. The mean differences for high-income middle school/junior high buildings showed mainly moderate to large differences; other significant differences were rated as small to moderate. SOE schools of a given educational level and of varying income levels generally had similar performance scores in most of the performance level categories. Overall, major differences in performances were not evident among the different income levels of SOE buildings.

In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde einem Phänomen nachgegangen, das bislang nur wenig wissenschaftliche Beachtung erfahren hat: der Stigmatisierung von leistungsstarken SchülerInnen als Streber. Da sich bislang kaum Forschung mit der Streber-Etikettierung beschäftigt hat, wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit versucht, anhand quantitativer Studien ein umfassendes Bild von der Etikettierung, ihrer Prozesse und ihrer Konsequenzen zu erfassen. In diesem Rahmen wurde folgenden Fragen nachgegangen: 1) Welche individuellen Faktoren sagen die Etikettierung als Streber und die Stigmatisierung anderer SchülerInnen als Streber vorher? 2) Welche Prozesse liegen der Stigmatisierung als Streber zugrunde? 3) Mit welchen Konsequenzen geht die Stigmatisierung einher? 4) Welche Faktoren tragen zur sozialen Akzeptanz von SchülerInnen mit herausragenden schulischen Leistungen bei? Die vorliegenden Befunde deuten darauf hin, dass es sich dabei um ein relevantes Phänomen handelt, welches mit individuellen Faktoren nebst schulischen Leistungen verbunden ist, durch den Klassenkontext determiniert wird und zudem mit aversiven Konsequenzen für die Betroffenen einhergeht. Neben dieser eher negativen Konnotation zeigen die Befunde aber auch auf, dass es Möglichkeiten zum Umgang und zur Lösung gibt. Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit konnte ein wichtiger Schritt zur Schließung einer Forschungslücke getan werden. Nichtsdestoweniger zeigen die Befunde auch, dass für eine allumfassende Erklärung des Phänomens Streber weitere Forschung dringend benötigt wird.