Many attempts have been made to control water conformance. It is very costly to produce, treat and dispose of water, and produced water represents the largest waste stream associated with oil and gas production. The production of large amounts of water results in: (a) the need for more complex water?oil separation; (b) corrosion of wellbore and other equipment; (c) a rapid decline in hydrocarbon production rate and ultimate recovery; and (d) consequently, premature abandonment of a well or field, leaving considerable hydrocarbons unproduced. Sometimes water production results from heterogeneities in the horizontal direction, which leads to uneven movement of the flood front and subsequent early breakthrough of water from high permeability layers. This problem is exacerbated if there is (vertical) hydraulic communication between layers so that crossflow can occur. One of the novel technologies in chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is a gel type called deep diverting gel (DDG), which describes material that functions by plugging thief zones deep from the well where they were being injected. To evaluate the performance of this new treatment method, we will (1) model the treatment methods, (2) conduct economic analysis, and (3) compare different EOR methods. We have conducted relevant literature review about the development, design, modeling and economics of the enhanced oil recovery methods. Schlumberger's Eclipse simulator software has been used for modeling purposes. Modeling runs have demonstrated that placement of a DDG in a high permeability zone provided a blockage that diverted water into lower permeability areas, thus increasing the sweep of target zones. Research results demonstrated that, although higher recovery can be achieved with a polymer flood, the combination of delayed production response and large polymer amounts cause such projects to be less economically favorable than deep gel placement treatments. From results of several sensitivity runs, it can be concluded that plug size and oil viscosity are two determining factors in the efficiency of DDG treatments. For the assumed case, economic analysis demonstrated that DDG has the most positive net present value (NPV), with polymer flooding second and simply continuing the waterflood to its economic limit the least positive NPV.

No description available.

A preocupação com a contaminação das águas subterrâneas está relacionada principalmente aos aquíferos não confinados, especialmente nos casos em que o nível freático é raso. Para evitar o escoamento subterrâneo lateral através de aterros de resíduos sólidos, o objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar – teoricamente e experimentalmente – uma técnica alternativa de encapsulamento, que consiste em uma barreira vertical de alta permeabilidade. Foi desenvolvida uma solução analítica para modelar o escoamento em uma barreira vertical cilíndrica instalada no entorno de um aterro localizado abaixo do nível d\'água, em um campo de fluxo uniforme, onde cada domínio (aquífero, barreira e área encapsulada) possui uma condutividade hidráulica diferente. Os resultados do estudo teórico mostram que nos casos em que o maciço de resíduos possui condutividade hidráulica maior do que o aquífero, a barreira de alta permeabilidade é a solução mais eficaz. Já nos problemas em que o aterro possui condutividade hidráulica menor do que o aquífero, a técnica mais indicada é a barreira de baixa permeabilidade. A partir do experimento em escala reduzida, conclui-se que a barreira de alta permeabilidade é uma técnica de encapsulamento eficiente para impedir o transporte advectivo através de determinada região. Segundo os resultados, a velocidade média do fluido na área encapsulada é consideravelmente menor do que a velocidade média no aquífero. Comparando com a barreira de baixa permeabilidade, a vantagem da barreira de alta permeabilidade é que o seu preenchimento é muito menos sensível às falhas, resultando em um melhor desempenho em longo prazo. / The concern about groundwater contamination is mainly related to unconfined aquifers, especially in the cases where the water table is shallow. Therefore, in order to prevent the groundwater lateral flow through landfills, this research evaluates – theoretically and experimentally – an alternative encapsulation technique, which consists in a vertical barrier of high permeability. An analytical solution was developed to model the flow for a cylindrical barrier installed around a landfill located below the groundwater table, in a field of uniform flow, where each domain (aquifer, barrier and encapsulated area) has a different hydraulic conductivity. The results from the theoretical study show that in situations where the landfill has a hydraulic conductivity higher than the aquifer, the high permeability barrier is more efficient. In contrast, in the cases where the landfill has a hydraulic conductivity lower than the aquifer, the lw permeability barrier is a more suitable technique. From the small-scale experiment, it is possible to conclude that the permeable barrier is an efficient encapsulation technique to prevent the advective transport through a certain region. According to the results, the fluid mean velocity at the encapsulated area is considerably lower than the aquifer mean velocity. Comparing to the low permeability barrier, the advantage of the high permeability barrier is that its backfill material is less sensitive to defects, resulting in a better long-term performance.

A preocupação com a contaminação das águas subterrâneas está relacionada principalmente aos aquíferos não confinados, especialmente nos casos em que o nível freático é raso. Para evitar o escoamento subterrâneo lateral através de aterros de resíduos sólidos, o objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar – teoricamente e experimentalmente – uma técnica alternativa de encapsulamento, que consiste em uma barreira vertical de alta permeabilidade. Foi desenvolvida uma solução analítica para modelar o escoamento em uma barreira vertical cilíndrica instalada no entorno de um aterro localizado abaixo do nível d\'água, em um campo de fluxo uniforme, onde cada domínio (aquífero, barreira e área encapsulada) possui uma condutividade hidráulica diferente. Os resultados do estudo teórico mostram que nos casos em que o maciço de resíduos possui condutividade hidráulica maior do que o aquífero, a barreira de alta permeabilidade é a solução mais eficaz. Já nos problemas em que o aterro possui condutividade hidráulica menor do que o aquífero, a técnica mais indicada é a barreira de baixa permeabilidade. A partir do experimento em escala reduzida, conclui-se que a barreira de alta permeabilidade é uma técnica de encapsulamento eficiente para impedir o transporte advectivo através de determinada região. Segundo os resultados, a velocidade média do fluido na área encapsulada é consideravelmente menor do que a velocidade média no aquífero. Comparando com a barreira de baixa permeabilidade, a vantagem da barreira de alta permeabilidade é que o seu preenchimento é muito menos sensível às falhas, resultando em um melhor desempenho em longo prazo. / The concern about groundwater contamination is mainly related to unconfined aquifers, especially in the cases where the water table is shallow. Therefore, in order to prevent the groundwater lateral flow through landfills, this research evaluates – theoretically and experimentally – an alternative encapsulation technique, which consists in a vertical barrier of high permeability. An analytical solution was developed to model the flow for a cylindrical barrier installed around a landfill located below the groundwater table, in a field of uniform flow, where each domain (aquifer, barrier and encapsulated area) has a different hydraulic conductivity. The results from the theoretical study show that in situations where the landfill has a hydraulic conductivity higher than the aquifer, the high permeability barrier is more efficient. In contrast, in the cases where the landfill has a hydraulic conductivity lower than the aquifer, the lw permeability barrier is a more suitable technique. From the small-scale experiment, it is possible to conclude that the permeable barrier is an efficient encapsulation technique to prevent the advective transport through a certain region. According to the results, the fluid mean velocity at the encapsulated area is considerably lower than the aquifer mean velocity. Comparing to the low permeability barrier, the advantage of the high permeability barrier is that its backfill material is less sensitive to defects, resulting in a better long-term performance.

Accurate hydraulic conductivity values are necessary for understanding groundwater flow. Methods for estimating hydraulic conductivity show limitations because measured values vary several orders of magnitude in high permeability aquifers. Slug tests, while cost and time efficient, result in values lower than expected. It is proposed that underdamped behavior of water in a well is similar to mass on a damped spring; hence, models constructed to simulate behavior independent of aquifer effects might replicate some tests. The Poiseuille and Darcy-Weisbach models, and extensions of these models considering entry/exit effects, are applied to an aquifer-free laboratory test, and real wells. Aquifer-free laboratory tests are modeled well using both Poiseuille and Darcy-Weisbach models with entry/exit effects. The Poiseuille model for wells does not agree with observed data, possibly because of high Reynolds numbers. The Darcy-Weisbach model does agree with well data significantly better, although the friction factor relies on a single Reynolds number.

[pt] Valkó e Oligney propuseram um modelo que estima a evolução da fratura utilizando uma interpretação direta da curva de pressão de fundo medida durante uma operação de fracpack. Os únicos dados de entrada necessários para a aplicação do modelo são os registros geralmente disponíveis durante e após a operação. Considerando uma fratura de geometria radial e utilizando equações simples de fluxo e de geomecânica, o modelo obtém raios de empacotamento a partir da inclinação positiva da curva de pressão de fundo nos períodos de tip screenout. Nesta dissertação o modelo de Valkó e Oligney é aprimorado com a inclusão e o ajuste das equações de estado para o crescimento da fratura e para o processo de filtração, respectivamente. O modelo é também estendido para outras geometrias bidimensionais de fratura, PKN e KGD. A aplicação do modelo foi realizada utilizando os registros de pressão de oito operações de fracpack. Os resultados obtidos são a curva de propagação da fratura, o crescimento da abertura, a eficiência ao longo do tempo e a distribuição final do agente de sustentação na fratura. Para a validação desses resultados foram utilizados dois simuladores comerciais com modelos tridimensionais. Os estudos de caso indicaram que os ajustes realizados aproximaram os resultados do modelo aos obtidos nos simuladores comerciais. Além disso, a aplicação dos modelos desenvolvidos para cada geometria de fratura e a comparação com os resultados dos simuladores comerciais, permitiu confirmar a tendência esperada que, durante uma operação de fracpack, a geometria da fratura se aproxima da radial. / [en] Valkó and Oligney developed a model to estimate fracture evolution using a direct interpretation of the measured bottom hole pressure curve during a fracpack operation. The only input data needed to use the model are the usual records of the job, available during and after the operation. Considering radial fracture geometry and using simplified equations of flow and geomechanics, the model estimates a packing radius of the fracture using the slope of the increasing bottom hole pressure curve during the tip screenout period. In this work, Valkó and Oligney method is enhanced with the inclusion of state equations for the fracture growth and for the leakoff process in order to improve the model, but still maintaining minimum input data. The method is also extended to other two-dimensional fracture geometries, PKN and KGD. To apply the enhanced method, eight fracpack operation data were used. The results obtained are fracture propagation, width growth and fluid efficiency in time as well as the final proppant distribution in the fracture. To validate these results, this work used two commercial simulators with three-dimensional models. The case studies show that the modifications done to Valkó and Oligney method approximate the two-dimensional model results to the ones obtained using the commercial simulators with threedimensional models. Furthermore, the comparison between the application of the model for each fracture geometry and the commercial simulators results confirmed the expected tendency for the fracture geometry during a fracpack operation, which is a radial fracture.

Le choc septique est la première cause de mortalité en réanimation. Des techniques extracorporelles de purification sanguine sont aujourd’hui proposées pour améliorer le pronostic de cette pathologie. Leur mode d’action est basé sur l’immunomodulation de la réponse inflammatoire systémique de l’hôte, obtenue principalement par épuration nonsélective des médiateurs de l’inflammation. Nous rapportons les résultats de différentes études in vitro, animales et cliniques ayant évalué les techniques de purification sanguine suivantes :hémofiltration à haut débit, hémofiltration en cascade, hémofiltration hautement adsorbante,filtration et adsorption couplée, hémoadsorption, et hémodialyse à haute perméabilité.Ce travail de recherche translationnelle montre que les techniques de purification sanguine sont non seulement capables d’épurer les médiateurs de l’inflammation mais aussi l’endotoxine pour l’hémofiltration hautement adsorbante et l’hémoadsorption. Nous démontrons par ailleurs la faisabilité technique, la sécurité d’application et les intérêts del’hémofiltration en cascade et de l’hémodialyse continue à haute perméabilité. Les effets hémodynamiques bénéfiques des techniques de purification sanguine sont également retrouvés. Pour les années à venir, il conviendra d’optimiser les techniques les plus performantes en tenant compte de leurs avantages et inconvénients respectifs. Sur le planphysiopathologique, l’effet plus direct de ces thérapies sur les leucocytes sera à approfondir. Il semble maintenant admis que convection, diffusion et adsorption ne doivent plus être opposés mais plutôt être considérés comme des mécanismes complémentaires / Septic shock is the main cause of death in the intensive care unit. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies are now being proposed in order to improve septic shock outcomes. These therapies work based on immunomodulation of the host inflammatory response, obtained by non selectively removing inflammatory mediators. We report data from several different studies performed in vitro, in animals and in human beings, assessing various blood purification therapies which include high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, high-adsorption hemofiltration, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, hemoadsorption and high-permeability hemodialysis. This translational research work shows that blood purification therapies are capable of removing not only the inflammatory mediators but also the endotoxins as far as highadsorptionhemofiltration and hemoadsorption are concerned. We demonstrate technical feasibility, safety and advantages of cascade hemofiltration and continuous high-permeability hemodialysis. The beneficial hemodynamic effects related to these blood purification techniques are also highlighted. For future research, optimization of the most efficient techniques is warranted, takinginto account of their respective advantages and drawbacks. Regarding pathophysiology, the direct effect of these therapies on leukocyte function is subject to further investigation. To date, convection, diffusion and adsorption should not be viewed in opposition but rather, seen as complementary mechanisms.