Maternal stress during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in offspring, but embryonic brain mechanisms disrupted by prenatal stress are not fully understood. Our lab has shown that prenatal stress delays inhibitory neural progenitor migration. Here, we investigated redox dysregulation as a mechanism for embryonic cortical interneuron migration delay, utilizing direct manipulation of pro- and anti-oxidants and a mouse model of maternal repetitive restraint stress starting on embryonic day 12. Time-lapse, live-imaging of migrating GABAergic interneurons showed that normal tangential migration of inhibitory progenitor cells was disrupted by the pro-oxidant, hydrogen peroxide. Interneuron migration was also delayed by in utero intracerebroventricular rotenone. Prenatal stress altered glutathione levels and induced changes in both activity of antioxidant enzymes and expression of redox-related genes in the embryonic forebrain. Assessment of dihydroethidium (DHE) fluorescence after prenatal stress in ganglionic eminence, the source of migrating interneurons, showed increased levels of DHE oxidation. Maternal antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine and astaxanthin) normalized levels of DHE oxidation in ganglionic eminence, and ameliorated the migration delay caused by prenatal stress. In adult male offspring, prenatally-stressed mice exhibited anxiety-like behavior on the elevated plus maze, impaired motor learning on the rotarod, cognitive flexibility on the water T-maze task, and deficits in sensorimotor gating in the pre-pulse inhibition task. Prenatally-stressed adult female offspring showed anxiety-like behavior, deficits in sociability and impaired motor learning. Maternal antioxidants prevented anxiety-like behaviors and improved sensorimotor gating in both sexes, and improved habitual learning and cognitive flexibility in adult female mice. Lastly, prenatal stress led to increases in PV+/GAD67+ cell ratios in mFC in male mice, but decreases in female mice, and antioxidant treatments eliminated those differences. Hippocampal GAD67+ cell densities were reduced by prenatal stress and restored by astaxanthin in male mice, and PV+/GAD67+ cell ratio was reduced by prenatal stress and partially restored by N-acetylcysteine in female mice. GAD67+ cell densities across regions correlated significantly with anxiety-like behavior in both male and female mice and social behavior in female mice. Through convergent redox manipulations, delayed interneuron migration after prenatal stress was found to critically involve redox dysregulation. Redox biology during prenatal periods may be a target for protecting brain development.

Abstract The Dlx genes play an important role in the differentiation and migration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons of mice. GABAergic interneurons are born in the proliferative zones of the ventral telencephalon and migrate to the cortex early during mouse development. Single Dlx mutant mice show only subtle phenotypes. However, the migration of immature interneurons is blocked in the ventral telencephalon of Dlx1/Dlx2 double mutant mice leading to reduction of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex. Also, Dlx5/Dlx6 expression is almost entirely absent in the forebrain, most probably due to cross-regulatory mechanisms. In zebrafish, the role of dlx genes in GABAergic interneuron development is unknown. By injecting Morpholino, we double knocked down dlx1 and dlx2 genes in wildtype zebrafish to investigate the function of the two genes in zebrafish GABAergic interneuron development. By comparing different subsets of GABAergic interneuron development in wildtype and dlx1/2 morphant zebrafish forebrain, we found out that at 3dpf, 4dpf and 7dpf, double knockdown of dlx1 and dlx2 genes in zebrafish remarkably reduced the number of Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, whereas the development of Calretinin-positive neurons is slightly affected. These results suggest that in zebrafish, dlx1a and dlx2a genes are important for the development of certain subtypes of GABAergic interneurons (Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive neurons) and may have minor influence on Calretinin-positive neuron development. This also suggests that different regulatory mechanisms are involved in the development of the different subtypes of GABAergic interneurons.

Abstract The Dlx genes play an important role in the differentiation and migration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons of mice. GABAergic interneurons are born in the proliferative zones of the ventral telencephalon and migrate to the cortex early during mouse development. Single Dlx mutant mice show only subtle phenotypes. However, the migration of immature interneurons is blocked in the ventral telencephalon of Dlx1/Dlx2 double mutant mice leading to reduction of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex. Also, Dlx5/Dlx6 expression is almost entirely absent in the forebrain, most probably due to cross-regulatory mechanisms. In zebrafish, the role of dlx genes in GABAergic interneuron development is unknown. By injecting Morpholino, we double knocked down dlx1 and dlx2 genes in wildtype zebrafish to investigate the function of the two genes in zebrafish GABAergic interneuron development. By comparing different subsets of GABAergic interneuron development in wildtype and dlx1/2 morphant zebrafish forebrain, we found out that at 3dpf, 4dpf and 7dpf, double knockdown of dlx1 and dlx2 genes in zebrafish remarkably reduced the number of Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, whereas the development of Calretinin-positive neurons is slightly affected. These results suggest that in zebrafish, dlx1a and dlx2a genes are important for the development of certain subtypes of GABAergic interneurons (Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive neurons) and may have minor influence on Calretinin-positive neuron development. This also suggests that different regulatory mechanisms are involved in the development of the different subtypes of GABAergic interneurons.

Abstract The Dlx genes play an important role in the differentiation and migration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons of mice. GABAergic interneurons are born in the proliferative zones of the ventral telencephalon and migrate to the cortex early during mouse development. Single Dlx mutant mice show only subtle phenotypes. However, the migration of immature interneurons is blocked in the ventral telencephalon of Dlx1/Dlx2 double mutant mice leading to reduction of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex. Also, Dlx5/Dlx6 expression is almost entirely absent in the forebrain, most probably due to cross-regulatory mechanisms. In zebrafish, the role of dlx genes in GABAergic interneuron development is unknown. By injecting Morpholino, we double knocked down dlx1 and dlx2 genes in wildtype zebrafish to investigate the function of the two genes in zebrafish GABAergic interneuron development. By comparing different subsets of GABAergic interneuron development in wildtype and dlx1/2 morphant zebrafish forebrain, we found out that at 3dpf, 4dpf and 7dpf, double knockdown of dlx1 and dlx2 genes in zebrafish remarkably reduced the number of Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, whereas the development of Calretinin-positive neurons is slightly affected. These results suggest that in zebrafish, dlx1a and dlx2a genes are important for the development of certain subtypes of GABAergic interneurons (Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive neurons) and may have minor influence on Calretinin-positive neuron development. This also suggests that different regulatory mechanisms are involved in the development of the different subtypes of GABAergic interneurons.

Abstract The Dlx genes play an important role in the differentiation and migration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons of mice. GABAergic interneurons are born in the proliferative zones of the ventral telencephalon and migrate to the cortex early during mouse development. Single Dlx mutant mice show only subtle phenotypes. However, the migration of immature interneurons is blocked in the ventral telencephalon of Dlx1/Dlx2 double mutant mice leading to reduction of GABAergic interneurons in the cortex. Also, Dlx5/Dlx6 expression is almost entirely absent in the forebrain, most probably due to cross-regulatory mechanisms. In zebrafish, the role of dlx genes in GABAergic interneuron development is unknown. By injecting Morpholino, we double knocked down dlx1 and dlx2 genes in wildtype zebrafish to investigate the function of the two genes in zebrafish GABAergic interneuron development. By comparing different subsets of GABAergic interneuron development in wildtype and dlx1/2 morphant zebrafish forebrain, we found out that at 3dpf, 4dpf and 7dpf, double knockdown of dlx1 and dlx2 genes in zebrafish remarkably reduced the number of Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, whereas the development of Calretinin-positive neurons is slightly affected. These results suggest that in zebrafish, dlx1a and dlx2a genes are important for the development of certain subtypes of GABAergic interneurons (Calbindin-, Somatostatin- and Parvalbumin-positive neurons) and may have minor influence on Calretinin-positive neuron development. This also suggests that different regulatory mechanisms are involved in the development of the different subtypes of GABAergic interneurons.

A hallmark of higher-order cortical regions is their functional heterogeneity, but it is not well understood how these areas are able to encode diverse behavioral information. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), for example, is known to be important in a large range of behaviors, including, decision making, emotional regulation and social cognition. In support of this, previous work shows activation of the ACC to anxiety-related and social stimuli but does not use cellular resolution or cell-type specific techniques to elucidate the possible heterogeneity of its subcircuits. In this work, I investigate how subpopulations of neurons or microcircuits within the ACC encode these different kinds of stimuli. One type of inhibitory interneuron, which is positive for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), is known to alter the activity of clusters of pyramidal excitatory neurons, often by inhibiting other types of inhibitory cells. Prior to this research, it was unknown whether the activity of VIP cells in the ACC (VIPACC) encodes anxiety-related or social information and whether all VIPACC activate similarly to the same behavioral stimuli. Using in vivo Ca2+ imaging and 3D-printed miniscopes in freely behaving mice to monitor VIPACC activity, I have identified distinct subpopulations of VIPACC that preferentially activate to either anxiogenic, anxiolytic, social, or non-social stimuli. I also demonstrate that these stimulus-selective subpopulations are largely non-overlapping and that clusters of cells may co-activate, improving their encoding. Finally, I used trans-synaptic tracing to map monosynaptic inputs to VIP and other interneuron subtypes in the ACC. I found that VIPACC receive widespread inputs from regions implicated in emotional regulation and social cognition and that some inputs differ between types of ACC interneurons. Overall, these data demonstrate that the ACC is not homogeneous – there is marked functional heterogeneity within one interneuron population in the ACC and connective heterogeneity across ACC cell types. This work contributes to our broader understanding of how the cortex encodes information across diverse contexts and provides insight into the complexity of neural processes involved in anxiety and social behavior.

In this study, the single-cell relative quantitative mRNA expression of three Calcium-binding proteins (CaBPs; calbindin, calretinin, parvalbumin) and eight nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunits (alpha2-alpha5, alpha7, beta2-beta4) from interneurons from the stratum radiatum or stratum oriens within the CA1 region of rat hippocampi was analyzed using quantitative real time RT-PCR. Eighty-seven percent of the interneurons examined expressed CaBP mRNA. Parvalbumin mRNA was detected in 64%, while calbindin and calretinin expression was detected in 26% and 40% of interneurons, respectively. CaBP expression was not exclusive; the average number of CaBP mRNA detected per interneuron of the 47 interneurons examined for CaBP was 1.3. There was no significant difference between the proportion of CaBPs expressed in the stratum radiatum compared to the stratum oriens. However, interneurons from the stratum radiatum expressed significantly higher relative levels of mRNA for calbindin. Eighty-four percent of the 31 interneurons examined for both CaBP and nAChR subunits expressed nAChR subunit mRNA; the average number of nAChR subunits detected per interneuron was 2.9. Furthermore, of the 24, 140, and 168 possible combinations of 2-, 3-, and 4-way co-expression between CaBP+nAChR mRNA, respectively, only two significant 3-way combinations were detected: parvalbumin+a3+a5 and parvalbumin+alpha5+beta4. This study reports that subpopulations of nAChR-containing interneurons defined by quantitative CaBP mRNA expression or CaBP+nAChR co-expression do exist within the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

The central nervous system (CNS) is protected by a vascular blood-brain barrier that prevents many types of pathogens from entering the brain. Still, some pathogens have evolved mechanisms to traverse this barrier and establish a long-term infection. The apicomplexan parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, is one such pathogen with the ability to infect the CNS in virtually all warm-blooded animals, including humans. Across the globe, an estimated 30% of the human population is infected with Toxoplasma, an infection for which mounting evidence suggests increases the risk for developing neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, like seizures and schizophrenia. In my dissertation, I investigate the telencephalic neural circuit changes induced by long-term Toxoplasma infection in the mouse brain and the neuroimmune signaling role of the complement system in mediating microglial remodeling of neural circuits following parasitic infection. While there has been keen interest in investigating neural circuit changes in the amygdala – a region of the brain involved in fear response and which Toxoplasma infection alters in many species of infected hosts – the hippocampus and cortex have been less explored. These are brain regions for which Toxoplasma also has tropism, and moreover, are rich with fast-spiking parvalbumin perisomatic synapses, a type of GABAergic synapse whose dysfunction has been implicated in epilepsy and schizophrenia. By employing a range of visualization techniques to assess cell-to-cell connectivity and neuron-glia interactions (including immunohistochemistry, ultrastructural microscopy, and microglia-specific reporter mouse lines), I discovered that longterm Toxoplasma infection causes microglia to target and ensheath neuronal somata in these regions and subsequently phagocytose their perisomatic inhibitory synapses. These findings provide a novel model by which Toxoplasma infection within the brain can lead to seizure susceptibility and a wider range of behavioral and cognitive changes unrelated to fear response. In the Toxoplasma infected brain, microglia, along with monocytes recruited to the brain from the periphery, coordinate a neuroinflammatory response against pathogenic invasion. This is characterized by a widespread activation of these cells and their increased interaction with neurons and their synaptic inputs. Yet, whether T. gondii infection triggers microglia and monocytes (i.e. phagocytes) to target, ensheath, and remove perisomatic inhibitory synapses on neuronal somata indiscriminately, or whether specificity exists in this type of circuit remodeling, remained unclear. Through a comprehensive assessment of phagocyte interactions with cortical neuron subtypes, I demonstrate that phagocytes selectively target and ensheath excitatory pyramidal cells in long-term infection. Moreover, coupling of in situ hybridization with transgenic reporter lines and immunolabeling revealed that in addition to phagocytes, excitatory neurons also express complement component C3 following infection (while inhibitory interneurons do not). Lastly, by employing targeted deletion of complement components, C1q and C3, I show that complement is required for phagocyte ensheathment of excitatory cells and the subsequent removal of perisomatic inhibitory synapses on these cells (albeit not through the classical pathway). Together, these studies highlight a novel role for complement in mediating synapse-type and cell-type specific circuit remodeling in the Toxoplasma infected brain. / Doctor of Philosophy / Parasites are microorganisms that rely on other living organisms (called hosts) for their survival. Although some parasites only live on their hosts, others have developed ways to establish infections and obtain the nutrients that keep them alive from host cells. My Ph.D. research has focused on studying one of these parasites, Toxoplasma gondii (commonly referred to as Toxo), that has evolved the unique ability to establish brain infections in almost all animals around the world, from rodents to humans. Recent discoveries show that brain infection with this parasite can cause seizures, an imbalance in the way that specialized cells of the brain (called neurons) communicate with each other, causing harmful hyperactivity within the brain. Toxo infection can also cause behavioral and cognitive changes in infected animals, making them more susceptible to predation. In humans, infection with Toxo increases their risk for developing different types of mental illness, such as schizophrenia. The focus of my Ph.D. research has been in trying to understand, at the cellular and molecular level, how infection with this parasite can lead to seizures and behavioral changes, by using mice as a model. Mice have a similar brain structure to humans, and over the years, scientists have developed many tools that allow us to visualize and study the connections between neurons (called synapses). I'm interested in understanding how changes in these connections affect how neurons communicate with each other, and ultimately, how we behave and think. I have been studying a type of connection that, if lost or damaged, can lead to seizures and some types of mental illness. These connections are called 'perisomatic inhibitory synapses', and they form on many distinct types of neurons, but specifically on the cell bodies of these neurons. They act as a traffic light, informing neurons when and for how long to 'slow down' their activity. I discovered that after the parasite enters the brain, it causes another type of cell in the brain, called microglia, to extensively interact with neurons in the cortex and hippocampus (areas of your brain important for thinking, executing behavior, and learning). Microglia are immune cells of the brain that inspect the brain for anything damaged or that doesn't belong (like parasites) and removes them from the brain. By performing experiments where I delete individual immune molecules from mice, I found that one immune molecule, called 'complement component C3' acts as cue for microglia to find these cells, wrap around them, and permanently remove these important connections. Surprisingly, however, microglia don't remove these connections from all neurons, indiscriminately, they do so only on one specific cell type called 'excitatory pyramidal neurons,' and as the name implies, they're the ones who drive activity in the brain. My half-a-decade's worth of research helps us understand parasitic infections in the brain in a couple of ways: First, I have discovered one of the mechanisms by which neuronal connections are lost in the Toxo-infected brain (which is a mechanism that leads to loss of neuronal connections in the injured and aging brain as well). This is significant because it might provide insight into why some people who are infected with Toxo develop seizures or mental illness, while others don't. More importantly, Toxo-infection causes changes in the brain that are very specific, in terms of both the type of neuronal connection that is affected and the type of cell that is affected. Why these changes are so specific remain to be uncovered, but it suggests that Toxo can either a) trigger a unique immune response in the brain that leads to very precise changes in neuron-toneuron connections and signaling or b) the parasite, while hiding inside of neurons, may hijack the machinery of certain cell types in a way that helps them survive longer.

Neuronal networks are the central functional units of the nervous system. Knowledge about the identity of participating neurons and the assembly of these during development is crucial for the understanding of CNS function. A promising system to dissect the development and functionalities of a neuronal network is the central pattern generator (CPG) for locomotion. We used screening approaches to identify spinal neuronal subpopulations by their specific gene expression, potentially involved in CPG function. Amongst others we found paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (Pitx2) as a cholinergic interneuron marker for partition cells, with a possible role in the spinal network for locomotion. In addition, we present two genes, Chondrolectin (Chodl) and Estrogen-related receptor beta (ERRβ) as novel markers for fast and slow motor neurons, respectively. The neuronal components of the CPG integrate three key functions; rhythm generation, ipsilateral flexors/extensors coordination and bilateral coordination over the midline. Commissural interneurons (CINs) are considered to participate in the latter. During development axons are guided to their targets by the help of axon guidance molecules. Netrin-1 and its receptor DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Cancer) have been shown to play an important role for spinal cord neurons in axon-pathfinding and migration towards the midline. We show that loss of netrin-1 functionally results in a switch from alternating to synchronous left-right locomotor activity and deletion of DCC surprisingly leads to a different phenotype, best described as uncoordination. Thus, during development, netrin-1 and DCC play a critical role for the establishment of a functional balanced CPG. Further we show a selective loss of CINs, predominantly from dorsally originating subtypes, not affecting the ventral-most V3 subtype in netrin-1 mutant mice, but a loss of CINs from all progenitor domains in Dcc mutant mice. Together, our data suggest a netrin-1-independent mechanism for DCC in axon guidance and a role of the most ventral originating CINs as part of the neuronal network controlling synchronous activities over the midline. Another pair of axon guidance molecules, EphA4 and ephrinB3, has been shown to cooperate in preventing ipsilateral interneurons from crossing the spinal midline and if either molecule is deleted in mice, this will result in a defect in left-right coordination of locomotion. We provide in vivo and in vitro evidence that the GTPase-activating protein α2-chimerin, as a downstream molecule of EphA4 signaling, is essential in axon guidance decisions involved in the correct formation of the spinal circuitry for locomotion.

Im Hippokampus gibt es verschiedene Netzwerkoszillationen mit unterschiedlichen Frequenzen. Ein Typ dieser Oszillationen sind die ”Ripple” mit einer Frequenz von etwa 200 Hz, welche in Komplexen mit einer Aktivitätswelle, der ”Sharp wave” auftreten. Sharp wave-ripple Komplexe (SWR) werden mit der Konsolidierung von Gedächtnis in Zusammenhang gebracht. Das Netzwerk, das den SWR unterliegt, hat bestimmte Mechanismen, von denen einige in der vorliegenden Arbeit näher untersucht werden. Im ersten Teil wird untersucht, wie ein hemmendes Interneuron in der hippokampalen Region CA1, das ”oriens-lacunosum moleculare” (O-LM) Interneuron, während der SWR in das Netzwerk eingebunden ist. Wir konnten zeigen, dass O-LM Zellen während der SWR starke synaptische Exzitation erhalten. Die Exzitation tritt spät während des Ripples im lokalen Feldpotential (LFP) auf und zeigt eine Phasenankopplung an die Ripple. In etwa der Hälfte der O-LM Zellen konnten wir Aktionspotentiale während der SWR zeigen, die an die Ripple-Phase im LFP gebunden sind und nach dem Ripple-Maximum auftreten. Der zweite Teil der Arbeit bezieht sich auf die hippokampale Region CA1 und vergleicht während SWR den synaptischen Eingang in zwei Untertypen von Pyramidenzellen, die tiefen und die oberflächlichen Pyramidenzellen. Beide Untertypen bekommen synaptische Eingänge während der SWR. Diese Eingänge sind eine Mischung aus exzitatorischen und inhibitorischen Eingängen, die in den Untertypen in ihrer Stärke vergleichbar sind. Im dritten Teil untersuchen wir die SWR in der Region CA2 des Hippokampus und zeigen, dass Pyramidenzellen in CA2 in das Netzwerk während SWR eingebunden sind. Wir können sowohl exzitatorische als auch inhibitorische synaptische Eingänge in den Pyramidenzellen darstellen und konnten eine Phasenkopplung der synaptischen Eingänge an die SWR im LFP zeigen. Aufgrund der Phasenverschiebung bei verschiedenen Haltepotentialen vermuten wir einen Oszillator für die Exzitation und einen für die Hemmung. / In the hippocampus there are different patterns of activity also known as network oscillations. These oscillations express different frequencies, and one oscillation is the ripple oscillation at around 200 Hz. It is associated with an activity wave called sharp wave and form a so-called sharp wave-ripple complex (SWR). SWRs are implicated in memory consolidation. In this thesis we investigate mechanisms underlying sharp wave-ripple complexes. In the first part of this thesis I examine one type of inhibitory neurons in the region CA1 of the hippocampus during SWR. Oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) interneurons receive strong excitatory synaptic input during ripples. This input arrives after the ripple maximum and is phase locked with the ripple cycles. Around half of the probed O-LM cells fire during the SWR and thereby show an active participation during SWR. The magnitude of excitation in O-LM cells and the ratio between excitation and inhibition determine if an O-LM cell is active during the SWR. Action potentials in these cells occur late during the SWR and are phase locked. In the second part the synaptic input onto excitatory pyramidal cells were investigated during ripple oscillations. Previous work has identified two different types of pyramidal cells in area CA1. We recorded from deep and superficial pyramidal cells. For both types of pyramidal cells the inhibitory and excitatory synaptic inputs temporally associated with ripples express comparable strength. In the last and third part, I recorded SWR in the CA2 region of the hippocampus and showed incidence, frequency and amplitude of ripples and SWR. Pyramidal cells in the CA2 region are integrated into the network during SWR. They receive SWR associated synaptic input during SWR. The excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in CA2 pyramidal cells were investigated in detail. Phase analysis show phase locking of local field potential ripples and synaptic inputs to the ascending phase of the ripple cycle.