Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-04-18T12:06:58Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Alice Francener Nogueira Gonzaga - 2013.pdf: 1868045 bytes, checksum: 95be1e5827e994d97205b7e53c0c6bf6 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-04-18T12:11:52Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Alice Francener Nogueira Gonzaga - 2013.pdf: 1868045 bytes, checksum: 95be1e5827e994d97205b7e53c0c6bf6 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-18T12:11:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Alice Francener Nogueira Gonzaga - 2013.pdf: 1868045 bytes, checksum: 95be1e5827e994d97205b7e53c0c6bf6 (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-03-22 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / Estimates of life on earth vary by tens of thousands and it has been claimed that there are yet a lot of species to be discovered .Taxonomy seeks to reduce this shortfall, by discovering and describing new species, but its an imperfect process that contains many types of errors. The historical pace of how the Linnean shortfall is being overcome has been temporally uneven rather than gradual. It depends on a number of factors, mainly the ones related to “who does it” (taxonomists), “how is it done” (methodologies), and “where is it done” (regions). Here we aim to point out these factors and their influences on how we have been overcoming (in time) the Linnean shortfall for bats (Chiroptera), the pace by which we do it and that of the errors that come together with it. To verify the effort in the rates of description we calculated the number of active taxonomists and the number of species described by taxonomists. To explore the completeness of bat taxonomy, we generated cumulative curves of species described per year, for both valid species and synonyms. To predict the number of species, and to see how our predictions are accurate in time and the differences between them, we adjusted the Clench function to the cumulative curve of species by regions in different periods of time. A total of 1220 species of bats are currently accepted, and of total species described 27.2% have been synonymized by now. The number of active taxonomists has been increasing exponentially through time but the number of species described per taxonomist has decreased. In the last decade, 37% of species have been described using molecular tools. The 5 total cumulative curve and most of biogeographic regions had not reached an asymptote yet and, in general, we could not make meaningful estimates of species richness. Overcoming the Linnean shortfall for bats has neither been steady in time nor has reaches an asymptote yet, evidencing that there are more species to be known. We should continue doing predictions but knowing that the factors and errors pointed here could influence the estimates. / (Sem resumo)

Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-07-14T14:59:37Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-07-14T15:01:03Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-14T15:01:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertação - Mateus Atadeu Moreira - 2015.pdf: 3009996 bytes, checksum: 1a2c29fc3dae91ef371d08eaa0f6b9e2 (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-28 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / We only have described a small fraction of the world’s biodiversity. The influence of how much we know biodiversity and how that hinders our strategies for conserving it is a genuine and weighty concern. Brazil has the greatest amphibian diversity in the world with 1026 amphibian species, and the number of described species is increasing at a high rate. It is likely that many of these Brazilian amphibians still undescribed are threatened. Although many new species are being described in Brazil some protected areas are being downsized or downgraded. In this study we aim to analyze how much the Linnean shortfall impairs our ability to prioritize areas for the conservation of a highly diverse and still poorly known group such as the Brazilian amphibians, and whether the main conservation strategy in Brazil is prepared to deal with this shortfall. We made four spatial prioritizations of the known Brazilian amphibians of four arbitrarily chosen scenarios (1980, 1990, 2000 and 2013), then we overlapped these prioritizations with the existing federal protected areas of each scenario, and compared the results, calculating the proportions of the high priority areas that changed place and the proportion of high priority areas federally protected at each scenario. In the first change of scenario 921 of the 4672 cells that comprises the seventeen per cent of highest priority cells in 1980 changed place to form the seventeen per cent most priority cells in 1990 (19,71% of the cells). On the 1990-2000 change 905 of the 4686 cells changed place (19,31%) and on the last change of scenario (2000-2013) 983 of the 4675 (21,01%) highest priority cells has changed place. The percentage of these highest priority areas that was federally protected at each scenario and in each of the biomes was severely low in all cases, but is maidenly rising with time. The new protected areas created between the scenarios (both the strict protection and sustainable use areas) do not follow the new priority areas. It is crucial that Brazilian taxonomy continues to grow. Since Brazil is so important for the future of the global diversity of amphibians is also crucial a systematic planning of new protected areas, using scientific models to account for the Linnean shortfall, in order to protect such an astonishing diversity. Keywords: Linnean shortfall, Biodiversity, Conservation, Brazilian Amphibians, Spatial Conservation Prioritization / A ciência descreveu menos da metade do número total de espécies existentes. A influência do quanto conhecemos ou não a biodiversidade e o quanto isso pesa nas nossas estratégias de conservação é uma preocupação genuína e séria. O Brasil possui a maior diversidade de anfíbios do mundo com 1026 espécies, e esse número tem crescido em uma alta taxa. É provável que muitos dos anfíbios que ainda não foram descritos no Brasil estejam ameaçados. Enquanto muitas espécies têm sido descritas ultimamente o Brasil está diminuindo o tamanho e o grau de proteção de diversas áreas protegidas. Nesse estudo avaliamos o quanto a lacuna Linneana afeta a definição de áreas prioritárias para a conservação de um grupo altamente diverso e ainda pobremente conhecido como os anfíbios do Brasil, e se a principal estratégia de conservação brasileira está preparada pra lidar com essa lacuna. Nós fizemos quatro priorizações espaciais da fauna de anfíbios conhecida no Brasil em quatro cenários no tempo (1980, 1990, 2000 e 2013), em seguida sobrepusemos essas priorizações com as Unidades de Conservação Federais de cada um desses cenários e comparamos os resultados. Calculamos o quanto a configuração das áreas mais prioritárias mudou de um cenário para outro e o quanto das áreas mais prioritárias estava protegido em cada cenário. De 1980 para 1990, 921 das 4672 células mais prioritárias mudaram de lugar (19,71% das células). De 1990 para 2000, 905 das 4686 células mudaram (19,31%) e na última mudança de cenário (2000-2013) 983 das 4675 (21,01%) tiveram mudança espacial. A proporção dessas áreas mais importantes para conservação que estava protegida em cada cenário e em cada bioma foi muito pequena, mas está crescendo modestamente com o tempo. As novas Unidades de conservação criadas entre os cenários não acompanham as novas áreas mais prioritárias que surgem com o acréscimo das novas espécies. Sendo o Brasil tão importante para a proteção da tão ameaçada fauna global de anfíbios é crucial que exista um planejamento sistemático de novas áreas protegidas, e que esse planejamento use modelos científicos para levar em conta a lacuna Linneana.