Les récepteurs métabotropes du glutamate (mGluR) sont des récepteurs couplés aux protéines G qui régulent la transmission synaptique. Ce sont des cibles de choix pour le traitement de maladies neurologiques et psychiatriques telles que la maladie de Parkinson et la schizophrénie.J'ai développé une stratégie d'étude de l'assemblage multimérique des protéines membranaires dans des cellules vivantes, à l'aide de techniques de marquage orthogonal et de FRET en temps-résolu. De façon inattendue, j'ai montré que certaines sous-unités de mGluR, en plus de former des récepteurs homodimériques, peuvent former des récepteurs hétérodimériques fonctionnels. D'autre part, j'ai appliqué ces techniques à l'étude du mécanisme d'activation des mGluR et de leur régulation allostérique. J'ai démontré qu'un mouvement relatif des domaines extracellulaires au sein du dimère était responsable de l'action du glutamate.Ce travail a permis de mieux comprendre le fonctionnement des mGluR, et permet la conception de nouveaux tests de criblage. / Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G protein-coupled receptors that regulate synaptic transmission. They are relevant therapeutic targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson disease and schizophrenia.I developed a strategy to study the multimeric assembly of membrane proteins in living cells, through a combination of orthogonal labeling and time-resolved FRET. Unexpectedly, some subunits of mGluRs, in addition to forming homodimeric receptors, were found capable of forming functional heterodimeric receptors. Then, I applied these techniques to study the activation mechanism of mGluRs and their allosteric regulation. I demonstrated that a conformational change of the dimeric extracellular domain is responsible for the action of glutamate.In addition to increase our understandings of how mGluRs function, this work opens new avenues for the design of drug screening tests.

Yes / The ability to either erase or update the memories of a previously learned spatial task is an essential process that is required to modify behaviour in a changing environment. Current evidence suggests that the neural representation of such cognitive flexibility involves the balancing of synaptic potentiation (acquisition of memories) with synaptic depression (modulation and updating previously acquired memories). Here we demonstrate that the p38 MAPK/MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) cascade is required to maintain the precise tuning of long-term potentiation and long-term depression at CA1 synapses of the hippocampus which is correlated with efficient reversal learning. Using the MK2 knockout (KO) mouse, we show that mGluR-LTD, but not NMDAR-LTD, is markedly impaired in mice aged between 4 and 5 weeks (juvenile) to 7 months (mature adult). Although the amplitude of LTP was the same as in wildtype mice, priming of LTP by the activation of group I metabotropic receptors was impaired in MK2 KO mice. Consistent with unaltered LTP amplitude and compromised mGluR-LTD, MK2 KO mice had intact spatial learning when performing the Barnes maze task, but showed specific deficits in selecting the most efficient combination of search strategies to perform the task reversal. Findings from this study suggest that the mGluR-p38-MK2 cascade is important for cognitive flexibility by regulating LTD amplitude and the priming of LTP. / Professor Richard Greene at the University of Bradford - startup fund to setup electrophysiological facility and Wellcome Trust 200646/Z/16/Z to S.A.L.C.

Epilepsy, defined by recurrent seizures, is the one of the most prevalent neurological disorders worldwide (World Health Organization 2007). While many forms of epilepsy are well-controlled by anti-epileptogenic medications, a significant portion of patients have intractable, i.e. untreatable, seizures. The etiology of these seizures is varied, but a significant cause, particularly for patients with intractable epilepsy is developmental malformation. In these cases, an error or interruption during the development of the neocortex produces a structural alteration. Such patients may have other neurological problems, but seizures are the most common symptom. The neuronal mechanisms that link malformation and cortical hyperexcitability are not well understood. Here we have sought to examine potential mechanisms that result from microgyria, a malformation characterized by excessive numbers of small gyri.The presence of epileptiform activity indicates that the normal balance of excitation and inhibition has shifted . Two functions of inhibition within neocortex are to prevent spread of excitation, and to modulate the timing of surrounding excitation. Although seemingly contradictory, increasing some forms of inhibition can result in an increase in synchronous excitatory activity. We hypothesize that for certain malformation epilepsies, the inhibitory processes that control timing are increased, creating a hyper-synchronous cortex, while the inhibitory processes that control horizontal spread are decreased, allowing the propagation of such activity. Here we have examined the network effect of selectively modulating the inhibitory cells that control vertical or columnar cortical synchrony. This modulation is performed via activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors found on the vertically-projecting interneurons but not on those inhibitory cells that control horizontal spread of activity. Our results suggest that the network effect of activating these interneurons is altered in malformed, epileptogenic cortex.

Glutamat ist der wichtigste exzitatorische Neurotransmitter im Zentralnervensystem der Säugetiere. Die präzise Kontrolle des extrazellulären Glutamatspiegels ist für eine normale synaptische Transmission wichtig und erforderlich, um die Neurone vor Exzitotoxizität zu schützen. Im Gehirn sorgen vor allem verschiedene hochaffine Na+-abhängige Glutamattransporter für diese Kontrolle. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde deshalb untersucht, welchen Einfluß die Inhibition der Glutamattransporter auf die exzitatorische synaptische Transmission in Schicht III, einer Region in der bei Alzheimer-Demenz, Schizophrenie und Epilepsie häufig Zellschädigungen und Zellverluste beobachtet werden, und Schicht V des medialen entorhinalen Kortex (mEC) hat. Extrazelluläre Messungen in den Schichten III und V der Ratte zeigten, daß die verwendeten Transport-Inhibitoren signifikant die negativen Feldpotentialkomponenten beider Schichten reduzierten. Schichtspezifische Unterschiede konnten dabei nicht festgestellt werden, was auf eine ähnliche Glutamatregulation in beiden Schichten schließen läßt. Für die anschließenden intrazellulären und patch-clamp Messungen wurden aus diesem Grund nur noch Neurone der Schicht III untersucht. Beide Transport-Inhibitoren (L-trans-2,4-PDC und DL-TBOA) reduzierten die Amplituden der pharmakologisch isolierbaren EPSPs/EPSCs ohne die Kinetik zu beeinflussen. Diese reduzierende Wirkung konnte durch trans-(±)-ACPD, einen Agonisten der Gruppe I und II metabotropen Glutamatrezeptoren (mGluRs), nachgeahmt werden. Die Vorinkubation der Hirnschnitte mit dem unspezifischen Gruppe I und II mGluR-Antagonisten MCPG verhinderte die durch trans-(±)-ACPD hervorgerufene Amplitudenreduktion und auch den reduzierenden Effekt der beiden Transport-Inhibitoren. In nachfolgenden Experimenten mit dem spezifischen Gruppe II mGluR-Antagonisten EGLU konnte dieser zwar die durch L-trans-2,4-PDC hervorgerufene Wirkung verhindern, nicht aber den durch DL-TBOA vermittelten Effekt, was auf eine Aktivierung von Gruppe I mGluRs hinweist. Zusätzlich führte die Applikation von DL-TBOA zu einer signifikanten Veränderung des Doppelpuls-Index, was auf einen präsynaptischen Wirkmechanismus hinweist. Die Applikation von L-trans-2,4-PDC hingegen hatte keinen Effekt auf den Doppelpuls-Index. Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Arbeit sprechen dafür, daß beide Transport-Inhibitoren die erregende synaptische Transmission über eine Aktivierung präsynaptischer metabotroper Glutamatrezeptoren der Gruppen I und II hemmen. Dabei konnte festgestellt werden, daß diese Hemmung unter Applikation von DL-TBOA die präsynaptische Transmitterausschüttung über einen negativen Rückkopplungsmechanismus durch Aktivierung von Gruppe I mGluRs vermindert, während L-trans-2,4-PDC seine Wirkung vor allem über eine Aktivierung der Gruppe II vermittelt. Dabei kann davon ausgegangen werden, daß L-trans-2,4-PDC in der benutzten Konzentration die mGluRs der Gruppe II direkt aktivieren kann und der Effekt nicht nur präsynaptisch vermittelt wird. / Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. The precise control of extracellular glutamate is crucial for the maintenance of normal synaptic transmission and the prevention of excitotoxicity. High-affinity glutamate transporters ensure termination of glutamatergic neurotransmission and keep the synaptic glutamate concentration below excitotoxic levels. In layer III, a region that is especially prone to cell damage in Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and epilepsy, and layer V of the medial entorhinal cortex (mEC) effects of blocking glutamate uptake on excitatory synaptic transmission were studied. Extracellular recordings in rat brain slices revealed that application of glutamate uptake inhibitors significantly reduced stimulus-induced negative field potentials in both, layer III and V of the mEC. This effect showed no significant differences in both layers suggesting a similar glutamate regulation in layer III and V. Therefore, only layer III neurons of the mEC were used for the subsequent intracellular and patch-clamp recordings. Two competitive glutamate transporter antagonists, DL-TBOA and L-trans-2,4-PDC, reduced the amplitude of pharmacologically isolated EPSPs/EPSCs without changing the time course of the events. This effect was mimicked by trans-(±)-ACPD, an agonist of group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). The competitive group I and II mGluR antagonist MCPG blocked the depression of the EPSC amplitude induced by trans-(±)-ACPD and also masked the effect of either DL-TBOA or L-trans-2,4-PDC. Furthermore, EGLU, which selectively antagonizes group II mGluRs, masked the effect of L-trans-2,4-PDC but not that of DL-TBOA, indicating an involvement of group I mGluRs in the latter case. Finally, DL-TBOA significantly enhanced the paired-pulse index, suggesting a presynaptic mechanism for the depression of EPSP/EPSC amplitude, whereas application of L-trans-2,4-PDC had no significant effect on the paired-pulse behaviour. The present study shows that both transport inhibitors depress pharmacologically isolated EPSPs/EPSCs in layer III neurons of the mEC in combined entorhinal-hippocampal slices. This effect seems to be mediated via activation of different groups of mGluRs. The results suggest that DL-TBOA causes a negative feedback on glutamate release via indirect activation of presynaptic group I mGluRs, possibly due to an accumulation of glutamate, whereas application of L-trans-2,4-PDC most likely leads to an activation of presynaptic group II mGluRs reducing Ca2+-independent release. The latter might be due to a direct action of L-trans-2,4-PDC at these receptors. The present data suggest that blockade of glutamate transport in the mEC does not lead to an excessive accumulation of glutamate because of a counteractive autoinhibiting mechanism.

Fragile-X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited intellectual impairment. Caused by the transcriptional repression of the Fmr1 gene on the X chromosome, FXS results in the loss of the Fragile-X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP). Human female patients with FXS are heterozygous for the Fmr1 mutation whereas males are hemizygous. FXS has been studied far less in females than in males due to a generally less severe clinical phenotype. Previous research has implicated the metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) in synaptic plasticity alterations in the cornu ammonis area 1 (CA1) region of the juvenile male Fmr1 knock-out (KO) hippocampus. In contrast, our investigations into the young adult dentate gyrus (DG) subfield of the hippocampus have revealed N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-associated impairments in synaptic plasticity. The current study sought to extend these investigations to the young adult female Fmr1 heterozygous (Het) and Fmr1 KO mouse as well as investigate NMDAR- and mGluR-mediated long-term depression (LTD) in the DG and CA1 of the young adult male Fmr1 KO mouse. Input-output curves and paired pulse measures of short-term plasticity were also evaluated in all genotypes. Field electrophysiology revealed a significant impairment in long-term potentiation (LTP) and LTD in male Fmr1 KO and female Fmr1 Het mice that was associated with NMDAR alteration. A more robust synaptic protocol was not able to rescue LTP in the male Fmr1 KO DG. Paired-pulse low-frequency stimulation and (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG)-induced mGluR-LTD was intact in all genotypes and brain regions examined. Although further investigation will be required to expand our understanding of FXS and to fully elucidate the mechanisms behind intact synaptic plasticity in the female Fmr1 KO mouse, our results suggest that NMDARs may be poised as important contributors to hippocampal pathophysiology in FXS. / Graduate

Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are lipophilic signals that are produced by postsynaptic neurons in an activity-dependent manner, and signal in a retrograde fashion to modulate neurotransmitter release. As such, eCBs are highly involved in synaptic plasticity, a process that strengthens or weakens synapses. eCB-mediated synaptic plasticity is involved in many brain processes including learning, short-term memory, and adaptive reward, which are processed in the hippocampus and ventral tegmental area (VTA), respectively. However, the expression of eCB biosynthetic enzyme mRNA within hippocampal and VTA neurons, as well as the relationship between these mRNA species and the occurrence of synaptic plasticity, remains unclear. The goal of these studies was to demonstrate the expression pattern of eCB biosynthetic enzyme mRNA within hippocampal and VTA neurons, and to describe the relationship between synaptic plasticity and mRNA expression. Using whole-cell electrophysiology and real-time quantitative PCR, I tested hippocampal and VTA neurons for the presence of eCB biosynthetic enzyme mRNA and described the relationship between these enzymes and synaptic plasticity. The data presented herein demonstrate the importance of eCB signaling within the hippocampus and VTA and the expression patterns of eCB biosynthetic machinery within several neuron types. These data provide evidence that eCB signaling plays a critical role in learning, short-term memory, and adaptive reward.

Yes / Brain function depends on co-ordinated transmission of signals from both excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters acting upon target neurons. NMDA, AMPA and mGluR receptors are the major subclasses of glutamate receptors that are involved in excitatory transmission at synapses, mechanisms of activity dependent synaptic plasticity, brain development and many neurological diseases. In addition to canonical role of regulating presynaptic release and activating postsynaptic potassium channels, GABAB receptors also regulate glutamate receptors. There is increasing evidence that metabotropic GABAB receptors are now known to play an important role in modulating the excitability of circuits throughout the brain by directly influencing different types of postsynaptic glutamate receptors. Specifically, GABAB receptors affect the expression, activity and signaling of glutamate receptors under physiological and pathological conditions. Conversely, NMDA receptor activity differentially regulates GABAB receptor subunit expression, signaling and function. In this review I will describe how GABAB receptor activity influence glutamate receptor function and vice versa. Such a modulation has widespread implications for the control of neurotransmission, calcium-dependent neuronal function, pain pathways and in various psychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases.

Yes / Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) dependent long-term depression (LTD) is a major form of synaptic plasticity underlying learning and memory. The molecular mechanisms involved in mGluR-LTD have been investigated intensively for the last two decades. In this 60th anniversary special issue article, we review the recent advances in determining the mechanisms that regulate the induction, transduction and expression of mGluR-LTD in the hippocampus, with a focus on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. In particular we discuss the requirement of p38 MAPK and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) activation. The recent advances in understanding the signaling cascades regulating mGluR-LTD are then related to the cognitive impairments observed in neurological disorders, such as fragile X syndrome and Alzheimer's disease.

Yes / The molecular mechanisms and signalling cascades that trigger the induction of group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (GI-mGluR)-dependent long-term depression (LTD) have been the subject of intensive investigation for nearly two decades. The generation of genetically modified animals has played a crucial role in elucidating the involvement of key molecules regulating the induction and maintenance of mGluR-LTD. In this review we will discuss the requirement of the newly discovered MAPKAPK-2 (MK2) and MAPKAPK-3 (MK3) signalling cascade in regulating GI-mGluR-LTD. Recently, it has been shown that the absence of MK2 impaired the induction of GI-mGluR-dependent LTD, an effect that is caused by reduced internalization of AMPA receptors (AMPAR). As the MK2 cascade directly regulates tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) production, this review will examine the evidence that the release of TNFα acts to regulate glutamate receptor expression and therefore may play a functional role in the impairment of GI-mGluRdependent LTD and the cognitive deficits observed in MK2/3 double knockout animals. The strong links of increased TNFα production in both aging and neurodegenerative disease could implicate the action of MK2 in these processes. / This work was supported by the BBSRC-BB/H018344/1 to S.A.L.C.

A formação de memórias de medo contextuais, como as estudadas no presente trabalho, requer a indução da plasticidade sináptica iniciada pela ativação de receptores transmembrana localizados nos neurônios de estruturas encefálicas como o hipocampo. O fluxo iônico mediado pelos receptores N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDARs) é essencial para ativar vias de sinalização intracelular que darão suporte à formação da memória. No entanto, esses receptores parecem não ser necessários em situações onde os animais passaram por uma experiência prévia similar a que está sendo aprendida. Dessa forma, um aprendizado anterior pode modificar os mecanismos de plasticidade que serão utilizados para codificar uma nova informação, caracterizando um fenômeno de metaplasticidade. Esse fenômeno ocorre quando os animais são pré-expostos ao local onde posteriormente serão submetidos a um aprendizado associativo ou quando são re-submetidos a mesma tarefa comportamental com dicas contextuais/espaciais diferentes. No presente trabalho, investigamos (i) os mecanismos de plasticidade sináptica (receptores) e de plasticidade não-sináptica (excitabilidade neuronal) recrutados para a formação do segundo aprendizado e (ii) se a independência dos NMDARs é mantida quando a memória anterior foi adquirida remotamente. Os animais utilizados nesse trabalho (camundongos ou ratos) foram expostos a dois aprendizados sequenciais realizados na tarefa de condicionamento aversivo ao contexto (CAC). O intervalo entre os condicionamentos foi de dois dias nos experimentos do Capítulo I e de três ou quarenta dias nos experimentos do Capítulo II. Cada aprendizado ocorreu em uma caixa de condicionamento com características próprias de formato, odor e iluminação (contexto A ou contexto B), sendo que o primeiro aprendizado ocorreu no contexto A e o segundo no contexto B. Nos experimentos do Capítulo I foram avaliadas no hipocampo dorsal as modificações na excitabilidade neuronal hipocampal induzidas pelo primeiro condicionamento, bem como os receptores envolvidos com a aquisição da memória subsequente e a sobreposição neuronal entre os dois aprendizados. Com a utilização do camundongo transgênico Teg-Tag foi possível identificar os neurônios recrutados para o primeiro aprendizado. Esse animal tem a expressão da proteína fluorescente verde (GFP, do inglês, green fluorescent protein) controlada pela ativação do gene c-fos, que é fisiologicamente transcrito após a atividade neuronal. Dessa forma, os neurônios ativados pelo aprendizado são marcados com GFP. Através da técnica de patch clamp foi observado que os neurônios GFP+ mantiveram a excitabilidade elevada por até dois dias após o treinamento no CAC. Além disso, a identificação dos neurônios recrutados 8 para o aprendizado subsequente foi realizada através da marcação imunofluorescente da proteína Fos, no seu pico de expressão endógena, noventa minutos após o re-treino. Foi observada uma maior sobreposição neuronal (GFP+, Fos+) quando os animais foram retreinados no mesmo contexto dois dias após o primeiro treino. Uma sobreposição intermediária (GFP+, Fos+) foi vista quando os animais tiveram o segundo condicionamento no contexto B, sendo ela significativamente maior do que a sobreposição nos animais não re-treinados. Adicionalmente, foi demonstrado que a aquisição do aprendizado subsequente é mediada por receptores metabotrópicos glutamatérgicos (mGluRs) ao invés de NMDARs. No Capítulo II foi investigado se uma memória remota, adquirida há quarenta dias, ainda seria capaz de influenciar nos mecanismos de plasticidade recrutados para aquisição do aprendizado subsequente. A dinâmica da consolidação sistêmica foi considerada nesses experimentos já que a evocação da memória remota passa a depender de estruturas encefálicas neocorticais, sem recrutar a atividade hipocampal. Apesar da evocação da memória remota não requerer a atividade hipocampal, foi observado que a aquisição do aprendizado subsequente a uma memória remota necessita a atividade de pelo menos uma sub-região do hipocampo (dorsal ou ventral). Complementarmente, os resultados indicaram que, quando o intervalo entre os aprendizados é aumentado (de três para quarenta dias), a formação do aprendizado subsequente, que era independente de NMDARs, volta a depender da plasticidade sináptica mediada por esses receptores no hipocampo (dorsal e ventral). Juntos, nossos resultados sugerem que o primeiro aprendizado causa um aumento da excitabilidade neuronal e modifica a plasticidade sináptica recrutada para o aprendizado subsequente, sendo este último mediado por mGluRs ao invés de NMDARs. Além disso, a metaplasticidade induzida pelo primeiro condicionamento é transiente; quando o intervalo entre as exposições é aumentado, o segundo aprendizado passa a depender novamente da ativação dos NMDARs. / Contextual fear memory formation, like the ones explored in the current work, requires the induction of the synaptic plasticity mediated by the activation of transmembrane receptors that are present in the brain structures as the hippocampus. The ionic flux through the N-methylaspartate- D-aspartate is crucial for activation of the intracellular signaling pathways that will support memory formation. However, these receptors are not necessary when animals had a prior similar learning. In this way, a previous learning can modify the plasticity mechanism that will be recruited to encode a new information, featuring a metaplasticity phenomenon. This phenomenon occurs when animals are pre-exposed to an environment where they will learn an associative learning later or when animals are re-exposed to the same behavioral task with distinct contextual/spatial cues. In the present study, we investigated (i) the synaptic plasticity mechanisms (receptors) and the non-synaptic plasticity mechanisms (neuronal excitability) required for the acquisition of the second learning and (ii) whether a subsequent learning that occurs in a remote time-point is still NMDAR-independent. The animals used in this study (mice or rats) were exposed to two sequential learnings that were performed in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC). The interval between conditionings were two days in the experiments of Chapter I and three or forty days in the experiments of the Chapter II. Each learning was performed in a box with differences on shape, odor and illumination (context A or context B). The first learning occurred in the context A followed by learning on context B. In the experiments of Chapter I it was evaluated the changes in the hippocampal neuronal excitability induced by the first conditioning, the receptors involved with the acquisition of the subsequent memory and the neuronal overlapping between the two sequential learnings. The Teg-Tag transgenic mouse allowed to identify the neurons activated for the first learning experience. This animal has the GFP expression under control of c-fos promoter that is activated by neuronal activity. It was shown by patch clamp that GFP+ neurons are still more excitable two days after learning. Also, the identification of neurons recruited for the subsequent learning was made through immunofluorescent staining of the Fos protein in its peak of endogenous expression, ninety minutes after learning. A greater overlapping (GFP+, Fos+) was observed when animals were retrained in the same context two days after first training. An intermediate overlapping was observed when animals were conditioned in the context B and this expression was significantly higher when compared to animals that were not 10 retrained in either context. Additionally, it was shown that acquisition of the subsequent learning is mediated by metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) instead of NMDARs In the Chapter II it was investigated whether a remote memory, acquired forty days earlier, is still able to influence in the synaptic plasticity mechanisms recruited for the acquisition of the subsequent learning. Systems consolidation dynamics was considered in these experiments because memory retrieval of a remote memory depends on neocortical brain regions, it not requires hippocampal activity. It was confirmed that hippocampus is not necessary for remote memory retrieval, however at least one longitudinal division of the hippocampus (dorsal or ventral) is essential for learning following a prior remote memory. Moreover, the results indicate that acquisition of the second learning is once again mediated by NMDARs in the hippocampus when the interval between learnings is extended from three to forty days. Altogether, our results suggest that the first learning lead to an increase in the neuronal excitability and modify the synaptic plasticity mechanism recruited for following learning, mGluR are required instead of NMDAR. Furthermore, the metaplasticity induced by first conditioning is transient; the second learning once again requires NMDARs activation when the interval between learnings is longer.