Master of Science / Department of Kinesiology / Steven W. Copp / Mechanical signals within contracting skeletal muscles contribute to the generation of the exercise pressor reflex; an important autonomic and cardiovascular control mechanism. In decerebrate rats, GsMTx4, a mechanically–activated channel inhibitor that is partially selective for piezo channels, was found recently to reduce the pressor response during static hindlimb muscle stretch; a maneuver used to investigate the mechanical component of the exercise pressor reflex (i.e., the mechanoreflex). However, the effect was found only during the very initial phase of the stretch when muscle length was changing which may have reflected the inhibition of rapidly-deactivating piezo 2 channels and the fact that different mechanically-activated channels with slower deactivation kinetics evoked the pressor response during the static phase of the maneuver. We tested the hypothesis that in decerebrate, unanesthetized rats, GsMTx4 would reduce the pressor response throughout the duration of a 30 second, 1 Hz dynamic hindlimb muscle stretch protocol. We found that the injection of 10 µg of GsMTx4 into the arterial supply of a hindlimb reduced the peak pressor response (control: 15±4, GsMTx4: 5±2 mmHg, p<0.05, n=8) and the pressor response at multiple time points throughout the duration of the stretch. GsMTx4, however, had no effect on the pressor response to the hindlimb arterial injection of lactic acid. Moreover, the injection of GsMTx4 into the jugular vein (a systemic control, n=5) or the injection of saline into the hindlimb arterial supply (a vehicle control, n=4) had no effect on the pressor response during dynamic stretch. We conclude that GsMTx4 reduced the pressor response throughout the duration of a 1 Hz dynamic stretch protocol which may have reflected the inhibition of piezo 2 channels throughout the dynamic stretch maneuver.

A recuperação da frequência cardíaca pós-exercício (RecFC) é determinada pela reativação vagal e retirada simpática. Essas respostas, por sua vez, são reguladas pela ação integrada dos diversos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular, como o comando central, o mecanorreflexo muscular, o metaborreflexo muscular e a termorregulação. Na hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) ocorre redução da RecFC, refletindo a presença de disfunção autonômica e sugerindo prejuízos nos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular, que precisam ser investigados. Dessa forma, esta tese visou avaliar e comparar a influência dos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular sobre a RecFC e sua regulação autonômica em normotensos (NT) e hipertensos nunca-tratados (HT). Para tanto, 23 homens HT (45±8 anos; 142±8/96±3 mmHg) e 25 NT (43±8 anos; 114±4/77±2 mmHg) realizaram, de forma aleatória, 5 sessões experimentais compostas de: período pré-exercício, 30 min de exercício em cicloergômetro (70% do VO2pico) e 5 min de recuperação. A recuperação diferiu entre as sessões, seguindo os protocolos: a) recuperação inativa (RI) - ausência de movimento; b) recuperação ativa (RA) - manutenção do movimento pelo próprio voluntário; c) recuperação passiva (RP) - manutenção do movimento por força externa; d) recuperação com oclusão (RO) - ausência de movimento e oclusão total da circulação da coxa; e e) recuperação com resfriamento (RR) - ausência de movimento e resfriamento por ventilação. A atividade eletrocardiográfica, a respiração e a pressão arterial foram continuamente registradas. A RecFC foi avaliada por meio do cálculo dos índices: a) RecFC30s, RecFC60s, RecFC300s: i.e., redução da FC após 30s, 60s e 300s de recuperação; b) constante de tempo de curta duração da RecFC (T30) e; c) constante de tempo de longa duração da RecFC (RecFCt). A comparação da RecFC entre RA e RP permitiu avaliar a influência do comando central sobre a RecFC. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RA em comparação à RP (RecFC30s = 11±6 vs. 13±7 bpm, p<0,01), não havendo diferença entre os grupos nessa resposta. A comparação de RP e RI foi utilizada para avaliar o mecanorreflexo. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RP em comparação à RI (T30 = 351±167 vs. 267±128 s, p<0,01) e esse efeito foi maior no grupo HT (+160±154 vs. +32±147 s, p=0,03). A comparação de RI e RO foi utilizada para avaliar o metaborreflexo. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RO que na RI (RecFC300s = 25±14 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0,01), e esse efeito foi maior nos HT (-16±11 vs. -8±15 bpm, p=0,05). Por fim, a comparação de RI e RR foi utilizada para avaliar a termorregulação. A RecFC foi mais rápida na RR em comparação à RI (RecFC300s = 39±12 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0,01), não havendo diferença entre os grupos nessa resposta. Conclui-se, que a RecFC é influenciada pela atuação do comando central, mecanorreflexo muscular, metaborreflexo muscular e termorregulação. Em adição, a redução na RecFC na HAS está relacionada, pelo menos em parte, à maior sensibilidade do mecanorreflexo e do metaborreflexo musculares / Post-exercise heart rate recovery (HRR) is determined by vagal reactivation and sympathetic withdrawal. These responses are regulated by the integrated action of several cardiovascular control mechanisms, such as central command, muscle mechanoreflex, muscle metaboreflex and thermoregulation. The reduction in HRR occurs in hypertension, which indicates the presence of autonomic dysfunction and suggests impairments of the cardiovascular control mechanisms that need to be studied. Thus, this thesis assessed and compared the influence of the cardiovascular control mechanisms on HRR and its autonomic regulation in normotensives (NT) and never-treated hypertensives (HT). For this purpose, 23 HT (45±8 years; 142±8/96±3 mmHg) and 25 NT (43±8 years; 114±4/77±2 mmHg) men performed, in a random order, 5 experimental sessions composed by: pre-exercise period, 30 min of cycle ergometer exercise (70% VO2peak) and 5 min of recovery. The recovery was different between the sessions, as follow: a) inactive recovery (IR) - absence of movement; b) active recovery (AR) - maintenance of movement by the own voluntary; c) passive recovery (PR) - maintenance of movement by an external force; d) occlusion recovery (OR) - absence of movement and total circulatory occlusion of hips\' circulation; and e) cooling recovery (CR) - absence of movement and cooling using a fan. Electrocardiographic activity, respiration and blood pressure were continuously registered. HRR was assessed by the calculation of the following indices: a) HRR30s, HRR60s and HRR300s: i.e. heart rate reduction after 30s, 60s and 300s of recovery; b) short-term time-constant of HRR (T30); and c) long-term time-constant of HRR (HRRt). The comparison of HRR between AR and PR allowed the assessment of the central command influence on HRR. HRR was slower in AR in comparison with PR (HRR30s = 11±6 vs. 13±7 bpm, p<0.01), and there were no difference between the groups in this response. The comparison of HRR between PR and IR allowed the assessment of the mechanoreflex influence on HRR. HRR was slower in PR in comparison with IR (T30 = 351±167 vs. 267±128 s, p<0.01), and this effect was greater in the HT (+160±154 vs. +32±147 s, p=0.03). The comparison of HRR between OR and IR allowed the assessment of the metaboreflex influence on HRR. HRR was slower in OR in comparison with IR (HRR300s = 25±14 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0.01), and this effect was greater in the HT (-16±11 vs. -8±15 bpm, p=0,05). Finally, the comparison of HRR between IR and CR allowed the assessment of the thermoregulation influence on HRR. HRR was accelerated in CR in comparison with IR (HRR300s = 39±12 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0.01), and there were no difference between the groups in this response. In conclusion: HRR is influenced by the action of central command, muscle mechanoreflex, muscle metaboreflex and thermoregulation. In addition, the reduction in HRR in hypertension is, at least in part, related to a greater sensitivity of the muscle mechanoreflex and metaboreflex

A recuperação da frequência cardíaca pós-exercício (RecFC) é determinada pela reativação vagal e retirada simpática. Essas respostas, por sua vez, são reguladas pela ação integrada dos diversos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular, como o comando central, o mecanorreflexo muscular, o metaborreflexo muscular e a termorregulação. Na hipertensão arterial sistêmica (HAS) ocorre redução da RecFC, refletindo a presença de disfunção autonômica e sugerindo prejuízos nos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular, que precisam ser investigados. Dessa forma, esta tese visou avaliar e comparar a influência dos mecanismos de controle cardiovascular sobre a RecFC e sua regulação autonômica em normotensos (NT) e hipertensos nunca-tratados (HT). Para tanto, 23 homens HT (45±8 anos; 142±8/96±3 mmHg) e 25 NT (43±8 anos; 114±4/77±2 mmHg) realizaram, de forma aleatória, 5 sessões experimentais compostas de: período pré-exercício, 30 min de exercício em cicloergômetro (70% do VO2pico) e 5 min de recuperação. A recuperação diferiu entre as sessões, seguindo os protocolos: a) recuperação inativa (RI) - ausência de movimento; b) recuperação ativa (RA) - manutenção do movimento pelo próprio voluntário; c) recuperação passiva (RP) - manutenção do movimento por força externa; d) recuperação com oclusão (RO) - ausência de movimento e oclusão total da circulação da coxa; e e) recuperação com resfriamento (RR) - ausência de movimento e resfriamento por ventilação. A atividade eletrocardiográfica, a respiração e a pressão arterial foram continuamente registradas. A RecFC foi avaliada por meio do cálculo dos índices: a) RecFC30s, RecFC60s, RecFC300s: i.e., redução da FC após 30s, 60s e 300s de recuperação; b) constante de tempo de curta duração da RecFC (T30) e; c) constante de tempo de longa duração da RecFC (RecFCt). A comparação da RecFC entre RA e RP permitiu avaliar a influência do comando central sobre a RecFC. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RA em comparação à RP (RecFC30s = 11±6 vs. 13±7 bpm, p<0,01), não havendo diferença entre os grupos nessa resposta. A comparação de RP e RI foi utilizada para avaliar o mecanorreflexo. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RP em comparação à RI (T30 = 351±167 vs. 267±128 s, p<0,01) e esse efeito foi maior no grupo HT (+160±154 vs. +32±147 s, p=0,03). A comparação de RI e RO foi utilizada para avaliar o metaborreflexo. A RecFC foi mais lenta na RO que na RI (RecFC300s = 25±14 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0,01), e esse efeito foi maior nos HT (-16±11 vs. -8±15 bpm, p=0,05). Por fim, a comparação de RI e RR foi utilizada para avaliar a termorregulação. A RecFC foi mais rápida na RR em comparação à RI (RecFC300s = 39±12 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0,01), não havendo diferença entre os grupos nessa resposta. Conclui-se, que a RecFC é influenciada pela atuação do comando central, mecanorreflexo muscular, metaborreflexo muscular e termorregulação. Em adição, a redução na RecFC na HAS está relacionada, pelo menos em parte, à maior sensibilidade do mecanorreflexo e do metaborreflexo musculares / Post-exercise heart rate recovery (HRR) is determined by vagal reactivation and sympathetic withdrawal. These responses are regulated by the integrated action of several cardiovascular control mechanisms, such as central command, muscle mechanoreflex, muscle metaboreflex and thermoregulation. The reduction in HRR occurs in hypertension, which indicates the presence of autonomic dysfunction and suggests impairments of the cardiovascular control mechanisms that need to be studied. Thus, this thesis assessed and compared the influence of the cardiovascular control mechanisms on HRR and its autonomic regulation in normotensives (NT) and never-treated hypertensives (HT). For this purpose, 23 HT (45±8 years; 142±8/96±3 mmHg) and 25 NT (43±8 years; 114±4/77±2 mmHg) men performed, in a random order, 5 experimental sessions composed by: pre-exercise period, 30 min of cycle ergometer exercise (70% VO2peak) and 5 min of recovery. The recovery was different between the sessions, as follow: a) inactive recovery (IR) - absence of movement; b) active recovery (AR) - maintenance of movement by the own voluntary; c) passive recovery (PR) - maintenance of movement by an external force; d) occlusion recovery (OR) - absence of movement and total circulatory occlusion of hips\' circulation; and e) cooling recovery (CR) - absence of movement and cooling using a fan. Electrocardiographic activity, respiration and blood pressure were continuously registered. HRR was assessed by the calculation of the following indices: a) HRR30s, HRR60s and HRR300s: i.e. heart rate reduction after 30s, 60s and 300s of recovery; b) short-term time-constant of HRR (T30); and c) long-term time-constant of HRR (HRRt). The comparison of HRR between AR and PR allowed the assessment of the central command influence on HRR. HRR was slower in AR in comparison with PR (HRR30s = 11±6 vs. 13±7 bpm, p<0.01), and there were no difference between the groups in this response. The comparison of HRR between PR and IR allowed the assessment of the mechanoreflex influence on HRR. HRR was slower in PR in comparison with IR (T30 = 351±167 vs. 267±128 s, p<0.01), and this effect was greater in the HT (+160±154 vs. +32±147 s, p=0.03). The comparison of HRR between OR and IR allowed the assessment of the metaboreflex influence on HRR. HRR was slower in OR in comparison with IR (HRR300s = 25±14 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0.01), and this effect was greater in the HT (-16±11 vs. -8±15 bpm, p=0,05). Finally, the comparison of HRR between IR and CR allowed the assessment of the thermoregulation influence on HRR. HRR was accelerated in CR in comparison with IR (HRR300s = 39±12 vs. 37±10 bpm, p<0.01), and there were no difference between the groups in this response. In conclusion: HRR is influenced by the action of central command, muscle mechanoreflex, muscle metaboreflex and thermoregulation. In addition, the reduction in HRR in hypertension is, at least in part, related to a greater sensitivity of the muscle mechanoreflex and metaboreflex