Mechanical tension is an important regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and cell death. It is involved in the control of tissue architecture and wound repair and its improper sensing can contribute to cancer. The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway was recently shown to be involved in regulating cell proliferation in response to mechanical tension. The core of the pathway consists of the kinases MST1/2 and LATS1/2, which regulate the target of the pathway, the transcription co-activator YAP/ TAZ (hereafter referred to as YAP). When the Hippo pathway is inactive, YAP remains in the nucleus and promotes cell proliferation and stem cell maintenance. When the Hippo signaling pathway is turned on, MST1/2 phosphorylate and activates LATS1/2. LATS1/2 phosphorylates and inactivates YAP in the cytoplasm which is sequestered and degraded, stopping cell proliferation and promoting differentiation of stem cells. Mechanical forces are transmitted across cells and tissues through the cell-cell junctions and the actin cytoskeleton. However, the factors that connect cell-cell junctions to the Hippo signaling pathway were not clearly known. We identified a LIM domain protein called TRIP6 that functions at the adherens junctions to regulate the Hippo signaling pathway in a tension-dependent manner. TRIP6 responds to mechanical tension at adherens junctions and regulates LATS1/2 activity. Under high mechanical tension, TRIP6 sequesters and inhibits LATS1/2 at adherens junctions to promote YAP activity. Conditions that reduce tension at adherens junctions by inhibition of actin stress fibers or disruption of cell-cell junctions reduce TRIP6-LATS1/2 binding, which activates LATS1/2 to inhibit YAP. Vinculin has been shown to act as part of a mechanosensory complex at adherens junctions. We show that vinculin promotes TRIP6 inhibition of LATS1/2 in response to mechanical tension. Furthermore, we show that TRIP6 competitively inhibits MOB1 (a known LATS1/2 activator) from binding and activating LATS1/2. Together these findings reveal TRIP6 responds to mechanical signals at adherens junctions to regulate the Hippo signaling pathway in mammalian cells.

Les cellules dans la nature se développent dans un large éventail de formes, suivant divers modèles de croissance. Malgré l'importance de ces processus fondamentaux, la façon dont les cellules régulent leur croissance et leur morphogenèse est encore mal comprise. Dans cette thèse, j'ai exploré ces aspects, avec une approche principalement biomécanique, en concentrant mes investigations sur des cellules à paroi à croissance de pointe et en exploitant en particulier la levure fissipare Schyzosaccharomyces pombe. J'ai d'abord développé de nouvelles méthodes pour mesurer les paramètres mécaniques clés de la paroi cellulaire in vivo et à grande échelle, ce qui a permis les premières observations de la dynamique des parois cellulaires. Ceci a révélé que la paroi cellulaire est plus souple et très variable au niveau des pôles de croissance, et presque stable et plus rigide dans les sites non cultivés. Au cours de l'allongement, il existe une interaction entre la mécanique des parois et la croissance cellulaire, dont le contrôle actif permet l'expansion cellulaire tout en préservant l'intégrité des cellules. De plus, j'ai observé qu'il existe une forte corrélation entre la mécanique des parois cellulaires et la morphologie cellulaire, et des perturbations des propriétés de la paroi affectent directement l'établissement et la maintenance de la forme. Ensemble, mes résultats montrent que la régulation de la paroi est fondamentale dans la détermination de la dynamique cellulaire dans les cellules à parois épaissies. Globalement, cela suggère que l'observation dynamique de la mécanique de surface cellulaire est essentielle pour une compréhension complète des processus multifactoriels et complexes comme la croissance et la morphogenèse. / Cells in nature develop in a wide range of forms, following diverse growth patterns. Despite the importance of these fundamental processes, how cells regulate their growth and morphogenesis is still poorly understood. In this thesis, I explored these processes, focusing my investigations on tip growing walled cells and in particular, by exploiting the fission yeast Schyzosaccharomyces pombe, adopting a mainly biomechanical approach. To this aim, I first developed novel methods to measure key cell wall mechanical parameters in vivo and in large scale, which allowed the very first observations of cell wall dynamics. This revealed that the cell wall is softer and highly variable at growing poles, and almost stable and stiffer at non-growing sites. During elongation, there is an interplay between wall mechanics and cell growth, whose active control allows cell expansion while preserving cell integrity. In addition, I observed that there is a strong correlation between cell wall mechanics and cell morphology, and ectopic perturbations of wall properties directly affect shape establishment and maintenance. Together my results show that the regulation of wall mechanics is fundamental in the determination of cell dynamics in tip growing walled cells. Moreover, this suggests that dynamic observation of cell surface mechanics is crucial for a complete understanding of multifactorial and complex processes as growth and morphogenesis.

Macrophages are innate immune cells responsible for engulfing microbes and cell debris through phagocytosis and orchestrating immune responses to maintain homeostasis. While conducting immune surveillance over all types of organs and tissues, macrophages face inherently heterogeneous microenvironments with unique biophysical features. For instance, microglia residing in the brain, Kupffer cells living in the skin and bone osteoclasts are exposed to very distinct tissue stiffnesses. Despite the research done in the last decade clearly indicates that macrophages are sensitive to physical factors, how mechanical cues modulate their inflammatory response remains poorly understood. The present study aims at investigating how microenvironment stiffness influences the pro-inflammatory behaviour of macrophages. Besides characterising the regulatory effect on pro-inflammatory gene expression and cytokine production, this work examines the impact of stiffness on the inflammasome, one of the main macrophage signalling platforms. For this, an in vitro system based in 2D polyacrylamide hydrogels whose stiffness can be independently tuned was established. Using substrates with an elastic moduli between 0.2 and 33.1 kPa, bone marrow-derived macrophages adopted a less spread and rounder morphology on compliant compared to stiff polyacrylamide. Upon priming with lipopolysaccharide, the expression levels of the gene encoding for TNF-α were higher on more compliant hydrogels, yet there were no significant differences in the expression of other major pro-inflammatory genes. Additionally stimulating macrophages with the ionophore nigericin revealed higher secreted protein levels of IL-1β and IL-6 on compliant substrates. Interestingly, macrophages challenged on compliant polyacrylamide also displayed an enhanced formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome as well as increased levels of pyroptotic cell death. The upregulation of inflammasome assembly on compliant hydrogels was not primarily attributed to the reduced cell spreading, since spatially confining cells on micropatterns led to a decrease of inflammasome-positive cells compared to well-spread cells. Finally, interfering with actomyosin contractility diminished the differences in inflammasome formation between compliant and stiff substrates. In summary, these results show that substrate stiffness affects the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages and for the first time describe that the NLRP3 inflammasome is one of the signalling components affected by stiffness mechanosensing. The work presented here expands our understanding of how microenvironment stiffness affects macrophage behaviour and which elements of their machinery might contribute to integrate mechanical cues into the regulation of their inflammatory functions. The onset of pathological processes or the implant of foreign bodies represent immune challenges in which macrophages can face a mechanically changing environment. Therefore, a better insight on how macrophages detect and process biophysical signals could potentially provide a basis for new strategies to modulate inflammatory responses.:INTRODUCTION 1.1 Macrophage cell biology 1.1.1 The origin of macrophages 1.1.2 The macrophage: a swiss army knife 1.1.3 The macrophage pro-inflammatory response 1.2 Immunobiophysics: the force of the immune system 1.2.1 Exertion of immune cell forces 1.2.2 Immune cell mechanosensing 1.3 Cellular mechanosensing and mechanotransduction 1.3.1 Cell adhesions to the extracellular matrix 1.3.2 Nuclear mechanotransduction 1.3.3 Membrane mechanosensing elements 1.4 Macrophage mechanosensing AIMS AND SCOPE OF THE THESIS RESULTS 3.1 Morphol. characterisation of macrophages cultured on substrates of varying stiffness 3.1.1 BMDMs adhere and can be cultured on polyacrylamide hydrogels 3.1.2 Macrophage morphology is influenced by substrate stiffness 3.1.3 PEG-Hep hydrogels induce similar morphological differences as PAA substrates but do not constitute a suitable macrophage culture platform 3.1.4 Substrate stiffness affects membrane architecture 3.2 Impact of substrate stiffness on the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages 3.2.1 The morphol. differences induced by different stiffness persist after macrophage priming 3.2.2 Tuning substrate stiffness does not cause major changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory genes 3.2.3 Lower substrate stiffness upregulates the secretion of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β 3.2.4 Stiffer substrates diminish macrophage pyroptotic cell death 3.2.5 Compliant substrates enhance NLRP3 inflammasome formation 3.3 Investigation of macrophage mechanotransducing elements 3.3.1 Limiting cell spreading alone does not recapitulate the effects induced by stiffness on inflammasome formation 3.3.2 Actomyosin contractility may play a role in transducing the mechanical cues given by substrate stiffness DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Compliant substrates enhance the macrophage pro-inflammatory response 4.2 Substrate stiffness influences the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome 4.3 Exclusively altering cell spreading does not explain the differences induced by substrate stiffness 4.4 Actomyosin contractility as a potential macrophage mechanotransducer element 4.5 Potential impact of the study in the context of cancer 4.6 Potential impact of the study in the context of implant design 4.7 Conclusions of the study MATERIALS AND METHODS 5.1 Production of polyacrylamide (PAA) hydrogels 5.2 Production of polyethylenglycol-heparin (PEG-Hep) hydrogels 5.3 Mechanical characterisation of hydrogels and macrophages 5.4 Isolation and culture of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) 5.5 Fluorescence confocal microscopy 5.6 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 5.7 Gene expression analysis using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) 5.8 Cytokine quantification assays 5.9 Cell viability assay 5.10 Culture of BMDMs on micropatterns 5.11 Optical diffraction tomography (ODT) 5.12 Statistical analysis and data visualisation APPENDIX LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF FIGURES BIBLIOGRAPHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS / Als Teil des angeborenen Immunsystems sind Makrophagen dafür verantwortlich Pathogene und Zellrückstände durch Phagozytose zu beseitigen. Sie orchestrieren Immunantworten um homöostatische Bedingungen von Organen und Geweben aufrechtzuerhalten. Dabei sind sie extrem heterogenen Mikroumgebungen ausgesetzt, welche sich jeweils durch eine einzigartige Kombination von (bio)chemischen und mechanischen Eigenschaften, vor allem Gewebesteifigkeiten, auszeichnen. Dies veranschaulichen beispielsweise im Gehirn residierende Mikroglia, Kupffer-Zellen in der Haut und Osteoklasten in Knochen. Obwohl diverse Studien aus dem letzten Jahrzehnt eindeutig zeigen, dass Makrophagen auf mechanische Signale reagieren, ist der zugrunde liegende Mechanismus, wie diese Signale eine Entzündungsreaktion modulieren, noch immer unzureichend verstanden. Die vorliegende Studie beinhaltet die systematische Untersuchung, wie die Steifigkeit der Mikroumgebung das proinflammatorische Verhalten von Makrophagen beeinflusst. Neben der Charakterisierung der regulatorischen Wirkung auf die proinflammatorische Genexpression und Zytokinproduktion untersucht diese Arbeit auch den Einfluss der Steifigkeit auf das Inflammasom; eine der wichtigsten Signalplattformen für Makrophagen. Zu diesem Zweck wurde zunächst ein Zellkultursystem mit 2D-Polyacrylamid-Hydrogelen als Zellsubstrat entwickelt, bei dem das Elastizitätsmodul der Gelsubstrate gezielt eingestellt werden kann. Unter Verwendung von Substraten mit einem Elastizitätsmodul zwischen 0,2 kPa und 33,1 kPa zeigt die mikroskopische Analyse, dass aus Knochenmark stammende Makrophagen im Vergleich zu steifem Polyacrylamid eine weniger ausgebreitete und rundere Morphologie annehmen. Nach dem Primen mit Lipopolysaccharid waren die Expressionsniveaus des Gens, das für TNF-α kodiert, auf deformierbareren Hydrogelen höher, jedoch gab es keine signifikanten Unterschiede in der Expression anderer wichtiger pro-inflammatorischer Gene. Eine zusätzliche Stimulierung von Makrophagen mit dem Ionophor Nigericin bewirkte höhere sekretierte Proteinspiegel von IL-1β und IL-6 auf deformierbaren Substraten. Makrophagen, die deformierbarem Polyacrylamid ausgesetzt waren, zeigten auch eine verstärkte Bildung des NLRP3-Inflammasoms sowie ein erhöhtes Ausmaß an pyroptotischem Zelltod. Die Hochregulierung der Inflammasom-Assemblierung auf deformierbaren Hydrogelen wurde nicht primär auf die reduzierte Zellausbreitung zurückgeführt, da räumlich begrenzte Zellen auf Mikromustern zu einer Abnahme von Inflammasom-positiven Zellen im Vergleich zu stark ausgebreiteten Zellen führten. Schließlich verringerte eine Störung der Aktomyosin-Kontraktilität die Unterschiede in der Inflammasombildung zwischen deformierbaren und steifen Substraten. Zusammenfassend zeigen diese Ergebnisse, dass die Substratsteifigkeit die proinflammatorische Reaktion von Makrophagen beeinflusst und beschreiben erstmalig, dass das NLRP3-Inflammasom eine der Signalkomponenten ist, die von der zellulären Steifheitswahrnehmung beeinflusst werden. Die hier vorgestellte Arbeit erweitert unser Verständnis davon, wie die Steifigkeit der Mikroumgebung das Verhalten von Makrophagen beeinflusst und welche Elemente ihrer Maschinerie dazu beitragen könnten mechanische Signale in die Regulierung ihrer Entzündungsfunktionen zu integrieren. Das Einsetzen pathologischer Prozesse oder die Implantation von Fremdkörpern stellen Immunherausforderungen dar, bei denen Makrophagen einer sich mechanisch verändernden Umgebung ausgesetzt sein können. Daher könnte ein besserer Einblick in die Art und Weise, wie Makrophagen biophysikalische Signale erkennen und verarbeiten, möglicherweise eine Grundlage für neue Strategien zur Modulation von Entzündungsreaktionen bieten.:INTRODUCTION 1.1 Macrophage cell biology 1.1.1 The origin of macrophages 1.1.2 The macrophage: a swiss army knife 1.1.3 The macrophage pro-inflammatory response 1.2 Immunobiophysics: the force of the immune system 1.2.1 Exertion of immune cell forces 1.2.2 Immune cell mechanosensing 1.3 Cellular mechanosensing and mechanotransduction 1.3.1 Cell adhesions to the extracellular matrix 1.3.2 Nuclear mechanotransduction 1.3.3 Membrane mechanosensing elements 1.4 Macrophage mechanosensing AIMS AND SCOPE OF THE THESIS RESULTS 3.1 Morphol. characterisation of macrophages cultured on substrates of varying stiffness 3.1.1 BMDMs adhere and can be cultured on polyacrylamide hydrogels 3.1.2 Macrophage morphology is influenced by substrate stiffness 3.1.3 PEG-Hep hydrogels induce similar morphological differences as PAA substrates but do not constitute a suitable macrophage culture platform 3.1.4 Substrate stiffness affects membrane architecture 3.2 Impact of substrate stiffness on the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages 3.2.1 The morphol. differences induced by different stiffness persist after macrophage priming 3.2.2 Tuning substrate stiffness does not cause major changes in the expression of pro-inflammatory genes 3.2.3 Lower substrate stiffness upregulates the secretion of the cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β 3.2.4 Stiffer substrates diminish macrophage pyroptotic cell death 3.2.5 Compliant substrates enhance NLRP3 inflammasome formation 3.3 Investigation of macrophage mechanotransducing elements 3.3.1 Limiting cell spreading alone does not recapitulate the effects induced by stiffness on inflammasome formation 3.3.2 Actomyosin contractility may play a role in transducing the mechanical cues given by substrate stiffness DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Compliant substrates enhance the macrophage pro-inflammatory response 4.2 Substrate stiffness influences the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome 4.3 Exclusively altering cell spreading does not explain the differences induced by substrate stiffness 4.4 Actomyosin contractility as a potential macrophage mechanotransducer element 4.5 Potential impact of the study in the context of cancer 4.6 Potential impact of the study in the context of implant design 4.7 Conclusions of the study MATERIALS AND METHODS 5.1 Production of polyacrylamide (PAA) hydrogels 5.2 Production of polyethylenglycol-heparin (PEG-Hep) hydrogels 5.3 Mechanical characterisation of hydrogels and macrophages 5.4 Isolation and culture of bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) 5.5 Fluorescence confocal microscopy 5.6 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 5.7 Gene expression analysis using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) 5.8 Cytokine quantification assays 5.9 Cell viability assay 5.10 Culture of BMDMs on micropatterns 5.11 Optical diffraction tomography (ODT) 5.12 Statistical analysis and data visualisation APPENDIX LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST OF FIGURES BIBLIOGRAPHY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Cette thèse s’est articulée autour de l’élaboration de revêtements surfaciques à base de polymères et de composants naturels. Dans un premier projet, des surfaces mécano-sensibles pour des applications de libération de molécules bioactives ont été élaborées. Des films de multicouches polyélectrolytes constitués d'une strate « réservoir » permettant le chargement d’une molécule bioactive, le paclitaxel, et d'une strate « barrière » mécano-sensible recouvrant ce réservoir et confinant le paclitaxel ont été élaborés. Lors de la mise sous étirement du film, la barrière est rendue perméable vis-à-vis d'une enzyme présente dans le surnageant. Cette enzyme induit ensuite la dégradation enzymatique du « réservoir » et la libération du paclitaxel. Dans un second projet, des substrats cellulaires nourriciers ont été réalisés à partir de films minces de gélatine réticulés mimant la matrice extracellulaire. Ces films peuvent être chargés: 1) en facteurs de croissance, ce qui permet de s'affranchir ensuite de l'ajout de ces molécules dans le milieu de culture; 2) en nanoparticules afin de moduler les propriétés mécaniques des films; 3) en agents antimicrobiens pour assurer une stérilité de la culture cellulaire. Ainsi, ces substrats aux propriétés biochimiques et biophysiques modulables permettent un contrôle précis du microenvironnement cellulaire. / This PhD work is about designing surface coatings with polymers and natural compounds. In the first project, mechanosensitive surfaces have been developed for drug release applications. Polyelectrolyte multilayer films have been designed with i) one reservoir strata for the loading of a bioactive molecule, paclitaxel, and ii) one mechanosensitive barrier strata on top of the reservoir to confine the molecule. When a mechanical stretch is applied on the structure, the barrier becomes permeable and enables the diffusion of an enzyme within the film.This enzyme degrades the reservoir strata and triggers the release of paclitaxel. In a second project, ECM-mimicking feeder substrate has been developed with crosslinked gelatin thin films. These films can be loaded with: i) growth factors to prevent any further addition of these compounds in the culture medium; ii) nanoparticles to modulate mechanical properties of the substrate; iii) antimicrobial agents to ensure sterility during cell culture experiments. Finally, these substrates have some biochemical and biophysical tunable properties that enable the precise control of cell microenvironment.