<p>  </p> <p>The growth of land plants depends on a group of pluripotent stem cells in a tissue called the meristem. Seed plants initiate and maintain different types of meristems at the asexual sporophyte stage, and they generate sexual gametophytes, which are dependent on their sporophytes and are devoid of a meristem. In contrast, aside from forming indeterminate meristems at the sporophyte stage, seedless vascular plants, including ferns, also develop meristems in their gametophytes to drive gametophyte development and formation of sexual organs. To date, compared to the well-characterized cell behaviors and regulatory pathways in the meristems of seed plants, the molecular and cellular basis of meristem development in seedless ferns is still poorly understood. </p> <p>In several seed plants, the HAIRY MERISTEM (HAM) family transcription factors play important roles in maintaining the indeterminacy of shoot apical meristems and promoting the <em>de novo</em> formation of axillary meristems. In the first part of this dissertation, through constructing a comprehensive phylogeny, I found that HAM family members are widely present in land plants and duplicated in a common ancestor of flowering plants, leading to the formation of two distinct groups: type I and type II. In addition, HAM members from different seed plants and seedless plants are able to replace the roles of the Arabidopsis type-II <em>HAM</em> genes, maintaining established shoot apical meristems and promoting the initiation of new stem cell niches in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, preliminary functional studies of the <em>HAM </em>homolog (<em>CrHAM</em>) in the model fern<em> Ceratopteris richardii</em> suggest that CrHAM is required for maintaining the indeterminacy of multicellular meristems in Ceratopteris gametophytes. Collectively, these results indicate that HAM family members may serve as common regulators in control of meristem development in both seed plants and seedless vascular plants. </p> <p>In the remaining chapter of this dissertation, long-term time-lapse confocal imaging was performed using Ceratopteris stable transgenic plants, in which each individual cell (nucleus) was labelled with a fluorescent marker. Real-time lineage, identity, and division activity of each single cell from meristem initiation to establishment in Ceratopteris gametophytes were then determined. Additionally, cell fate and lineage alterations during <em>de novo</em> formation of new meristems were examined by mechanical perturbations. These quantitative analyses lead to the conclusion that in Ceratopteris gametophytes, initiation and proliferation of multicellular meristems relies on a few marginal cell lineages. Once established, the meristem maintains an actively dividing zone during gametophyte development. Within the meristem, cell division is independent of cell lineages and marginal cells are more actively dividing than inner cells. The meristem also triggers differentiation of adjacent cells into egg-producing archegonia in a position-dependent manner. </p> <p>In summary, this work provides insight into the evolution of key stem-cell regulators and advances the understanding of diversified meristem development in land plants. </p>

Vegetative propagation allows the amplification of selected genotypes for research, breeding, and commercial planting. However, efficient in vitro regeneration and genetic transformation remains a major obstacle to research and commercial application in many plant species. Our aims are to improve knowledge of gene regulatory circuits important to meristem organization, and to identify genes that might be useful for improving the efficiency of in vitro regeneration. In this thesis, we have approached these goals in two ways. First, we analyzed gene expression during poplar (Populus) regeneration using an AffymetrixGeneChip® array representing over 56,000 poplar transcripts. We have produced a catalog of regulated genes that can be used to inform studies of gene function and biotechnology. Second, we developed a GUS reporter system for monitoring meristem initiation using promoters of poplar homologs to the meristem-active regulatory genes WUSCHEL (WUS) and SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM). This provides plant materials whose developmental state can be assayed with improved speed and sensitivity. For the microarray study, we hybridized cDNAs derived from tissues of a female hybrid poplar clone (INRA 717-1 B4, Populus tremula x P. alba) at five sequential time points during organogenesis. Samples were taken from stems prior to callus induction, at 3 days and 5 days after callus induction, and at 3 and 8 days after the start of shoot induction. Approximately 15% of the monitored genes were significantly up-or down-regulated based on both Extraction and Analysis of Differentially Expressed Gene Expression (EDGE) and Linear Models for Microarray Data (LIMMA, FDR<0.01). Of these, over 3,000 genes had a 5-fold or greater change in expression. We found a very strong and rapid change in gene expression at the first time point after callus induction, prior to detectable morphological changes. Subsequent changes in gene expression at later regeneration stages were more than an order of magnitude smaller. A total of 588 transcription factors that were distributed in 45 gene families were differentially regulated. Genes that showed strong differential expression encoded proteins active in auxin and cytokinin signaling, cell division, and plastid development. When compared with data on in vitro callogenesis from root explants in Arabidopsis, 25% (1,260) of up-regulated and 22% (748) of down- regulated genes were in common with the genes that we found regulated in poplar during callus induction. When ~3kb of the 5' flanking regions of close homologs were used to drive expression of the GUSPlus gene, 50 to 60% of the transgenic events showed expression in apical and axillary meristems. However, expression was also common in other organs, including in leaf veins (40% and 46% of WUS and STM transgenic events, respectively) and hydathodes (56% of WUS transgenic events). Histochemical GUS staining of explants during callogenesis and shoot regeneration using in vitro stems as explants showed that expression was detectable prior to visible shoot development, starting 3 to 15 days after explants were placed onto callus inducing medium. Based on microarray gene expression data, a paralog of poplar WUS was detectably up-regulated during shoot initiation, but the other paralog was not. Surprisingly, both paralogs of poplar STM were down-regulated 3- to 6-fold during early callus initiation, a possible consequence of its stronger expression in the secondary meristem (cambium) than in shoot tissues. We identified 15 to 35 copies of cytokinin response regulator binding motifs (ARR1AT) and one copy of the auxin response element (AuxRE) in both promoters. Several of the WUS and STM transgenic events produced should be useful for monitoring the timing and location of meristem development during natural and in vitro shoot regeneration. / Graduation date: 2008

Poaceae (or Gramineae) belong to the grass family and is one of the largest families among flowering plants on land. They include some of the most important cereal crops such as rice (Oryza sativa), barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat (Triticum aestivum), maize (Zea mays), and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). The characteristic bushy appearance of grass plants, including cereal crops, is formed by the activities of axillary meristems (AMs) generated in the leaf axil. These give rise to tillers from the basal nodes which recapitulate secondary growth axis and AMs are formed during vegetative development. On transition to flowering the apical meristem transforming to an inflorescence meristem (IM) which produces branches from axillary meristem. These IM gives rise to branches that ultimately bear florets. Vegetative branching/tillering determines plant biomass and influences the number of inflorescences per plant. While inflorescence branching determines the number of florets and hence seeds. Thus the overall activity of axillary meristems plays a key role in determining plant architecture during both vegetative and reproductive stages. In Arabidopsis, research on the plant specific transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) has pioneered our understanding of its regulatory functions during transition from vegetative to reproductive development and its role in specifying a floral meristem (FM) identity to the newly arising lateral meristems. In the FM LFY activates other FM genes and genes for floral organ patterning transcription factors. LFY is strongly expressed throughout the young floral meristems from the earliest stages of specification but is completely absent from the IM (Weigel et al., 1992). LFY expression can also be detected at low levels in the newly emerging leaf primordia during the vegetative phase, and these levels gradually increase until the floral transition (Blazquez et al., 1997; Hempel et al., 1997). In rice, the LFY ortholog-RFL/APO2 is expressed predominantly in very young branching panicles/ inflorescence meristems (Kyozuka et al., 1998; Prasad et al., 2003) while in the vegetative phase RFL is expressed at axils of leaves (Rao et al., 2008). In rice FMs expression is restricted to primordia of lodicules, stamens, carpels and ovules (Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). Knockdown of RFL activity or loss of function mutants show delayed flowering and poor panicle branching with reduced number of florets and lower fertility (Rao et al., 2008, Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). In some genotypes reduced vegetative axillary branching is also compromised (Rao et al., 2008). On the other hand RFL overexpression leads to the early flowering, attributing a role as an activator for the transition of vegetative meristems to inflorescence meristems (Rao et al., 2008). Thus, RFL shows a distinct developmental expression profile, has unique mutant phenotypes as compared to Arabidopsis LFY thus indicating a divergence in functions. We have used various functional genomics approaches to investigate regulatory networks controlledby RFL in the vegetative axillary meristems and in branching panicles with florets. These regulatory effects influence tillering and panicle branching, thus contributing to rice plant architecture. RFL functions in axillary meristem Vegetative AMs are secondary shoot meristems whose outgrowth determines plant architecture. In rice, AMs form tillers from basal nodes and mutants with altered tillering reveal that an interplay between transcription factors and the phytohormones - auxin, strigolactone underpins this process. We probed the relationship between RFL and other factors that control AM development. Our findings indicate that the derangements in AM development that occur on RFL knockdown arise from its early effects during specification of these meristems and also later effects during their outgrowth of AM as a tiller. Overall, the derailments of both steps of AM development lead to reduced tillering in plants with reduced RFL activity. Our studies on the gene expression status for key transcription factor genes, genes for strigolactone pathway and for auxin transporters gave an insight on the interplay between RFL, LAX1 and strigolactone signalling. Expression levels of LAX1 and CUC genes, that encode transcription factors with AM specification functions, were modulated upon RFL knockdown and on induction of RFL:ΔGR fusion protein. Thus our findings imply a likely, direct activating role for RFL in AM development that acts in part, through attaining appropriate LAX1 expression levels. Our data place meristem specification transcription factors LAX1 and CUC downstream to RFL. Arabidopsis LFY has a predominant role in conferring floral meristem (FM) identity (Weigel et al., 1992; Wagner, 2009; Irish, 2010; Moyroud et al., 2010). Its functions in axillary meristems were not known until recently. The latter functions were uncovered with the new LFYHARA allele with only partial defects in floral meristem identity (Chahtane et al., 2013). This mutant allele showed LFY can promote growth of vegetative AMs through its direct target REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEMS1 (RAX1), a R2R3 myb domain factor (Chahtane et al., 2013). These functions for Arabidopsis LFY and RAX1 in AMs development are parallel to and redundant with the pathway regulated by LATERAL SUPPRESSOR (LAS) and REGULATOR OF AXILLARY MERISTEM FORMATION1 (ROX1) (Yang et al., 2012; Greb et al., 2003). Interestingly, ROX1 is orthologous to rice LAX1 and our data show LAX1 expression levels in rice panicles and in culms with vegetative AMs is dependent on the expression status of RFL. Thus, we speculate that as compared to Arabidopsis AM development, in rice the LFY-dependent and LFY-independent regulatory pathways for AMs development are closely linked. In Arabidopsis, CUC2 and CUC3 genes in addition to their role in shoot meristem formation and organ separation play a role in AM development possibly by defining a boundary for the emerging AM. These functions for the Arabidopsis CUC genes are routed through their effects on LAS and also by mechanisms independent of LAS (Hibara et al., 2006; Raman et al., 2008). These data show modulation in RFL activity using the inducible RFL:∆GR protein leads to corresponding expression changes in CUC1/CUC2 and CUC3 genes expression in culm tissues. Thus, during rice AM development the meristem functions of RFL and CUC genes are related. Consequent to specification of AM the buds are kept dormant. Bud outgrowth is influenced by auxin and strigolactone signalling pathways. We investigated the transcript levels, in rice culms of genes involved in strigolactone biosynthesis and perception and found the strigolactone biosynthesis gene D10 and hormone perception gene are significantly upregulated in RFL knockdown plants. Further, bioassays were done for strigolactone levels, where we used arbuscular mycorrhiza colonization assay as an indicator for strigolactone levels in wild type plants and in RFL knockdown plants. These data validate higher strigolactone signalling in RFL knockdown plants. To probe the relationship between RFL and the strigolactone pathway we created plants knocked down for both RFL and D3. For comparison of the tillering phenotype of these double knockdown plants we created plants with D3 knockdown alone. We observed reduced tillering in plants with knockdown of both RFL and D3 as compared to the tiller number in plants with knockdown of D3 alone. These data suggest that RFL acts upstream to D3 of control bud outgrowth. As effects of strigolactones are influenced by auxin transport we studied expression of OsPIN1 and OsPIN3 in RFL knockdown plants. Their reduced expression was correlated with auxin deficiency phenotypes of the roots in RFL knockdown plants. These data in conjunction with observations on OsPIN3 the gene expression modulation by the induction of RFL:∆GR allow us to speculate on a relationship between RFL, auxin transport and strigolactones with regard to bud outgrowth. We propose that the low tillering phenotype of RFL knockdown plants arises from weakened PATS, consequent to low levels of PIN1 and PIN3, coupled with moderate increase in strigolactones. Taken together, our findings suggest functions for RFL during AM specification and tiller bud outgrowth. RFL functions in panicle branching Prior studies on phenotypes of RFL knockdown or loss of function mutants suggested roles for RFL in transition to flowering, inflorescence meristem development, emergence of lateral organs and floral organ development (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). It has been speculated that RFL acts to suppress the transition from inflorescence meristem to floral meristem through its interaction with APO1 (Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). The downstream genes regulated by RFL in these processes have not yet been elucidated. To identify direct targets of RFL in developing panicles we adopted ChIP-seq coupled with studies on gene expression modulation on induction of RFL. For the former we raised polyclonal anti-sera and chromatin from branching panicles with few florets. For gene expression modulation studies, we created transgenics with a T-DNA construct where an artificial miRNA against 3’UTR specifically knocked endogenous RFL and the same T-DNA had a second expression cassette for generation of a chemically inducible RFL-ΔGR protein that is not targeted by amiR RFL. Our preliminary ChIP-seq data in the wild type panicle tissues hints that RFL binds to hundreds of loci across the genome thus providing first glimpse of direct targets of RFL in these tissues. These data, while preliminary, were manually curated to identify likely targets that function in flowering, we summarize here some key findings. Our study indicates a role of RFL in flowering transition by activating genes like OsSPL14 and OsPRMT6a. Recent studies indicate that OsSPL14 directly binds to the promoter of OsMADS56 or FTL1, the rice homologs of SOC1 and FT to promote flowering (Lu et al., 2013). As RFL knockdown plants show highly reduced expression of OsMADS50/SOC1 and for RFT1 (Rao et al., 2008), and we show here RFL can bind and induce OsSPL14 expression we suggest the RFL¬OsSPL14 module can contribute to the transition of the SAM to flowering. Further, OsSPL14 in the young panicles directly activates DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 (DEP1) to control panicle length (Lu et al., 2013). Thus RFL-OsSPL14-DEP1 module could explain the role of RFL in controlling panicle architecture (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda-Kawakatsu et al., 2012). Thus RFL plays a role in floral transition and this function is conserved across several LFY homologs. Our data ChIP-seq in the wild type tissue and gene expression modulation studies in transgenics also give molecular evidences for the role of RFL in suppression of floral fate. The direct binding of RFL to OsMADS17, OsYABBY3, OsMADS58 and HD-ZIP-IV loci and the changes in their transcript levels on induction of RFL support this hypothesis. Once the transition from SAM to FM takes place, we speculate RFL represses the conversion of inflorescence branch meristems to floral fate by negatively regulating OsYABBY3, HD-ZIP class IV and OsMADS17 that can promote differentiation. These hypotheses indicate a diverged function for RFL in floral fate repression. Arabidopsis LFY is known to activate the expression of AGAMOUS (AG), whose orthologs in rice are OsMADS3 and OsMADS58. Our studies confirm conservation with regard to RFL binding to cis elements at OsMADS58 locus that is homologous to Arabidopsis AG. But importantly we show altered consequences of this binding on gene expression. We find RFL can suppress the expression of OsMADS58 which we speculate can promote a meristematic fate. Further, we also present the abnormal upregulation of floral organ fate genes on RFL downregulation. These data too indicate functions of RFL, are in part, distinct from the role of Arabidopsis LFY where it works in promoting floral meristem specification and development. These inferences are supported by our data that rice gene homologs for AP1, AP3 and SEP3 are not directly regulated by RFL, unlike their direct regulation by Arabidopsis LFY during flower development. We also report the expression levels of LAX1, FZP, OsIDS1 and OsMADS34 genes involved in meristem phase change and IM branching are RFL dependent. This is consistent with its role in the suppression of determinacy, thereby extending the IM activity for branch formation. But as yet we do not know if these effects are direct. Together, our data report direct targets of RFL that contribute to its functions in meristem regulation, flowering transition, and suppression of floral organ development. Overall, our preliminary data on RFL chromatin occupancy combined with our detailed studies on the modulation of gene expression provides evidence for targets and pathways unique to the rice RFL during inflorescence development. Comparative analysis of genes downstream to RFL in vegetative tillers Vs panicles Tillers and panicle branches arise from the axillary meristems at vegetative and reproductive stages, respectively, of a rice plant and overall contribute to the plant architecture. Some regulatory factors control branching in both these tissues - for example, MOC1 and LAX1. Mutants at these loci affect tillers and panicle branch development thus indicating common mechanisms control lateral branch primordia development (Li et al., 2003; Komatsu et al., 2003; Oikawa and Kyozuka, 2009). Knockdown of RFL activity or loss-of-function mutants cause significantly reduced panicle branching and in few instances, reduction in vegetative axillary branching (Rao et al., 2008; Ikeda- Kawakatsu et al., 2012). We took up the global expression profiling of RFL knockdown plants compared to wild type plants in the axillary meristem and branching panicle tissue. These data provide a useful list of potential targets of RFL in axillary meristem and branching panicle tissue. The comparative analysis of the genes affected in the two tissues indicates only a subset of genes is affected by RFL in both the vegetative axillary meristems and branching panicle. These genes include transcription factors (OsSPL14, Zn finger domain protein, and bHLH domain protein), hormone signalling molecules (GA2 ox9) and cell signalling (LRR protein) as a set of genes activated by RFL in both tissues. On the other hand, these comparative expression profiling studies also show distinct set of genes deregulated by RFL knockdown in these two tissues therefore implicating RFL functions have a tissue-specific context. The genes deregulated only in axillary meristem tissue only include D3- involved in the perception of strigolactone, OsMADS34 speculated to have a role in floral transition and RCN1 involved in transition to flowering. On the other hand, the genes – CUC1, OsMADS3, OsMADS58 involved in organ development and floral meristem determination were found to be deregulated only in panicle tissues of RFL knockdown plants. These data point towards presence of distinct mechanisms for the development of AMs as tillers versus the development of panicle axillary as rachis branches. Overall, these data implicate genes involved in transition to flowering, axillary meristem development and floral meristem development are controlled by RFL in different meristems to thereby control plant architecture and transition to flowering.

In angiosperms, specialized reproductive structures are borne in flowers to ensure their reproductive success. After the vegetative growth, plants undergo reproductive phase change to produce flowers. Floral meristems (FMs) are generated on the flanks of inflorescence and groups of specialized stem cells in the FM differentiate into four whorls of organs of a flower. In dicots, floral meristem successively gives rise to sepals, petals, stamens and carpels; after which it terminates. The fate of organs formed on FM is under the control of genetic regulators, key among which are members of MADS box transcription factor family. Their individual and combined act confers distinct identities to floral organs. Grass flowers are highly modified in structure. Rice flower, a model for grasses, is borne on a short branch called spikelet and they together from the basic structural units of the rice infloresences known as panicle. The outer whorl organs of a grass floret are bract-like structures known as lemma and palea to dicot sepals is highly dibated (see Chapter 1). In grass florets, petal homologs are a pair of highly reduced, fleshy bracts known as lodicules, while stamen and carpel homologs occupy the same position and share the same functions as their dicot counterparts. Aside from these distinct outer whorl organs, the florets are subtended by two pairs of bracts known as empty glumes and rudimentary glumes. The genetic regulators that control their unique identities and those that perform conserved functions are very intriguing and central questions in plant developmental biology. Using various contemporary and complementary technologies, we have analysed the molecular functions and downstream pathways of a MADS box transcription factor, OsMADSI during the rice floret meristem specification and organ development. Further by reverse genetics and overexpression studies, we have also functionally characterized two target genes of OsMADSI, OsETTINI and OsETTINI2 to understand their roles downstream to OsMADSI during the rice floret development.

TOOTH/MIR160A regulates leaf margin outgrowth in Arabidopsis thaliana Unlike animals, a striking aspect of the plant development is that they have evolved a flexible pattern of post embryonic development. This exposes them to the challenges of many biotic and abiotic signals throughout their life. So, plants have to evolve/regulate various mechanisms to modulate their growth and development for accomplishing a successful life cycle in the prevailing environmental conditions. Auxin is involved in the initiation of lateral organs at the meristem and serration development along the leaf margin (Bilsborough et al., 2011, Hay et al., 2006). These two developmental mechanisms share common molecular players. For example, CUC2 is required for the boundary formation at the SAM and also is shown to be essential for serration formation at the leaf margin. Similarly, tth shows increased leaf serration phenotype as well as defects in the positioning of flowers at the meristem. This demonstrates the functional significance of TTH-regulated ARFs in controlling auxin mediated developmental pathways. Leaves originate as small lumps of undifferentiated cells at the flanks of the shoot apical meristem which undergo several rounds division and expansion to generate the mature leaf with characteristic size, shape and leaf margin. Both, endogenous as well as environmental factors modulate the growth and development of a leaf. This is evident from the plasticity in leaf form, observed during the life time of a single plant, as well as from the diversity among closely related species living in different habitats. It is well known that pathways controlling leaf form are subjected to the effects of selection and adaptation. Leaf margin is a key feature of the final leaf shape and it contributes to the abundant diversity in leaf form. Leaf margin architecture varies quite significantly from smooth or entire margin to margins with large outgrowths (lobed margins). The evolution and ecological advantages of this diversity is a subject of intense investigation. It also provides a wonderful system to study the mechanistic details of iterative generation of repeated units, which is a common feature in producing many biological shapes. Recent advances in molecular technologies and the availability of genomic resources ushered the identification of new factors involved in leaf margin development. Our current knowledge of this developmental programme is that CUC2 establishes auxin maxima at the leaf margin by reorienting an auxin efflux carrier PIN1 which ultimately results in serration outgrowth (Bilsborough et al., 2011, Hay et al., 2006). A few missing links in this pathway are the mechanistic details of CUC2 function in reorienting PIN1 and the molecular details of auxin mediated serration outgrowth. Forward genetic screens have been valuable in characterizing a genetic pathway even in the post genomic era. An EMS mutagenesis screen was performed in this context to identify novel factors that can improve our understanding of this intricate mechanism. tooth was identified in the M2 population based on its increased leaf serration phenotype. Genetic analysis showed that tth phenotype is due to a monogenic recessive mutation. Along with increased leaf serration, tth also shows various developmental defects such as aberrant phyllotaxy, narrower cotyledons and narrower leaves. Positional cloning and sequencing analysis showed a G to A transition at the AT2G39175 locus which codes for MIR160A. The mutation is at the 7th base position of the mature miRNA sequence. Functional characterization of miRNAs by isolating mutations is hampered by their small genomic sizes. Till now, only a few miRNAs have been characterized by mutational analysis in plants (Allen et al., 2007, Baker et al., 2005, Cartolano et al., 2007, Chuck et al., 2007, Knauer et al., 2013, Nag et al., 2009, Nikovics et al., 2006). miR160-ARF10 regulatory module is shown to be required for leaf blade out growth and serration, but not leaf complexity in tomato (Hendelman et al., 2012). miR160 is coded by 3 loci in Arabidopsis, MIR160A, B and C. All three loci encode identical mature miRNA that targets 3 Auxin response factors, ARF10, 16 and 17. ARFs are the effector molecules of auxin mediated developmental programmes. Genetic analysis showed that enhanced serration outgrowth in tth is due to the up-regulation of its target genes. Here, we have identified a miRNA that negatively regulates serration outgrowth by repressing ARF10, 16 and 17 whose functional significance in regulating leaf margin development was not known previously. Extensive genetic interaction studies have shown that TTH acts in parallel to SAW-BP and MIR164-CUC pathways in regulating leaf margin development. We have also shown that CUC2 and PIN1 are absolutely essential for serration development in tth. CUC2 establishes a pattern required for the expression of ARF10 at the leaf margin. In the absence of CUC2, downstream effector molecules such as ARFs can not perform their function. arf10-2 arf16-2 could reduce, but not suppress serration outgrowth in various mutants suggesting their functional redundancy with other ARF family members. CUC2 establishes auxin maxima at the leaf margin that triggers the degradation of AUX/IAA repressors thereby relieving ARF proteins which mediate serration outgrowth. Whereas, TTH acts at the post transcriptional level for maintaining normal ARF transcript levels Role of SPYINDLY in Arabidopsis leaf margin development SPYNDLY encodes an O-linked N-acetyl glucosamine transferase that acts as a negative regulator of GA response. Consistent with its role in GA response, spy mutants show several GA dependent phenotypes such as early flowering and hyper branched trichomes. spy mutants also show several GA independent phenotypes such as aberrant phyllotaxy and smooth leaf margin. We have studied its role in regulating Arabidopsis leaf serration development. Reporter analysis of ARF10::GUS and CUC2::GUS in spy-3 revealed that SPY is not involved in establishing serration pattern. The spy-3 leaves did not show any defects during the early stages of serration development, but the mature leaves display smooth leaf margin indicating that SPY function is required for serration outgrowth. As shown in the present study, TTH regulated ARFs are also involved in serration outgrowth. Analysis of leaf margin phenotype in tth spy-3 showed that SPY activity is not required for ARF mediated serration outgrowth. Similar genetic interaction studies with SAW-BP pathway mutants showed that leaf margin out growth mediated by meristematic genes is not dependent on SPY function. Genetic interaction studies with MIR164-CUC pathway genes showed that SPY is required for serration outgrowth in these mutants. Interestingly, the cuc2-3 mutant is defective at both patterning and outgrowth of serration. The spy-3 could suppress serration out growth in cuc2-D suggesting that CUC2 mediated serration out growth is dependent on SPY activity. Protein-protein interaction studies between SPY and CUC2 are in progress to demonstrate whether SPY directly interacts with CUC2 or CUC2 derived signal to regulate serration out outgrowth. It is interesting to examine how mutations at SPY locus can abolish serration out growth mediated by CUC2, but does not affect the serration pattern, even though CUC2 is reported to be essential for both the patterning and outgrowth of serration.

LFY of Arabidopsis is a member of a unique plant specific transcription factor family. It is involved in giving meristem a determinate floral fate by the activation of floral organ identity genes and preventing inflorescence meristem identity. RFL is a homolog of FLO/LFY in rice. Studies from our lab on rice RFL, based on the effects of knockdown or overexpression, showed its major functions are in timing the conversion of SAM to IM and to prevent the premature conversion of branch meristem to spikelets. Additionally roles in vegetative axillary meristem specification have been also been identified in laboratory. Here, we attempt to delineate molecular pathways directly regulated by RFL as a transcription factor controlling inflorescence and floral development in rice. Part I: Identification of global target genes bound by RFL in developing rice inflorescences We carried out ChIP sequencing of the DNA bound by RFL in panicles (01.-0.3cm stage) using anti-RFL antibody. DNA sequences in one library pool were analyses by the MACS algorithm (FDR<0.01), to find 8000 binding sites while the SPP algorithm identified 5000 enriched peaks. These mapped to 2500 or 2800 gene-associated loci respectively, 617 of which were common loci to both pipelines. Several RFL bound gene loci were homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana LFY gene targets. Such gene targets underscore conserved downstream targets for LFY-proteins in evolutionarily very distinct species. AtLFY is known to bind variants of CCANT/G cis element classified as primary, inflorescence or seedling type. We scanned for these three types of cis elements at 123 RFL bound genes with likely functions in flowering. For a few of these 123 rice loci we find one of these cis motifs (p-value<0.001) in RFL bound ChIP-seq data. To validate these targets of RFL, we adopted in vitro DNA-protein binding assays with bacterially purified RFL protein. We confirm RFL target interactions with some genes implicated in flowering time, others in photoperiod triggered flowering, circadian rhythm, gibberellin hormone pathway, inflorescence development and branching. The in vitro experiments hint different RFL-DNA binding properties as compared to Arabidopsis LFY. We report binding to sequences at rice gene loci that are unique targets. Part II: Pathways regulated by RFL for reproductive transition and panicle development To co-relate DNA binding of RFL to target loci with changes in their gene expression, expression studies were taken up for selected set of genes implicated in rice flowering transition and panicle architecture. To study in planta and tissue specific gene regulation by RFL we raised RFL dsRNAi transgenics. Comparative transcript analysis in these RFL partial knockdown lines and matched wild type tissues reveal that RFL is an activator for some genes and repressor for other gene targets. We also examined if the gene expression effects of RFL knockdown can be reversed by induced complementation with an RFL-GR protein. We raised transgenics plants with a T-DNA ubi:RFL-GR, 35S CaMV:amiR RFL for these experiments. In planta target gene transcript levels were assessed in various conditions conditions. These studies validate rice RFL as an activator of some panicle architecture genes. Part III: Analysis of endogenous RFL protein in WT rice tissues Studies in Arabidopsis and in petunia with LFY and AFL, respectively, implicate these some abnormal mobility as compared to their predicted molecular weight when overexpressed. We studied endogenous RFL protein abundance in planta, adopting western analysis with anti-RFL antibody. We consistently identify two prominent cross reacting bands in different tissues which can be also be pulled-down from whole nuclear extracts of panicle and axillary meristem tissues. We speculate on likely modifications and possible functions for the same.

Although herbivory and other types of plant damage typically are viewed as detrimental to plant survival and performance, vigorous regrowth, greater seed set, and fitness benefits may be possible when damage to the apical meristem, or actively growing stem terminal, is involved. Such damage releases apical dominance, or the hormonal suppression of lateral buds, activates dormant lateral buds, and enables lateral shoots to grow. Since in plants with terminal flowers, each stem may bear a flower, removal of the apical meristem may result in stem bifurcation and ultimately increase the number of flowers and seeds, thereby increasing potential fitness. In the current study, possible overcompensation in response to apical meristem damage caused by simulated herbivory (clipping) and the gall midge Asphondylia borrichiae Rossi and Strong (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) (galling) was investigated in the native coastal halophyte, sea oxeye daisy Borrichia frutescens (L.) DC. (Asteraceae), in relation to nutrient supplementation. Results suggest a strong correlation between stem count and gall count at the study site; moreover, apical dominance was relatively weak early in the growing season and stronger in short plants that were shaded by taller neighbors later in the season. Results also indicate that overcompensation or even full compensation is an unlikely response to apical meristem damage in B. frutescens. Stem count was similar across all stem treatments, but increased significantly with nutrient supplementation, which all supports weak apical dominance in sea oxeye daisy. Nearly all measures of fitness also were either slightly or significantly lower when clipped and galled compared to plants with stems intact, while seed count responded positively to nutrient supplementation.