• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 6
  • 5
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Allele-Specific Gene Expression in the Laboratory Mouse

Zwemer, Lillian January 2012 (has links)
Traditionally, autosomal genes, when expressed, are assumed to express both alleles equally. Exceptions to this tenet include genes for which a specific genotypic polymorphism controls expression level, as well as genes for which monoallelic expression is epigenetically dictated. In this work, we discovered and characterized allele-specific gene expression in a variety of tissues using multiple techniques. We used cell lines and fresh tissue from reciprocal crosses of F1 heterozygous mice and the homozygous parental strains. We relied on a variety of high-throughput genomic techniques including RNA-Seq and DNA SNP-arrays to examine multiple types of allele-specific expression. We searched for novel examples of random autosomal monoallelic expression (RMAE) by using DNA SNP-arrays and cDNA from lymphoblast and fibroblast clonal cell lines of heterozygous mice. We found that of the approximately 1,350 autosomal genes we assessed, over 10% showed evidence of RMAE in at least one cell type. This allele-specific expression was stable over long periods in cell culture and encompassed a variety of gene types, some of which also exhibit RMAE in human clonal lines. Additionally, for a subset of RMAE genes, there seemed to be preferential inactivation of one allele; this monoallelic expression was still considered random, as from clone to clone the gene could be expressed either monoallelically or biallelically. In a second set of experiments we developed an analysis pipeline to examine RNASeq data for allele-specific expression. Using a pilot data set, we assessed the murine liver for parent-of-origin monoallelic expression, examining both known and candidate novel imprinted genes. We observed imprinted monoallelic expression in the adult liver for some, but not all, imprinted genes that have been reported in studies of embryonic tissue. The results suggest that there are few, if any, novel imprinted genes to be discovered in the mouse liver. This pilot data set also allowed examination of the genetic basis of allele specific gene expression. In keeping with recent reports, we found evidence for genetically based allele-specific expression, ranging from mild to greater than 4-fold allelic imbalance. We examined the extent to which this allelic imbalance correlated with total expression levels in the parental strains.
2

Functions of Trypanosoma brucei RAP1 in Antigenic Variation

Afrin, Marjia 20 June 2022 (has links)
No description available.
3

Mechanismen der bimodalen Membran-PR3-Expression auf neutrophilen Granulozyten

Eulenberg, Claudia 07 November 2013 (has links)
Anti-Neutrophile Cytoplasmatische Antikörper verursachen nekrotisierende Vaskulitiden kleiner Blutgefäße. Die Serinprotease PR3 ist ein ANCA-Zielantigen, welches von zirkulierenden ANCA auf der Zellmembran erkannt wird. ANCA aktivieren neutrophile Granulozyten, die dann die nekrotisierende Vaskulitis verursachen. Das Membran-PR3 Expressionsmuster ist bimodal wobei mPR3-niedrig- und mPR3-hoch-exprimierende Zellen existieren. Wir testeten die Hypothese, dass ein Membranrezeptor eine hohe mPR3-Expression vermittelt. Wir verwendeten humane neutrophile Granulozyten, neutrophil-differenzierte Stammzellen und transfizierte HEK293 Zellen. Wir identifizierten das Glykoprotein CD177 als einen mPR3-präsentierenden Rezeptor. CD177 zeigte eine spezifische Bindung von reifem PR3-Protein, nicht aber von einem unprozessierten PR3. Wir separierten die mPR3-Zellpopulationen und führten Durchflusszytometrie, Giemsa-Färbung, Western Blot-Experimente und RT-PCR für die PR3 und CD177 mRNA-Expression durch. Wir fanden, dass die mPR3hoch neutrophilen Granulozyten PR3- und CD177-Protein enthielten, während in den mPR3niedrig neutrophilen Granulozyten nur PR3, aber kein CD177 detektierbar war. Die CD177-Regulation vollzog sich auf transkriptioneller Ebene, da die Zellen, die negativ für das CD177-Protein waren auch keine mRNA transkribierten. Um die Grundlage der fehlenden CD177-Transkription zu analysieren, identifizierten wir den Transkriptionsstart von CD177 für eine anschließende Mutations- und SNP-Analyse. Die CD177-Sequenzen der proteinkodierenden Regionen und der Intron-Exon-Übergänge der beiden Zellpopulationen waren identisch. Jedoch fanden wir, dass das CD177-Gen einer monoallelischen Expression unterliegt. Es wurde dabei maternale als auch paternale monoallelische Expression detektiert. In weiterführenden Untersuchungen soll der Regulationsmechanismus der monoallelischen CD177-Expression charakterisiert werden. / Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies cause necrotizing small-vessel vasculitis. The serine protease PR3 provides a main ANCA target antigen and is recognized by circulating ANCA on the neutrophil cell surface. ANCA activate neutrophils and activated neutrophils cause vasculitis. The membrane-PR3 expression pattern is bimodal in that low and high mPR3 expressing cells can be distinguished. We tested the hypothesis that a membrane receptor mediates mPR3high expression. We studied human neutrophils, neutrophilic differentiated CD34-positive hematopoietic stem cells and transfected HEK293 cells. We identified the glycoprotein CD177 as an mPR3 presenting receptor. CD177 demonstrated specific binding of mature, but not of unprocessed pro-PR3. We separated the two mPR3 populations and performed cytometry analysis, Giemsa staining, western blot analysis and RT-PCR for PR3 and CD177 expression. We detected PR3 and CD177 protein in mPR3high expressing neutrophils, whereas only PR3, but no CD177 was found in mPR3low expressing cells. Regulation took place on a transcriptional level because cells that were negative for CD177 protein were also negative for mRNA. To further study this finding, we identified the CD177 transcription start for a subsequent mutation and SNP analysis. CD177 sequences of the protein-coding regions and the intron-exon regions did not differ in both populations. However, we found a monoallelic CD177 expression and were able to detect maternal as well as paternal allele expression. Future experiments will elucidate the mechanisms that control monoallelic CD177 gene expression.
4

Analysis of the role of nuclear organization during random X chromosome inactivation / Analyse du role de l’organisation nucleaire dans l’inactivation du chromosome X

Pollex, Tim 19 September 2014 (has links)
Chez les mammifères femelles, le processus d’inactivation du chromosome X (XCI) assure la compensation de dose entre les deux sexes. Chez la souris, l’inactivation du X est établie de manière aléatoire dans l’épiblaste au stade blastocyste et peut être récapitulée in vitro dans les cellules souches embryonnaires. L’ARN non-codant Xist, exprimé à partir du centre d’inactivation du X (Xic), est le régulateur principal de ce processus. Il décore en cis le chromosome choisi pour être inactivé et initie la répression de ses gènes. Ainsi, de manière remarquable, les deux chromosomes X sont traités différemment pendant l’initiation de la XCI malgré leur homologie de séquence et leur localisation au sein d’un même noyau. De manière remarquable, ce processus implique le traitement différentiel de deux chromosomes homologues au sein d’un même noyau, avec des changements d’environnements nucléaires et chromatiniens entre le X actif et le X inactif. Il a été proposé que la localisation nucléaire pourrait jouer un rôle important dans l’initiation de l’expression monoallélique des gènes, non seulement pour l’initiation de la XCI mais aussi pour des processus tels que l’exclusion allélique dans les cellules lymphoides. Par exemple, l’association de loci avec des compartiments hétérochromatiques nucléaires et l’association en trans de loci homologues pourraient être impliquées dans la régulation des gènes monoalléliques. Ainsi, j’ai utilisé le système bactérien TetR/TetO afin d’analyser le rôle de l’organisation nucléaire du chromosome X et du Xic dans l’initiation de la XCI. J’ai pu montrer que si le recrutement des protéines de fusion TetR-LaminB1 ou -Cbx5 au niveau de la cassette TetO insérée dans le Xic permet la répression des gènes à proximité, cet évènement n’est pas toujours accompagné d’une relocalisation nucléaire. De plus, l’association forcée du Xic avec la périphérie nucléaire (TetR-LaminB1) n’a pas d’influence sur le choix du chromosome X à inactiver. Enfin, si la relocalisation des deux Xic à la périphérie nucléaire induit une réduction des évènements d’association en trans entre les deux loci, elle n’a pas d’effet sur l’initiation de l’inactivation. En résumé, ces résultats suggèrent que l’organisation nucléaire du chromosome X et du Xic et l’association des Xic en trans ne sont pas des facteurs déterministes pour le choix et l’initiation de la XCI, mais pourraient être le résultat des changements d’expression des gènes liés à l’X au cours de la différenciation des cellules souches ainsi que de l’augmentation de l’expression de Xist.Enfin, j’ai également analysé le rôle de la protéine CTCF, qui a été proposée pour être importante dans l’organisation structurale du génome, dans le contexte du Xic et de l’initiation de l’inactivation. Ainsi, le recrutement de CTCF au niveau de cassette TetO insérée dans le Xic induit localement une réduction mineure des interactions en cis et la répression des gènes du Xic, à l’exception de Xist dont l’expression est augmentée. Pour autant, la présence ectopique de CTCF n’a pas d’incidence majeure sur l’organisation générale du Xic. / X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) ensures dosage compensation in female mammals. Random XCI is established in the epiblast of female mouse embryos and can be recapitulated in vitro in differentiating embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The major regulator of XCI is the long non-coding RNA Xist, which is expressed from the X-inactivation center (Xic), covers the chromosome in cis and initiates gene silencing. During XCI, the two X chromosomes are treated very differently, despite their homology and the fact that they reside in the same nucleus. Nuclear localization has been hypothesized to play a role in monoallelic gene regulation, not only during XCI but also in other contexts. For example, association with heterochromatin and homologous trans interactions (“pairing”) have been implicated in the establishment of monoallelic gene expression in lymphoid cells and transient pairing has been suggested to participate in symmetry breaking during random XCI. Using the bacterial tetO/tetR system to alter the subnuclear localization and environment of one or both Xics, we have tested the function of subnuclear localization and trans interactions between the Xic loci during initiation of XCI. Using stable expression and reversible binding of TetR fusion proteins (e.g. LaminB1, Cbx5) we show that binding of these proteins can induce local gene repression and chromatin changes, although this is not always associated with subnuclear relocalization. We further show that the forced association of the Xic with the nuclear envelope, does not impact on the choice-making process during XCI. In particular, tethering both Xics to the nuclear lamina during early ESC differentiation resulted in a substantial reduction of homologous pairing events, but had no obvious impact on the onset of random, monoallelic Xist expression. Taken together, our results suggest that nuclear localization and trans interactions of the Xic may be downstream events rather than causal in the regulation of the XCI process.Furthermore, we recruited CTCF, a protein suggested to be involved in structural organization of the genome, to the Xic using the tetO/tetR system. Upon binding of CTCF the overall structure of the Xic remained unaltered though few cis interactions appeared to be weakened, which was accompanied by gene repression in the Xic. Surprisingly, the only upregulated gene in the Xic was Xist in ESCs and during differentiation, which demonstrates that the induced minor changes of cis interactions might impact on gene regulation in the Xic.
5

Antigenic variation in Trypanosoma brucei: analysis of its control and a transcription factor involved

Kassem, Ali 27 March 2015 (has links)
African trypanosomes are a major plague in sub-Saharan Africa. They cause sleeping sickness in humans and nagana in cattle. These parasites are transmitted between their mammalian hosts by tsetse flies. They are adapting to their different environments through differentiation processes. These processes involve, amongst other things, the expression of different surface coats. These coats are made of procyclin protein at the insect midgut procyclic stage and of variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) at the mammalian bloodstream stage. At a given time, one VSG is expressed from a single VSG gene out of a repertoire of more than 1500 VSG genes present in the trypanosomes genome. The expressed VSG gene is always located at one of fifteen telomeric polycistronic transcription units called expression sites (ES). The VSG coat is changed regularly in a process called antigenic variation allowing trypanosomes to escape the immune response. The exact mechanism controlling the selection of the active ES is not yet known and controversies have been raised concerning the ES transcription control. Although several molecular factors involved in the ES monoallelic-expression have been identified, none of them seems to be a critical regulator.<p><p>Thus during my thesis we decided to explore two aspects of ES expression: (A) deciphering the level at which this expression is controlled and (B) fishing for new protein factors controlling this expression.<p>A) It is not even clear at which level the ES transcription control takes place. In particular, there has been debate on whether it is taking place at the transcription initiation or elongation level. Previous experiments generated contradictory conclusions and gave rise to two different models. The first model suggested that transcription initiation takes place in all ESs simultaneously. The second model suggested that transcription is initiated in only two ESs, one being fully active and a second being pre-active. These two models were equally able to account for the finding of transcripts from different ES within a trypanosome population provided the pre-active ES differs between individual cells. In order to decide if a single or multiple ES promoters can initiate transcription in a given cell, single cell RT-PCR targeting the beginning of the ES was required. Thus single cell RT-PCR was performed and an analysis of the obtained transcripts showed that transcription initiation is taking place on many ES while only one VSG is transcribed. This permitted the unambiguous conclusion that the monoallelic expression of VSG is exerted by controls operating downstream from transcription initiation, suggesting transcription elongation or RNA processing as critical control steps. <p>B) We have characterized a new nuclear protein, Tb alba3, involved in the repression of silent VSGs. Its invalidation lead to chromatin opening in the silent expression sites and to a raise in their expression. As this protein is cytoplasmic and binding procyclin mRNAs at the procyclic stage, it could be a new versatile factor, shuttling between the cytoplasm and the nucleus and involved both in the inverse regulation of major surface antigens at different differentiation stages and the control of antigenic variation.<p><p>These results enhance our understanding of ES transcription control and of ES monoallelic expression. / Doctorat en Sciences / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
6

Experimental and theoretical analysis of X-chromosome inactivation as a paradigm for epigenetic memory and molecular decision-making

Mutzel, Verena 19 October 2021 (has links)
X-Chromosom-Inaktivierung (XCI) ist der Mechanismus, den Säuger zur Dosiskompensierung zwischen weiblichen und männlichen Zellen verwenden. XCI wird ausgelöst durch die monoallelische Hochregulation der langen nicht-kodierenden RNA Xist von einem der zwei X-Chromosomen in weiblichen Zellen. Die Xist RNA vermittelt dann das Ausschalten der Gene auf diesem X-Chromosom. Das wirft einige interessante Fragen auf: Wie zählen Zellen ihre X-Chromosomen und stellen sicher, dass genau eines aktiv bleibt? Wie entscheiden sie, welches X-Chromosom aktiv bleibt und welches ausgeschaltet wird? Und wie erinnern sie sich an diese Entscheidung und behalten sie stabil bei durch alle weiteren Zellteilungen? Mithilfe eines stochastischen Modells zeigen wir, dass diese XCI Regulation prinzipiell durch nur zwei Regulatoren erklärt werden kann: Ein global (in trans) agierender XCI Aktivator und ein lokal (in cis) agierender XCI Repressor. Dieses Netzwerk aus nur zwei Regulatoren kann die Xist Expressionsmuster in verschiedenen Säugerspezies reproduzieren, von der Maus bis zum Mensch. Es sagt außerdem voraus, dass Zellen in der Lage sind, biallelische zu monoallelischer Xist Expression zu korrigieren, eine Vorhersage, für die wir tatsächlich experimentelle Belege finden. Mit einem mechanistischen Modell zeigen wir, dass das cis-Gedächtnis über den Xist Expressionszustand durch Antisense-Transkription zustande kommen könnte. Auf dieser Hypothese aufbauend untersucht der zweite Teil der Arbeit das Potential von Antisense-Transkription, ein lokales Gedächtnis über den Expressionszustand eines Gens zu generieren, genauer. Diese Analyse sagt vorher, dass Antisense-Repression den Expressionszustand eines Lokus tatsächlich für einige Tage stabil erhalten kann. / X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mechanism for dosage compensation between the sexes in mammals. It is initiated through monoallelic upregulation of the long non-coding RNA Xist from one X chromosome, which mediates almost complete transcriptional silencing of this X chromosome. XCI regulation raises intriguing and thus far unanswered questions: How do cells count their X chromosomes and ensure that exactly one stays active? How do they make a mutually exclusive choice for one inactive X chromosome, and how do they then stably maintain this choice throughout subsequent cell divisions? Using stochastic modeling, we show that XCI onset only requires two regulators: A trans-acting Xist activator that ensures female specificity and a cis-acting Xist repressor that allows stable maintenance of alternative Xist expression states. This two-regulator network can recapitulate Xist expression patterns across different species and makes a novel prediction that is validated experimentally: Cells are able to revert biallelic Xist expression to monoallelic expression. With a mechanistic stochastic model we show that Xist's antisense transcript Tsix might be the cis-acting Xist repressor, uncovering the molecular mechanism behind the stabilization of the alternative Xist expression states. Building upon Tsix' possible functional role in stabilizing alternative Xist expression states on the active and inactive X chromosome, the second part of this thesis investigates the potential of antisense transcription to maintain a transient transcriptional memory. We find that mutual repression between a pair of antisense genes can allow the locus to remember the transcription state it has acquired due to a past signal for several days.

Page generated in 0.0486 seconds