<p>Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) are used as an important regulatory instrument to protect workers’ health from adverse effects of chemical exposures. The OELs mirror the outcome of the risk assessment and risk management performed by the standard setting actor. In paper I the OELs established by 18 different organisations or national regulatory agencies from the industrialised world were compared. The comparison concerned: (1) what chemicals have been selected and (2) the average level of exposure limits for all chemicals. In paper II the OELs established by 7 different national regulatory agencies of EU member states are compared to those of the European Commission (EC). In addition to the same comparisons as performed in the first study a comparison level was introduced (3) the similarity between the OELs of these EU member states and the OELs recommended by the EC.</p><p>List of OELs were collected through the web-pages of, and e-mail communication with the standard-setting agencies. The selection of agencies was determined by availability of the lists. The database of paper I contains OELs for a total of 1341 substances; of these 25 substances have OELs from all 18 organisations while more than one third of the substances are only regulated by one organisation alone. In paper II this database was narrowed down to the European perspective.  The average level of OELs differs substantially between organisations; the US OSHA exposure limits are (on average) nearly 40 % higher than those of Poland. Also within Europe there was a nearly as large difference. The average level of lists tends to decrease over time, although there are exceptions to this. The similarity index in paper II indicates that the exposure limits of EU member states are converging towards the European Commission’s recommended OELs. These two studies also showed that OELs for the same substance can vary significantly between different standard-setters. The work presented in paper III identifies steps in the risk assessment that could account for these differences. Substances for which the level of OELs vary by a factor of 100 or more were identified and their documentation sought for further scrutiny. Differences in the identification of the critical effect could explain the different level of the OELs for half of the substances. The results reported in paper III also confirm the tendency of older OELs generally being higher. Furthermore, several OELs were more than 30 years old and were based on out-dated knowledge. But the age of the data review could not account for all the differences in data selection, only one fifth of the documents referred to all available key studies. Also the evaluation of the key studies varied significantly.</p>

No description available.

Heat stress occurs when the body cannot adequately cool itself due to the combined contributions of metabolic heat, environmental factors and clothing. Heat stress found in the workplace puts employees at risk of developing heat-related illnesses, disorders and could be fatal. The wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) index is the current method used to assess environmental contributions to heat stress in an occupational setting. The purpose of this thesis was to explore whether the National Weather Service's Heat Index (HI) could substitute for the WBGT Index during occupational heat stress exposure assessment. The possibility of using the HI for heat stress exposure assessments was explored by first developing an occupational exposure limit based on the HI and then by comparing the HI to WBGT Index over a range of environments. Data from 10 selected studies were reviewed and categorized into two groups (Classic Data and Progressive Data) based on the method used to determine the upper limit of the prescriptive zone. WBGT and HI values were estimated from the environmental data provided in the 10 studies and the metabolic demands were also noted. These data were used to illustrate the relationship between environment (WBGT and HI) and metabolic rate. Next the relationship between HI and WBGT was compared over a range of environments consisting of combinations of air temperature and percent relative humidity as defined by the NWS's Heat Index Chart. Finally the effects of adding a high radiant heat load (Tg = Tdb+10 °C) to the relationship between WBGT and HI was explored. The HI occupational exposure limits were protective of the upper limit threshold points in a manner similar to WBGT. A greater spread in the Classic and Progressive upper limit data was observed above the occupational exposure limit when expressed as HI. High correlation was observed (R2 = 0.95) between the WBGT Index and HI over a range of environments, assuming no radiant heat. The incremental increase in HI due to high radiant heat indicated a strong dependency on the absolute value of HI, which makes using HI to predict WBGT in radiant heat environments problematic. Findings suggest the Heat Index could be used to assess heat stress exposures and to set occupational exposure limits for hot environments in the absence of high radiant heat.

Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) are used as an important regulatory instrument to protect workers’ health from adverse effects of chemical exposures. The main objective of this thesis is to study risk assessment practices in the setting of OEL in order to produce knowledge that will help improve the consistency and transparency of OELs. For the purpose of paper I a database of OELs for a total of 1341 substances was compiled. Of these, only 25 substances have OELs from all 18 included organisations while more than one third of the substances are only regulated by one organisation alone. The average level of OELs differs substantially between organisations; the US OSHA exposure limits are (on average) nearly 40 % higher than those of Poland. In paper II six EU member states’ OELs are compared to the European Commission’s OELs. Also within Europe there is a large difference concerning the average level of OELs (35%). The average level of lists tends to decrease over time, although there are exceptions to this. There are also indications that the exposure limits of EU member states are converging towards the European Commission’s OELs. The work presented in paper III identifies steps in the risk assessment that could account for the large differences in OELs for 14 different substances. Differences in the identification of the critical effect could explain the different level of the OELs for half of the substances. But the age of the data review could not account for all the differences in data selection, only one fifth of the documents referred to all available key studies. Also the evaluation of the key studies varied significantly. The aim of paper IV was to investigate how the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) of the European Commission uses assessment factors when proposing health-based indicative OELs. For only one third of the investigated OELs were explicit assessment factors given. On average the safety margin of the recommendations was 2.1 higher when an explicit assessment factor had been used. It is recommended that the SCOEL develop and adhere to a more articulate framework on the use of assessment factors. Paper V focuses on the Derived No-Effect Levels (DNELs) which are to be calculated under the new European Union REACH legislation. It is a comparison of the safety margins of 88 SCOEL recommendations with those of the corresponding worker-DNELs, derived according to the default approach as described in the REACH guidance document. Overall, the REACH safety margins were approximately six times higher than those derived from the SCOEL documentations but varied widely with REACH/SCOEL safety margin ratios ranging by two orders of magnitude, from 0.3 to 58. / QC 20110215

Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) are used as an important regulatory instrument to protect workers’ health from adverse effects of chemical exposures. The OELs mirror the outcome of the risk assessment and risk management performed by the standard setting actor. In paper I the OELs established by 18 different organisations or national regulatory agencies from the industrialised world were compared. The comparison concerned: (1) what chemicals have been selected and (2) the average level of exposure limits for all chemicals. In paper II the OELs established by 7 different national regulatory agencies of EU member states are compared to those of the European Commission (EC). In addition to the same comparisons as performed in the first study a comparison level was introduced (3) the similarity between the OELs of these EU member states and the OELs recommended by the EC. List of OELs were collected through the web-pages of, and e-mail communication with the standard-setting agencies. The selection of agencies was determined by availability of the lists. The database of paper I contains OELs for a total of 1341 substances; of these 25 substances have OELs from all 18 organisations while more than one third of the substances are only regulated by one organisation alone. In paper II this database was narrowed down to the European perspective.  The average level of OELs differs substantially between organisations; the US OSHA exposure limits are (on average) nearly 40 % higher than those of Poland. Also within Europe there was a nearly as large difference. The average level of lists tends to decrease over time, although there are exceptions to this. The similarity index in paper II indicates that the exposure limits of EU member states are converging towards the European Commission’s recommended OELs. These two studies also showed that OELs for the same substance can vary significantly between different standard-setters. The work presented in paper III identifies steps in the risk assessment that could account for these differences. Substances for which the level of OELs vary by a factor of 100 or more were identified and their documentation sought for further scrutiny. Differences in the identification of the critical effect could explain the different level of the OELs for half of the substances. The results reported in paper III also confirm the tendency of older OELs generally being higher. Furthermore, several OELs were more than 30 years old and were based on out-dated knowledge. But the age of the data review could not account for all the differences in data selection, only one fifth of the documents referred to all available key studies. Also the evaluation of the key studies varied significantly.

Background: The Platinum mining operations in South Africa mining platinum containing ore from areas where variable amounts of uranium are found, leading to the possibility of occupational exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of Uranium-238 and in particular the gas Radon-222. No scientific data is available for occupational exposure to Radon-222 in South African platinum mining operations. Objective: To determine the risk of occupational exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in a South African platinum mine. Design: Quantitative sampling (personal and static) to establish baseline data on exposure to radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in a underground South African platinum mine. Setting: The Bafokeng Rasimone platinum mine located 30 km North West of Rustenburg in the Bushveld complex in the North West Province of South Africa. Study subjects: One hundred and seventy four potentially highest exposed underground employees and one hundred and twelve static underground samples were sampled. Method: Personal and area samples were taken on selected employees and in locations using RGM samplers using CR-39 plastic as a detection medium. Employees were selected to sample the highest exposed occupations and static samples were located to sample returning air from levels underneath the sampling point before it is exhausted to the above ground atmosphere. After analysis by an accredited laboratory, the results were converted to exposure following the National Council on Radiation Protection-78 methodology. Main outcome measures: Quantify the relative risks of potentially highest exposed employee`s exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in underground working areas in milliSievert per year. Results: The mean reference background exposure averaged 0.6168 mSv/a with underground personal exposure averaging 0.6808 mSv/a, and underground static exposure averaging 0.8726 mSv/a. These values are substantially below the 50 mSv/a Occupational Exposure Limit, and only pose a slightly elevated risk for the development of lung cancer above the normal back-ground exposure. Mining Team leaders and rock drill operators were identified as the potentially highest exposed employees due to the close proximity to the working face, large amounts of time spent close to the working face and the lower ventilation volumes at the working face, with Team leaders having the highest exposure of the sampled occupations with a average of 1.16 mSv/a. Conclusions: Occupational exposure to radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in the underground air of a South African platinum mine does not pose a significant risk to the health of employees working in the platinum mine. / Thesis (MSc (Occupational Hygiene))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

Background: The Platinum mining operations in South Africa mining platinum containing ore from areas where variable amounts of uranium are found, leading to the possibility of occupational exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of Uranium-238 and in particular the gas Radon-222. No scientific data is available for occupational exposure to Radon-222 in South African platinum mining operations. Objective: To determine the risk of occupational exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in a South African platinum mine. Design: Quantitative sampling (personal and static) to establish baseline data on exposure to radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in a underground South African platinum mine. Setting: The Bafokeng Rasimone platinum mine located 30 km North West of Rustenburg in the Bushveld complex in the North West Province of South Africa. Study subjects: One hundred and seventy four potentially highest exposed underground employees and one hundred and twelve static underground samples were sampled. Method: Personal and area samples were taken on selected employees and in locations using RGM samplers using CR-39 plastic as a detection medium. Employees were selected to sample the highest exposed occupations and static samples were located to sample returning air from levels underneath the sampling point before it is exhausted to the above ground atmosphere. After analysis by an accredited laboratory, the results were converted to exposure following the National Council on Radiation Protection-78 methodology. Main outcome measures: Quantify the relative risks of potentially highest exposed employee`s exposure to the radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in underground working areas in milliSievert per year. Results: The mean reference background exposure averaged 0.6168 mSv/a with underground personal exposure averaging 0.6808 mSv/a, and underground static exposure averaging 0.8726 mSv/a. These values are substantially below the 50 mSv/a Occupational Exposure Limit, and only pose a slightly elevated risk for the development of lung cancer above the normal back-ground exposure. Mining Team leaders and rock drill operators were identified as the potentially highest exposed employees due to the close proximity to the working face, large amounts of time spent close to the working face and the lower ventilation volumes at the working face, with Team leaders having the highest exposure of the sampled occupations with a average of 1.16 mSv/a. Conclusions: Occupational exposure to radioactive disintegration products of naturally occurring Radon-222 gas in the underground air of a South African platinum mine does not pose a significant risk to the health of employees working in the platinum mine. / Thesis (MSc (Occupational Hygiene))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

De nombreuses études de biométrologie sont menées à l’INRS, pour évaluer l’exposition professionnelle à des substances chimiques, en France, et pour compléter les connaissances en proposant des valeurs de références destinées à protéger des salariés exposés à ces substances. Ces études consistent à mesurer simultanément l’imprégnation biologique et l’exposition atmosphérique à une substance, chez des salariés exposés à celle-ci. La relation entre ces mesures biologiques et atmosphériques est ensuite estimée à travers un modèle de régression linéaire. Lorsque que cette relation existe et que la voie d’absorption du toxique est essentiellement inhalatoire, il est ensuite possible de dériver une Valeur Limite Biologique (VLB) à partir de la Valeur Limite d’Exposition Professionnelle (VLEP-8h) du toxique. Deux aspects de ces données ont été identifiés, qui ne sont pas ou seulement partiellement prises en compte dans les modélisations statistiques courantes : la censure due aux limites de détection (LD)/quantification (LQ) des mesures biologiques et atmosphériques et la variabilité inter-individuelle. Ignorer ces deux particularités lors de la modélisation mène à une perte de puissance statistique et à de potentielles conclusions biaisées. Les travaux menés dans le cadre de cette thèse ont permis d’adapter le modèle de régression à ces deux caractéristiques, dans un cadre bayésien. L’approche proposée repose sur la modélisation des mesures atmosphériques à l’aide de modèles à effets aléatoires prenant en compte les valeurs inférieures à la LD/LQ, et sur la modélisation simultanée des mesures biologiques, supposée être linéairement dépendantes sur une échelle logarithmique, de l'exposition atmosphérique, tout en tenant compte de la variabilité inter-individuelle. Ce travail a donné lieu à une publication scientifique dans une revue à comité de lecture. L’application de cette méthodologie a été réalisée sur des jeux d’exposition professionnelle au béryllium et au chrome, après avoir été cependant adaptée aux caractéristiques toxicocinétiques de ces deux substances. Il a ainsi été possible de proposer une VLB pour le béryllium (0,06 µg/g créatinine). L’exploitation de mesures de chrome dans deux secteurs d’activités différents (exposition professionnelle aux peintures de chromates, et exposition professionnelle dans le secteur du chromage électrolytique) a permis de mettre en évidence que le chrome urinaire dépend essentiellement de l’exposition au chrome VI, le chrome non VI ayant moins d’impact. Nous n’avons pas pu montrer de relation entre la solubilité du CrVI et le chrome urinaire. Une VLB de 0,41 µg/g créatinine, de l’ordre de la Valeur Biologique de Référence (VBR) proposée par l’ANSES (0,54 µg/g créatinine), a été estimée pour l’exposition professionnelle aux peintures de chromates, et une VLB de 1,85 µg/g créatinine a été estimée pour l’exposition professionnelle dans le secteur du chromage électrolytique, qui est en cohérence avec la VLB proposée par l’ANSES dans ce secteur, à savoir 1,8 µg/g créatinine / Many biomonitoring studies are conducted at INRS, in order to assess occupational exposure to chemicals in France, and to propose reference values to protect workers exposed to these substances. These studies consist in measuring simultaneously biological and airborne exposure of workers exposed to a toxic substance. The relationship between these biological and airborne measurements is then estimated through a linear regression model. When this relationship exists and the route of absorption of the toxic is essentially inhalatory, it is possible to derive a Biological Limit Value (BLV) from the Occupational Exposure Limit Value (OEL) of the toxic substance. However, two characteristics of these data have been identified, which are not or only partially taken into account in the current statistical modelling: the left-censoring due to limits of detection (LoD)/quantification (LoQ) of biological and airborne measurements, and the between-individual variability. Ignoring both of these features in modelling leads to a loss of statistical power and potentially biased conclusions. The work carried out in this thesis allowed us to adapt the regression model to these two characteristics, in a Bayesian framework. The proposed approach is based on the modelling of airborne measurements using random effects models adapted for values below the LoD / LoQ, and on the simultaneous modelling of biological measurements, assumed to depend linearly on a logarithmic scale, on the airborne exposure, while taking into account between-subject variability. This work resulted in a scientific publication in a peer-reviewed journal. This methodology has been applied on beryllium and chromium occupational exposure datasets, after adaptation to the toxicokinetic characteristics of these two substances. It has thus been possible to propose a BLV for beryllium (0.06 μg / g creatinine). The analysis of chromium measurements in two different sectors of activity (occupational exposure to chromate paints, and occupational exposure in the electroplating sector) made it possible to show that urinary chromium depends mainly on airborne exposure to VI chromium, non-VI chromium having less impact. We were not able to show a relationship between the solubility of airborne VI chromium and urinary chromium. A BLV of 0.41 μg / g creatinine, close to the Biological Guidance Value (BGV) proposed by ANSES (0.54 μg / g creatinine), was estimated for occupational exposure to chromate paints, and a BLV of 1.85 μg/g creatinine was obtained for occupational exposure in the electrolytic chromium plating sector, which is consistent with the ANSES proposed BLV in this sector, i-e 1.8 μg / g creatinine

No description available.

<p>  </p> <p>Inhalation is a primary route of environmental and occupational exposures. Inhalation toxicology studies have thoroughly demonstrated the efficacy and adverse effects of a large number of chemicals, metals, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals. With the rapid development of new technologies and emergence of prominent subpopulations, some emerging exposure issues have arisen. To better protect public health, it is necessary to address these numerous emerging issues related to inhalation toxicology including 1) exposures to complex and unknown chemical emissions generated as we resolve infrastructure needs, 2) real-world exposure scenarios such as nanoparticle (NP) mixtures that may induce unique toxicity, and 3) variations in toxicity responses that occur in vulnerable and prevalent subpopulations following exposures. We designed three aims 1) to characterize differential representative composite manufacturing emissions (CMEs) and toxicity assessment of inhalation exposure to CMEs, 2) to examine the contribution of variable iron and manganese NP components in welding fumes to pulmonary toxicity, and 3) to evaluate metabolic syndrome (MetS)-induced variations in NP-Biocorona (NP-BC) composition following inhalation and modulation of pulmonary toxicity. Overall, this proposal aimed to characterize the emerging and complex exposures occurring in the real world and elucidate the mechanisms of differential pulmonary toxicity and susceptibility associated with CMEs, different metal NP components in welding fumes, and underlying diseases such as MetS. The conclusions from this project can help to improve the application of water infrastructure repairing technology and the utilization of welding and understand the mechanism of susceptibility to NP exposure among individuals with underlying diseases. Furthermore, the findings from these evaluations have supported and improved worldwide regulation, which promotes a safer utilization of novel materials, newly developed medicines, and complex chemicals.</p>