61 |
The management of operational risk in South African banks / by Ja'nel EsterhuysenEsterhuysen, Ja'nel Tobias January 2003 (has links)
One of the biggest problems South African banks are experiencing when managing
operational risk is the lack of a single definition for operational risk. Operational risk
can take many forms; for example computer system failure, the malfunction of an
ATM or in same instances the long queues at a bank can be an operational risk It is
clear that banks lack sufficient information to distinguish between different
operational risk events as well as other risk events like credit risk, market risk, etc. In
other words, banks are experiencing great difficulties with the identification of
operational risk in South Africa
The study therefore aims to determine and construct a single definition of operational
risk that will be sufficient for the assessment of operational risk management in South
Africa. The study also aims to examine the existing as well as the possible methods to
identify, quantify and measure operational risk The main goal of this study is
therefore to investigate the feasibility of capital provisions as a way of managing
operational risk in South African banks, in other words the viability of the New Basel
Capital Accord on South African banks. The methodology used includes a literature
review, in-depth interviews and a case study on South African Retail Bank to
determine and evaluate some of the most renowned indicators of operational risk in
South Africa.
The first objective was to determine a single definition of operational risk in South
Africa. As mentioned, South African banks are having great difficulties to find a
single definition of operational risk and this is causing problems in identifying
operational risks in South Africa. It is the view of this study that the Basel
Committee's definition is not sufficient enough for operational risk management in
South Africa; therefore there is a great need to find a single definition of operational
risk in South African banks.
The second objective is to provide an overview of the Base1 Committee and its
Capital Accord, by focusing on one of the outstanding changes to the existing accord,
which is the proposed explicit capital requirement for operational risk. It has been
established that the Base1 Capital Accord is widely adopted around the world.
Consequently, from the viewpoint of being competitive, it is to the advantage of a
bank to adhere to the prescriptions of the Base1 Capital Accord. However, to stay
relevant, the Basel Capital Accord was due for a review. The Basel Committee
released a proposal to replace the existing Basel Capital Accord with a more. risk sensitive
framework. The new framework intends to improve safety and soundness in
the financial system by placing more emphasis on banks' own internal control and
management, the supervisory review process, and market discipline.
The third objective of this research was to present the theory of asset and liability
management (ALM) within the unifying theme of operational risk management. It
was indicated that capital is used to absorb an operational risk loss. The Asset and
Liability Committee (ALCO) is responsible for the strategic management of a bank's
balance sheet, therefore also ALM, and as capital forms part of the banks balance
sheet, it is also the responsibility of the ALCO to manage the capital that is used as
provision for an operational risk.
The fourth objective was to determine and evaluate the key risk indicators of
operational risk in South Africa theoretically and then also by means of a case study
on a South African Retail Bank and then to made some recommendations regarding
the effective identification of the key indicators of operational risk in South Africa. It
was indicated the challenge in identifying key operational risk indicators is to find
indicators that is not only business-specific but are also fm wide indicators of
operational risk. Recommendations on the effective identification of key operational
risk indicators were made. / Thesis (M.Com. (Economics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.
|
62 |
The management of operational risk in South African banks / by Ja'nel EsterhuysenEsterhuysen, Ja'nel Tobias January 2003 (has links)
One of the biggest problems South African banks are experiencing when managing
operational risk is the lack of a single definition for operational risk. Operational risk
can take many forms; for example computer system failure, the malfunction of an
ATM or in same instances the long queues at a bank can be an operational risk It is
clear that banks lack sufficient information to distinguish between different
operational risk events as well as other risk events like credit risk, market risk, etc. In
other words, banks are experiencing great difficulties with the identification of
operational risk in South Africa
The study therefore aims to determine and construct a single definition of operational
risk that will be sufficient for the assessment of operational risk management in South
Africa. The study also aims to examine the existing as well as the possible methods to
identify, quantify and measure operational risk The main goal of this study is
therefore to investigate the feasibility of capital provisions as a way of managing
operational risk in South African banks, in other words the viability of the New Basel
Capital Accord on South African banks. The methodology used includes a literature
review, in-depth interviews and a case study on South African Retail Bank to
determine and evaluate some of the most renowned indicators of operational risk in
South Africa.
The first objective was to determine a single definition of operational risk in South
Africa. As mentioned, South African banks are having great difficulties to find a
single definition of operational risk and this is causing problems in identifying
operational risks in South Africa. It is the view of this study that the Basel
Committee's definition is not sufficient enough for operational risk management in
South Africa; therefore there is a great need to find a single definition of operational
risk in South African banks.
The second objective is to provide an overview of the Base1 Committee and its
Capital Accord, by focusing on one of the outstanding changes to the existing accord,
which is the proposed explicit capital requirement for operational risk. It has been
established that the Base1 Capital Accord is widely adopted around the world.
Consequently, from the viewpoint of being competitive, it is to the advantage of a
bank to adhere to the prescriptions of the Base1 Capital Accord. However, to stay
relevant, the Basel Capital Accord was due for a review. The Basel Committee
released a proposal to replace the existing Basel Capital Accord with a more. risk sensitive
framework. The new framework intends to improve safety and soundness in
the financial system by placing more emphasis on banks' own internal control and
management, the supervisory review process, and market discipline.
The third objective of this research was to present the theory of asset and liability
management (ALM) within the unifying theme of operational risk management. It
was indicated that capital is used to absorb an operational risk loss. The Asset and
Liability Committee (ALCO) is responsible for the strategic management of a bank's
balance sheet, therefore also ALM, and as capital forms part of the banks balance
sheet, it is also the responsibility of the ALCO to manage the capital that is used as
provision for an operational risk.
The fourth objective was to determine and evaluate the key risk indicators of
operational risk in South Africa theoretically and then also by means of a case study
on a South African Retail Bank and then to made some recommendations regarding
the effective identification of the key indicators of operational risk in South Africa. It
was indicated the challenge in identifying key operational risk indicators is to find
indicators that is not only business-specific but are also fm wide indicators of
operational risk. Recommendations on the effective identification of key operational
risk indicators were made. / Thesis (M.Com. (Economics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2004.
|
63 |
Measuring operational risk in the ALCO process / by Charmaine SmitSmit, Charmaine January 2008 (has links)
In the last decade, the financial service industry has become increasingly aware of the dangers posed by operational risk. Profound changes in the economic and financial environment have made it necessary for banks in general to adapt their long term strategies as well as their approaches to the management of their assets and liabilities. Regardless of this heightened awareness, banks continue to fail at effective management of these risks. The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is responsible for managing a bank's assets and liabilities to balance its many risk exposures and thereby help it achieve its operating objectives e.g. maximising Net Interest Income (Nil). Thus the ALCO process is the crux of the strategic management process performed within a bank. The ALCO process is driven by people, processes and technology which, in essence, is a broad definition of operational risk. Failure in any one of these areas will lead to failure of the ALCO, ALCO processes and, therefore, the strategic Asset and Liability Management (ALM). The focus of this study is, therefore, how to measure and manage operational risk in a bank's ALCO process. A case study was conducted, with the aid of ALCO experts in a specialised niche bank in South Africa, to identify operational risks within this bank's ALCO process. The various risk indicators of operational risk were classified into 5 broad categories. Each category was weighted according to its representative risk indicator and converted into percentages for the interpretation of the overall results. Category 2 (authority levels) has the highest negative impact, while the remaining 4 categories (employee, model, system and other indicators) have a medium negative impact, on the efficiency of the ALCO process. / Thesis (M.Com. (Risk Management))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.
|
64 |
The impact of six sigma on operational efficiency / Andreas MachininiMachinini, Mazondeki Andreas January 2010 (has links)
Globalisation of markets has brought about enormous challenges and
opportunities for business organisations. The prevailing business environment
propels organisations to improve and create value in order to remain
competitive. Improvement and value creation begin internally and get reflected
externally in the form of value added propositions to the market. Six Sigma is
a methodology known for creating value within organisations, in all industries,
through process improvement which translates into enormous savings for the
organisation. Six Sigma is widely used globally and it has been in existence
for many years, yet it is not so prevalent in the South African business
environment. This research explores the principles and approach adopted,
which distinguish the Six Sigma methodology from other improvement
programs. In the manufacturing industry, operational efficiencies are essential
to enhance value creation and profitability.
The study begins by discussing the origin, history and evolvement of Six
Sigma into a methodology recognisable and espoused by leading world class
organisations. The technique used to effect Six Sigma is entrenched and
enforced by adherence to stipulated basic principles, breakthrough strategy
and Six Sigma tools in identification and elimination of variation. The study
later models some of Six Sigma tools by application on the operational entity
in verification and testing of theoretical knowledge into practical knowledge
that can be exploited for process improvement consequently enhancing
operational efficiencies. The impact of Six Sigma on operational efficiencies
underlie on the ability to positively change process effectiveness and
capability to near perfection as expressed by defect rate of not more than 3.4
defects per million opportunities. / Thesis (M.B.A.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.
|
65 |
Measuring operational risk in the ALCO process / by Charmaine SmitSmit, Charmaine January 2008 (has links)
In the last decade, the financial service industry has become increasingly aware of the dangers posed by operational risk. Profound changes in the economic and financial environment have made it necessary for banks in general to adapt their long term strategies as well as their approaches to the management of their assets and liabilities. Regardless of this heightened awareness, banks continue to fail at effective management of these risks. The Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is responsible for managing a bank's assets and liabilities to balance its many risk exposures and thereby help it achieve its operating objectives e.g. maximising Net Interest Income (Nil). Thus the ALCO process is the crux of the strategic management process performed within a bank. The ALCO process is driven by people, processes and technology which, in essence, is a broad definition of operational risk. Failure in any one of these areas will lead to failure of the ALCO, ALCO processes and, therefore, the strategic Asset and Liability Management (ALM). The focus of this study is, therefore, how to measure and manage operational risk in a bank's ALCO process. A case study was conducted, with the aid of ALCO experts in a specialised niche bank in South Africa, to identify operational risks within this bank's ALCO process. The various risk indicators of operational risk were classified into 5 broad categories. Each category was weighted according to its representative risk indicator and converted into percentages for the interpretation of the overall results. Category 2 (authority levels) has the highest negative impact, while the remaining 4 categories (employee, model, system and other indicators) have a medium negative impact, on the efficiency of the ALCO process. / Thesis (M.Com. (Risk Management))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.
|
66 |
The impact of six sigma on operational efficiency / Andreas MachininiMachinini, Mazondeki Andreas January 2010 (has links)
Globalisation of markets has brought about enormous challenges and
opportunities for business organisations. The prevailing business environment
propels organisations to improve and create value in order to remain
competitive. Improvement and value creation begin internally and get reflected
externally in the form of value added propositions to the market. Six Sigma is
a methodology known for creating value within organisations, in all industries,
through process improvement which translates into enormous savings for the
organisation. Six Sigma is widely used globally and it has been in existence
for many years, yet it is not so prevalent in the South African business
environment. This research explores the principles and approach adopted,
which distinguish the Six Sigma methodology from other improvement
programs. In the manufacturing industry, operational efficiencies are essential
to enhance value creation and profitability.
The study begins by discussing the origin, history and evolvement of Six
Sigma into a methodology recognisable and espoused by leading world class
organisations. The technique used to effect Six Sigma is entrenched and
enforced by adherence to stipulated basic principles, breakthrough strategy
and Six Sigma tools in identification and elimination of variation. The study
later models some of Six Sigma tools by application on the operational entity
in verification and testing of theoretical knowledge into practical knowledge
that can be exploited for process improvement consequently enhancing
operational efficiencies. The impact of Six Sigma on operational efficiencies
underlie on the ability to positively change process effectiveness and
capability to near perfection as expressed by defect rate of not more than 3.4
defects per million opportunities. / Thesis (M.B.A.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.
|
67 |
Adaptive planning is achievable through transformation of the deliberate planning process matching missions to capabilities /Scheidegger, Craig W. January 2005 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in Joint Campaign Planning and Strategy)--Joint Forces Staff College, Joint Advanced Warfighting School, 2005. / "31 May 2005." Electronic version of original print document. Includes bibliographical references (p. 65-66).
|
68 |
Towards successful technology introductions : executive summaryTurner, Suzanne N. January 1998 (has links)
No description available.
|
69 |
OR modelling within the RCM contextJia, Xisheng January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
70 |
Organisational restructuring and change management : a case study of the restructuring of the Christian Council of GhanaBortey, Emmanuel Borlabi January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.1203 seconds