Specifically, using a sample of 2,848 couples from the RELATE dataset, a model was tested examining the direct associations between personality factors (neuroticism, agreeableness, and extraversion) and relationship satisfaction in romantic couple relationships. The results indicated that lower levels of neuroticism, higher levels of agreeableness, and lower levels of extraversion were associated with greater relationship satisfaction. In particular, ratings of agreeableness had the strongest associations with satisfaction for males and females, while neuroticism had the next strongest associations, followed by extraversion. Paths between male variables and female variables and satisfaction were not significantly different; however, slight gender differences were present among factor loadings of variables as well as coefficient values of all paths. Additionally, differences in actor and partner effects were evident. Actor effects were present for each of the personality factors, except for male extraversion; partner effects were present for all of the personality factors.

The dynamics between partners’ careers have implications for household and gender inequality as heterosexual unions are usually formed by two individuals with similar educational attainment where the man has a stronger labor market position. This paper examines how the partner’s occupational status relates to individual career outcomes, and how the association varies by gender. The literature reports conflicting expectations on the subject. Social capital theory suggests that an occupationally successful partner can be beneficial to one’s career because of useful contacts, information, and advice. Economic theory assumes a negative relationship between the resources of the partner and own career outcomes due to less time and effort spent in the labor market. Using multiple regression analysis predicting hourly wage, annual income, and career progression, the contrasting hypotheses are tested on Swedish panel data including 1,065 married or cohabitating individuals. Results show a positive correlation between the partner’s occupational status at the start of cohabitation and hourly wage and career progression. The association does not differ significantly between men and women. However, the findings show that gender is more important than the partners’ occupational status for the interaction between careers in dual-earner couples.

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of family-of-origin quality, adult regulation of negative affect, and marital stability with the extent to which couples report they drink similarly and the extent to which they report that the husband drinks more than the wife. It was hypothesized that these two types of couple drinking patterns would be impacted by each individual spouse's context as well as by the interaction of those contexts. A national sample of 1498 couples or 2996 individuals (1498 wives and 1498 husbands married to each other) participated in this study. This study sought to understand the family-of-origin influences when there was not an alcoholic parent in the home. Therefore, adult children of alcoholics were excluded from the sample. The results of this study suggested that wives family-of-origin quality and both spouses' regulation of negative affect were highly predictive of a husband drinking more than the wife, and moderately to highly predictive of couple drinking similarity. The husband's family-of-origin had only indirect effects on both alcohol use patterns. His family-of-origin had moderately significant effects on drinking similarity through the mediating variable of the husband's regulation of negative affect. His family-of-origin had moderate to highly significant effects on whether or not he drinks more than his wife through two indirect paths, with regulation of negative affect and marital stability as mediating variables. When examining partner effects on couple alcohol use patterns, findings suggest the contributions of husband and wife are not entirely equal. Findings suggest that the wife's family-of-origin influences the pattern of the ‘husband drinking more than his wife’, through the mediating variable of the husband's regulation of negative affect, and this relationship was found to be stronger than his own family-of-origin. The wife's family-of-origin and her regulation of negative affect were more predictive of whether or not the couple drank similarly than the husband's family-of-origin or his regulation of negative affect. The most poignant conclusion drawn from this study is the importance of recognizing not only individual contributors to later alcohol use, but also the influence of the interacting couple contexts when examining couple alcohol use patterns.

Le traitement d’un premier cancer de la prostate et les mois qui suivent, sont une période stressante pour les patients et leur conjointe. Les objectifs de cette étude sont, d’une part, de déterminer l’évolution de variables psychosociales (soutien social, qualité de la relation conjugale, ajustement dyadique et stratégies de coping) et du bien-être émotionnel et physique, et d’autre part, d’identifier les effets acteurs-partenaires, c'est-à-dire les effets des variables psychosociales d’un membre du couple sur son bien-être et sur celui de l’autre membre. Nous avons mené une étude longitudinale auprès de 132 patients atteints d’un cancer de la prostate et de 100 de leurs conjointes. Une évaluation psychologique leur a été proposée au début, au milieu, à la fin du traitement et quatre mois après. Les résultats montrent que les patients ont un état émotionnel et une qualité de vie satisfaisants et que les conjointes présentent une symptomatologie dépressive. Chez les patients, on observe des effets acteurs positifs du soutien social, de la relation conjugale et des stratégies de coping, centrées sur le problème ou sur la recherche de soutien social, sur leur bien-être, et des effets partenaires positifs de ces mêmes variables sur le bien-être de leur conjointe. Chez les conjointes, la relation conjugale a un effet acteur positif sur leur bien-être, mais le soutien social et les stratégies de coping centrées sur l’émotion ont des effets acteurs négatifs. De plus, l’effet partenaire soutien social des conjointes est positif sur le bien-être des patients, alors que celui des stratégies de coping centrées sur l’émotion est négatif. Celui de la relation conjugale est positif quand il s’agit de la disponibilité et de l’intensité du soutien, et négatif quand il s’agit de l’ajustement dyadique. De façon générale, le soutien social, la relation conjugale et les stratégies de coping sont de bons prédicteurs de la qualité de vie, directement ou par le biais du partenaire. / The treatment of a first prostate cancer and the following months are a stressful period for the patients and their spouse. The first aim of this study was to determine the evolution of psychosocial variables (social support, quality of conjugal relationships, dyadic adjustment and coping strategies) and of emotional and physical well-being. The second aim was to identify actors-partners effects - that is the effect of one of partner’s psychosocial variables on his/her well-being and on that of the other. A longitudinal study was carried on 132 patients with prostate cancer and 100 of their spouses. A psychological evaluation was conducted at the beginning, half way through, at the end of the treatment and four months afterwards. Results showed that patients had a good emotional state and a good quality of life and, that the spouses developed a depressive symptomatology. For patients, positive actor effects of social support, conjugal relationships and coping strategies (problem-focused or seeking social support focused) on their well-being and, positive partner effects of the same variables on the spouses’ well-being were observed. For the spouses, conjugal relationships had a positive actor effect on their well-being, but social support and emotion-focused coping strategies had negative actor effects. Also, spouses’ social support had a positive partner effect on the patients’ well-being while emotion-focused coping strategies had a negative effect. Conjugal relationship effect was positive when referring to availability and intensity of support and, negative when referring to dyadic adjustment. Overall, social support, conjugal relationship and coping strategies were found to be good predictors of quality of life, directly or indirectly through the partner.