Texte remanié de: Tesi--Studi italianistici--Pisa--Università degli studi, 1997. Titre de soutenance : I "Primi poemetti" di Giovanni Pascoli, struttura e motivi simbolici. / Bibliogr. p. 351-371.

Texte remanié de: Tesi di laurea--Lettere--Università degli studi di Bologna, 1945.

Diss.--Fribourg-en-Brisgau--Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, 1998. / Bibliogr. p. 217-228.

Habilschr. phil. Bern, 1976.

Philosophiquement le XXème siècle est de bien des façons un siècle existentialiste où l’existence est pensée comme transcendance du monde dans l’attente. Selon l’existentialisme l’homme est à la fois dans le monde et outre le monde car si la situation nous transcende dans sa factualité nous la transcendons par notre volonté. Pourtant pour l’existentialisme de l’échec rien – si ce n’est la mort – ne peut vraiment libérer l’homme de la situation de fait du monde historique: sa seule transcendance peut alors être seulement dans le sentiment d’une impossibilité de la transcendance et donc dans conscience de l’échec. On retrouve poétiquement cette situation d’échec dans le mythe d’Orphée où elle interroge métalogiquement le pouvoir de l’acte poétique. Au-delà de l’orphisme religieux le mythe d’Orphée nous propose alors la vision d’un chant qui est à la fois désenchantement nostalgique et enchantement épistémique et donc respectivement lamentation pour ce qui n’est plus et admiration pour ce qui est. Orphique est donc la mélancolie nostalgique qui en vain veut transcender le présent dans le passé mais qui toutefois en tant que phonie magique transcende le présent dans le futur. On peut alors pour le XXème siècle poétique parler d’existentialisme orphique et recenser certaines de ses manifestations les plus éminentes. Dans la poésie italienne le poème L’ultimo viaggio (1904) de Pascoli présente un syntagme – non esser più – qui porte à lui seul une problématique existentialiste – aussi bien dans son mode nostalgique négatif que dans son mode épistémique affirmatif – que l’on retrouve de manière tout aussi forte chez Ungaretti et Montale et Pasolini où l’aspiration à l’être vit indiscutablement dans la désolation du ne plus être. Ces quatre poètes sont alors affrontés selon une même méthode herméneutique qui actualise la microcritique d’un syntagme fortement circonstanciel – non esser più pour Pascoli, equivoco della luna pour Ungaretti, eternità d’istante pour Montale et grin di cristàl pour Pasolini – par la macrocritique du corpus poétique de chaque poète afin d’interroger – tout au long du XXème siècle – diverses modalités d’un même existentialisme orphique. / Philosophically the 20th century is in many ways an existentialist century where the existence is thought of as transcendence of the world in the expectation. According to existentialism man is at the same time in the world and beyond the world because if the situation transcends us in its factuality we transcend it by our will. Yet for the existentialism of failure nothing – except death – can really free man from the factual situation of the historic world: his sole transcendence can only be in the feeling of the impossibility of transcendence and thus in the consciousness of failure. Poetically we find this situation of failure in the myth of Orpheus where the power of the poetic act is questioned metalogically. Beyond the religious orphism the myth of Orpheus offers us the vision of a chant which is at the same time nostalgic disenchantment and epistemic enchantment and therefore respectively a lamentation for what is no more and admiration for what is. Thus orphic is the nostalgic melancholy which in vain wants to transcend the present in the past but nontheless as a magic word transcends the present in the future. So for the 20th poetic century we can speak of orphic existentialism and list some of its most eminent manifestations. In the Italian poetry the poem L’ultimo viaggio (1904) by Pascoli presents a phrase – non esser più – which carries of its own an existentialist problematic – both in its negative nostalgic way as in its affirmative epistemic way – that we find with equal force in Ungaretti and Montale and Pasolini where, without any doubts, the aspiration to the being lives in the desolation of the no longer being. These four poets are thus faced with the same hermeneutic method which actualizes the microcriticism of a strongly circumstantial phrase – non esser più for Pascoli, equivoco della luna for Ungaretti, eternità d’istante for Montale and grin di cristàl for Pasolini – via the macrocriticism of the poetic corpus of each poet in order to question – all along the 20th century – different modalities of one and the same orphic existentialism.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

[pt] Em 1960, Pier Paolo Pasolini publicou pela editora Einaudi seu livro de ensaios poéticos, intitulado Passione e Ideologia. Essa obra reflete a relação afetiva e intelectual do autor com a poesia dialetal italiana. Partindo do recolhimento dos cantos dialetais feitos por folcloristas do Oitocento, tais como Pitrè, Tommaseo e Nigra, Pasolini elucubrou a poesia dialetal como a poesia popular italiana por excelência. Nesse sentido, pretende-se demonstrar como Pasolini, mediado pela leitura dos trabalhos dos críticos Benedetto Croce e Gianfranco Contini, promoveu um mapeamento das principais referências que justificariam as possíveis afinidades da poesia em dialeto com a poesia dita popular. Autores como Dante, Vico, Rousseau, Herder e Giovanni Pascoli foram mobilizados por ele dentre aqueles que pensavam a poesia como sendo a primeira linguagem entre os homens, sendo ela proveniente do vulgo e, sobretudo, como fruto de uma atividade sentida e imaginada. / [en] In 1960, Pier Paolo Pasolini published by Einaudi publishing his book of poetic essays entitled Passione e Ideologia. That work reflects the emotional and intellectual relationship of the author with the Italian dialectal poetry. Starting from the gathering of dialectal songs done by folklorists of the Italian Oitocento such as Pitrè, Tommaseo and Nigra, Pasolini thought over the dialectal poetry as a popular Italian poetry par excellence. In this sense, we intend to demonstrate how Pasolini, refereed by reading the works of the critics Benedetto Croce and Gianfranco Contini, promoted a mapping of the main references that justify the possible affinities of poetry in dialect with a alleged folk poetry. Authors such as Dante, Vico, Rousseau, Herder and Giovanni Pascoli were mobilized by him among those who thought poetry as the first language of men, coming from the vulgar, and above all, as the result of a felt and imagined activity.

Il presente lavoro si pone l'obiettivo di analizzare la produzione critica di ambito pascoliano del Pietrobono, con una particolare attenzione per l’influsso da lui esercitato nella costruzione della tradizione interpretativa e letteraria pascoliana. Il progetto di ricerca si è focalizzato sull’analisi di Pietrobono letterato, interprete e amico di Giovanni Pascoli, studiandone l’attività alla luce dei commenti alle Poesie di Pascoli approntate dal Padre scolopio, e alle relazioni comuni evidenziate dallo studio critico delle rispettive opere. Particolare rilievo si è posto alla ricostruzione della formazione del florilegio, alla curatela e al commento dell’antologia pascoliana pubblicata da Pietrobono nel 1918 e più volte rieditata: se ne sono analizzate le numerose edizioni e la variazioni apportate nella scelta di componimenti e nei commenti. Una sezione del lavoro riporta e analizza la corrispondenza epistolare intrattenuta tra Luigi Pietrobono e Maria Pascoli a partire dal 1912 sino al 1950. Ne emerge un rapporto intenso e proficuo dal punto di vista letterario-editoriale, nel quale i protagonisti si supportano per i rispettivi lavori che vanno pubblicando sulle opere di Pascoli. Di queste missive, presenti nell’archivio della Casa Museo di Castelvecchio, si è proceduto alla trascrizione e commento. / The aim of the present work is to provide a thorough analysis of the critical production of Pietrobono concerning Giovanni Pascoli with a particular emphasis on the influence that he exercised in building the literary and interpretative tradition on Pascoli’s poetic heritage. The research project is focused on the critical analysis of Pietrobono as a literary man, as an interpreter and close friend of Giovanni Pascoli. The analysis builds on the study of his activity in light of the comments to the opera Poesie of Pascoli made by the “Scolopio” father and of the common relations that clearly emerge from a critical assessment of their respective production. Particular attention has been devoted to the building of the florilegium and to the editorial choices and to the comment to the Pascoli’s anthology first published in 1918 and then re-edited several times. This works presents a detailed and careful analysis of the different editions and in particular of the different choices concerning the works included and of the changes in the comments. A section of the present research work is focused on the epistolary correspondence between Luigi Pietrobono and Maria Pascoli that started in 1912 and continued up to 1950. From the letters it clearly emerges a close relationship and very productive literary-editorial interaction between the two writers that advise and support each other concerning their works on Pascoli’s production. These letters, preserved in the archive of the Casa Museo di Castelvecchio, have been transcribed and commented in the present research work.