This paper puts forward the hypothesis that the characteristics of followers of the pecking order theory of capital structure are explicitly distinct from those of non-followers. The factors determining financing behavior are far beyond the conventional perception of asymmetric information. Sampling from the IT industry in Taiwan, we observe that pecking order followers are associated with higher profitability, adequate cash, and other broadly recognized variables.

Abstract The finance literature offers two major models about the capital structure of a firm. In the tradeoff model, firms tradeoff the costs and benefits of borrowing to identify their optimal capital structure and gradually move towards it. On the contrast, firms do not have an optimal capital structure in the pecking order model. The moving of the capital structure is simply the result of the financing hierarchy: retained earnings, safe debt, risky debt, and finally equity. The purpose of this study is to test whether the public firms in Taiwan have optimal capital structure. We address the question with cross-section regressions. If the tradeoff exists, moving towards the optimal capital structure will explain the change of capital structure. On the other hand ,the deficit-in funds¡]DEF¡^will explain the change of capital structure when the pecking order model exists. The empirical result shows that the public firms in Taiwan have optimal capital structure, and their realized capital structures are moving towards it, but the speed of adjustment is quite slow.

Titel: Finansiering i mikroföretag - En kvantitativ studie inom mikroföretags sätt att finansiera sig   Författare: Daniel Johansson, Eva Näätänen, Vlad Ulrich   Handledare: Emil Numminen   Institution: Institutionen för industriell ekonomi, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola   Kurs: Kandidatarbete i Företagsekonomi, 15 högskolepoäng   Syfte: Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka hur tillgängligheten av finansieringsmedel påverkar finansieringen i svenska mikroföretag.   Metod: En kvantitativ studie har genomförts genom att data om 630 mikroföretag samlades via nätenkäter.   Slutsatser: Denna studie visar att svenska mikroföretag väljer sin finansiering enligt en förkortad pecking order. Ett finansiellt gap existerar mellan mikroföretag och finansiella institut i Sverige vilket ökar risken för mikroföretag att blir nekade extern finansiering som exempelvis banklån. Tillgänglighet av banklån påverkar i sin tur hur mikroföretag finansierar sig. Det finansiella gapet minskar under mikroföretagens livscykel och därmed ökar tillgängligheten av vissa externa finansieringsalternativ. / le: Financing of micro-enterprises - A quantitative study in micro-enterprises’ way of funding   Authors: Daniel Johansson, Eva Näätänen, Vlad Ulrich   Supervisor: Emil Numminen   Department: Department of Industrial Economics, Blekinge Institute of Technology   Course: Bachelor’s thesis in Business Administration, 15 credits   Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate how the availability of financial resources affects the financing of Swedish micro-enterprises.   Method: A quantitative study was carried out by collecting data about 630 micro-enterprises through online surveys.   Results: This study shows that Swedish micro-enterprises choose their financing in order with a truncated pecking order. A financial gap exists between micro-enterprises and financial institutions in Sweden that increases the risk for micro-enterprises to be denied external finance such as bank loans. Availability of bank loans in turn affects the financial decisions of the micro-enterprises. The financial gap decreases during the businesses' lifecycle and thus increases the availability of some external financing options.

This dissertation intends to describe how small Swedish companies experience the handling of financing in China. Which include describing how small Swedish companies have chosen to finance their establishment, and whether Myers Pecking order theory is applicable. Further more, to show the inquired companies attitude towards external equity, and if any problems are experienced, connected to reaching long-term external finance. The specifikation of the problem for this dissertation is, How do small Swedish companies established in China experience the handling of financing? And to answer the specification of the problem a quantitative approach has been used. The data was gathered through a survey sent out to a number of small Swedish companies established in China. The definition of small Swedish companies has been set to less than 100 employees, and furthermore, established in China under any of the entry modes WFOE, FICE, Joint Venture or Rep/Sales Office. The over all conclusions for this dissertation, are that internal finance is preferred, and in general is the use of external finance insignificant among small Swedish companies established in China. What can be concluded from this is that Myers Pecking order theory is applicable. Further more, there are strong indications that the inquired companies do not experience any financial gap, or in general any imminent problems surrounding reaching external finance. Important to add to the conclusion is that just because there are no imminent problems, does this not signify that companies do not experience any problems at all reaching external finance.

Bakgrund: Pecking order-teorin är en av de viktigaste teorierna som används inom kapitalstruktur. Men vilken giltighet teorin har i det praktiska för företaget, är väldigt olika beroende på olika faktorer. En av dessa faktorer är företagets storlek. Tidigare forskning tyder på att pecking order förmågan varierar mellan företag av olika storlek. Vissa studier har kommit fram till att pecking order beteendet är mer giltigt hos små företag. Andra menar att det är större företag som är bättre på att följa pecking order teorin. Syfte: Studiens syfte är att se om företagets storlek har någon inverkan på hur väl ett företag följer pecking order. Teori: Viktiga teorier är kapitalstruktur, pecking order teorin, assymmetrisk information, företagsstorlek, tidigare forskning av Gonzalez och Gonzalez (2012) samt Agca och Mozumdar (2004). Metod: Studien genomförs med hjälp av en kvantitativ metod. Data för 45 företag på fem år har samlats in för åren 2008-2012, för att sedan beräkna och genomföra tolkningar. Slutsats: Företagsstorleken har en inverkan på hur väl svenska företag lever upp till pecking order teorin. Sambandet är positivt, och visar att ju större företaget är, desto bättre följer det pecking order.

No description available.

Ur svårigheterna att förklara företags kapitalstruktur och hur den är förknippad med olika risker för olika ägartyper, är syftet att undersöka vilken av Trade-off-teorin och Pecking order-teorin som bäst kan förklara skuldsättningen hos svenska familjeägda företag på Stockholmsbörsen. Med hjälp av en modell för respektive teori har vi genomfört regressionsanalyser för att besvara vårt syfte. Med grund i tidigare forskning kring familjeägda företag och teoriernas grundläggande synsätt på förändring i skuldsättning, har studien utgått från hypotesen att familjeägda företag i högre utsträckning kommer att finansiera sig med internt genererade medel än extern belåning, vilket ligger i linje med Pecking order-teorin. Studien utgår från både finansiell- och ägardata gällande tidsperioden 2004-2013. Resultaten pekar likt hypotesen förutspått mot ett större stöd för Pecking order-teorin hos svenska familjeägda företag. Studiens slutsats är att Pecking order-teorin, i högre utsträckning än Trade-off-teorin, kan förklara skuldsättningen hos svenska familjeägda företag.

Submitted by Suethene Souza (suethene.souza@ufpe.br) on 2015-03-12T18:55:58Z No. of bitstreams: 2 TESE Edilson dos Santos.pdf: 2187385 bytes, checksum: 63c9e7b94a952fcecca5019849672b1a (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-12T18:55:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 TESE Edilson dos Santos.pdf: 2187385 bytes, checksum: 63c9e7b94a952fcecca5019849672b1a (MD5) license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: 66e71c371cc565284e70f40736c94386 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-13 / CAPES / Aproximadamente meio século de pesquisas após os trabalhos de Modigliani e Miller (1958), ainda há um amplo debate sobre a composição da estrutura de capital das empresas. Neste contexto, nas últimas décadas os estudos cross-country se destacaram por tentar verificar os determinantes da estrutura de capital nos mais diversos países. Entretanto, vale ressaltar que, em tempos de crise e recessão as decisões de financiamento ganham uma maior importância, visto que os recursos no mercado financeiro podem ficar mais escassos, e assim impactar nos possíveis investimentos e nas atividades de produção das empresas, portanto será que os determinantes da estrutura de capital das empresas que fazem parte dos países emergentes podem ser explicadas por uma das principais teorias de estrutura de capital – trade-off e pecking order? Será que as empresas de Brasil, Rússia, Índia e China mantem suas estruturas de capital mediante o cenário de crise? E as estratégias de financiamento são semelhantes àquelas apresentadas por empresas de países desenvolvidos (países integrantes do G7)? Deste modo, o presente trabalho tem como objetivo principal verificar se as principais teorias sobre estrutura de capital conseguem explicar as estruturas das empresas dos principais países emergentes, mediante o cenário de crise iniciado em 2007, e analisar se elas estão alinhadas ao padrão adotado pelas empresas dos países desenvolvidos. Para tanto foram analisados dados de empresas listadas nas Bolsas de valores do Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e países representantes do G7, no período de 2003 a 2011. A técnica econométrica chamada regressão quantílica foi utilizada como principal ferramenta de análise, uma vez que suas características permitem uma leitura mais detalhada dos dados, considerando a heterogeneidade das empresas. Os principais resultados obtidos sugerem que entre os países emergentes, as empresas sinalizam mudanças na intensidade dos determinantes clássicos da estrutura de capital, bem como estratégias de financiamento distintas para as empresas de Brasil, Rússia, Índia e China. Com relação às possíveis semelhanças nas estruturas de capital dos países emergentes e desenvolvidos, os resultados sinalizaram estratégias distintas. Por fim, os efeitos da crise das hipotecas subprime proporcionaram uma perspectiva diferente daqueles observados em momentos de menor turbulência econômica mundial.

This research project set out to determine whether there is a relationship between the observed leverage levels of South African companies, their profitability, earnings volatility and the probability of financial distress. The relevant body of knowledge against which to execute this research project is known as capital structure theory. Capital structure theory deals with the way in which firms finance themselves. It is concerned with the relationship between the structure of debt, equity and hybrid securities found on the right hand side of the firm’s balance sheet. It is believed that the 2007/8 global financial crisis offers researchers a unique opportunity to gain insight into how the observed leverage levels of firms and their earnings volatility interact to form their probability of financial distress. This area of research is of particular interest since it is commonly believed and frequently stated that South African firms are underleveraged and secondly because there is contrarian research beginning to be published indicating that firms with very little or no debt (commonly referred to as lazy balance sheets) are outperforming their more indebted peers and are being rewarded by investors for their prudence. Copyright / Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2010. / Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) / unrestricted

As decisões relacionadas à configuração da estrutura de capital das empresas impulsionam as pesquisas há mais de cinqüenta anos. Muito embora o assunto seja recorrente e atual no meio acadêmico, ele se mantém bastante controverso. Neste trabalho são exploradas diretamente duas bases teóricas distintas: a Static Trade off Theory (STT), a partir do modelo proposto por Frank e Goyal (2003) e a Pecking Order Theory (POT), a partir do modelo proposto por Shyam-Sunder e Myers (1999). Os resultados destes testes são comparados aos modelos propostos por Qiu e Smith (2007) e Bahng e Jeong (2012) para analisar a estrutura de endividamento das empresas a níveis diferentes de alavancagem. A amostra selecionada consiste de empresas brasileiras de capital aberto, não-financeiras e não-regulamentadas, listadas na Bolsa de Valores Mobiliários de São Paulo (BM&FBovespa) no período entre 2002 e 2011. Utilizou-se como metodologia as técnicas Regressão Múltipla por meio do método dos Mínimos Quadrados Ordinários (MQO) comparativamente à Regressão Quantílica. Como resultados destacou-se uma velocidade de ajuste à estrutura de capital alvo entre 6% e 14% ao ano, nos teste da teoria trade off. Quanto aos testes da teoria pecking order, constatou-se que as empresas brasileiras se orientam conforme esta teoria na tomada de decisão sobre estrutura de capital, financiando-se em grande parte com capital de terceiros. / Decisions related to the configuration of the capital structure of companies drive research for over fifty years. Although it is recurrent and current in academia, it remains quite controversial. This paper explored directly two different theoretical bases: the Static Trade off Theory (STT), from the model proposed by Frank and Goyal (2003) and the Pecking Order Theory (POT), from the model proposed by Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999). The results of these tests are compared to the models proposed by Qiu and Smith (2007) and Bahng and Jeong (2012) to analyze the debt structure of firms at different levels of leverage. The sample consists of Brazilian companies traded, non-financial and non-regulated, listed on the Securities Exchange of São Paulo (BM & FBovespa) between 2002 and 2011. It was used as a methodology techniques Multiple Regression by the method of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) compared to Quantile Regression. The results pointed to a speed of adjustment to target capital structure between 6% and 14% per year, the trade off theory test. As for testing the pecking order theory, it was found that Brazilian companies are oriented according to this theory in decision making on capital structure, financing itself largely with debt capital.