Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) pose a significant and increasing threat to global health. One primary cause of this threat is increasing antibiotic resistance. As traditional antibiotics continue to grow less effective, there is an urgent need for novel antimicrobial strategies. This work explores the potential of ceragenins, also known as cationic steroid antimicrobials (CSAs), as a promising alternative to combat HAIs. Specifically, we investigated potential roles that CSAs can play in the context of multiple medical device coatings in healthcare settings. Ceragenins are synthetic mimic of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) which exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against many common pathogens that have been cited as high priority by global health organizations. Unlike traditional antibiotics, which rely on specificity to bacterial enzymes or processes, ceragenins disrupt microbial membranes generally. This mechanism of action allows ceragenins to bypass many of the related antibiotic resistance mutations of bacteria and fungi. As microbial membranes are a highly conserved and fundamental structure of these pathogens, it is much more difficult for microbes to develop mutations that prevent CSA binding. Additionally, ceragenins are resistant to both host and pathogenic proteolytic degradation and are cost-effective to produce, which place CSAs as an attractive alternative to traditional antibiotics. This research investigates the integration of ceragenins into various medical devices to prevent HAIs. Specifically, we investigated silicone tissue expanders, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, and adhesive devices which include both polyacrylate and silicone scar tape. These studies include the development of coating techniques to maximize appropriate antimicrobial activity while maintaining stability and biocompatibility across these different base materials. Our experimental results demonstrate that ceragenin-coated devices significantly reduce microbial colonization and biofilm formation. We considered the length of antimicrobial activity needed and developed coatings that would be appropriate for those use cases. This reduction in harmful pathogenic colonization demonstrates their potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with HAIs. Further research and development could facilitate the continued adoption of ceragenin-based coatings in medical devices, which can reduce the incidence of HAIs while contributing to the broader fight against antibiotic-resistant infections worldwide.

A serious opioid crisis is affecting public health and economics, eroding people’s quality of life. 80% of patients who receive opioids suffer from adverse effects such as Opioid-induced constipation (OIC). However, there is no efficient medicine for these adverse effects. Notably, mainstream theory supports that analgesia effects are mainly controlled by CNS while OIC is predominately controlled by peripheral. In addition, the sites of action of opioid was based on the assumption that mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs), did not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Unfortunately, the BBB crossing of PAMORAs mislead the understanding of the role of the central nervous system (CNS) and gastrointestinal tract playing in the adverse effects such as opioid-induced constipation (OIC). Here, we developed a novel technology platform to prevent drugs from crossing the BBB. By applying this technology, naloxone- and oxycodone conjugates demonstrated superior potency, peripheral selectivity, pharmacokinetics, and effectiveness in rats compared to currently clinically used PAMORAs. By the help of these probes, it is revealed for the first time to that the mu-opioid receptors in the CNS played more important role in OIC than the peripheral receptors, which overturned the old theory. And the new theory points the way to better future PAMORAs drug design.

Nous avons mené une étude prospective randomisée dans le but de comparer l'effet de l'irrigation du cathéter de type PICC avec deux types d'anticoagulants: Héparine standard et Tinzaparine, une héparine de faible poids moléculaire. Notre étude s'adresse aux patients de la clinique externe d'oncologie de l'hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont. Entre début Mai 2005 et Mars 2008, nous avons recruté 131 patients dont 70 ont été randomisés. Parmi les 61 patients exclus, 23 n'ont pas rencontré les critères d'inclusion, 30 ont refusé de participer et 8 ne sont pas inclus pour d'autres raisons. Sur les 70, 36 sujets sont randomisés dans le groupe Héparine standard et 34 dans le groupe Tinzaparine. La population en intention de traiter comprend 65 sujets dont 32 dans le groupe Héparine standard et 33 dans le groupe Tinzaparine. Le médicament a été administré pendant un mombre maximal de 30 jours et les sujets ont été suivis pendant 90 jours. La thrombose veineuse associée au cathéter (TVAC) a été objectivée par une phlébographie ou une échographie-Doppler à la fin de la période de 30 jours suivant l'installation du cathéter. L'incidence de la TVAC sur 30 jours est de 14,39 par 1000 cathéter-jours (IC à 95%:[9,0;19,79]/1000 cathéter-jours ou 41,5% (27/65). L'incidence de la thrombose veineuse profonde (TVP) symptômatique du membre supérieur sur la période de suivi de 90 jours est de 0,41 par 1000 cathéter-jours (IC à 95%:[0,08;0,81]/1000 cathéter-jours ou 3% (2/65). Nous n'avons observé aucune différence entre les deux groupes par rapport à la fréquence de la TVAC ni de la TVP. Nous ne pouvons conclure à une différence dans l'efficacité de la Tinzaparine par rapport à l'Héparine standard dans la prévention de la TVAC. / Our prospective, randomized study aims at comparing the effectiveness of two types of heparin used for the instillation of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): Standard heparin and Tinzaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. We recruited patients from the ambulatory center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital. Between the beginning of May 2005 and March 2008, 131 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients excluded, 23 did not satisfy the inclusion criteria, 30 refused to participate and 8 were not enrolled for other reasons. Seventy patients were randomized into two groups, 36 in the Standard heparin group and 34 in the Tinzaparin group. Our population intent-to-treat included 65/70 patients, 32 of these received Standard heparin and 33 received Tinzaparin. The experimental intervention was administered for a maximum of 30 days and all the subjects were followed up for 90 days. The events were documented objectively with a venogram or Doppler ultrasonography by the end of the 30 days following the catheter installation. The incidence of catheter-related venous thrombosis (CRVT) during 30 days of instillation is 14,39/1000 catheter-days (CI 95%:[9,0;19,79]/1000 catheter-days or 41.5% (27/65). The incidence of symptomatic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during the observation period of 90 days is 0,41/1000 catheter-days (CI 95%:[0,08;0,81]/1000 catheter-days or 3% (2/65). We did not observe any difference in the frequency of CRVT or DVT between the two groups. We can not conclude that either Standard heparin or Tinzaparin is more effective in the prevention of CRVT in our population.

Nous avons mené une étude prospective randomisée dans le but de comparer l'effet de l'irrigation du cathéter de type PICC avec deux types d'anticoagulants: Héparine standard et Tinzaparine, une héparine de faible poids moléculaire. Notre étude s'adresse aux patients de la clinique externe d'oncologie de l'hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont. Entre début Mai 2005 et Mars 2008, nous avons recruté 131 patients dont 70 ont été randomisés. Parmi les 61 patients exclus, 23 n'ont pas rencontré les critères d'inclusion, 30 ont refusé de participer et 8 ne sont pas inclus pour d'autres raisons. Sur les 70, 36 sujets sont randomisés dans le groupe Héparine standard et 34 dans le groupe Tinzaparine. La population en intention de traiter comprend 65 sujets dont 32 dans le groupe Héparine standard et 33 dans le groupe Tinzaparine. Le médicament a été administré pendant un mombre maximal de 30 jours et les sujets ont été suivis pendant 90 jours. La thrombose veineuse associée au cathéter (TVAC) a été objectivée par une phlébographie ou une échographie-Doppler à la fin de la période de 30 jours suivant l'installation du cathéter. L'incidence de la TVAC sur 30 jours est de 14,39 par 1000 cathéter-jours (IC à 95%:[9,0;19,79]/1000 cathéter-jours ou 41,5% (27/65). L'incidence de la thrombose veineuse profonde (TVP) symptômatique du membre supérieur sur la période de suivi de 90 jours est de 0,41 par 1000 cathéter-jours (IC à 95%:[0,08;0,81]/1000 cathéter-jours ou 3% (2/65). Nous n'avons observé aucune différence entre les deux groupes par rapport à la fréquence de la TVAC ni de la TVP. Nous ne pouvons conclure à une différence dans l'efficacité de la Tinzaparine par rapport à l'Héparine standard dans la prévention de la TVAC. / Our prospective, randomized study aims at comparing the effectiveness of two types of heparin used for the instillation of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC): Standard heparin and Tinzaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. We recruited patients from the ambulatory center of Maisonneuve-Rosemont hospital. Between the beginning of May 2005 and March 2008, 131 patients were enrolled. Of 61 patients excluded, 23 did not satisfy the inclusion criteria, 30 refused to participate and 8 were not enrolled for other reasons. Seventy patients were randomized into two groups, 36 in the Standard heparin group and 34 in the Tinzaparin group. Our population intent-to-treat included 65/70 patients, 32 of these received Standard heparin and 33 received Tinzaparin. The experimental intervention was administered for a maximum of 30 days and all the subjects were followed up for 90 days. The events were documented objectively with a venogram or Doppler ultrasonography by the end of the 30 days following the catheter installation. The incidence of catheter-related venous thrombosis (CRVT) during 30 days of instillation is 14,39/1000 catheter-days (CI 95%:[9,0;19,79]/1000 catheter-days or 41.5% (27/65). The incidence of symptomatic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during the observation period of 90 days is 0,41/1000 catheter-days (CI 95%:[0,08;0,81]/1000 catheter-days or 3% (2/65). We did not observe any difference in the frequency of CRVT or DVT between the two groups. We can not conclude that either Standard heparin or Tinzaparin is more effective in the prevention of CRVT in our population.