Diss. / Filmed with: Kleeman, Gustav Maximilian / De universa Creticae dialecte indole, adiecta glossarum Creticarum collectione -- Klotz, Walter / Ueber die Quellen zur Geschichte Phokions in Diodoros, Arrianos, Nepos und Plutarchos -- Klopfleisch, Friedrich / De duabus vetustissimis picturis vitreis in templo S. Viti in voco Veitsberg prope Weidam sito -- Kitt, Johannes / Quae ac quanta sit inter Aeschylum, et Herodotum et consilii operum et religionis similitudo -- Kirsch, Arnold / Quaestiones Vergilianae criticae -- Keese, Johannes ; Plinius Secundus, C. ; Serenus Sammonicus, Quintus / Quomodo Serenus Sammonicus a medicina Pliniana ipsoque Plinio pendeat -- Klammer, Hermann / Animadversiones Annaeanae grammaticae -- Haenel, Gustav Friedrich / Succincta interpretatio fragmenti 7. [paragraphus]. ult. D. XIV, 6 de senatusconsulto Macedoniano -- Kirchner, Carl / Horazens Damasippus : zweiten Buchs dritte Satire -- Kirchner, Johannes / De Servii carminum Vergilianorum interpretis : commentario pleniore qui dicitur ; partic. I -- Kirchner, Johannes / De Servii carminum Vergilianorum interpretis : commentario pleniore qui dicitur ; partic. II -- Klodic, Antonio / Grammatica Greca -- Klett, Friedrich / Zu Xenophons Leben -- Kampfhenkel, Otto / Die Symmetrie als Kunstgesetz bei Horaz -- Klander, C.A. / Disputatio quo loco Sophocles chorum ejusque cantus habuerit -- Klüpfel, Engelbert ; Ruef, Johann Kaspar, ed. ; Zell, Karl, joint ed. / De vita et scriptis Conradi Celtis Protucii praecipui renascentium in Germania literarum restauratoris primique Germanorum poetae laureati, opus posthumum B. Engelberti Klüpfelii : pars prior -- Klüpfel, Engelbert / Kluepfeliani de vita et scriptis Conradi Celtis Protucii particula IX. sive libri II. de scriptis Celtis cap. V-XI -- Klüpfel, Engelbert ; Zell, Karl / Kluepfeliani de vita et scriptis Conradi Celtis Protucii particula X. sive penultima complactens libri II. cap. XII-XVI -- Klüpfel, Engelbert ; Zell, Karl / Kluepfeliani de vita et scriptis Conradi Celtis Protucii particulae ultimae fasciculus prior curante -- Klüpfel, Engelbert ; Zell, Karl / Klüpfeliani de vita et scriptis Conradi Celtis Protucii particulae ultimae fasciculus alter idemque ultimus -- Klein, Carolus Theophilus / Commentationis in locum Psalm 16, v. 10 specimen -- Klein, Josef / Epigraphisch-antiquarische Streifzüge : 1-4 -- Kleeman, Maximilinaus / Vocabula Homerica in Graecorum dialectis et in cotidiano sermone sevata collegit. Includes bibliographical references.

The author's thesis, Heidelberg. / "Die deutschen Persiusübersetzungen von 1811-1897": p. [169] "Allgemeine Literatur": p. [170]-171.

The author's thesis, Heidelberg. / "Die deutschen Persiusübersetzungen von 1811-1897": p. [169] "Allgemeine Literatur": p. [170]-171.

Based on the author's diss., Vienna, 1966. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [129]-134).

Based on the author's diss., Vienna, 1966. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [129]-134).

This dissertation treats Persius’ book of satires as a physical object, as a text to be read aloud, as a literary artefact that has a fundamental total structure, and as a text that is interested in its genre and in how satire can position itself against tired philosophical and literary traditions and tropes. It seeks to diversify the intellectual contexts in which the satirist may be situated—both literary and philosophical, ranging from Hipponax to Ovid, Plato to Cornutus. In the first chapter, we struggle to track down a poet who compulsively avoids identification in his Prologue. It turns out that he is best identified by a reactionary Hipponactean meter and very misleading birdsounds. Without addressee or self-identification or occasion, the poem is labeled a carmen at the same time that we are told that carmina are to be distrusted. In the second chapter, the poet introduces his libellus to us—or, rather, it turns out that he is not interested in us at all—he talks to his book or to some fiction that he has invented for the occasion of Satire I. The book itself may be read or not, he doesn’t mind. The poet focuses his attention on the poetry-reading practices of others in performance, alighting upon their every intimate body part, but denies us a view of him—he is merely the concealed spleen. In Chapter Three, the poet continues his exploration of performative speech (prayer, this time) in Satire II, while maintaining his self-concealment. We see only his inner, highly unappealing raw heart on a platter. A body part further to the spleen is added to our plate: the heart, uncooked. His last words hint at what he has to offer; but we’ll be sorry that he does soon enough. Chapter Four shows that in the central poem, Satire III, the poet swings vastly in the other direction. Rather than a disembodied critique of others, the poem’s opening lines are highly focalized through the poet’s experience. He exposes more of his body than we would ever wish to see—splitting and gaping open, it becomes a giant pore. At the same moment, his book comes physically into our view, but it is as split as he is. The hardened critic turns out to be a leaky vessel, a failing proficiens who cannot catch up to his Stoic lessons. In the fifth chapter, the poet picks up another book, Plato’s Alcibiades, which shares his interest in the morally underdeveloped youth and the hazards of ethical progress. In Satire IV, his rendition of that dialogue, Persius offers a theory of dialogue as fiction that frames his engagement with philosophy. The result is that the Stoics may find that they have a very bad student on their hands, one who raises the specter of Socrates’ misbehavior and failures. The sixth chapter expands the discussion of Persius’ relation to the Platonic corpus in Satire V, which sustains and develops Platonic questions of desire, slavery, and praise, and confuses its own genres. Finally, Chapter Seven addresses Persius’ retreat, projected death, and reincarnation in Satire VI. He reflects upon the fate of his body. He is unconcerned about what happens to bodies and poets—and, implicitly, their texts—after death. The poet’s book and the body are merged in their insignificance.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Cornell University. / "Index editionum et commentariorum": p. 32.

Esta dissertação consiste em uma tradução das sátiras de Pérsio (34-62 d.C.), acompanhada de notas e precedida de estudo preambular, que discute a questão da obscuridade do texto e seu valor literário. Dentre os poetas satíricos latinos canônicos (Lucílio, Horácio e Juvenal), Pérsio parece ter sido relegado a uma posição de menor prestígio. Investigar os motivos determinantes do generalizado juízo negativo acerca da obra de Pérsio foi, por isso, um dos objetivos desta pesquisa. Ainda que, de início, o contato com o texto denunciasse já os elementos condicionantes da situação de inferioridade em que a crítica pôs o autor, nosso contínuo e reiterado trabalho com as sátiras foi aos poucos revelando as qualidades literárias que a propalada obscuridade encobria, de modo a propor uma reavaliação da obra de Pérsio no quadro da sátira latina. A primeira parte desta pesquisa está dividida em quatro capítulos, em que se abordam: a vida e obra de Pérsio; os argumentos de cada sátira; o juízo da crítica sobre a obscuridade; a questão do valor literário dos poemas. A segunda parte apresenta a tradução comentada das sátiras, em que se procurou praticar uma forma vernácula tanto quanto possível fiel e exata ao texto latino, conservando-se as mesmas imagens de Pérsio, mesmo quando o original pudesse vir marcado por sua tão censurada obscuridade. / This dissertation consists basically of a translation of Persius\' (34-62 A.D.) satires, accompanied by notes and preceded by a preliminary study, which aims to discuss the issue of the text obscurity and its literary value. Amongst the canonical Latin satirical poets (Lucilius, Horace and Juvenal), Persius seems to have been relegated to a less prestigious position. One of the present research goals is, therefore, to investigate the determinant reasons for the widespread negative opinions about Persius\' work. Although our first contact with Persius\' texts had already announced the conditioning elements of the author\'s situation of inferiority, our continuous and repeated work with his satires could gradually disclose literary virtues that were hidden by the poet\'s reputed obscurity, making it possible to propose a re-evaluation of Persius\' work in the context of the Latin literary genre of satire. The first part of this research is divided into four chapters, which deal with the following subjects: the life and work of Persius; the plot of each satire; the standard criticism\'s beliefs about the poet\'s obscurity; the question of the literary value of the poems. The second part presents an annotated translation, which has sought to be as exact and faithful to the Latin text as possible, by maintaining the same images as those created by Persius, even when the original text was marked by its so reproached obscurity.

No description available.

La présente étude propose une recherche sur la fortune de Perse (auteur satirique latin du I siècle ap. J. Ch.) pendant la Renaissance et l’édition critique du commentaire des Satires de Giovanni Britannico (humaniste, imprimeur et professeur de Rhétorique à Brescia au XVe siècle), ouvrage publié pour la première fois à Brescia en 1481 et qui bénéficia d’une énorme diffusion en France. Le premier chapitre de la thèse est consacré à la réception de Perse en Italie durant le XVe siècle et passe en revue les commentaires des Satires précédent l’ouvrage de Britannico. Le deuxième propose un profil biographique de l’humaniste et analyse son oeuvre, en l’inscrivant dans le cadre de l’activité éditoriale et typographique de sa famille. Le troisième présente la structure et les caractéristiques du commentaire et met en lumière les nouveautés exégétiques de l’ouvrage en rapport avec la production contemporaine. Le quatrième chapitre est consacré à la réception du commentaire en Europe durant la première moitié du XVIe siècle. La thèse se termine avec l’édition du commentaire, accompagnée d’un apparat critique qui présente les variantes et les sources de l’ouvrage. / The aim of the thesis is to investigate about the reception of Persius’ poetry in the Renaissance period and to provide a critical edition of Giovanni Britannico’s commentary on Satires. Britannico’s work was published in Brescia in 1481 and it enjoyed a great diffusion and great appreciation in France during the 16th Century. The first chapter analyses Persius Satires reception in Italy during the second half of the 15th Century, by reviewing commentaries written before Britannico’s work.Then the thesis provides a biographical profile of the author and it analyses his literary production in the context of editorial and printing press activity of his family. The third chapter describes the structure and the features of the commentary, by comparing it with contemporary production on Persius. The last one studies the reception of the commentary in Europe in 16th Century. The critical edition of Britannico’s commentary is accompanied by a critical apparatus providing information about variant reading of the text and about its sources.