Adult immunizations effectively reduce morbidity, mortality, and transmission rates of multiple diseases; however, outpatient providers often a struggle to convince patients to accept vaccinations. This project’s aim is to address vaccination rates in our adult population, focusing first on the influenza vaccine in year one (2016), and then on pneumococcal vaccine in year two (2017), by 1) using a strong quality improvement strategy (known as a Champion Team) and 2) implementing a clinic program consisting of provider training, improved documentation, and informative posters targeted at patients. A quality improvement strategy known as a “Champion Team” provided a strong mechanism through which we developed and implemented the interventions across both years. Specifically, the Champion Team consisted of key stakeholders (nurses, residents, physician faculty, and informatics expert) who identified, developed, and evaluated the program. Programming included an annual health care professional training session for each vaccine (early fall of 2016 and 2017 for flu, spring 2017 for pneumococcal), improved documentation strategies and nursing uptake, and informative posters in the clinic. We assayed data from our patient electronic health record to evaluate: the percentage of our patient population for whom an immunization was documented relative to the number of unique patients seen in our clinic during that time frame. This approach in year one showed a marked increase in influenza vaccination rates in our clinic. During the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 flu seasons our clinic vaccination rates were 39.98% and 42.05% respectively. After implementation of our champion team and clinic wide program to increase rates in 2016 our vaccination rates for the 2016/2017 flu seasons was 50.88%. Pneumonia data for a full year are under analyses and will be included in this presentation. We anticipate a similar increase in rates for our pneumococcal vaccinations. Our Champion Team and clinic wide program were perceived as relatively low-effort interventions yet appeared to increase vaccinations over the course of this study. The replication of these findings across pneumonia data (pending) and, in future work, with the herpes zoster vaccine (planned for Year 3), will increase our confidence that increases in rates were attributable to these very accessible interventions.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a component of innate immunity. The concentration of CRP in serum increases in microbial infections including Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Employing a mouse model of pneumococcal infection, it has been shown that passively administered human wild-type CRP protects mice against infection, provided that CRP is injected into mice within two hours of administering pneumococci. Engineered CRP (E-CRP) molecules have been reported recently; unlike wild-type CRP, passively administered E-CRP protected mice against infection even when E-CRP was injected into mice after twelve hours of administering pneumococci. The current study was aimed at comparing the protective capacity of E-CRP with that of an antibiotic clarithromycin. We established a mouse model of pneumococcal infection in which both E-CRP and clarithromycin, when used alone, provided minimal but equal protection against infection. In this model, the combination of E-CRP and clarithromycin drastically reduced bacteremia and increased survival of mice when compared to the protective effects of either E-CRP or clarithromycin alone. E-CRP was more effective in reducing bacteremia in mice treated with clarithromycin than in untreated mice. Also, there was 90% reduction in antibiotic dosing by including E-CRP in the antibiotic-treatment for maximal protection of infected mice. These findings provide an example of cooperation between the innate immune system and molecules that prevent multiplication of bacteria, and that should be exploited to develop novel combination therapies for infections against multidrug-resistant pneumococci. The reduction in antibiotic dosing by including E-CRP in the combination therapy might also resolve the problem of developing antibiotic resistance.

C-reactive protein (CRP) binds to several species of bacterial pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae. Experiments in mice have revealed that one of the functions of CRP is to protect against pneumococcal infection by binding to pneumococci and activating the complement system. For protection, however, CRP must be injected into mice within a few hours of administering pneumococci, that is, CRP is protective against early-stage infection but not against late-stage infection. It is assumed that CRP cannot protect if pneumococci got time to recruit complement inhibitor factor H on their surface to become complement attack-resistant. Since the conformation of CRP is altered under inflammatory conditions and altered CRP binds to immobilized factor H also, we hypothesized that in order to protect against late-stage infection, CRP needed to change its structure and that was not happening in mice. Accordingly, we engineered CRP molecules (E-CRP) which bind to factor H on pneumococci but do not bind to factor H on any host cell in the blood. We found that E-CRP, in cooperation with wild-type CRP, was protective regardless of the timing of administering E-CRP into mice. We conclude that CRP acts via two different conformations to execute its anti-pneumococcal function and a model for the mechanism of action of CRP is proposed. These results suggest that pre-modified CRP, such as E-CRP, is therapeutically beneficial to decrease bacteremia in pneumococcal infection. Our findings may also have implications for infections with antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal strains and for infections with other bacterial species that use host proteins to evade complement-mediated killing.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. One host defense function of C-reactive protein (CRP) is to protect against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection as shown by experiments employing murine models of pneumococcal infection. The protective effect of CRP is due to reduction in bacteremia. There is a distinct relationship between the structure of CRP and its anti-pneumococcal function. CRP is functional in both native and non-native pentameric structural conformations. In the native conformation, CRP binds to pneumococci through the phosphocholine molecules present on the C-polysaccharide of the pneumococcus and the anti-pneumococcal function probably involves the known ability of ligand-complexed CRP to activate the complement system. In the native structure-function relationship, CRP is protective only when given to mice within a few hours of the administration of pneumococci. The non-native pentameric conformation of CRP is created when CRP is exposed to conditions mimicking inflammatory microenvironments, such as acidic pH and redox conditions. In the non-native conformation, CRP binds to immobilized complement inhibitor factor H in addition to being able to bind to phosphocholine. Recent data using CRP mutants suggest that the factor H-binding function of non-native CRP is beneficial: in the non-native structure-function relationship, CRP can be given to mice any time after the administration of pneumococci irrespective of whether the pneumococci became complement-resistant or not. In conclusion, while native CRP is protective only against early stage infection, non-native CRP is protective against both early stage and late stage infections. Because non-native CRP displays phosphocholine-independent anti-pneumococcal activity, it is quite possible that CRP functions as a general anti-bacterial molecule.

C-reactive protein (CRP), a component of the innate immune system, is an antipneumococcal plasma protein. Human CRP has been shown to protect mice against infection with lethal doses of Streptococcus pneumoniae by decreasing bacteremia. in vitro, CRP binds to phosphocholine-containing substances, such as pneumococcal C-polysaccharide, in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Phosphocholine-complexed human CRP activates the complement system in both human and murine sera. The mechanism of antipneumococcal action of CRP in vivo, however, has not been defined yet. In this study, we tested a decades-old hypothesis that the complement-activating property of phosphocholine-complexed CRP contributes to protection of mice against pneumococcal infection. Our approach was to investigate a CRP mutant, incapable of activating murine complement, in mouse protection experiments. We employed site-directed mutagenesis of CRP, guided by its three-dimensional structure, and identified a mutant H38R which, unlike wild-type CRP, did not activate complement in murine serum. Substitution of His38 with Arg in CRP did not affect the pentameric structure of CRP, did not affect the binding of CRP to pneumococci, and did not decrease the stability of CRP in mouse circulation. Employing a murine model of pneumococcal infection, we found that passively administered H38R CRP failed to protect mice against infection. Infected mice injected with H38R CRP showed no reduction in bacteremia and did not survive longer, as opposed to infected mice treated with wild-type CRP. Thus, the hypothesis that complement activation by phosphocholine-complexed CRP is an antipneumococcal effector function was supported. We can conclude now that complement activation by phosphocholine-complexed CRP is indeed essential for CRP-mediated protection of mice against pneumococcal infection.

Many children under the age of 5 die each year of invasive pneumococcal disease. Childhood vaccination against this disease reduces morbidity and mortality. Despite the introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in a central African country in 2011, all provinces have not yet been vaccinated. The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental study was to determine whether there was an association between the introduction of PCV13 and new cases of pneumococcal disease in 2 provinces in central Africa. The sample size for the study was 380. The theoretical framework for this study was the epidemic model supported by the concept of herd immunity. Key research questions examined the incidence of pneumococcal disease in children by age, gender, and province. The independent variables were age, gender, province, and introduction of PCV13. The dependent variable was incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease. The research questions were evaluated using chi-square test of independence and logistic regression. The results of the study indicated that vaccination with PCV13 significantly reduced incident cases of invasive pneumococcal diseases (aOR 0.333, 95% CI 0.628-0.177, p = 0.001). However, this association was not significant for age (aOR 0.574, 95% CI 1.186-0.278, p = .134), and there were no significant gender differences (aOR 1.047, 95% CI 1.929-0.569, p = 0.882). Positive social change may result by enabling the protection of more children in the central Africa country provinces that have not yet adopted using PCV13 and by introducing the vaccine in other African countries.

Human C-reactive protein (CRP) increases survival of and decreases bacteremia in mice infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Such protection of mice against pneumococcal infection is seen only when CRP is administered into mice 6 hours before to 2 hours after the injection of pneumococci, but not when CRP is given to mice at a later time. Our first aim was to define the mechanism of CRP-mediated initial protection of mice against infection. It was proposed that CRP binds to phosphocholine (PCh) moieties present in the cell wall and activates the complement system on the pneumococcal surface that kills the pathogen. We generated a CRP mutant F66A/T76Y/E81A incapable of binding to PCh. Mutant CRP did not protect mice from pneumococcal infection. Thus, the proposed hypothesis was correct; the PCh-binding property of CRP contributes to the protection of mice against pneumococcal infection. Our second aim was to investigate why CRP was not protective during the late stages of infection. Pneumococci are known to recruit an inhibitor of complement activation, factor H, from the host to their surface to escape complement attack. We considered the ability of CRP, in its nonnative form, to bind to factor H, and generated a CRP mutant E42Q/F66A/T76Y/E81A capable of binding to factor H. In vivo experiments using the quadruple CRP mutant are in progress. We anticipate that the combination of wild-type and quadruple mutant CRP should be protective during the late stages of infection; wild-type CRP would bind to PCh and activate complement while mutant CRP would cover factor H to prevent its complement-inhibitory activity. Our long-term goal is to explore the possibility of developing a CRP-based strategy to treat pneumococcal infection.

The stage at diagnosis is the single most important predictor of lung cancer outcome. Therefore, detecting lung cancer early is of utmost importance. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has proven beneficial in the early detection and mortality reduction of lung cancer. Despite this, very few of the high-risk population get annual LDCT done. Patients' attitudes towards tobacco usage and preventive care can be a factor in getting LDCT. We analyzed the relationship between the willingness to undergo LDCT and a person's readiness to try tobacco cessation medication or get the pneumococcal vaccine. We also analyzed the relationship between patients who had tobacco cessation counseling and their willingness to get LDCT and pneumococcal vaccine. Medical records of high-risk patients seen in the East Tennessee State University (ETSU) clinics between January 1, 2016, and November 30, 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. In the data obtained, a total of 2,834 patients were current smokers and were included in the research. The study subjects were assessed in two ways, which from here on will be referred to as method one and method two. In the first method, patients who underwent LDCT were assessed, and the outcome investigated was tobacco cessation counseling, tobacco cessation medication prescription, and pneumococcal vaccination. In the second method, patients who had tobacco cessation counseling were assessed, and the outcome evaluated was LDCT, tobacco cessation medication prescription, and pneumococcal vaccination. In the first method, out of 2,834 total population, 570 had undergone at least one LDCT screening during the study period. Of the 570 patients who underwent LDCT, 22.8% tried one of the tobacco cessation medications at least once during the study period (vs. 9.8% in patients who did not get the LDCT). Also, 71.5% of patients who had LDCT received at least one dose of pneumonia vaccine (vs. 35.5% in patients who did not get the LDCT). In the second method, 1,673 out of 2,834 patients received at least one tobacco cessation counseling, and out of those, 27.5% had LDCT screening (vs. 9.5% among those who never received counseling). Also, 54.9% received a pneumococcal vaccine (vs. 45.1% among those who did not receive counseling). The study demonstrates a relationship between getting LDCT and getting a pneumococcal vaccine or tobacco cessation medications. It also reveals that tobacco cessation counseling increases the odds of getting LDCT, tobacco cessation medications, and pneumococcal vaccine.

No description available.

No description available.