No description available.

Benzodiazepínicos são as drogas lícitas mais vendidas no Brasil - certa de 50 milhões de brasileiros fazem uso diário desse tipo de droga. É clara a importância de se conhecer os efeitos que essas drogas podem ter sobre o comportamento. Existem diversas lacunas no conhecimento de como afetam diferentes aspectos do comportamento operante, entretanto. Especificamente, o efeito do tratamento sobre o responder por reforçadores condicionados tem sido uma área pouco explorada. O presente estudo se propôs a investigar os efeitos do tratamento com bromazepam sobre o responder por um estímulo condicionado e um incondicionado, em dois esquemas complementares, razão progressiva e segunda ordem. Foram conduzidos três experimentos. Experimento I: 9 ratas de aproximadamente 9 meses de idade foram submetidas à um esquema de razão progressiva, tendo um composto de luz (LUZ) e solução de sacarose (SAC) como consequência; uma vez obtida uma linha de base foi iniciado tratamento com 1 mg/kg de bromazepam em 4 dos sujeitos (BRO) e salina (VEI) nos demais. Após 28 dias, foi removida SAC. Após 8 dias, foi removida também LUZ. Ocorreram então 5 sessões de extinção. Foi observada uma redução no responder durante o tratamento em BRO. O tratamento não apresentou efeitos adicionais durante a fase de remoção das consequências. Experimento II: replicação do I utilizando 18 machos de aproximadamente 3 meses de idade e com uma entrefase de adaptação ao procedimento de injeção. O tratamento levou ao aumento do responder em BRO (F2,23=8,13; p=0,001), porém não trouxe diferenças após a remoção das consequências. Experimento III: 20 ratos machos de 3 meses de idade foram submetidos à duas fases experimentais: manutenção (no qual, por quatro dias, eram expostos à esquemas de segunda ordem de Razão/Intervalo com a duração do intervalo crescente a cada sessão (FI 2min (FR5:luz); FI 5min(FR5:luz); FI10min(FR5:luz) e FI20min(FR5:luz), e teste (T1 FI20min(FR5luz)), T2 FR5 e T3 FI20min). As fases de manutenção tinham por objetivo estabelecer e fortalecer a relação LUZ/SAC. Responder para VEI se mostrou estável nas fases teste, enquanto foi observada uma redução em T3 para BRO. Os resultados indicam que BRO teve efeito de modular o responder pelo reforçador incondicionado em todas as situações experimentais, interagindo com o esquema vigente e outras variáveis experimentais como sexo. Não foi observado, entretanto, efeito específico sobre a eficácia de reforçadores condicionados / Benzodiazepines are the most sold of legal drugs in Brazil about 50 million Brazilians use this kind of drug on a daily basis. The importance of knowing the effects of these drugs on behavior is clear. There are several gaps in the knowledge of these drugs affect operant behavior, however. Specifically, the effect of treatment on the responding for conditioned reinforcements is an area that has seldom been investigated. The present study proposed to investigate the effects of bromazepam treatment on the responding for a conditioned and an unconditioned stimulus, in two complementary schedules, namely, progressive ratio and second order. Three experiments were held. Experiment I: 9 female rats of approximately 9 months of age underwent a progressive ratio schedule, with a sucrose solution (SUC) and a light presentation (LIGHT) as concomitant consequences. Once baseline was stablished, treatment with 1mg/kg bromazepam was started for 4 subjects (BRO). The remaining received saline (VEI). After 29 days, SAC was removed. After 8 days, LIGHT was also removed. Then 5 sessions of extinction took place. Lower responding was observed in BRO. Treatment did not further effect behavior in the remaining experimental stages (consequence removal). Experiment II: pilot replication using 18 male rats and including a stage of habituation to the injection procedure. Treatment incurred in the increase of responding for BRO (F2,23=8.13; p=0.001), but had no further effects on the subsequent stages. Experiment III: 20 male rats underwent two experimental stages: maintenance (for four days the animal underwent second order schedules composed of a Ratio and an Interval component, in which the interval increased with each session ( (FI 2min(FR5:light); FI 5min(FR5light); FI10min(FR5light) E FI20min(FR5light) and test (T1 FI20min(FR5light)), T2 FR5 and T3 FI20min). Maintenance stages were intended to stablish and strengthen the LIGHT/SUC relation. VEI responded in a stable manner in all test stages, while BRO showed a reduction in responding in T3. Overall results indicate BRO was able to modulate responding for the unconditioned reinforcer in all experimental situations, interacting with other variables such as schedule and sex. No particular effect was found on the efficacy of the conditioned stimulus, however

Benzodiazepínicos são as drogas lícitas mais vendidas no Brasil - certa de 50 milhões de brasileiros fazem uso diário desse tipo de droga. É clara a importância de se conhecer os efeitos que essas drogas podem ter sobre o comportamento. Existem diversas lacunas no conhecimento de como afetam diferentes aspectos do comportamento operante, entretanto. Especificamente, o efeito do tratamento sobre o responder por reforçadores condicionados tem sido uma área pouco explorada. O presente estudo se propôs a investigar os efeitos do tratamento com bromazepam sobre o responder por um estímulo condicionado e um incondicionado, em dois esquemas complementares, razão progressiva e segunda ordem. Foram conduzidos três experimentos. Experimento I: 9 ratas de aproximadamente 9 meses de idade foram submetidas à um esquema de razão progressiva, tendo um composto de luz (LUZ) e solução de sacarose (SAC) como consequência; uma vez obtida uma linha de base foi iniciado tratamento com 1 mg/kg de bromazepam em 4 dos sujeitos (BRO) e salina (VEI) nos demais. Após 28 dias, foi removida SAC. Após 8 dias, foi removida também LUZ. Ocorreram então 5 sessões de extinção. Foi observada uma redução no responder durante o tratamento em BRO. O tratamento não apresentou efeitos adicionais durante a fase de remoção das consequências. Experimento II: replicação do I utilizando 18 machos de aproximadamente 3 meses de idade e com uma entrefase de adaptação ao procedimento de injeção. O tratamento levou ao aumento do responder em BRO (F2,23=8,13; p=0,001), porém não trouxe diferenças após a remoção das consequências. Experimento III: 20 ratos machos de 3 meses de idade foram submetidos à duas fases experimentais: manutenção (no qual, por quatro dias, eram expostos à esquemas de segunda ordem de Razão/Intervalo com a duração do intervalo crescente a cada sessão (FI 2min (FR5:luz); FI 5min(FR5:luz); FI10min(FR5:luz) e FI20min(FR5:luz), e teste (T1 FI20min(FR5luz)), T2 FR5 e T3 FI20min). As fases de manutenção tinham por objetivo estabelecer e fortalecer a relação LUZ/SAC. Responder para VEI se mostrou estável nas fases teste, enquanto foi observada uma redução em T3 para BRO. Os resultados indicam que BRO teve efeito de modular o responder pelo reforçador incondicionado em todas as situações experimentais, interagindo com o esquema vigente e outras variáveis experimentais como sexo. Não foi observado, entretanto, efeito específico sobre a eficácia de reforçadores condicionados / Benzodiazepines are the most sold of legal drugs in Brazil about 50 million Brazilians use this kind of drug on a daily basis. The importance of knowing the effects of these drugs on behavior is clear. There are several gaps in the knowledge of these drugs affect operant behavior, however. Specifically, the effect of treatment on the responding for conditioned reinforcements is an area that has seldom been investigated. The present study proposed to investigate the effects of bromazepam treatment on the responding for a conditioned and an unconditioned stimulus, in two complementary schedules, namely, progressive ratio and second order. Three experiments were held. Experiment I: 9 female rats of approximately 9 months of age underwent a progressive ratio schedule, with a sucrose solution (SUC) and a light presentation (LIGHT) as concomitant consequences. Once baseline was stablished, treatment with 1mg/kg bromazepam was started for 4 subjects (BRO). The remaining received saline (VEI). After 29 days, SAC was removed. After 8 days, LIGHT was also removed. Then 5 sessions of extinction took place. Lower responding was observed in BRO. Treatment did not further effect behavior in the remaining experimental stages (consequence removal). Experiment II: pilot replication using 18 male rats and including a stage of habituation to the injection procedure. Treatment incurred in the increase of responding for BRO (F2,23=8.13; p=0.001), but had no further effects on the subsequent stages. Experiment III: 20 male rats underwent two experimental stages: maintenance (for four days the animal underwent second order schedules composed of a Ratio and an Interval component, in which the interval increased with each session ( (FI 2min(FR5:light); FI 5min(FR5light); FI10min(FR5light) E FI20min(FR5light) and test (T1 FI20min(FR5light)), T2 FR5 and T3 FI20min). Maintenance stages were intended to stablish and strengthen the LIGHT/SUC relation. VEI responded in a stable manner in all test stages, while BRO showed a reduction in responding in T3. Overall results indicate BRO was able to modulate responding for the unconditioned reinforcer in all experimental situations, interacting with other variables such as schedule and sex. No particular effect was found on the efficacy of the conditioned stimulus, however

No description available.

Reinforcer assessments have largely relied on the use of progressive ratio (PR) schedules to identify stimuli that function as reinforcers. PR schedules evaluate the reinforcing efficacy of a stimulus by measuring the number of responses produced in order to access a stimulus as the number of required responses increases. The current evaluation extends the literature on reinforcer assessments by measuring responding under a progressive force (PF) schedule, in addition to progressive ratio requirements. We compared responding under PR and PF schedules with two children with autism using a multielement design embedded within a reversal experimental design. Results were mixed and implications for further development of reinforcer assessment methods (particularly PF schedules) are discussed.

Nombreux individus vont expérimenter avec les drogues d’abus, mais peu vont devenir toxicomanes. Plusieurs facteurs sont impliqués dans la transition d’un usage récréatif à l’addiction. Les drogues, les conditionnements et les voies d’administration qui mènent à l’augmentation rapide du taux drogue dans le cerveau favorisent cette évolution. La raison est méconnue. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’injection rapide de drogue promeut des changements dans le cerveau qui mènent à l’augmentation de la consommation et de la motivation à obtenir la drogue. Nous avons comparé la consommation lors de conditions à ratio fixe (FR) et à ratio progressif (PR) chez des rats s’auto-administrant la cocaïne administrée par voie intraveineuse (i.v.) en 5 ou 90 secondes (s). Tous les rats ont été entrainés à peser sur un levier afin de s’auto administrer des injections de cocaïne de 0.25 ou 0.5 mg/kg par voie intraveineuse injectée en 5 s sous FR avant d’être divisés en groupes s’auto administrant la cocaïne injectée en 5 ou 90 s pendant 1 heure (h)/session. Pour étudier les différences potentielles en consommation, l’accès à la cocaïne à été augmenté à 6 h/session. Les différences en motivation ont été détectées par l’auto administration de la cocaïne sous PR en fonction de la dose et de la vitesse d’infusion. L’accès à la drogue pendant 1 h/session n’a pas influencé la consommation. Lorsque l’accès a été prolongé à 6 h, tous les animaux ont augmenté leur consommation, mais l’augmentation était plus prononcée chez les rats s’injectant la cocaïne en 5 s. De plus, la vitesse d’injection a influencé la motivation pour obtenir la drogue. Lors de conditions à PR, la courbe dose-réponse pour le nombre d’infusions prises a été déplacée vers le haut pour les rats s’auto administrant des injections de cocaïne en 5 s versus 90 s. De plus, des différences qualitatives on été observées en PR. La consommation de cocaïne des rats s’injectant des infusions en 5 s était dépendante de la dose, tandis que les rats s’auto administrant la drogue en 90 s ont pris la même quantité de drogue, peu importe la dose. Finalement, les rats s’auto administrant des infusions de cocaïne 0.5 mg/kg en 5 s ont consommé plus de cocaïne que les rats prenant des infusions en 90 s, peu importe si elle était injectée en 5 ou 90 s le jour du test. Ainsi, nos résultats montrent que l’injection rapide de drogue dans le cerveau mène à l’augmentation de la consommation et de la motivation pour obtenir la cocaïne, deux symptômes qui caractérisent la toxicomanie. / While many people will experiment with drugs of abuse, few will become addicts. Many factors have been implicated in the transition from recreational drug use to addiction. Drugs, formulations and routes of administration that lead to the rapid rise of drug levels in the brain are thought to facilitate this evolution. The reason for this remains unknown. We hypothesized that the rapid delivery of drugs might promote certain changes in the brain leading to increased drug intake and greater motivation to obtain the drug. In order to assess the effects of the speed of administration, we compared drug intake under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio conditions in rats self-administering intravenous (i.v.) cocaine injections delivered over either 5 or 90 seconds (s). Rats were trained to press a lever for 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg cocaine injections delivered over 5 s under a FR schedule of reinforcement, before being divided into groups self-administering cocaine delivered over either 5 or 90 s for 1 hour (h)/session. To assess potential differences in drug consumption, access to cocaine was increased to 6 h/session. To assess differences in motivation for cocaine, drug self-administration was determined under a PR schedule of reinforcement both as a function of dose and infusion rate. When animals were given access to i.v. cocaine for 1 h/session, the infusion speed did not influence drug consumption. However, when access to the drug was prolonged to 6 h/session, all animals augmented their drug intake, though the increase was greater in animals self-administering the drug delivered more rapidly (over 5 vs. 90 s). The speed of drug delivery also influenced the motivation for cocaine. Under PR conditions, the dose response curve for the number of self-administered infusions was shifted upward in the 5-s animals relative to those in the 90-s group. Moreover, qualitative differences were observed in cocaine intake under PR conditions. Whereas the intake of rats self-administering cocaine delivered over 5 s was dose-dependent, drug consumption in rats injecting the drug over 90 s did not vary with the dose. Finally, rats self-administering 0.5 mg/kg cocaine infusions delivered over 5 s took more cocaine than the rats receiving it over 90 s, regardless of whether cocaine was delivered over 5 or 90 s during PR testing. Thus, our results show that increasing the speed at which cocaine is delivered to the brain leads to greater drug intake and increased willingness to expend effort to obtain the drug, two important symptoms of addiction.

No description available.

Nombreux individus vont expérimenter avec les drogues d’abus, mais peu vont devenir toxicomanes. Plusieurs facteurs sont impliqués dans la transition d’un usage récréatif à l’addiction. Les drogues, les conditionnements et les voies d’administration qui mènent à l’augmentation rapide du taux drogue dans le cerveau favorisent cette évolution. La raison est méconnue. Nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’injection rapide de drogue promeut des changements dans le cerveau qui mènent à l’augmentation de la consommation et de la motivation à obtenir la drogue. Nous avons comparé la consommation lors de conditions à ratio fixe (FR) et à ratio progressif (PR) chez des rats s’auto-administrant la cocaïne administrée par voie intraveineuse (i.v.) en 5 ou 90 secondes (s). Tous les rats ont été entrainés à peser sur un levier afin de s’auto administrer des injections de cocaïne de 0.25 ou 0.5 mg/kg par voie intraveineuse injectée en 5 s sous FR avant d’être divisés en groupes s’auto administrant la cocaïne injectée en 5 ou 90 s pendant 1 heure (h)/session. Pour étudier les différences potentielles en consommation, l’accès à la cocaïne à été augmenté à 6 h/session. Les différences en motivation ont été détectées par l’auto administration de la cocaïne sous PR en fonction de la dose et de la vitesse d’infusion. L’accès à la drogue pendant 1 h/session n’a pas influencé la consommation. Lorsque l’accès a été prolongé à 6 h, tous les animaux ont augmenté leur consommation, mais l’augmentation était plus prononcée chez les rats s’injectant la cocaïne en 5 s. De plus, la vitesse d’injection a influencé la motivation pour obtenir la drogue. Lors de conditions à PR, la courbe dose-réponse pour le nombre d’infusions prises a été déplacée vers le haut pour les rats s’auto administrant des injections de cocaïne en 5 s versus 90 s. De plus, des différences qualitatives on été observées en PR. La consommation de cocaïne des rats s’injectant des infusions en 5 s était dépendante de la dose, tandis que les rats s’auto administrant la drogue en 90 s ont pris la même quantité de drogue, peu importe la dose. Finalement, les rats s’auto administrant des infusions de cocaïne 0.5 mg/kg en 5 s ont consommé plus de cocaïne que les rats prenant des infusions en 90 s, peu importe si elle était injectée en 5 ou 90 s le jour du test. Ainsi, nos résultats montrent que l’injection rapide de drogue dans le cerveau mène à l’augmentation de la consommation et de la motivation pour obtenir la cocaïne, deux symptômes qui caractérisent la toxicomanie. / While many people will experiment with drugs of abuse, few will become addicts. Many factors have been implicated in the transition from recreational drug use to addiction. Drugs, formulations and routes of administration that lead to the rapid rise of drug levels in the brain are thought to facilitate this evolution. The reason for this remains unknown. We hypothesized that the rapid delivery of drugs might promote certain changes in the brain leading to increased drug intake and greater motivation to obtain the drug. In order to assess the effects of the speed of administration, we compared drug intake under fixed (FR) and progressive (PR) ratio conditions in rats self-administering intravenous (i.v.) cocaine injections delivered over either 5 or 90 seconds (s). Rats were trained to press a lever for 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg cocaine injections delivered over 5 s under a FR schedule of reinforcement, before being divided into groups self-administering cocaine delivered over either 5 or 90 s for 1 hour (h)/session. To assess potential differences in drug consumption, access to cocaine was increased to 6 h/session. To assess differences in motivation for cocaine, drug self-administration was determined under a PR schedule of reinforcement both as a function of dose and infusion rate. When animals were given access to i.v. cocaine for 1 h/session, the infusion speed did not influence drug consumption. However, when access to the drug was prolonged to 6 h/session, all animals augmented their drug intake, though the increase was greater in animals self-administering the drug delivered more rapidly (over 5 vs. 90 s). The speed of drug delivery also influenced the motivation for cocaine. Under PR conditions, the dose response curve for the number of self-administered infusions was shifted upward in the 5-s animals relative to those in the 90-s group. Moreover, qualitative differences were observed in cocaine intake under PR conditions. Whereas the intake of rats self-administering cocaine delivered over 5 s was dose-dependent, drug consumption in rats injecting the drug over 90 s did not vary with the dose. Finally, rats self-administering 0.5 mg/kg cocaine infusions delivered over 5 s took more cocaine than the rats receiving it over 90 s, regardless of whether cocaine was delivered over 5 or 90 s during PR testing. Thus, our results show that increasing the speed at which cocaine is delivered to the brain leads to greater drug intake and increased willingness to expend effort to obtain the drug, two important symptoms of addiction.

No description available.