L’association lésionnelle d’une contusion pulmonaire et d’un état de choc hémorragique est fréquente et constitue un réel chalenge thérapeutique. La prise en charge de ce choc va nécessiter une réanimation hémodynamique dans laquelle le remplissage vasculaire tient une place centrale. Mais dans ce contexte de poumon contus, il devra être raisonné car délétère sur le plan pulmonaire, notamment en terme d'oedème et d'altération de la compliance. Ce remplissage devra donc être titré, basé sur des objectifs tensionnels clairs et un monitorage hémodynamique fiable. L'utilisation de solutés à haut pouvoir d'expansion volémique (sérum salé hypertonique, colloïdes) présente un intérêt, de même que l'introduction précoce de vasopresseurs. Le monitorage hémodynamique permettra de conduire cette réanimation sur des objectifs de pression artérielle, sur des indices de précharge dépendance et sur la mesure de l'eau pulmonaire extravasculaire. Notre travail, basé sur des études expérimentales et cliniques, a pour objectif de caractériser les modalités actuelles de prise en charge d’une contusion pulmonaire, sur les plans hémodynamiques et respiratoires. / Pulmonary contusion is often associated with hemorrhagic shock, constituting a challenge in trauma care. For patients who have sustained lung contusions, fluid resuscitation should be carefully performed, because injured lungs are particularly vulnerable to massive fluid infusions with an increased risk of pulmonary edema and compliance impairment. Fluid administration should be included in an optimized and goal directed resuscitation, based on blood pressure objectives and hemodynamical monitoring. The use of fluids with high volume-expanding capacities (hypertonic saline, colloids) is probably interesting, as well as early introduction of vasopressors. Hemodynamic monitoring will allow to conduct resuscitation on blood pressure objectives, on preload parameters and on extravascular lung water measurement.Our work, based on experimental and clinical studies, objective to characterize the current modalities of ventilatory and hemodynamical aspect of pulmonary contusion care.

Background: General anesthesia usually requires mechanical ventilation, which is traditionally accomplished with constant tidal volumes in volume- or pressure-controlled modes. Experimental studies suggest that the use of variable tidal volumes (variable ventilation) recruits lung tissue, improves pulmonary function and reduces systemic inflammatory response. However, it is currently not known whether patients undergoing open abdominal surgery might benefit from intraoperative variable ventilation. Methods/Design: The PROtective VARiable ventilation trial ('PROVAR') is a single center, randomized controlled trial enrolling 50 patients who are planning for open abdominal surgery expected to last longer than 3 hours. PROVAR compares conventional (non-variable) lung protective ventilation (CV) with variable lung protective ventilation (VV) regarding pulmonary function and inflammatory response. The primary endpoint of the study is the forced vital capacity on the first postoperative day. Secondary endpoints include further lung function tests, plasma cytokine levels, spatial distribution of ventilation assessed by means of electrical impedance tomography and postoperative pulmonary complications. Discussion: We hypothesize that VV improves lung function and reduces systemic inflammatory response compared to CV in patients receiving mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery longer than 3 hours. PROVAR is the first randomized controlled trial aiming at intra- and postoperative effects of VV on lung function. This study may help to define the role of VV during general anesthesia requiring mechanical ventilation.