ABSTRACT   INSTITUTION:                                        Institutionen för pedagogik                                                                 Avdelningen för bild                                                                Växjö Universitet ADRESS:                                               351 95 Växjö TELEFON:                                              0470 - 70 80 00 HANDLEDARE:                                      Margareta Wallin-Wictorin TITEL:                                                     Konst och verklighet? – En undersökning                                            av den samtida konstutställningen Reality Check. ENGELSK TITEL:                                    Art and Reality? – A study of       the contemporary art exhibition Reality Check. FÖRFATTARE:                                       Nina Wennberg ADRESS:                                                Hertered, Ekebo 182                                                                 310 38 Simlångsdalen TELEFON:                                              0707-124957 TYP AV UPPSATS:                                 C-uppsats VENTILERINGSTERMIN:                       Ht 2008.   I uppsatsen behandlas den samtida konstutställningen Reality Check och dess tema – konst och verklighet. Fokus läggs på att undersöka hur man arbetat kring tema och hur man gjort urvalet av konstnärer utifrån det. I uppsatsen undersöks även hur man arbetat med konstpedagogik för att nå ut till sin publik och hur man lyckats med detta. Diskussioner förs kring teorier om verklighet och huruvida det går att återspegla verkligheten genom konst.   Keywords: samtidskonst, verklighet, Reality Check, konstpedagogik.

<h1>ABSTRACT</h1><p> </p><p>INSTITUTION:                                        Institutionen för pedagogik</p><p>                                                                Avdelningen för bild</p><p>                                                               Växjö Universitet</p><p>ADRESS:                                               351 95 Växjö</p><p>TELEFON:                                              0470 - 70 80 00</p><p>HANDLEDARE:                                      Margareta Wallin-Wictorin</p><p>TITEL:                                                     Konst och verklighet? – En undersökning                                            av den samtida konstutställningen <em>Reality Check.</em></p><p>ENGELSK TITEL:                                    Art and Reality? – A study of</p><p>      the contemporary art exhibition <em>Reality Check.</em></p><p>FÖRFATTARE:                                       Nina Wennberg</p><p>ADRESS:                                                Hertered, Ekebo 182</p><p>                                                                310 38 Simlångsdalen</p><p>TELEFON:                                              0707-124957</p><p>TYP AV UPPSATS:                                 C-uppsats</p><p>VENTILERINGSTERMIN:                       Ht 2008.</p><p> </p><p>I uppsatsen behandlas den samtida konstutställningen <em>Reality Check</em> och dess tema – konst och verklighet. Fokus läggs på att undersöka hur man arbetat kring tema och hur man gjort urvalet av konstnärer utifrån det. I uppsatsen undersöks även hur man arbetat med konstpedagogik för att nå ut till sin publik och hur man lyckats med detta. Diskussioner förs kring teorier om verklighet och huruvida det går att återspegla verkligheten genom konst.</p><p> </p><p>Keywords: <em>samtidskonst, verklighet, Reality Check, konstpedagogik. </em></p>

No description available.

In this paper, we utilize White's Reality Check, White (2000), and Hansen's SPA test, Hansen (2004), to evaluate technical trading rules while quantifying the data-snooping bias. Secondly, we discuss the result with Probability of Backtest Overfitting framework, introduced by Bailey et al. (2015). Hence, the study presents a comprehensive test of momentum trading across the US futures markets from 2004 to 2016. The evidence indicates that technical trading rules have not been pro?table in the US futures markets after correcting for the data snooping bias.

在使用White的真實性檢定和Stepwise Multiple Test消除資料勘誤的問題之後，有些技術分析確實可以擊敗大盤，在1989到2008，DJIA, NASDAQ, S&P 500, NIKKEI 225, TAIEX這五個指數中。但是在較不成熟的市場或較過去的時間內，我沒辦法找到任何強烈的關係在這些市場與超額報酬間。還有學習策略通常沒辦法獲得比簡單策略更好的表現，代表使用過去最好的策略來預測未來並不是個好主意。我同時還發現在熊市比穩定的牛市更有可能擊敗買進持有的策略。 / In five indices, DJIA, NASDAQ, S&P 500, NIKKEI 225, TAIEX, from 1989 to 2008, some technical trading rules indeed can defeat the broad market even after using the White reality check and stepwise multiple test to solve the data snooping problem. But in the markets like less mature ones or the one which was in the older period, I can’t find a strong relation between these markets and the excess return in my research. And the learning strategy usually can’t have a better performance than the simple one, means applying the rule which had a best record to forecast the future may not be a good idea. I also found that it is more likely to beat the buy and hold strategy when there is a bear market but not a steady bull market.

Made available in DSpace on 2010-04-20T21:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 4 Leonardo Augusto Soares Ferreira.pdf.jpg: 16019 bytes, checksum: dc1eaac0a2de75f6802157267be815c3 (MD5) Leonardo Augusto Soares Ferreira.pdf.txt: 112676 bytes, checksum: f236bd28c9197f48ec072d6ba8170cef (MD5) Leonardo Augusto Soares Ferreira.pdf: 201705 bytes, checksum: 4baa5a6aeb99520a42f7a4766b6def1a (MD5) license.txt: 4886 bytes, checksum: 95e35e47c5ddb6db000fa6ec8243979f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-01-16T00:00:00Z / This work studies the profitability of Technical Analysis models within Brazilian foreign exchange market. It uses the White`s (2000) methodology to test 1712 rules generated from four technical analysis models and finds out that the best rule do not have significant forecast power when data-snooping effects are considered. The results indicate that the Brazilian foreign exchange market is in line with the efficient markets hypothesis suggested by the literature. / Este trabalho estuda a lucratividade dos modelos de Análise Técnica no mercado de câmbio brasileiro. Utilizando a metodologia de White (2000) para testar 1712 regras geradas a partir de quatro modelos de Análise Técnica verifica-se que a melhor regra não possui poder de previsibilidade significante ao se considerar os efeitos de data-snooping. Os resultados indicam que o mercado de câmbio brasileiro está de acordo com a hipótese de mercado eficiente sugerida pela literatura.

在這篇文章裡我們採用了White所提出的真實檢驗法(Reality Check)來解決探勘資料偏誤(Data-snooping bias)的問題，結果顯示從1980年到2008年間，技術分析法則的確可以幫助投資人在日圓兌美元及英鎊兌美元這兩個外匯市場獲利；我們也發現在外匯市場最普遍的技術分析方式─移動平均法(moving average)表現不如其他的技術分析法則，而通道突破法(channel break-out)的表現則明顯優於其他技術分析法則。 除了檢驗技術分析方法的獲利性之外，我們也嘗試著探討技術分析方法的獲利性與央行干預之間的關係，追隨Szacmary與Mathur在1997年所發表的論文，我們把技術分析法則擴充為在真實檢驗法中所使用到的所有法則，並且盡可能加長分析的期間。結果顯示技術分析法則的獲利與央行干預並不存在任何特定的關係。 / In this paper we construct a huge universe of simple trading rules and apply White’s Reality Check to mitigate data-snooping bias then detect the profitability of technical trading rules. We find that technical analysis is useful no matter in the full sample time or each subsample period. The channel break-out method outperforms the other methods in our finding while the profitability of the most commonly used moving average method is worse than the others. Furthermore, we inspect the relationships between the returns of technical trading rules and central bank intervention. The results suggest that there’s no evident relationship between the return series of trading rules and central bank intervention and are not consistent with the view of our following previous study.

Submitted by Silvana Teresinha Dornelles Studzinski (sstudzinski) on 2016-05-09T16:39:33Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Paulo da Silva Junior_.pdf: 1387377 bytes, checksum: 406aabbaaa602ea75591dc7a69bac631 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-05-09T16:39:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Paulo da Silva Junior_.pdf: 1387377 bytes, checksum: 406aabbaaa602ea75591dc7a69bac631 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-03 / UNISINOS - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos / Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo principal compreender o processo de construção de professores iniciantes na docência do ensino superior. Tomou como lócus a Faculdade Murialdo localizada no município de Caxias do Sul, no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Trata-se de uma IES isolada de caráter confessional. Na perspectiva de atender ao intento investigativo, foi desenvolvida uma pesquisa de caráter qualitativo, ouvindo, através de entrevistas semiestruturadas, sete docentes de áreas distintas, com até três anos de experiência no magistério superior. Essa escolha possibilitou melhor configurar a abrangência do estudo. Para a interpretação dos dados foram utilizados os princípios da Análise de Conteúdo. Os aportes teóricos principais tiveram como base os estudos Hubermann, Marcelo Garcia, Freire, Anastasiou, Pimenta, Cunha, Mayor Ruiz, Gaeta e Masetto, Isaia, Nóvoa, Shön, Tardif, Zabalza e Zeballos. Na perspectiva de alcançar os objetivos, algumas questões foram centrais: O que motiva os profissionais de diferentes áreas a se envolverem no magistério superior? Como os docentes constroem os saberes necessários a essa profissão? Que desafios enfrentam na prática de ensinar e aprender? Que valor dão aos conhecimentos do campo da pedagogia universitária? Que expectativas têm sobre o apoio institucional no seu trabalho? Ampliando ainda o estudo, procuramos, também, compreender as principais experiências que viveram nos anos iniciais da carreira docente e o que significaram para as suas práticas cotidianas. Interessou saber, ainda, como as estratégias de formação e desenvolvimento institucional podem ser mobilizadas para fortalecer a docência. Os dados evidenciaram o “choque de realidade” por que passam os docentes iniciantes, confirmando pesquisas anteriores. Reconhecem que seus saberes são empíricos, inspirados nos seus ex-professores e na sua trajetória como estudantes. Percebem, porém, mudanças geracionais, que exige deles um esforço para compreenderem seus alunos, suas culturas e condições de estudo. Percebem que necessitam de saberes que os ajude a ter êxito no seu trabalho e apostam na troca de experiências e em formações colaborativas como alternativas importantes para tal. Entretanto, são raras as menções de necessidades que extrapolam a visão instrumental e pragmática dos saberes que requisitam. Talvez, dada a sua condição profissional de origem, ainda não tenham consciência da complexidade da docência como um espaço de formação que extrapola a dimensão do conhecimento específico. Os espaços de formação institucional, bem como políticas nesse sentido, são requeridos pelos professores que iniciam a docência superior. Ainda não ficou explicitado de forma mais intensa esse compromisso, ficando a sugestão do necessário investimento de uma formação permanente e situada na própria IES, além de incentivos a cursos de pós-graduação lato e stricto sensu. A fragilidade da formação e o incipiente apoio institucional no ambiente acadêmico retardam e afetam a construção da profissionalidade, que se situa mais numa responsabilidade individual do que nas políticas que sustentam a educação superior no país. / This research aimed to understand the construction process of beginning professors in universities. Took as the locus Murialdo School, located in the city of Caxias do Sul, state of Rio Grande do Sul. It is an isolated IES confessional character. With a view to meet the investigative purpose, a qualitative research was developed by listening, through semi-structured interviews, seven teachers from different areas, with up to three years of experience in university teaching. This choice enabled best to set the scope of the study. For the interpretation of the data, the principles of content analysis were used. The main theoretical contributions were based on the Hubermann studies, Marcelo Garcia, Freire, Anastasiou, pepper, Cunha, Mayor Ruiz, Gaetta and Maceto, Isaia, Nóvoa, Shön, Tardif, Zabalza and Zeballos. With a view to achieving the objectives, some issues were central: what motivates professionals from different areas to get involved in university teaching? How do teachers build the knowledge necessary for this profession? What are challenges in the practice of teaching and learning? What do values give the knowledge of the university pedagogy field? What expectations do they have on institutional support in their work? Further expanding the study, we seek to also understand the key experiences that lived in the early years of teaching careers and what they meant for their daily practices. Interested to know also as training and institutional development strategies can be mobilized to strengthen teaching. The data showed the "reality check" by passing the beginner teachers, confirming previous research. They recognize that their knowledge is empirical, inspired by his former teachers and his career as a student. Realize, however, generational changes, which require them an effort to understand their students, their cultures and study conditions. Realize they need knowledge to help them succeed in their work and are committed to exchange of experiences and collaborative training as important alternatives to do so. However, there are few mentions of needs that go beyond the instrumental and pragmatic view of knowledge ordering. Perhaps, given their professional status of origin, there is no awareness of the complexity of teaching as a training space that goes beyond the dimension of expertise. The spaces of institutional training and policies accordingly, are required by teachers entering the top teaching. Still it was not explained more fully in this commitment, becoming the suggestion of the investment required for ongoing formation and located in the very IES, and incentives for post-graduation courses and strict sense. The fragility of the incipient training and institutional support in the academic environment slow down and affect the construction of professionalism, that are more an individual responsibility than in policies that support higher education in the country.

於這篇論文中，我們運White (2000)的Reality Check與Romano and Wolf (2005)的stepwise multiple test檢測交易策略的獲利性以更正資料窺探的偏誤。不同於先前運用資料窺探法則的研究，我們的研究以技術分析及時間序列預測兩者為依歸來建立交易策略，另外我們探討的市場集中在六個主要的亞洲股票市場。大致上，我們發現鮮少證據支持技術交易策略的獲利性；於基礎分析中且考慮交易成本時，只有少數幾個獲利性交易法則出現於兩個興新市場。另外在子樣本期間中，我們發現獲利性策略的表現並不穩定且這幾年來獲利性有逐漸變弱的趨勢。在進階分析中，我們發現沒有任何交易策略表現優越於基本的買進持有策略。 / In this paper, we exam the profitability of trading strategies by using both White’s (2000) Reality Check and Romano and Wolf (2005)s’ stepwise multiple test that correct the data snooping bias. Different from previous studies with the data snooping methodology, our analysis set the universe of forecasts (trading strategies) based on both technical analysis and time series prediction, and the markets which our investigation focuses on are six major Asian stock markets. Overall we find little supportive evidence for the profitability of trading strategies. Our basic analysis shows that there are only few profitable trading strategies detected for two emerging markets while transaction costs are taken into account. Moreover, the performances of the profitable strategies are unstable and the profitability becomes much weaker in the recent years as we find in the sub-periods. In further analysis, we also find that there is no trading strategies in our universe that can outperform the basically buy and hold strategy.