• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Question?rio de Relacionamento Central (CRQ): evid?ncias de validade em pacientes card?acos / Central Relationship Questionnaire (CRQ): evidences of validity in cardiac patients sample

Sanches, Fabr?cia Medeiros 27 February 2009 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:27:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fabricia Medeiros Sanches.pdf: 436028 bytes, checksum: 8c7d688676aa4a702ade87e22bd12392 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-02-27 / The Central Relationship Questionnaire-CRQ is a self-report instrument designed to evaluate the central relationship patterns, specially related to the lovers relationship. As the Core Conflictual Relationship Them- CCRT the CRQ is divided in three subscales: Wishes (W); Responses from Other (RO), and Responses of Self (RS). The aim of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the convergent and discriminant validities of the Brazilian version of the CRQc6.0 in coronary patients. Method: The Sample included 40 coronary patients (1G) and 30 people of the community (2G). When compared to the 2G participants of 1G were older (average age 58 vs. 37 years old), predominantly composed by men (65% vs. 43,3%), with lower scholarship level (65% - less of 5 years vs. 47% - complete high school). Instruments: The CRQ 6.0 and the Escala de Sintomas Psicopatol?gicos- EAS-40, a measure of psychopathological symptoms according to the following dimensions: psychoticism (F1), obsessivity-compulsivity(F2), somatization (F3) and anxiety (F4).Results: Results suggested: good internal consistency of CRQ 6.0 (?>0,80) in both groups excepting to RO (?=0,58) in 1G; no significant association between the CRQ 6.0 dimensions and the EAS-40 dimensions in 1G p>0,05); significant association between RO and psychoticism, and between RE and psychoticism, RE and obsessivity-compulsivity; RE and somatization and RE and EAS-total (p<0,01). The discriminant validity analyses between the 1G and 2G pointed to significant differences to the W (p=0,018) and RE (p=0,026) dimensions. Future researches should involve more representative and paired samples. It is still suggested that measures of levels of alexithymia and depression are evaluated. / O Question?rio de Relacionamento Central (CRQ) ? um instrumento de autorelato para avaliar o padr?o central de relacionamentos, mais precisamente os relacionamentos amorosos. Originado do m?todo do Tema Central de Relacionamento Conflituoso-CCRT, ? dividido em tr?s subescalas: Desejos (D), Respostas do Outro (RO) e Respostas do Eu (RE). O objetivo foi o de investigar a consist?ncia interna, validade convergente e discriminante da vers?o brasileira do CRQ em pacientes coronarianos. A amostra incluiu 40 pacientes com Doen?a Arterial Coronariana, constituintes do Grupo Um (G1) e 30 acompanhantes do Grupo Dois (G2). Comparado os dois grupos, GC tinha idade m?dia mais elevada (idade m?dia 58 vs.37anos), predomin?ncia do sexo masculino (65% vs. 43,3%) e n?vel mais baixo de escolaridade (62% menor que cinco anos vs. 47% segundo grau completo). Instrumentos: CRQ 6.0 e Escala de Sintomas Psicopatol?gicos-EAS-40 que avalia sintomas psicopatol?gicos segundo as dimens?es: psicoticismo (F1), obsessividade-compulsividade (F2), somatiza??o (F3) e ansiedade (F4). Resultados: Todas as dimens?es do CRQ apresentaram boa consist?ncia interna (?>0,80) em ambos os grupos, com exce??o de RO (?=0,58) no G1. N?o foram encontradas associa??es significantes entre as dimens?es do CRQ 6.0 e as da EAS-40 no G1. No G2 as associa??es foram significantes entre RO e psicoticismo e entre RE e psicoticismo, obsessividade compulsividade e somatiza??o e EAS-40 total (p<0,01). A an?lise de validade discriminante entre G1 e G2 resultou em diferen?as significantes nas dimens?es D (p=0,018) e RE (p=0,026). Pesquisas futuras com o CRQ 6.0 e pacientes com DAC, devem contar com amostras maiores e pareadas. Sugerem-se, ainda, avalia??es dos n?veis de alexitimia e depress?o.

Page generated in 0.1214 seconds