Unintended pregnancy leads to many public health consequences like lower educational attainment and diminished career opportunities, with higher rates of unintended pregnancies occurring in lower income communities and among women with drug addiction. Beyond preventing unintended pregnancies, effective contraception helps prevent poor birth spacing, thereby reducing the risk of both premature and low-weight births and maternal mortality and morbidity during the peripartum period. Long acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants, are considered the birth control of choice for women of reproductive potential as they possess a number of advantages: cost-effectiveness, minimal maintenance for 3 to 10 years, reversibility, and high efficacy and continuation rates. Despite these benefits, LARCs have been widely underused in rural communities as a result of many factors including hospital and gynecology department closures, workforce shortages, provider knowledge, and access to care challenges that arise from complex social determinants of health specific to rural US communities. We therefore investigated the knowledge and current practice of clinical providers regarding LARCs counseling and provision in Hawkins County of Northeast Tennessee. Hawkins County is a primarily rural county with clinics serving a large lower income population with a high prevalence of substance use, therefore making it at risk for higher rates of unintended pregnancies. An online survey was sent to all consenting medical providers (NPs, PAs, and physicians) (n=7) to collect information on their practices related to contraception, including LARCs. Following completion of online surveys, semi-structured interviews (n=2) were planned to qualitatively explore providers’ perspectives. Quantitative analysis of survey data and thematic analysis of interviews were conducted. Analysis of survey data shows that though non-OB/GYN primary care providers reported on being somewhat comfortable to comfortable in their ability to counsel patients on LARCs, they reported low levels of actually counseling on LARCs, compared with oral contraception. Furthermore, the survey data also shows low levels of LARC insertion/removal among non-OB/GYN primary care providers, with most noting preference to refer patients to a private OB/GYN provider within the community or the health department. Additionally, non-OB/GYN primary care providers reported little to no interest in including insertion/removal of LARCs within their scope of practice, citing clinic supply, no time for procedures, and low patient desire as reasons. All providers reported believing that there are little to no barriers to obtaining LARCs by patients within Hawkins County.The semi-structured interviews, including one with the county’s main OB/GYN provider, indicated that though there is access to LARCs within Hawkins County, there may still be multiple barriers including possible poor quality of counseling on LARCs by non-OB/GYN primary care providers and preference for counseling specific populations on LARCs rather than all patients of reproductive potential, both of which may contribute to low patient desire for LARCs. This work is a useful starting place for increasing utilization of LARCs within Hawkins County. By exploring current knowledge and practices of primary care providers, we can better address potential systematic barriers to improve access to and utilization of LARCs in rural communities.

and Key words Title - Right to Have Children and Cross-border Reproductive Care Key words - cross-border reproductive care, reproductive tourism, assisted reproduction, access to reproductive care, causes of cross-border reproductive care, consequences of cross-border reproductive care, law evasion, right to procreate, right to have children Abstract - Children give a meaning to man's life. In today's world where more than 10 % of women suffer from infertility, assisted reproduction treatment (hereinafter referred to as "ART") occupies an important place. The topic of human reproduction is particularly delicate. There is no consensus on which ART methods are ethically acceptable and to whom ART should be provided. Therefore each and every state holds its own position in these matters. Difference among legal approaches results in patients seeking desirable treatment abroad. According to available data, most of the ART recipients travel abroad in order to evade legal barriers in their state of origin. Although in the most cases the ART abroad does not constitute any difficulties, in some cases problems may arise in connection with the treatment. States may try to prevent patients from traveling abroad in order to obtain the ART. They may try to protect themselves by refusing giving effect to legal...

The experience of a pelvic exam or Pap smear is something that, while necessary to maintain reproductive health, can be fraught with difficulty for women. Ouj, Igberase, Exe, and Ejikeme (2011) note that “[m]ost women feel a level of discomfort or pain and for some it is embarrassing, dehumanizing, degrading and associated with fear, anxiety and apprehension” (p. 637). However, little recent research has focused on the specific communication surrounding reproductive care for young women. The Internet is a common place for young people to seek health information, understand their own health risks, and seek social support from others. The current study utilizes information gleaned from the archives of an internet message board and sexual education website to examine the way that young women communicate about reproductive health care, risk, and social support with experts and peers in the online community. Results indicate that young women request, seek, and receive several different types of social support in the online community. Further, themes illuminate the complex nature of women’s concerns about potential risk and reproductive care.

Les services reproductifs transfrontaliers (SRT) réfèrent au déplacement d'une juridiction à une autre, de personnes ou de matériel reproductif dans le cadre d'un projet de procréation assistée (PA). Ce phénomène a été observé dans de nombreux pays, mais le système de PA mondialisé canadien, ou reproscape, demeure sous-étudié. Ce manque de connaissances nuit au développement normatif en matière de PA. En adoptant un cadre conceptuel issu de l'anthropologie médicale, l'objectif général de cette thèse était de décrire et comprendre le reproscape canadien. Pour alimenter la réflexion éthique et juridique et la prestation des services de PA, nous avons réalisé une enquête ethnographique clinique multisite combinant : (1) une revue de la littérature, (2) l'observation participante et non participante de deux cliniques de fertilité (Québec et Ontario), d'une agence d'importation de gamètes et d'une dizaine de congrès scientifiques, ainsi que (3) des entrevues semi-dirigées avec 45 actrices et acteurs des SRT : personnes utilisatrices, personnel médical et intermédiaires. Les données ont fait l'objet d'une analyse qualitative inductive, assistée du logiciel NVivo 11. Trois dimensions émergent de nos résultats. (1) Le Canada se caractérise par une mosaïque de lois et de règlements locaux, fédéraux et provinciaux qui influencent de façon paradoxale les SRT. L'obligation de don altruiste, établie par la Loi sur la procréation assistée (LPA), joue un rôle prédominant sur le reproscape canadien. (2) Au niveau de l'expérience des SRT, la simplicité de certains SRT intégrés à la pratique clinique, comme l'importation de sperme ou d'ovocytes, contraste avec la complexité des voyages vers l'étranger auxquels les personnes utilisatrices se sentent souvent contraintes. (3) Interrogées sur leurs perspectives éthiques, quatre positions principales ressortent des entrevues: (a) le respect de leur autonomie reproductive, (b) les risques individuels et (c) sociaux des SRT, dont celui d'exploitation des gestatrices et des donneuses d'ovules, ainsi que (d) les incohérences de la LPA quant à sa capacité d'atténuer ces risques. En conclusion, le reproscape canadien se caractérise, entre autres, par une situation de " sous-traitance reproductive " : une reconnaissance institutionnelle des SRT, combinée à une délocalisation des risques moraux et médicaux hors des frontières nationales. Les conclusions de notre étude mettent en évidence le caractère inextricable du local et du global en PA et comment le reproscape mondial fonctionne par vases communicants. / Abstract : Cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) refers to the movement from one jurisdiction to another of persons or reproductive material as part of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. This phenomenon has been observed in many countries, but the Canadian globalized ART system (or "reproscape") remains understudied empirically. This lack of data undermines the normative development in terms of ART. The aim of this dissertation is to describe and understand the Canadian reproscape in order to support ethical and legal reflection. To achieve this goal, we conducted a multi-site clinical ethnography combining (1) literature reviews, (2) participant and non-participant observation in two fertility clinics (Quebec and Ontario), a gamete importation and distribution agency and a dozen scientific congresses, (3) as well as semi-directed interviews with 45 actors of CBRC: users, medical professionals and intermediaries. The data were analyzed by inductive qualitative analysis assisted by NVivo 11 software. Three dimensions emerge from our results. (1) Regarding the legal and clinical contexts of ART, Canada is characterized by a local mosaic of laws and regulations that paradoxically influence CBRC. The altruistic obligation established by the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA) plays a predominant role on the reproscape. (2) In terms of the experience of the main actors, the simplicity of CBRC integrated to the clinic, such as the import of semen or oocytes, contrasts with the complexity of journeys abroad for which users often feel constrained. (3) When asked about their ethical perspectives, the actors mentioned four main positions: (a) the respect for their reproductive autonomy, (b) the individual and (c) social risks of CBRC, including the exploitation of egg donors as well as gestational surrogates, and (d) AHRA inconsistencies in its ability to mitigate these risks. Our conclusion is that the Canadian reproscape is characterized, inter alia, by a situation of "reproductive outsourcing." This concept is characterized by an institutional recognition of CBRC combined with a relocation of moral and medical risks outside national borders. The results of our study underline the inextricable local and global nature of ART and how CBRC works as communicating vessels.