This thesis is about studio habits. Specifically, it considers what happens in practice in the artist's studio and ways in which creative acts have been visualised and disseminated. The chapters of this thesis are organised around views of the studios of four twentieth century painters: Francis Bacon (1908-1994), Lee Krasner (1909-1984), Jackson Pollock (1912-1956) and Agnes Martin (1913-2005). Each of these artists' studio habits has been fundamental to their respective mythologies and the studios they occupied in their lifetimes have inflected discussion of their work. Drawing on critical theories of sexuality, gender and space, this thesis argues that the idea of the artist as a master continues to dominate as an explanation of art-making but that this characterisation is called into question by these four artist's specific practices in the studio. Close readings of the studio habits in these case studies, considered here as a situated negotiation between artist and studio, challenges the idea of mastery that studio-view exhibits and images tend to promote. Notions of mastery are inclined to construct practice as a paradigm between an active artist and passive studio materials and these, in turn, are apt to be read in terms of masculinity and femininity, respectively. Thus, the role of studio artist has tended to privilege a male lead. Therefore, analysing particular performances of masculinity by these artists provides a means to contest reading studio-view images as statements of mastery and the damaging and inequitable connotations this designation implies. Furthermore, this thesis argues that the recent trend to preserve studio material, or to otherwise encompass traces of practice in exhibits, films and photographs, may be correlated with theoretical shifts which took place in latter half of the twentieth century as a response to philosophical losses entailed in the critique of authority and objecthood and the rise of performance and conceptual art practices.

No description available.

An artists's approach to studio practice reflects knowledge acquired from a variety of source. Various methods are tried, modified, and re-interpreted, culmination in a studio practice that reflects one's own understanding of process and work ethic. This process is the work and the work practice concealed in the artwork, is rarely framed in verbal language. Martin Heidegger offers a particular philosophy of work practice that is clarified in words, allowing me to place my present understanding of studio practice within the notion of Greek techne. This essay is an explication of two works by the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, namely 'The Question Concerning Technology' and 'The origin of the Work of Art.' Heidegger's notion of authentic production and truth in art, provide a contextual framework within which I place my own understanding of studio practice and creative process. This method of work practice positions the artist as facilitator, co-dependent and co-responsible with the materials and form. The artist responds to the needs of the work allowing the materials and form to interact and ultimately reveal the work's true identity. Inherent in this work practice is the artist's knowledge, technical skill and commitment to process rather than outcome. This method of work practice is used in many cultures, from eastern calligraphy to western action painting, and has influenced contemporary artists too numerous to name individually. I am indebted to them all / Master of Arts (Hons) Visual Arts

No description available.

Under mina tidiga år som gitarrist i utveckling, figurerade otalet myter och berättelser på musikaffärer, i konsertlokaler och bland gitarristvänner. Detta var myter om gitarrutrustning, hur man fick samma gitarrljud som på favoritskivorna, vissa gitarrmodellers bästa årgångar osv. Nu, äldre, möjligen klokare, och strävande efter att bli en mer upplyst musikproducent, har ett utforskande av dessa myter förändrats från att vara ett till synes omöjligt uppdrag, till ett realistiskt projekt. Den här undersökningen har fokuserat på uppfattningen av elgitarrförstärkarna i min ägo och tagit avstamp i mitt eget musikskapande, detta med utgångspunkt både från lyssnar- och användarperspektiv. Förstärkarmodellerna skiljer sig åt konstruktionsmässigt och slagkraften de haft i populärkulturen. Två intervjuer, två blindtester och en personlig utvärdering gjordes för att utforska gitarrförstärkarnas sound, spelbarhet och gensvar. Resultaten pekade i slutändan på att vi väljer förstärkare annorlunda då vi utgår från fördomar, tidigare erfarenhet och visuellt intryck än vad vi gör när vi enbart lyssnar på deras ljud. En antydan till variation mellan förstärkarnas påverkan på gitarristers spelkänsla verkar också kunna existera men på grund av de komplexa parametrarna involverade i en sådan analys är det svårt att fastställa några tydliga tendenser. Det som dock kan reflekteras över är att vi troligen lyssnar på, och spelar genom gitarrförstärkare med mer än våra öron och ögon, samt att en förstärkares taktila egenskaper, design och kulturella signifikans troligtvis är av större värde än vi kanske uppfattar enbart genom ljudande material. / During my early years as a developing guitarist, numerous myths and stories circulated in music stores, concert venues, and among guitarist friends. These myths revolved around guitar equipment, how to achieve the same guitar sound as on favourite records, the best years for certain guitar models, and so on. Now, older and possibly wiser, striving to become a more enlightened music producer, my exploration of these myths has shifted from being a seemingly impossible mission to a realistic project. This investigation has focused on the perception of the electric guitar amplifiers in my possession, based on my own music creation, taking into account both listener and user perspectives. The amplifier models differ in their construction and the impact they have had on popular culture. Two interviews, two blind tests, and a personal evaluation were conducted to explore the sound, playability, and response of the guitar amplifiers. Ultimately, the results indicated that we choose amplifiers differently when we rely on biases, past experiences, and visual impressions than when we solely listen to their sound. There also seems to be a hint of variation in how amplifiers affect guitarists' feeling of ease when playing, but due to the complex parameters involved in such an analysis, it is difficult to establish clear tendencies. However, what can be reflected upon is that we likely listen to and play through guitar amplifiers with more than just our ears and eyes, and that the tactile properties, design, and cultural significance of an amplifier are probably of greater value than we may perceive through purely sonic qualities.

No description available.