The purpose of this document is to construct a pedagogical model for which we can better teach the adaptation and versatility of the saxophone within the musical world. In my experience, there seems to be an absence of discussion regarding the rich historical diversity of the instrument. When considering the development of the saxophone it is usually within the scope of a particular musical style, most often through the genres of classical music or jazz. By narrowing our scope to the field that we inhabit we leave out some of the most innovative and interesting approaches to the instrument, and concepts that could potentially be integrated into our own performance practices. Through an examination of how the instrument has adapted in response to technological, social and aesthetic changes we gain insight into the flexibility of the instrument and begin to dismantle barriers that often define “schools of playing.” By establishing the saxophone’s history of adaptation, I build an argument that there is no singular correct approach to sound, only a rich variety of choices. Soundscape ecologist Bernard Krause popularized the term “acoustic niche” which originated from his colleague Ruth Happel. Acoustic niche refers to the situation by which vocalizing creatures within a particular environment alter their frequencies to compensate for sonic changes to their territory caused by encroaching other species including humans. He states that examining, “the diversity and structure of natural sounds from a rainforest forcefully demonstrates very special relationships of many insects, birds, mammals, and amphibians to each other.” The adaptation of creatures’ vocalizations, rising and falling within certain frequency levels, is essential to their survival. Any “masking” or invasion by others threatens an individual’s ability to locate food sources, communicate danger signals and attract mates. In this context, acoustic niche theory becomes a useful metaphor for the development, adaptation, and trajectories of the saxophone in the instrumental world. Since its invention in the mid-nineteenth century, the saxophone has regularly adapted and altered its tonal profile to carve a place in a diverse spectrum of genres and musical styles. The opening chapter discusses the landscape of the saxophone community as a whole. This includes the genres of classical and jazz as well as niche communities such as Carnatic and popular musics. In this chapter I frame the issue of “specialization” and provide background material on acoustic niche theory. The second chapter seeks to complicate and enrich the saxophone’s historical narrative in order to demonstrate the logic of various communities existing within. The third chapter begins with a discussion of technological changes made to the instrument since its invention. The remainder of chapter three explores a variety of diverse tonal profiles that exist within general communities such as classical, jazz, popular and non-Western musics. The final chapter considers a practical application of these discussions and presents a sample pedagogical method. / A Treatise submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Music. / Spring Semester 2019. / April 19, 2019. / Acoustic Niche, Historical Narrative, Pedagogy, Saxophone, Specialization, Tonal Profile / Includes bibliographical references. / Geoffrey Deibel, Professor Directing Treatise; Denise Von Glahn, University Representative; Deborah Bish, Committee Member; Jeffrey Keesecker, Committee Member.

No description available.

The purpose of the study was to review educational objectives for conducting classes for the undergraduate through the doctoral degree. This included one hundred and seventy-three behavioral objectives and three basic methods of evaluation.Specific conducting textbooks were reviewed as were the conclusions from related research. Articles relating to the preparation of the conductor and conducting curricula were also reviewed. The survey instrument designed for this dissertation was mailed to teachers of conducting at the eighteen selected schools where programs were commensurate with this study.FindingsConducting textbooks are used most frequently at the undergraduate level.Equipment most frequently used for evaluation are the tape recorder and videotape (VTR).Compositions of Bach are most frequently used in conducting classes followed by Mozart, Beethoven, Haydn and Handel. Music of Schubert, Tschaikovsky, Brahms, Holst, and Stravinsky are also used frequently.Most teachers provide practical conducting experiences daily or weekly but opportunities to conduct live ensembles are still relatively scarce for undergraduates.All teachers teach conducting techniques and score analysis and memory. Seventy-six percent of the respondents also teach rehearsal techniques.Visual observation of conducting students is the most frequently used method of evaluation.Teachers feel there should be more classes, more class meetings, and a greater variety of conducting classes required--especially at the undergraduate level.ConclusionsEducational objectives should be clearly stated for conducting courses at all levels.Evaluation of conducting students should be provided in a variety of forms that are clear and meaningful to the student and be based on stated educational objectives.Conducting courses should be developed for opera, ballet, theater, oratorios, and jazz ensembles.The number of conducting courses, class meetings, and credit should be increased.More conducting classes should be required for the music education major and conducting major, especially at the undergraduate level.Ensembles should be frequently and consistently available to conducting students.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.