Global ETD Search

1	Mediální konstrukce minulosti: obraz normalizačního období v české televizní publicistice po roce 2006 / Media Construction of the Past: Image of the Period of Normalization in the Czech Non-fiction Television Shows after the Year 2000 Červínová, Adéla January 2013 (has links) The diploma thesis "Media Construction of the Past: Image of the Period of Normalization in the Czech Non-fiction Television Shows after the Year 2006" looks into media construction during normalization period in television shows, which mark themselves as journalistic. The two following methods are used to analyze chosen thematic units broadcasted between the years 2007-2012: quantitative content analysis and semiotic analysis. Content analysis besides other things provides information about the frequency of occurrence of specialists in the field of social sciences, both movies and period footage as well as Slovak speaking people in non- fiction television shows such as Retro, Historie.cs, Víkend and Střepiny. Semiotic analysis notices denotative meaning of two examined units as well as opening jingle of Retro and Historie.cs shows and subsequently interprets used components. Based on this interpretation myths associated with construction of both normalization and the past are deciphered. Chapters dedicated to research are complemented by methodological part, which familiarizes with the technique of researches and explains differences between quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as the theoretical part, which brings insight into media representation, media construction, and relationship...
2	Folkets försvinnande : Konstruktioner av det förflutna i svensk folkminnesforskning under 1920-talet Skogh, Linnéa January 2017 (has links) In Sweden, during the 1920s, the past played a definite part in the folklore research. The folklore scholars argued for collecting the cultural memories (folkminnen) of “the people”, as they were understood to disappear due to a threat from the modern civilization, which was thought to spread across the countryside at an ever-accelerating pace. This study shows that the past is constructed through discourse – not as a predefined object but rather as a dynamic process of temporal constructions. This study analyses the construction of the past in folklore research in Sweden during the 1920s. Two methodological tools have been primarily used to help unfold the process in which the past is constructed. First, by discourses of the past (förflutenhetsdiskurser) which is how, in my case the scholars, relate to the past by various verbal practices. Secondly, by identifying binary characterizations. In this study, the construction of the past, in folklore research, has been shown through three main themes. First, by understanding the importance of collecting the cultural memories of “the people” as an urgent project – due to their inevitable disappearing – but also as a duty towards the people of the past and as a duty towards future generations. Secondly, by identifying three different dichotomies which all functioned as part of the process of the construction of the past. Thirdly, by analyzing “the people” as a category that best is described as a compound of both culture and human. folklore research the construction of the past Sweden 1920s 1900 discourse discourses of the past binary characterisations modernity temporalities folkminnesforskning konstruktionen av det förflutna 1900-tal Sverige diskurs förflutenhetsdiskurser binära karaktäriseringar modernitet History of Ideas Idé- och lärdomshistoria
3	Wem gehört die Krim?: Putins Rechtfertigung der Krim-Annexion Guttke, Matthias 23 June 2020 (has links) Given the doubtfulness of the legal justification of Crimea’s declaration of independence on March 11 2014, which was followed by a referendum on March 16 that culminated in the peninsula’s treaty with Moscow to join the Russian Federation, Mr Putin used his speech on March 18 to put historical arguments forward in an effort to legitimise the Russian course of action in front of his own population. The speech counters the international community’s legal assessment, which classified Crimea’s accession to Russia as an annexation, with a historical legitimisation full of symbolism and mysticism that blatantly reinterprets Russian history and delegitimises the territorial integrity of Ukraine. This article analyses Putin’s attempt to justify Russia’s annexation of Crimea and tries to infer the mindset and aims that lie behind his historic-political argumentation. info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/940 ddc:940

1

Page generated in 0.1831 seconds