Syftet med denna uppsats var att beskriva grundlärares uppfattning av variationsteori i skrivundervisning av texttyper. Undersökningens frågor svarade mot hur lärare resonerar om val av innehåll och metoder i undervisningen om skrivande av texttyper samt hur lärare upplevde att de använde variationsteori för planering, genomförande och utvärdering av undervisningen för att utveckla elevers skrivande av olika texttyper. Analysen var genomförd med fenomenografi som ansats, webbenkät och semistrukturerad intervju som metod och variationsteori som teori. Resultatet visade att lärarna upplevde variationsteori som tidskrävande och komplex att arbeta med men att det gav god effekt för både elevernas kunskapsutveckling och för lärarnas utveckling av yrkesprofession. Resultatet visade också att lärarna upplever att det är komplext att använda variationsteori i undervisning om att skriva olika texttyper. Men variationsteorin är uppskattad att använda i undervisningen och vissa faktorer kan förenkla användandet. Slutsatsen blir ända att svenskämnets struktur behöver bli mer tillgängligt för variationsteori. / The aim of this paper was to describe teachers’ ways of understanding variation theory used in teaching to write different types of texts. This was done by answering questions as how teachers’ reason in selecting content and methods in teaching to write different types of texts and how teachers experienced how to use variation theory in planning, teaching and evaluation of teaching to develop students' writing of different text types. This empirical study was done with a phenomenography view and variation theory as the theoretical framework for the analysis. The methods were survey and semi structured interview. The results showed that the teachers experienced the variation theory as time-consuming and complex to work with, but that it had a good effect on both the students 'knowledge development and the teachers' development of professional profession. The results showed that the teachers’ experience variation theory as complex in teaching about writing different types of texts. Although variation theory was appreciated in teaching and some factors may facilitate the use of the theory. Anyway, the structure needs to be more accessible to variation theory.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T19:33:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rodrigo Leite da Silva.pdf: 5873206 bytes, checksum: 41b5b0b338aa31938fedaed40f1af226 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-10-25 / Aim: This study, situated in the studies of the Portuguese language, aims to contribute to studies dealing with the textual construction of belief in (1) essay in academic and scientific texts and popular science, (2) text news journalistic and (3) chronicles of everyday life. Methodology: The research follows a theoretical-analytical, in which we adopted the theoretical postulations of Text Linguistics, complemented by Critical Discourse Analysis, with socio-cognitive aspects. Justification/ Hypothesis: Although the essay is the focus of constant interest to scholars of the text, treat it as a class opinionated, grouping types of texts opinionated modified by genres, though, is a spongy ground. There is, by definition that the textual construction of belief, it changes depending on the gender discourse in the category of explanation, the schema of textual argument. Results: The analysis indicates that the essay is a text in class opinionated, which changes depending on the conditions of discursive production, in a textual outline of a thesis and two theses. In both modifications, the legitimacy of the arguments is attributed to Marco of Social Cognitions and it is from, which are built to strengthen the arguments. The arguments used travel necessity, possibility and probability. The text presents a journalistic news organization opinionated, based on the interests of the newspaper company, from small text (headline, hairline, eye and lead). And the chronicles of everyday life, are guided by the focusing of the chronicler, in assessing the Mark of the Social Cognitions / Objetivo: Este trabalho, situado no âmbito dos estudos da Língua Portuguesa, tem por objetivo contribuir com os estudos que tratam da construção textual da opinião, em (1) em textos dissertativos acadêmico-científicos e de divulgação científica; (2) textos de notícia jornalística e (3) crônicas do cotidiano. Metodologia: A investigação realizada segue um procedimento teóricoanalítico, em que adotamos as postulações teóricas da Linguística de Texto, sendo complementada pela Análise Crítica do Discurso, com vertente sóciocognitiva. Justificativa / Hipótese: Embora, o dissertativo seja foco de interesse constante para os estudiosos do texto, tratá-lo como uma classe opinativa, que agrupa tipos de textos opinativos modificados por gêneros discursivos, ainda, é um terreno lacunoso. Tem-se, por hipótese que a construção textual da opinião, modifica-se dependendo do gênero discursivo, na categoria justificativa, do esquema textual da argumentação. Resultados Obtidos: As análises indicam que o dissertativo é um texto da classe opinativa, que se modifica dependendo das condições de produção discursiva, em um esquema textual de uma tese e de duas teses. Em ambas as modificações, a legitimidade dos argumentos é atribuída ao Marco das Cognições Sociais e é a partir dele, que são construídos os argumentos de reforço. Os argumentos utilizados percorrem a necessidade, a possibilidade e a probabilidade. O texto de jornalístico de notícia apresenta a organização opinativa, baseados em interesses da empresa-jornal, desde o texto reduzido (manchete, linha fina, olho e lead). E as crônicas do cotidiano, são guiadas pela focalização do cronista, em que avalia o Marco das Cognições Sociais