Aim: The overall aim is to examine how a patient perspective, grounded in caring science, can be preserved and developed in the context of hospital care.   Methods: The first study examines attitudes towards caring science in a clinical practice. Data were collected through focus group interviews with seven nurses, three head nurses and four senior preceptors. An interpretive approach guided the study. The results called for collaboration between clinical praxis and the academy, according to how caring science can be preserved and developed. Study II–III functioned in accordance with this goal and were conducted in collaboration with a hospital ward for people over seventy-five years of age. In an attempt to develop care the patients were invited to attend a team meeting. The data in these studies were collected using interviews and observations. Fifteen patients (study II) and nine nurses (study III) who had experienced patient participation in a team meeting participated. In these studies, a reflective lifeworld approach guided the research process. Study IV is presented as a general structure and philosophical examination in the light of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty’s philosophies.   Main Findings: To preserve and develop a patient perspective is strongly connected to existential issues, such as lived time, intersubjectivity and a meaningful existence. For the patients, vulnerability is exposed and increased when the need for hospital care arises. The team meeting is experienced as an emotional situation where existential dimensions need to be recognized. The nurses desire to develop caring is challenged by organizational and economic demands. Time presents both a possibility for an encounter as well as a threat to excellent care.   Conclusions: There is a need to challenge narrow processes in modern health care that value the staffs’ work and the patients’ vulnerability in quantifiable measures of efficiency. The challenge is to take into account something that is invaluable - human existence.

Bakgrund: Patientnära rond är ett teamarbete mellan framförallt patient, sjuksköterska och läkare. Ett bra samarbete förbättrar relationen dem emellan. Dessutom har en framgångsrik rond mellan patient och sjukvårdspersonal stor betydelse för att patienten ska kunna få en säker och personcentrerad vård. Därför är det viktigt att få en djupare förståelse för hur patienter och sjukvårdpersonal upplever patientnära rond samt för betydelsen av teamarbetet vid patientnära rond. Syfte: Att belysa vilka effekter patientnära rond har på vårdteam samt att undersöka upplevelsen av patientnära rond utifrån perspektiven från både patienter och sjukvårdspersonal (sjuksköterskor, läkare och medicinstudenter). Metod: En litteraturstudie baserad på 14 vetenskapliga originalartiklar. Databaser som användes i studien var PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, SBU och SveMed. Resultat: Resultatet av denna studie indikerar att både patienter och sjukvårdspersonal upplever en ökad tillfredsställelse vid patientnära rond. Vidare visar resultatet att patientnära rond bidrar till att sjukvårdpersonal kan ge patienter en proaktiv omvårdnad, att samarbetet sjukvårdpersonal emellan blir mer effektivt och att patientnära rond gynnar medicinstudenters utveckling samt ökar studenters tillfredsställelse med sin utbildning. En utmaning som sjuksköterskor upplever i samband med patientnära rond är tidsbegränsning – framför allt upplever de att det tar tid för sjuksköterskor och läkare att synkronisera och koordinera mötet mellan patient och vårdpersonal samt att tid för dokumentation är bristande. Läkare upplever dessutom att deras autonomi minskas i samband med patientnära rond. Slutsats: Överlag kan patientnära rond vara ett effektivt sätt att främja personcentrerad vård. Patientnära rond har en positiv inverkan på teamarbete sjukvårdpersonal emellan samt bidrar till ökad tillfredsställelse hos både patienter och sjukvårdspersonal. Det finns dock behov av ytterligare forskning om patienters upplevelse av patientnära rond och vilka specifika åtgärder som kan vidtas för att sjukvårdpersonalen ska kunna samarbeta på ett mer effektivt sätt. / Background: The ward round is a team collaboration mainly between patient, nurse and physician. A good collaboration enhances the relationship between them. In addition, a successful round between the patient and the medical personnel is of great significance for the patient to have a safe and person-centered care. Therefore it is important to gain a deeper understanding of how patients and medical staff experience ward rounds, as well as of the importance of team work during the ward rounds. Aim: To shed light upon the effects of ward rounding on healthcare teams and to explore the experience of ward rounds from the perspectives of both patients and medical staff (nurses, physicians and medical students). Method: A literature study based on 14 scientific articles. Databases used in the study were PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SBU and SveMed. Results: The results of this study indicate that both patients and medical personnel experience an increased satisfaction during ward rounds. Furthermore, the results show that ward rounds contribute in making medical personnel provide a proactive care to their patients, that cooperation between medical staff becomes more efficient, and that ward rounding benefits medical students’ development and increases students’ satisfaction with their education. A challenge that nurses experience during ward rounds is time limitation – mainly they experience that it takes time for nurses and physicians to synchronize and coordinate the meeting between patient and medical personnel, and also that the time for documentation is inadequate. Physicians also experience that their autonomy is reduced in relation to ward rounds. Conclusion: Overall, ward rounding can be an effective way to promote person-centered care. Ward rounds have a positive impact on teamwork between medical personnel and contribute to increased satisfaction among both patients and medical staff. However, there is need for further research on patients' perception of ward rounding and which specific measures that can be taken for the medical staff to be able to collaborate more efficiently.

Syfte: Studien syftade till att undersöka nyutexaminerade kvinnliga sjuksköterskors upplevelser avseende rondsituationen och arbetsledarrollen.   Metod: Kvalitativ deskriptiv studie. Åtta semi- strukturerade intervjuer genomfördes och analyserades med innehållsanalys.   Resultat: Nyutexaminerade sjuksköterskor upplever svårigheter att hantera ronden och rollen som arbetsledare. Trots sitt omvårdnadsansvar upplever sjuksköterskan att omvårdnaden prioriteras ner och att mer tid går till att fördela och utföra läkarordinationer i det dagliga arbetet. På arbetsplatserna saknas rondstruktur och praktisk vägledning i hur en rond ska gå till, vilket även upplevs som bristfälligt under utbildningens gång. Det finns otillräcklig kunskap och tid för att förbereda sig för en rond på bästa sätt. Sjuksköterskorna har olika upplevelser, både negativa och positiva, av den kommunikation som finns med läkare under rondsituationer. Att arbetsleda är svårt dels på grund av utbildningens otillfredsställande förberedelser och dels på grund av svårigheterna att som ny personal på arbetsplatsen förväntas ta kommando och för första gången leda en annan yrkesgrupp.   Slutsats: Nyutexaminerade sjuksköterskor upplever svårigheter att hantera rondsituationer på grund av bristande struktur samt problematik i rollen som arbetsledare för omvårdnaden. Kommunikation och samarbete mellan läkare och sjuksköterska har stor betydelse för rondens utgång. Omvårdnad upplevs generellt vara nedprioriterat i förhållande till medicinsk vetenskap. / Objective: The study aims to examine newly qualified female nurses' experiences regarding the ward round and leadership role.   Method: Qualitative descriptive study. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using content analysis.   Results: Graduate nurses are experiencing difficulties in managing the round and the leadership role. Despite their nursing responsibilities they experience a lack of priority in nursing, and that most time is spent to distribute and perform medical prescriptions in their daily work. The workplace has no structure and practical guidance regarding rounds, which is also perceived as deficient during the education. There is insufficient knowledge and time to prepare for a round in the best way. The nurses have different experiences, both positive and negative, of the communication with doctors during round situations. The leadership role is difficult partly because of inadequate preparation and training. Also because of the difficulties in which the newly graduated nurse in the new workplace is expected to take command, and for the first time take the lead of a different profession.   Conclusion: Newly graduated nurses are experiencing difficulties in managing the ward round due to lack of structure as well as problems in the leadership role of nursing. Communication and cooperation between doctors and nurses are of great importance for the round outcome. Nursing is generally perceived to not be prioritized in relation to medical science.

Aim: The overall aim is to examine how a patient perspective, grounded in caring science, can be preserved and developed in the context of hospital care. Methods: The first study examines attitudes towards caring science in a clinical practice. Data were collected through focus group interviews with seven nurses, three head nurses and four senior preceptors. An interpretive approach guided the study. The results called for collaboration between clinical praxis and the academy, according to how caring science can be preserved and developed. Study II–III functioned in accordance with this goal and were conducted in collaboration with a hospital ward for people over seventyfive years of age. In an attempt to develop care the patients were invited to attend a team meeting. The data in these studies were collected using interviews and observations. Fifteen patients (study II) and nine nurses (study III) who had experienced patient participation in a team meeting participated. In these studies, a reflective lifeworld approach guided the research process. Study IV is presented as a general structure and philosophical examination in the light of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty’s philosophies. Main Findings: To preserve and develop a patient perspective is strongly connected to existential issues, such as lived time, intersubjectivity and a meaningful existence. For the patients, vulnerability is exposed and increased when the need for hospital care arises. The team meeting is experienced as an emotional situation where existential dimensions need to be recognized. The nurses desire to develop caring is challenged by organizational and economic demands. Time presents both a possibility for an encounter as well as a threat to excellent care. Conclusions: There is a need to challenge narrow processes in modern health care that value the staffs’ work and the patients’ vulnerability in quantifiable measures of efficiency. The challenge is to take into account something that is invaluable - human existence. / <p>Akademisk avhandling som för avläggande av filosofie doktorsexamen vid Linnéuniversitetet försvaras vid offentlig disputation, 15 september 2014, klockan 10.30 i sal Myrdal, Hus K, Växjö</p>

The nursing handover report belongs to everyday activities of nurses. In the work of a nurse it is important to know exactly who, when, where, what and how. This is what the following activity and responsibilities of the duty period are derived from. This diploma thesis, focused on the Nursing Handover Report at a Patient´s Bedside, has a theoretical and practical part. The first, theoretical part, is composed of three chapters, the modern trend of nursing, the nursing report and legislation. The second, practical part, is based on quantitative and qualitative surveys with three defined objectives and four hypotheses. The first objective was to determine what nurses regard as a major contribution of the nursing handover report at a patient´s bedside. The second objective was to define the greatest obstacle in the nursing handover report at a patient´s bedside. The third objective was assessing the patients´ attitude towards the nursing handover report at their bedside. All three objectives were met by the research. The qualitative part of this diploma work was based on a conducted kvasiexperiment and subsequent questions for patients and nurses. The research sample was 5 nurses and 5 patients from the intermediate care unit (IMCU) and 5 nurses and 5 patients from the resuscitation station (RES) of the České Budějovice hospital, PLC. The semi-structured interview consisted of six to eight questions, surveying the feelings, contents, visualization, integration, advantages, disadvantages, departments, nursing handover at the bedside and the quality. The data collection was carried out by means of an anonymous questionnaire designed for nurses to find out how nurses hand the report over or how they would like to hand it over. 303 nurses from the České Budějovice Hospital, PLC, and the Příbram Hospital, PLC, took part in the research. The results were used to confirm or to reject the hypotheses. The first hypothesis: Nurses do not consider an oral handover report as a quality one when done without a visual completion, this has not been confirmed by the investigation. The second hypothesis: In terms of the risk of the patient's damage, the quality of the handover report done by the nurses in the IMCU and the RES is better than that done by the nurses in a standard unit, this has been confirmed. The third hypothesis: Nurses consider the time consuming nature of the handover report at the patient´s bedside as the greatest difficulty, this has not been confirmed. The fourth and last hypothesis: Patients have a positive attitude towards the nursing handover report at the bedside, this has been confirmed by the research. The output of this thesis is to suggest a standard for the nursing handover report at a patient´s bedside. The results can be used for nursing managers, deputy directors of nursing, medical students and nursing professionals.